Tag Archives: seeking

Tranche Model Applied To The ‘Swensen Six’ Portfolio

Diversify globally using six ETFs. Reduce portfolio risk through the use of a tranching model. Minimize the “luck-of-review-day.”. Rebalancing a portfolio, whether it is done monthly, quarterly, or annually, inserts a variable known as the “luck-of-review-day.” This problem is examined in a recent white paper readers can find at the end of this introductory blog post . The paper is titled, Minimizing Timing Luck with Portfolio Tranching . What is portfolio tranching and how can it be applied to the ” Swensen Six ” portfolio? While the “Swensen Six” is an example portfolio, the Tranche Model can be used with any group of securities. There is an advantage to including low correlated securities and the “Swensen Six” meets this requirement. The spreadsheet used for the following tranche analysis includes four critical worksheets. 1) A main menu where assumptions are set up for the analysis. 2) A portfolio worksheet for listing securities and number of shares held in each security. Available cash is also included. 3) Data worksheet for automatically downloading data. 4) Tranche recommendations based on the assumptions and securities used for portfolio construction. A few of the assumptions include the following. The Number of Offset Portfolios can be set from one (1) through twelve (12). I generally use eight (8) as this takes into account eight different portfolios ranging over the past sixteen (16) trading days. The second variable is to determine the Periods between Offsets and I generally use two (2). If the portfolio is updated after the market closes on a Friday, the data for the first portfolio offset is Friday, the second portfolio offset is the prior Wednesday and the third portfolio offset is the prior Monday. If one selects three (3) for the offset periods we jump back by three-day intervals. Look-back periods of 60 and 100 trading days are based on extensive research. Weights of 50% for the shorter look-back period and 30% for the longer look-back period are applied to ROC1 and ROC2 respectively. See the following screen-shot. For this example, two (2) ETFs are the maximum permitted for any offset portfolio. (click to enlarge) After the assumptions or variables are set in the Main Menu and the latest data is downloaded, we move to the Tranche Recommendations as shown in the following screen-shot. Based on the recommendations from the 10/23/2015 portfolio, 50% is invested in VNQ and 50% in TLT. The same was true two days prior of 10/21/2015. However, the recommendation ten trading days ago was to invest 50% in SHY and 50% in TLT. The seventh offset portfolio recommended investing 50% in TLT and 50% in TIP. Based on the eight portfolio offsets, the required number of shares is listed in the Required column. What these different offset portfolios are telling us is that we would have come up with different recommendations had the portfolio review come up on a different day or what is known as “luck-of-review-day.” (click to enlarge) For a $100,000 portfolio an investor, using this tranche model, would invest 75 shares in SHY, 450 shares in VNQ, 400 shares in TLT, and 50 shares in TIP. Rounding the number of shares is a personal judgment. Back-testing research shows tranching reduces portfolio volatility. There is a penalty to be paid for lowering risk as the return is also reduced. Portfolio turnover is another issue. I prefer to review portfolios every 33 days and depending on how one rounds the number of shares held in the various ETFs, one has some control over the portfolio turn over. All the ETFs using in the “Swensen Six” are commission free through certain discount brokers so commissions are not an issue. Note to readers: This tranche model differs from the model explained in the white paper referenced above.

Is The Russian Bear Out Of The Woods?

Summary The Russian economy is still depressed, but may have found its bottom. Valuations are reflecting a collapse, which is no longer realistic. First signs of returning investor appetite and technical picture brightens. For risk-prone investors, it may be the moment to add Russia in their portfolios through RSX and RSXJ. Shortly after the publication of my previous article on the Russian market, we witnessed nothing less than a crash on August 24. The Russian stock market, the leading Market Vectors Russia ETF (NYSEARCA: RSX ) and its small-cap family member the Market Vectors Russia Small-Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: RSXJ ) saw a sharp drop during that day but failed to hit new lows compared to the previous ones in December 2014 (more on the charts later on). Since that day, the Russian market recovered, like most other stock markets, also helped by a recovery in commodity prices. So, did the August 24 turbulence mark the end of the bear market in Russia and thus for the above-mentioned ETFs? Let’s take a look at the underlying fundamentals and the technical picture. Economy in dire state Compared to two months ago, the Russian economy did not change for the better. According to Russian Deputy Economy Minister Alexei Vedev, in September, Russia’s gross domestic product (GDP) dropped 3.8% compared to last year. He added that preliminary data points to a 4.3% drop in GDP during the third quarter. Prospects for economic growth remain suppressed too. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) expects GDP to decline 3.8% this year. Next year will see a flat development at best. More likely is a small contraction before the economy can return to rates close to 1.5% in the next years. Compared to the previous recession, during the financial crisis, a sharp recovery is less likely since commodity prices are now low for an extended period of time. In the words of IMF’s Russia representative Gabriel Di Bella (source Reuters): “What we had in 2009 were shocks that were more temporary in nature and what seems to be the case right now is that the shocks are… not very short term,” Di Bella said. “They’re shocks that are more persistent.” Recent underlying numbers are close to miserable. For instance, retail sales dropped 10.4% YoY vs. -9.3% expected, and capital investment declined 5.6%, although this was better than the -6.9% expected. Also, real wages figures were slightly better than expected, but -9.7% is still poor. Compared to the nominal wage growth of 4.5% in September, it’s clear where Russia’s main problem lies. Inflation still troubling The biggest challenge for Russia is the current high inflation and expectations that are unanchored. Consumer price inflation (CPI) came in at 15.7% in September, far from the Central Bank of Russia’s (CBR) long-term target of 4%. The CBR aims to return to a CPI rate of 4% by the end of 2017. But roughly 70% of the Russian population doubt the institution will succeed in bringing down inflation to that target and this group is growing in the recent months. On the other hand, the IMF’s Di Bella and some analysts do see a slowdown in inflation in the coming months, partly due to a base effect. The problem is that the CBR’s key policy rate stands at 11% and is too restrictive for the current shape of the economy. But with inflation rate this high, a cut in the next monetary policy meeting (October 30) is tricky. The IMF calls the CBR to hold rates during the next meeting, but analysts of ING expect cuts of 50 basis points during the next two meetings (source: Bloomberg). According to CBR Governor Elvira Nabiullina, cutting the level of capital requirements may be another option to spur additional lending to the economy. The banking sector is stable and Governor Nabiullina said the sector would see a profit of around RUB 100-200 billion (USD 1.5-3 billion) this year. Companies show encouraging numbers Sberbank ( OTCPK:SBRCY ), which is the 2nd largest holding of RSX, was able to show a 9M-2015 RAS net profit of RUB 144.4 billion (USD 2.2 billion), although this was 50% lower than last year. This was mainly due to a 16% drop in net interest income. Net fee and commission income rose 6%. For a better picture, we have to wait for the IFRS numbers. The retail sector shows numbers which seem in contrast to the dire state of the Russian economy. Despite the poor aforementioned retail sales, listed retail companies showed encouraging numbers. For instance, discounter Magnit, a top 5 holding of RSX, was able to increase its revenues 27.2% YoY to RUB 690.4 billion (USD 10.6 billion) during the first nine months of 2015. Net income rose 27.6% to RUB 43.2 billion (USD 0.7 billion) during the same period. Supermarket-chain X5 Retail Group, also included in RSX, reported that its Q3 revenues grew 28.6% YoY on the back of a 13.1% like-for-like revenue growth. But also net income showed a decent increase with a plus of 21% YoY. To remind ourselves, Russian companies are still heavily undervalued compared to peers from other emerging and developed markets. For instance, Magnit is trading at a price/earnings ratio of 12.7 (2015e) and X5 Retail trades at a P/E of 12.8 (2015e). The average P/E of RSX is 5.9 and lists at a price-to-book ratio of 0.8. Its smaller family member, RSXJ, quotes a P/E ratio of 7.5 and a P/B of slightly below 0.5! First signs of a reversal The low valuations accompanied by relatively healthy company fundamentals are luring a growing number of investors back to the Russian market. Earlier this week, retailer Lenta, known for its budget hypermarkets, successfully sold new shares and raised USD 150 million in capital. The company intends to use the proceeds from the share placement to speed up store openings and aims to open at least 40 new hypermarkets in 2016, a number upped from the previous planned 32. For 2017, the company seeks to open a similar number of stores, or even more. Bond investors are returning to Russia as well and seek new or additional exposure. However, this is not because of the sound macro-environment surrounding Russia, but more so due to initial fears of a collapse accompanied by a wave of defaults did not materialize. Many investors who cut their exposure reenter due to attractive valuations. According to Reuters, USD returns on Russian bonds yielded 12% thus far in 2015 and corporate bonds even 20%. The country saw net capital inflows in the third quarter. What does the trick is that Russia and its companies have very low debt levels. Therefore, a number of asset managers are willing to rotate part of their funds back into the country. Though, it should be said that emerging peers, such as Brazil, have a much bleaker outlook which helps the move (back) to Russia. Stock market may have found the bottom Investors should realize that most of the gains are made when moving in front of the curve. Waiting for the economic turnaround may be too conservative and one could miss out on the big move. When looking at the charts of the main ETFs for the Russian market, one for the large caps and one for the mid and small caps, we notice that despite the crash of global markets on August 24, new lows stayed off. This is an encouraging sign from a technical point of view. Not hitting a new low on the selling pressure during August 24 may indicate that the remaining supply can easily be picked up by demand at current levels. RSXJ had a rougher day but set a double bottom pattern. In the field of technical analysis, double bottoms are regarded as the best chart patterns (see also Thomas Bulkowski thepatternsite.com ). Both ETFs are close to their 200-day moving average but already crossed the 50-day moving average. However, a so-called ‘Golden Cross’ has yet to appear, although this mostly will occur after a strong rally. An investor waiting for that sign may miss a large chunk of the move. (click to enlarge) When comparing RSX with the MSCI Russia Index, we see something interesting. The RSX is able to outperform the MSCI Index, despite the annual fees of 0.6% (see chart below). The outperformance amounts to 5% during the last four years. This highlights why RSX is a solid instrument to play the Russian market. Unfortunately, during the measured period, a loss of 37% was recorded. Risks remain, but the brave may enter The Russian economy continues to struggle. The government may be forced to finance its budget deficit by taking USD 35 billion from the International Reserves, managed by the CBR. But that’s why these funds are created for, and with reserves totaling USD 377.3 billion (as at October 17), there’s ample room. Next to that, Russia’s debt-to-GDP is still at a very low 17%. Nonetheless, the government should proceed with reforms. Encouraging is that government officials acknowledge that the country cannot navigate on oil prices. Oil prices stabilizing at around USD 50 or even rising to USD 60-70 will not be enough for a full-scale recovery. Russia’s budget is based on an oil price of USD 50. The government seems to realize that more taxes is not the solution. It is finally considering to raise the retirement age, although this may be a highly unpopular measure. The country is also strengthening its ties with China and overtook Saudi Arabia as China’s main oil trading partner. Nevertheless, China is known to prefer balanced ‘market shares’ when looking at its oil imports, so the upper bound in China exports might be near. Additional government initiative could be the last stage before an economic recovery can take off. The Russian financial market is now valued at distressed levels. So from that point of view, there’s a lot needed to push valuations even lower. It may be time to (start to) add Russia in the portfolio. As described in my previous article on Russia, small- and mid-cap companies should be preferred in a recovery, which points to RSXJ. Investors should be advised that the order book of RSXJ can show large spreads and, therefore, investors should make sure to check the NAV on the site of the ETF provider to prevent paying too much when placing an order on the screen. In addition, shares of RSXJ have limited liquidity and total assets of RSXJ is only USD 40 million. RSX may, in that case, be a better option (1x spread and ample liquidity, assets of USD 2 billion). But either choice could show a lot of potential for the long term. If an investor is interested in the Russian market and comfortable with the country-specific risks, this might be the time to enter.

A Lower-Risk Way To Invest In The Dow

Summary During the average 6-month period over the last 10 years, the Dow-tracking ETF DIA gained 3.98%. DIA shareholders suffered a 38% decline during one of those 6-month periods. A hedged portfolio of Dow component stocks, such as the one shown below, can offer a higher expected return with less than half the drawdown risk. Although cost is a concern when hedging, in our example, the hedged portfolio has a negative cost. Risk Versus Return For The Dow-Tracking ETF Although not as widely-traded as ETFs tracking the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq, according to the ETF Database , the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (NYSEARCA: DIA ) is among the top-40 ETFs by average trading volume over the last 3 months, and has assets under management of over $11.5 billion, so it holds a place in the portfolios of a lot of investors. Any of those investors who owned DIA in late 2008 and early 2009 saw the ETF drop about 38% within a six-month period between August of 2008 and February of 2009. During the average six-month period over the last ten years, though, DIA investors had a respectable total return of about 3.98%. But as we’ll show below, by using the hedged portfolio method to invest in some of DIA’s top holdings, an investor can get a higher expected return over the next six months while risking a drawdown less than half as large as the one mentioned above. When Stocks Can Be Safer Than An ETF It may seem counterintuitive that you can be exposed to less risk by holding a handful of Dow components than by holding the ETF that owns all of them, but that can be the case when you own those stocks within a hedged portfolio. Although a diversified limits the idiosyncratic risk of owning individual stocks, it doesn’t limit market risk (DIA isn’t as diversified as some ETFs, as it has about half of its assets in its top-10 holdings). But a hedged portfolio limits both. Below, we’ll show how to construct a hedged portfolio out of DIA top holdings for an investor who is unwilling to risk a drawdown of more than 19%, and has $500,000 that he wants to invest. First, though, let’s address the issue of risk tolerance, and how it affects potential return. Risk Tolerance and Potential Return All else equal, with a hedged portfolio, the greater an investor’s risk tolerance — the greater the maximum drawdown he is willing to risk (his “threshold”, in our terminology) – the higher his potential return will be. So, we should expect that an investor who is willing to risk a 29% decline will have a chance at higher potential returns than one who is only willing to risk a 9% drawdown. In our example, we’ll be splitting the difference and using a 19% threshold (half of the 38% drawdown DIA investors experienced in 2008-2009). Constructing A Hedged Portfolio We’ll recap the hedged portfolio method here briefly, and then explain how you can implement it yourself using DIA’s top holdings as a starting point. Finally, we’ll present an example of a hedged portfolio that was constructed this way with an automated tool. The process, in broad strokes, is this: Find securities with relatively high potential returns. Find securities that are relatively inexpensive to hedge. Buy a handful of securities that score well on the first two criteria; in other words, buy a handful of securities with high potential returns net of their hedging costs (or, ones with high net potential returns). Hedge them. The potential benefits of this approach are two-fold: If you are successful at the first step (finding securities with high expected returns), and you hold a concentrated portfolio of them, your portfolio should generate decent returns over time. If you are hedged, and your return estimates are completely wrong, on occasion — or the market moves against you — your downside will be strictly limited. How to Implement This Approach Finding Promising Stocks If we were looking for securities with the highest potential returns, we wouldn’t limit ourselves to just Dow components; instead, we’d consider a much broader universe of stocks. But since we’re concerned with Dow stocks here, we’ll start with the top holdings of DIA. To quantify potential returns for DIA’s top holdings, you can check Seeking Alpha Pro for articles that offer price targets for the stocks, or you can use sell-side analysts’ consensus price targets for them and then convert those to percentage returns from current prices. For example, via Nasdaq , this is the 12 month consensus price target for Dow component and top-10 DIA holding Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS ): You can use that consensus price target as a starting point for your estimate, adjusting it based on the time frame you’re using and whether you think it is overly optimistic or not. In general, though, you’ll need to use the same time frame for each of your potential return calculations to facilitate comparisons of potential returns, hedging costs, and net expected returns. Our method starts with calculations of six-month expected returns. Finding inexpensive ways to hedge these securities Our method attempts to find optimal static hedges using collars as well as protective puts going out approximately six months. Whatever hedging method you use, for this example, you’d want to make sure that each security is hedged against a greater-than-19% decline over the time frame covered by your potential return calculations. And you’ll need to calculate your cost of hedging as a percentage of position value. Select the securities with highest net potential returns When starting from a large universe of securities, you’d want to select the ones with the highest potential returns, net of hedging costs; you can do the same here, starting with the top holdings in DIA, but, in any case, you’ll at least want to exclude any of them that has a negative potential return net of hedging costs. It doesn’t make sense to pay X to hedge a stock if you estimate the stock will return