Tag Archives: utilities

What’s Behind The Recent Rally Of SLV?

Summary The silver market heated up in recent weeks. What’s behind the recent rally in the price of SLV? A weaker U.S. dollar and falling long-term yields are part of the story behind the latest recovery in the silver market. The silver market has heated in recent weeks, which has also pushed up the price of the iShares Silver Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SLV ). What’s behind the recent rally of SLV? Let’s examine what is keeping up the price of SLV, and what does it mean up ahead for the silver market? Is it just because of the weaker U.S. dollar? It’s hard to consider the rally in the price of SLV without taking into account the recent depreciation of the U.S. dollar. The chart below presents the traded weighted U.S. dollar index (normalized to 100 for the end of March) and the price of SLV over the past several months: (click to enlarge) Source: FRED and Google Finance As you can see, the U.S. dollar lost some ground since the beginning of the month after several U.S. economic reports came below expectations including the NFP report, retail sales, and JOLTS. And since the core CPI came a bit higher than expected – the annual rate reached 1.9% – the market has become even more suspicious as to whether the FOMC will actually move forward and raise rates anytime soon, let alone this year. But the chart above also shows that while the depreciation of the U.S. dollar may have slightly contributed to the rally of the SLV, it still did fall by much to explain such a spike in SLV’s price. It’s worth noticing, however, that this week’s ECB monetary policy could have an impact on the foreign exchange markets including the euro/USD. And if the ECB were to convey a dovish sentiment that may include plans to expand or extend the current QE program, this news could actually pull back up the U.S. dollar – something that could curb down the recent rise in SLV and perhaps even bring it back down. If we also look at the recent changes in the long-term treasury yields relative to SLV, we could see that haven’t plummeted and only slowly came down in the past few weeks, which could have also helped boost up precious metals prices. (click to enlarge) Source of data: Bloomberg and U.S. Department of the Treasury Based on the CME Group 30-Day Fed Fund futures prices, the market has lowered the implied probabilities for the Fed to raise rates in December to only 30% and for March 2016 to 52% – only a month ago, the odds were close to 50% for a December hike. The drop in probabilities, mainly due to weaker-than-expected economic data – mostly in the labor market – has provided backwind to the silver market. And although from the fundamentals point of view, the market continues to slowly tighten, there haven’t been enough new developments to warrant such a rise in the price of SLV. Bottom Line The last time the price of SLV rose so fast in a single month was back in January of this year. Back then, long-term yields also dropped and the U.S. dollar fell against major currencies. And the Swiss National Bank decided to end the pegging of the Swiss franc to the euro. These events boosted volatility and helped pull up SLV. This time around, we also see falling U.S. dollar and lower LT yields, and volatility may have subsided in recent weeks, it could still erupt as there are growing concerns over the progress of China and even the U.S. This current climate could change and drag back down SLV especially if other central banks (ECB and BOJ) continue to move forward and devalue their respective currencies and the Fed pull its rate hike. But as long as these central banks don’t move forward – the Fed by raising rates, and ECB and BOJ in expanding their QE programs – the price of SLV is likely to continue to remain its current level. For more please see: Is SLV about to change course?

Ameren Offers Utilities Investors With Protection From Higher Interest Rates

Summary Midwestern electric and natural gas utility Ameren has seen its share price perform well YTD, with even a disappointing Q2 earnings report proving to be just a speed bump. Following years of underperformance compared to the peer average, Ameren is changing its focus so as to take advantage of demand for new transmission infrastructure. Its Illinois operations will provide it with a buffer against higher interest rates due to that state’s regulatory linkage between allowed return on equity and interest rates. While Ameren’s shares are overvalued on a forward basis, a warm winter in its service area due to El Nino could create an attractive long investment opportunity. Shares of Midwest electric and natural gas utility Ameren (NYSE: AEE ) have rebounded strongly since setting a 12-month low at the end of June, with a disappointing Q2 earnings report only providing a slight bump on the way to an 18% price increase since then. The company has not been one of the sector’s better performers in recent years as weather volatility and arbitrary regulator behavior have held it back. Its regulatory outlook has improved this year, however, in a way that will reduce its exposure to higher future interest rates. Adverse weather conditions in Q4 will provide short-term headwinds first, however. This article evaluates Ameren as a potential long investment opportunity in the context of this operating environment. Ameren at a glance Headquartered in St. Louis, MO, Ameren is a relatively large electric and natural gas utility with more than $20 billion in total assets and a market capitalization of $10.7 billion. The company operates in a 64,000 square mile service area that includes much of eastern Missouri and most of Illinois, excluding Chicago and its surrounding environs. Its operations are divided into 3 segments. Ameren Missouri oversees electric generation, transmission, and distribution plus natural gas distribution in that state’s share of the service area. It currently has 1.2 million electric customers and 127,000 natural gas customers, with the former receiving electricity generated by the company’s 10,200 MW generating fleet. Unlike many of its peers, Ameren Missouri remains heavily reliant on coal, which comprises 53% of its fuel mix (the balance is split between nuclear, natural gas, and hydro). Unlike its counterpart across the Mississippi River, Ameren Illinois only engages in electric and natural gas distribution activities. It has 1.2 million electric and 813,000 natural gas customers in the state. Much of the electricity that it uses is sourced from Ameren’s generating capacity in Missouri via the third and final segment, Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois, which operates 4,600 circuit miles of 345 kV regional transmission lines. Historically, Ameren Missouri has made the primary contribution to the company’s total rate base, reaching 63% in 2011 compared to 29% from the Illinois operations and 8% from the transmission operations. This has negatively impacted Ameren’s past consolidated earnings due to the lack of a favorable regulatory scheme in Missouri. While the state’s scheme does provide utilities with a fuel cost recapture mechanism that insulates them from the type of fuel price spikes that are not uncommon during Midwest winters, its use of historical test years result in a large amount of regulatory lag. This lag prevents Ameren from recognizing higher rates due to infrastructure investments and similar capex for roughly 2 quarters despite incurring higher depreciation, O&M, and property tax costs during the interim. The regulatory scheme employed in Illinois, on the other hand, has improved in recent years. The most substantial change has been the decision to base the allowed return on equity for electric utilities on the 30-year Treasury rate plus 580 basis points. While this formula currently results in a below-average allowed rate for Ameren Illinois, it will mitigate the impact of higher interest rates following the Federal Reserve’s planned rate hike on Ameren’s consolidated earnings. Furthermore, electric utility rates are based on a year-end rate base and provides for the recovery of “prudently incurred” actual costs, greatly reducing regulatory lag. Illinois natural gas utilities operate within a similar scheme that bases rates on future test years and includes infrastructure riders, similarly reducing lag. Finally, Ameren’s transmission operations are governed by a federal regulatory scheme that reduces regulatory lag by employing forward-looking calculations with an annual reconciliation mechanism. Ameren has reported slow but steady earnings growth since 2013, although its annual EPS results have yet to return to their pre-financial crisis highs. Its annual EBITDA, meanwhile, has remained flat over the same period, highlighting the lack of growth in its service area over the last several years. The company was hit especially hard by the 2008 financial crisis and slashed its dividend in that year. Since then the dividend has only increased by 10%, causing the company to lag significantly behind its peers. Its yield had been much higher than the sector average before the crisis and remained high even after the cut, however, and as a result, it has a forward yield of 3.9% despite this low growth rate. Q2 earnings report Ameren reported Q2 earnings at the end of July that missed the analyst consensus on both lines. It reported revenue of $1.4 billion (see table), down by 1.4% YoY and missing the consensus by $40 million. Revenue from its electric operations increased by 1.2% and provided 89% of consolidated revenue as higher demand in Illinois more than offset reduced demand in Missouri as the latter state experienced a mild early summer. Natural gas revenue fell by 18% YoY due to a 3.2% decline in volumes as Illinois experienced a warmer than normal spring, reducing the number of heating degree days. A sharp fall in energy prices over the previous 12 months also contributed to the lower natural gas revenues in particular. Ameren financials (non-adjusted) Q2 2015 Q1 2015 Q4 2014 Q3 2014 Q2 2014 Revenue ($MM) 1,401.0 1,556.0 1,370.0 1,670.0 1,419.0 Gross income ($MM) 1,049.0 975.0 880.0 1,273.0 1,031.0 Net income ($MM) 141.0 108.0 48.0 293.0 149.0 Diluted EPS ($) 0.58 0.45 0.20 1.20 0.61 EBITDA ($MM) 447.0 459.0 336.0 762.0 522.0 Source: Morningstar (2015). Gross profit rose slightly to $1.05 billion from $1.03 billion YoY despite the revenue decline. The increase was the result of the company’s cost of revenue falling by 9.3% YoY due to lower fuel prices, more than offsetting the negative impact of lower revenues. Operating income fell sharply to $237 million from $322 million in the previous year. While a large loss provision for the construction license of a new nuclear unit was the decline’s major driver, higher O&M and depreciation costs resulting from regulatory lag in Missouri also contributed. Ameren’s consolidated net income fell to $141 million, or a diluted EPS of $0.58, compared to $150 million, or a diluted EPS of $0.62, in the previous year, missing the analyst consensus by $0.03. The most recent result included a $52 million boost resulting from the recognition of a tax benefit via the resolution of an uncertain tax position that the company treated as discontinued operations. EPS from continuing operations came in at only $0.40 versus $0.62 YoY. EBITDA also declined, falling from $522 million YoY to $447 million. Outlook Ameren reaffirmed its FY 2015 EPS guidance range of $2.45-$2.65 during its Q2 earnings call based on the assumption of normal temperatures in Q3 and Q4. The company’s service area did experience more cooling degree days than average in Q3, reinforcing this range. El Nino can be expected to impact its Q4 earnings, however, by bringing warmer than normal temperatures into the company’s service area between October and January. This year’s event is expected to be one of the strongest on record and previous such events have introduced warm weather in Missouri and Illinois during the quarter, reducing demand for natural gas. Ameren is unlikely to be as exposed to El Nino’s adverse weather impacts as many of its peers since the bulk of annual consolidated earnings have traditionally been brought in via its electric operations during the Q2 and Q3 summer months. Furthermore, temperatures in its service area have historically returned to normal by February during past El Nino events. Investors can expect its Q4 earnings to be lower than normal, however. Ameren’s earnings in FY 2016 and beyond will be driven by the company’s ability to utilize its planned capex in a manner that takes advantage of its regulatory environment where possible. The company expects capex to drive a rate base CAGR of 6% through FY 2019 as it invests in a combination of reliability, environmental, and new capacity projects. The latter will be the most important as they are designed to increase the share of its total rate base attributable to its transmission segment from 8% currently to 19% by FY 2019. The transmission segment will achieve a rate base CAGR of 27% over the same period, ultimately reaching $2.3 billion in total capex. The company expects that this will in turn result in an EPS CAGR of 7-10% through at least FY 2018. The company’s ability to achieve and maintain this earnings growth target will ultimately depend on how quickly the Federal Reserve implements its expected interest rate increase. At first glance, Ameren is more exposed than many of its peers to higher interest rates due to its BBB+ credit rating from S&P and Fitch (the credit ratings of its state units are higher). Interest rate spreads have widened in recent weeks as expectations of a Federal Reserve rate increase occurring by the end of the year have grown, with the largest increases occurring for lower-rated debt. At first glance, this would suggest that Ameren will be at a disadvantage to those of its peers with superior ratings. Unlike many of its peers, however, a substantial segment of the company’s operations reside within a regulatory scheme that links the allowed return on equity to interest rates. While this has kept the return on equity below the peer average during the current era of low interest rates, it will support Ameren’s ability to both finance its planned capex and mitigate the negative impact of higher interest costs on its earnings. Looking beyond FY 2016, Ameren’s Missouri operations are likely to be burdened by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s [EPA] recently released Clean Power Plan, which requires individual states to achieve predetermined reductions to the carbon intensities (greenhouse gas emissions per unit of electricity generated) of their respective state utilities beginning in 2022. Illinois has one of the country’s highest carbon intensities and must achieve a 28% reduction by then, while Missouri is not far behind with a required 19% reduction . One advantage of these reductions is that they could pave the way for additional capex to convert existing coal-fired power plants to natural gas and possibly even build new, cleaner capacity. The presence of substantial regulatory lag in Missouri would contribute to earnings volatility. Valuation The consensus analyst estimates for Ameren’s diluted EPS in FY 2015 and FY 2016 have increased modestly over the last 90 days in response to warmer Q3 weather and the Federal Reserve’s decision not to increase interest rates in September, as had been widely expected by the market. The FY 2015 estimate has increased from $2.55 to $2.56 while the FY 2016 estimate has increased from $2.70 to $2.72 over the same period. Based on a share price at the time of writing of $44.10, the company’s shares are trading at a trailing valuation of 18.0x and forward valuations of 17.2x and 16.2x, respectively. The forward ratios in particular are at the high end of their respective 5-year ranges, albeit lower than they were at the end of 2014, suggesting that the company’s shares are modestly overvalued at this time. This is especially true for the company’s short-term outlook given the likelihood of a warm Q4 in its service area. Conclusion Ameren’s shares have exhibited an above-average amount of volatility in 2015 to date as the company has attempted to recover from its past history as a relative laggard in the electric and natural gas utilities sector. Recent developments have mostly been favorable, with its Illinois regulatory scheme changing to link the allowed return on equity to interest rates and the company’s own focus shifting away from Missouri’s poor regulatory environment to its growing transmission operations. This new approach will be necessary if Ameren is to bring its earnings growth closer to the sector average, let alone above it. Fortunately, the combination of new transmission projects, reliability investments, and environmental controls will provide it with large capex opportunities over the next 5 years that will be necessary to support faster earnings growth. Furthermore, its forward dividend yield of 3.9% is relatively high already. The main draw that Ameren has to offer to potential investors is its linkage between allowed return on equity for a substantial segment of its operations and interest rates, as this will offset one of the market’s major current concerns about utilities in general. The company’s shares are also overvalued on a forward basis, leaving them exposed to a substantial decline in the event that this year’s El Nino has a greater than expected negative impact on its Q4 and potentially also Q1 2016 earnings. Yield-seeking investors who wish to be insulated from higher interest rates could view such an event as a potential buying opportunity, however, and I would consider Ameren’s shares to be attractively valued in the event that its forward P/E ratio falls back to 14x its FY 2016 earnings, or $38 per share, as it has already done twice in the last 3 months.

Diving Into The Deep End With Water Utilities

Only 11 investor-owned water utilities remain in the United States. Water utilities offer a steady income but increases in revenue often must be negotiated with regulatory bodies. CTWS and others have used acquisitions as a means to ensure growth amidst a regulated pricing environment. Descriptions ARTNA AWR CTWS CWCO CWT Yearly Forward Dividend 0.89 0.90 1.07 0.30 0.67 Yield 3.43% 2.16% 2.9% 2.57% 2.99% Payout Ratio 68.55% 52.46% 50.76% 63.31% 55.94% 5 year Div Annual Growth 3.3% 10.50% 2.33% 1.39% 2.02% Over the past five years AWR has seen impressive dividend growth, allowing it to beat the S&P 500. The rest have fallen short but in the process have offered nice yields that have continued to rise, albeit at a modest clip. SPY data by YCharts Artesian Resources (NASDAQ: ARTNA ) is the largest investor owned water utility on the Delmarva Peninsula and eighth largest in the US. It serves 301,000 people with 82,900 metered customers, producing 7.6 billion gallons per year. There is 1,201 miles of main, 5,827 fire hydrants and 69 treatment facilitates. The average residential water service cost for customers is $1.57 per day. Source: ARTNA Investor Relations Website Artesian invested $23.7 million in infrastructure improvements in 2014. American States Water Company (NYSE: AWR ) is a public utility holding company that owns 100% of its subsidiaries, Golden State Water Company and American States Utility Services, Inc. GSWC is a regulated water utility servicing 258,000 customers in California and electricity for 24,000, also in California. 75 cities are served with 38 water stations. ASUS offers contracted water and waste water services. Presently nine military bases water needs are being provided by ASUS with more active bids taking place and have the potential to be awarded in the next 5 years. Many of these contracts with military bases are 50 year contracts. 60% of AWR’s water supply comes from groundwater and 35% from Metropolitan Water Districts and its member agencies (mostly from the Colorado River). Source: AWR Investor Relations Website For the last two years AWR has instituted stock share repurchases each amounting of up to 3.2% of total outstanding shares. Connecticut Water Service Inc. (NASDAQ: CTWS ) is a regionally focused, regulated water utility. In addition to coverage in Connecticut, CTWS also owns the Main Water Company that covers small regions of Maine. There are 123,000 utility customers, 2,100 miles of pipe, 239 wells, 25 surface water supplies providing 176 million gallons per day. Source: CTWS Investor Relations Website CTWS’s strategy for growth is conservative acquisitions, such as two Maine water companies in 2012. Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. ( CWCO ) is a company focused on the business of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plans and water distributions in the Caribbean across 14 plants with a production capacity of 26.4 million gallons per day. Source: CWCO Investor Relations Website As of last quarter, CWCO plans on beginning the process of assisting in building another plant costing $600 million, this time in the continental United States. CWCO will take a minority position in the plant and will assist in operating it. This plant will be in Rosarito, Mexico and will serve Tijuana, Mexico’s 1.8 million people and San Diego, California’s 3.1 million. California Water Service Group ( CWT ) is the third largest investor-owned water utility in the US and provides water utility services for customers in California, Washington, New Mexico, and Hawaii. In these states CWT serves more than 2 million people through just shy of 500,000 customer connections, 95% of which are in California. Source: CWT Investor Relations Website In 2014 CWT invested $132 million in capital improvements and received authorization from regional governments to increase their rates, yielding $45 million in new revenue.