Tag Archives: stocks

Should We Be Getting Ready To Cover Our Shorts In Energy?

Summary Crude oil priced in gold is near a 30-year low. Crude oil priced in inflation-adjusted dollars tells another story. What are the crude/gas ratios and technicals telling us about our short positions? Getting paid to be patient while we wait for the bottom in energy markets and stocks. Now that oil and gasoline cost less than bottled water, maybe it’s time to start looking at covering our short positions. Don’t get me wrong; I’m not ready to use the L word just yet (long), but I can clearly see long positions on the horizon at lower levels. The downward spiral is still intact, but history has proved short-selling parties can’t last forever. Just how inexpensive is crude oil? Let’s look at the 30-year chart for a barrel of crude priced in gold. All-time high 0.15050 of an ounce, June 2008. All-time low 0.03322 of an ounce, July 1986. Current 0.03370 of an ounce, December 2015. 1986-2015 average, 0.69889. Distance from the all-time low priced in gold 0.00048 of an ounce or about 50 cents. Source & supporting data Federal Reserve data 1986-2105-cost-of-oil-priced-in-gold 1986-2015 oil gold ratio (oil normally trades above gold on this ratio) Source Federal Reserve Is $34.52 per barrel misleading if you look at the historical price action from 1993-2015 calculated in inflation-adjusted dollars? All-time high $147.27 per barrel, July 2008 ($162.34 in 2015 USD). All-time low $10.35 per barrel, December 1998 ($15.80 in 2015 USD). The 30-year average price for oil is $42.87 ($59.09 in 2015 USD). 2015 dollars generated using the bls.gov inflation calculator . Current cash oil price $34.52 per barrel Data source Chicago Mercantile Exchange The fundamentals are still weak The technicals are still weak Daily = downtrend Weekly = downtrend Monthly = downtrend The spread between a gallon WTI crude and wholesale gasoline is more than twice the historical average. 1990-2015 historical average, $0.2147 ($0.28 in 2015 dollars). Current 12-month rolling average = $0.4426. Spread between WTI crude and retail gasoline, better than average. 1990-2015 historical average is $0.8642 ($1.14 in 2015 USD). Current 12-month rolling average = $1.2612. Spread between wholesale and retail gasoline, consistent with the historical average. 1990-2015 historical average is $0.6496 ($0.86 in 2015 USD). Current 12-month rolling average = $0.8186. Where the futures market is pricing crude oil through December 2024. Ratios tell me to maintain shorts, technicals say stay short, futures markets indicate higher prices. One current crude oil position to track Short March 2016 deliver at $46.80, contract value $46,800. Deposit posted per contract = $15,000. Exchange margin per contract = $3,800. March 2016 is currently trading at $36.74, contract value $36,740. I’d like to cover these $46.80 shorts, reverse to long at $33.00. 1) To cover my $46.80 shorts, I’m going to write a put at the $33.00 strike , collecting $1.24 per barrel or $1,240 per contract (expires in 58 days). The only way my current $46.80 short can be “pulled” away is if the market falls from the current price of $36.74 down to $33.00. Should this occur, my short position would appreciate by another $3,740 per contract between now and 17 February 2016 expiration. If March delivery never goes down to $33.00, I keep the $1,240 put premium collected against my $46.80 short. 2) I’m also going to write another put at $33.00, collecting another $1,240. Again, if March 2016 WTI crude does not trade down to $33.00, I keep the $1,240 in time premium. If it does go below $33.00, I was paid $1,240 to enter a new long position at $33.00 or $3,740 per contract better than where the market is currently trading ($36.74), (yes, I’ll have to offset and roll the position in March). 3) If the market stays the same, I’ve collected $2,480 over the next 58 days on a position if delivered is worth $33,000. 4) If oil starts to rally, I can cover my $46.80 shorts and watch the $33.00 puts expire worthless (+$2,480). There are several other ways to offset my $46.80 shorts, example, writing an in-the-money put at $40.00 currently trading at $4.59, collecting $4,590 in premium ($920 in time value). On the upside, the current position is trading at $36.74 contract value $36,740 (1,000 barrel contract x $36.74 per barrel) or I’m getting paid 6.750% in total time value over the next 58 days to liquidate my $46.80 if the market goes down to $33.00. If $33.00 in put is hit, my gain on the trade = $13,800 per contract plus the collected time value of $2,480 for a total of $16,200. The margin I’m allocating on this position is $15,000 per contract ( exchange margin = $3,800 per contract). What this strategy has done is paid me 16.53% in option time value on my $15,000 deposit per contract to be patient over the next 58 days. Many traders don’t realize how collecting fat time premium can work for you. Let’s assume the market is right and crude oil bottoms at the current price of $36.74 (March 2016 delivery). Let’s assume you go long crude oil at $36.74, wrote an out-of-the-money call at $39.50, and the $39.50 call is trading at $1.59, then you’re collecting $1.59 per barrel, $1,590 per contract, $27.41 per day or $10,006 per year on a position that has a total value of $36,740. The time value writing out-of-the-money options = 27.23% in annual time premium collected or 66.70% on the $15,000 allocated to cover the $3,800 in exchange margin. We’re posting $11,200 more than is required by the exchange to minimize the probability of a call. Our margin for error without being in jeopardy of having a call is $11.20 a barrel plus whatever option premium collected; in this case, $1.59 for a total of $12.79. In order for us to be on call (in this example) March 2016, crude oil would need to fall below $23.95 a barrel between now and 17 February 2016 (58 days). Again, I’m not advocating getting in at $36.74, I’m using this as an example to show you how hefty the time premium is writing out-of-the-money calls to generate income against a long crude oil position. In this example, the only way your $36.80 position can be called away from us is at $39.50 for a $2.70 profit per barrel or $2,700 per contract. If it does not get called away, we’d keep the time premium against our long of $1,590 (+10.60% on the $15,000 deposit for 58 days). In my case, I’m writing the $33.00 put to get into a $33.00 long position collecting $1,240 in time value; if delivered at $33.00, I’ll write the $36.00 or $37.00 call against the delivered $33.00 long collecting another $1,000 to $2,500 against the $33.00 long (I will have to roll this position to forward delivery month). Energy Stocks Energy stocks might not be as sick as all the academic chatter generated by the tradeless master debaters. Sure, crude may go down to $20, maybe $10, who cares? There are defined risk strategies to capture the move in both crude and energy stocks if you’re up to speed and can handle the risk. Fact, over the next five years, the world will need energy and the additional products crude produces. Demand may go down, but population will increase, and there are scores of situations that could generate a nice rally in crude from the low $30s as well as energy stocks. Many of these energy stocks you can trade using the same strategy of writing puts to get in and calls to get out as I’ve explained in the crude oil example above. Word of caution, you have to watch your bid/ask spreads, make sure you get firm quotes on the bid/ask, match them up to your other desks and always use price orders. On the horizon, I see short covering and potential net new long positions entering in energy stocks. Yes, the charts still look ugly. If you want to be less aggressive, wait for the turn (change in trend) using something as simple as a Bollinger 20,2 and exponential moving average 9 on weekly data in the examples below. Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE: XOM ) BP p.l.c. (NYSE: BP ) Royal Dutch Shell plc (NYSE: RDS.A ) Chevron Corporation (NYSE: CVX ) Valero Energy Corporation (NYSE: VLO ) (no short on this) Petrobras – Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (NYSE: PBR ) Marathon Petroleum Corp. (NYSE: MPC ) (no short on this) ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP ) Suncor Energy, Inc. (NYSE: SU ) Total S.A. (NYSE: TOT ) Statoil ASA (NYSE: STO ) Yes, oil is inexpensive and appears to be moving lower, but the world still needs it. We will eventually find a bottom, might as well get paid on our short positions while we wait.

Appaloosa Demands SunEdison, Vivint Solar Books

SunEdison (SUNE) stock was torched Tuesday after TerraForm Power (TERP) activist investor Appaloosa Management demanded to see the parent company’s books ahead of its Vivint Solar (VSLR) acquisition. And in other solar news, SolarCity (SCTY) and Vivint Solar stocks lurched lower after the installers threatened to exit Nevada should the state opt to slash net-metering payments to solar customers. In morning trading on the stock market today,

New Valuation Approach – PTR: PTR-Based Fund Delivers Over 63% Annual Returns In Big Data Simulations

A new approach to stock valuation looks at the relationship of the stock price to the value of the patent technology owned by the firm. Simulations indicate that stocks with low price-to-technology ratios outperform the market. Investors may wish to include PTR valuations as part of a stock-screening exercise. A former student approached me with a new model for stock valuation that appears to have great promise. Wisdomain.com has a database with comprehensive information on patents which has been used by intellectual property professionals to manage technology. Recently, the company figured out a Price/Technology ratio that appears to be a powerful tool for screening technology investments. PTR challenges the conventional principles of long-term value investing. It takes a completely objective approach to valuation through the mining of intellectual property big data and combining it with financial big data. It is an investment indicator that provides insights into the future performance of investments by identifying undervalued companies that possess patented technologies. Because patent valuation is technology valuation, PTR uses a proprietary algorithm based on technology valuation and total market capitalization data to identify undervalued technology companies. PTR = Market Capitalization Σ (Total Value of Patents) Σ (Total Value of Patents) = Total Technology Asset Value Technology assets play a key role in facilitating the competitiveness of a company in most industries. Since the sum of the value of all of the patents owned by a company is a good proxy for the value of the technology assets owned, it can be considered to be tied to the future potential profitability of the company. Although the formula is similar to the P/E ratio in that the companies with relatively lower PTR values are considered to be the undervalued companies, it is also completely different. Historical simulations of a PTR index formed by PTR funds comprised of the top 20 lowest PTR stocks exceed the NASDAQ’s average returns by 46.4% in the 1st year and 71.9% in the 2nd year. Similarly, the simulations show that the low PTR funds outperform the S&P 500 by 5.8% in the 1st month and 78.8% by the 2nd year. The PTR Index outperforms the market 100% of the time during the simulation period, and funds held over longer periods result in higher returns relative to the market. (click to enlarge) Simulation period = 2010-2015; PTR, NASDAQ, and S&P 500 values have been normalized to 1,000; Funds purchased on a daily basis over the course of the simulation period to minimize the effect of daily variations in stock prices and obtain the average performance values of the funds over the investment periods within the simulation period. The PTR investment model shown above is based on long-term investments into funds comprised of 20 low PTR companies. There were individual cases among the 20 lowest PTR stocks where the stock demonstrated negative returns; however, funds created by combining the 20 lowest PTR stocks have been shown to deliver positive returns. Although investments into individual stocks with the lowest PTR values do not guarantee positive returns, the PTR as a stand-alone indicator has proven to be quite successful. The top 15 companies with the lowest PTR values that are currently traded on the NASDAQ and NYSE are as follows. DMRC , ESIO , CKP , RIGL , IMMU , SNMX , UIS , ROVI , SGI , ARRY , OCLR , AMD , IMI , XNPT and HTCH . (click to enlarge) Although the simulations above demonstrate that the PTR is a breakthrough investment indicator for technology-driven companies, analysts are still in the early stages of developing the methodologies to maximize profitability through the application of the PTR. Some interesting findings to date have shown that the PTR stocks in the smaller market capitalization categories demonstrate better performance relative to PTR stocks in the larger market capitalization categories. With this level of performance, it will be interesting to see what else the PTR has in store for us.