Tag Archives: stocks

Baidu Stock Soars After Hours As Q4 Revenue Beats

China search leader Baidu ( BIDU ) reported Q4 revenue late Thursday that beat Wall Street’s expectations, sending Baidu’s stock up by double digits in after-hours action. Riding along with volatile China stocks feeling the impact of a slowing economy at home, Baidu’s U.S. stock is up 58% since late August but down 23% in the past 12 months, after closing Thursday’s regular session at 158.22, down 2.8%. After hours, shares of China Internet giant  Alibaba ( BABA ) were up more than 1.5% and shares of China e-commerce giant JD.com ( JD )were  up more than 1%. For Q4, Baidu saw revenue rise 33% year over year in local currency to $2.88 billion, or RMB 18.69 billion. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters had expected RMB 18.54 billion, up 32% in local currency. Baidu posted Q4 EPS  excluding the net gain recognized from Baidu’s Oct. 26 exchange of  Qunar ( QUNR ) shares with fellow China online travel firm  Ctrip ( CTRP )  of RMB 7.61, or $1.18. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters had expected EPS of RMB 6.62. The company guided Q1 revenue of RMB 15.41 billion to RMB 15.97 billion ($2.379 billion to $2.465 billion).  On an apples-to-apples basis, excluding Qunar from Baidu’s financials, the guidance represents a 27.8% to 32.5% year-over-year revenue increase, the company said. But that still missed the analyst consensus estimate for RMB 16.32 billion Baidu-backed Qunar announced its share swap with Ctrip.com, another leading Chinese online travel agency, in October. In the company’s earnings release, Baidu CEO Robin Li called 2015 “a touchstone year for Baidu: We made significant progress in broadening our online marketing platform and further extending our reach into transactions services. Even as China’s overall growth slows, services and domestic consumption are growing.” Company executives were slated to hold a conference call with analysts late Thursday. Baidu’s top revenue vertical markets — retail/e-commerce, local services, financial services, health care and education — “reflect Baidu’s vital role in connecting users with merchants in these growing sectors,” Li said in his statement. For Q1, Baidu is guiding revenue in an amount ranging from RMB 15.41 billion ($2.37 billion) to RMB 15.97 billion ($2.46 billion). That’s up 21.1% to 25.5% year-over-year in RMB. On an apples-to-apples basis, excluding Qunar from Baidu’s financials, the Q1 guidance represents a 27.8% to 32.5% year-over-year increase, Baidu said. As a result of Baidu’s exchange of Qunar shares with Ctrip, Baidu deconsolidated Qunar’s financials after Oct. 26. Online-To-Offline A Baidu Focus In June 2015, Baidu announced it would invest $3.2 billion during the next three years to bolster its lineup of online-to-offline, or O2O, offerings by fortifying group-buying website Nuomi, which Baidu acquired for $160 million in 2014. Baidu has emphasized that big up-front spending to establish its O20 business will pay off because its vast abilities in search will eventually translate to revenue from business commissions. The O2O business model aims to attract customers online and then direct them offline to make purchases at physical stores and to services including health care and food delivery. Earlier this month, Baidu announced that the company has received a nonbinding proposal from two Baidu executives to acquire the company’s fast-growing Qiyi video wing for $2.8 billion. The nonbinding proposal came from CEO Li and from Qiyi CEO Yu Gong, Baidu said. The pair have proposed acquiring all of the outstanding shares of Qiyi owned by Baidu based on an enterprise valuation of U.S. $2.8 billion. Should the deal be approved by a special committee formed by Baidu to review the offer, Qiyi will remain a strategic partner, although it will be independent. Baidu currently owns 80.5% of Qiyi’s total outstanding shares.  

Do You Need To Buy At Market Bottoms To Get Profitable Results?

By Ronald Delegge Legendary speculator Bernard Baruch once quipped: “Don’t try to buy at the bottom and sell at the top. It can’t be done except by liars.” Baruch was on to something. And since reams have been written and said about tops and bottoms in both individual securities along with broader markets, we can’t help but ask: Does a person need to buy at the absolute bottom to turn a profit? Hit the rewind button to July 15, 2015, when via ETFguide’s Weekly Picks we wrote the following timestamped ETF trade alert to premium members: Mining stocks are in puke territory and trading 15% below their 50 and 200-day moving average. The Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (NYSEARCA: GDX ) is oversold and market sentiment is presently overly bearish. We’re buying GDX at current prices near $16.50. Buying depressed out-of-favor assets takes guts, but with enough patience and time, the results can be rewarding. Since our GDX trade alert on Jul. 15, GDX has been dead money and it wasn’t until Jan. 19, 2016 when GDX hit a rock bottom closing price at $12.47. The rest of the global gold mining sector too, went straight into the toilet. And now comes the fun part. Click to enlarge Since GDX’s closing bottom on Jan. 19, the fund has soared +46.05% compared to just a +2.87% gain for the S&P 500. But wait, there’s more. Our GDX position – which we did not buy at the market bottom – is now ahead by a respectable +18.11% (see chart above) and it’s still an open trade. Only a greedy slob would be unhappy with that kind of return in this kind of market. It also explicitly proves that you don’t have to buy at market bottoms to turn a profit. I would argue that having stamina, stomach, and patience (SSP) are far more important than buying stocks or whatever else at the bottom. Why? Because even a trader or investor that buys at the bottom but lacks SSP, will inevitably self-destruct. And besides that, nobody but “liars” consistently buys at market bottoms – nobody . Another real life example – and one of the most extreme cases I’ve ever seen – that buying at market bottoms isn’t a prerequisite to achieving great profits is a Portfolio Report Card I did on my Index Investing Show podcast for a 72-year old man with a $26.9 million portfolio. What did he own? This particular guy invested in biotech stocks right before the 1987 stock market crash. Bad timing. He also bought Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) a few years later in 1991 which again was really bad timing. It was such bad timing that ten years later, he was down 25% on his original investment in Apple! Instead of bailing, his SSP (stamina, stomach, and patience) kept him in the game and legendary results followed. Even though he missed several market bottoms in Apple, he was still able to turn an $84,000 investment into over $8 million. In summary, if you want profitable investment results, stop focusing on tops and bottoms and start cultivating SSP. Disclosure: No positions Link to the original post on ETFguide.com

Investors’ Biggest Mistake: Home Bias

By Tim Maverick Everybody loves to cheer for their home team when it comes to sports. But, it turns out that investors around the world do the same with their money. Let me give you an example. Brazil is suffering through its worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. Its currency, the real, is near record lows. And its stock market is down by 40% over the past five years. Add in other factors such as the Zika virus – and it’s bad times, to say the least. But what are Brazilian investors doing? They’re liquidating their overseas holdings and buying Brazilian stocks. Are they nuts? Nope, it’s just human nature. In investing, it’s called “home bias.” And U.S. investors are among the most guilty. It’s Not 1950 In my years giving advice to clients, I found a very strong aversion among investors to investing overseas. People confuse familiarity with safety. I once had a client who stormed out of the office saying he would never invest a penny of his money outside the United States. Now, that was an extreme circumstance. But people do invest as if it’s still 1950, and the U.S. is the dominant economic power. Back then, the U.S. made up a huge part of the world’s market capitalization. Today, that’s down to about 50%. Yet, people invest as if nothing’s changed. A study by the mutual fund company Henderson Global Investors found that Americans were the second-most guilty of home bias globally, trailing only Canadians. This is backed up by an analysis done last summer by robo-advisor SigFig. It found that the median individual investor had a mere 6.6% of their portfolio in international equities. The study also found that bigger, and presumably more sophisticated, portfolios had less home bias. This makes sense. I can guarantee people like George Soros don’t have most of their portfolios in the U.S. The World Is Waiting The U.S. economy produced only 22.5% of the world’s GDP in 2014. That’s quite a change from just after World War II when the U.S. accounted for half of global GDP. Overall, developed economies now make up less than half of global GDP. Developing economies now account for just over half. Let’s just think about Asia for a moment – specifically China, India, and Indonesia. In terms of population, they rank first, second, and fourth respectively. The U.S. is third. There are over 2.8 billion people in these three countries. Are you, as an investor, going to ignore them as if they don’t exist? Wall Street wants you to. They want you to buy U.S. stocks. That’s why most Wall Street firms badmouth China every chance they get. Use Your Common Sense Investing overseas is really just common sense. Most people wouldn’t put 100% of their money into one stock. Nor would they limit themselves to stocks from Pennsylvania just because they live in that state. Why then would you limit yourself to just one country? My favorite analogy is that it would be like grocery shopping in only one aisle of the store. But investors continue shopping in one aisle. Home bias remains a big problem for even financial professionals. The toughest sell remains getting clients to diversify. Many stubbornly cling to putting all or most of their eggs into one basket. At a conference for registered investment advisors in November, Charles Schwab’s Jeff Kleintop said, “That’s exactly the opposite of what they should be doing now.” Now Is the Time to Diversify I would put the emphasis on the word now. The U.S. market has outperformed international markets since 2009. I can assure you it won’t continue. Markets will revert to the mean. In simple terms, underperforming markets will begin outperforming – and vice versa. As someone who has been in the investment business since the 1980s, I can tell you it’s a basic fact of financial markets. It’s like the sun rising and setting every day. Many markets – particularly the emerging ones – are at valuations not seen in decades. That’s thanks largely to U.S. fund managers selling. In other words, home bias. I think it’ll be a lot easier and more profitable to find companies that are serving those 2.8 billion-plus consumers in Asia, than finding an undiscovered gem in the U.S. The mass of Wall Street research makes that near possible, except for an occasional penny stock. I’d like to end with a piece of advice from famed investor, Jim Rogers. He said you should wait until you see money lying in the corner and all you have to do is go over and pick it up. That describes overseas markets right now more than the U.S. Link to the original article on Wall Street Daily .