Tag Archives: seeking

FFC: A CEF Specializing In Preferred Shares Paying 8% Monthly

Summary FFC has been paying $0.13 monthly for 5 years. FFC uses leverage to increase dividends. FFC is a fund that is highly sensitive to interest rates. Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Securities Income Fund Incorporated (NYSE: FFC ) is a United States based diversified, closed-end management investment company. FFC’s objective is to provide a high yield while preserving capital by using preferred securities. (TD Ameritrade) Flaherty and Crumrine serves as the investment advisor to the CEF. The 5 year chart below shows how successful this CEF has been in meeting these objectives: (click to enlarge) Source: Interactive Brokers The chart shows that FFC has consistently paid the current $0.13 monthly dividend for 5 years. At the end of each year the company adjusts the payout to match its annual earnings and consequently the December payout is often less than $0.13. The share price modulates somewhat but the median price over the past 3 years has been about $19.00 per share. For those of us that need and/or like to have dividends delivered to us monthly, Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Securities Income Fund might be the right ticket. This closed end fund recently released its quarterly letter and offered the statistics shown below: Source: FFC Shareholders Letter dated 9/22/15 with statistics as of 8/31/15 Source: FFC Shareholders Letter dated 9/22/15 with statistics as of 8/31/15 Source: FFC Shareholders Letter dated 9/22/15 with statistics as of 8/31/15 Currently FFC is selling at a premium to NAV by about 3% since NAV is about $19.06 and the current price is around $20.10 per share. At this share price the CEF is offering an 8% return and about 8.5 % on NAV. FFC is able to offer this high yield because it uses leverage of around 35%. (Information from Morningstar) That means the fund borrows money to buy more shares over and above what it could buy with only its own cash. Operating expenses for FFC including interest for leverage are running at 1.39% of NAV. Excluding interest operating expenses are running at 0.87% of NAV which is relatively reasonable when compared to most other specialized mutual funds. (Taken from FFC’s Form N-Q filed for the 3rd quarter) Conclusion: As a matter of principle I normally don’t invest in a CEF when it is selling above NAV. You can see that at the end of August FFC was selling below NAV and was an opportune time to buy. Since the fund is currently selling above NAV, I recommend waiting until the fund is selling at or below NAV if you see this as a desirable vehicle for steady monthly income.. Be advised that this CEF is highly sensitive to interest rate changes and one should consider the direction of interest rates when buying this CEF. As interest rates rise, the cost of leverage increases which translates into higher expenses for the fund. Furthermore the value of the preferred shares is likely to decline as interest rates escalate hence NAV will drop as well. Capital losses could be excessive in an environment where interest rates are rising rapidly.

VUVLX: Enjoy Your Long Term Dividend

Summary VUVLX has a high dividend with broad sector exposure. Actively managed fund that has outperformed its benchmark over the last four years. Quantitatively driven investment approach which attempts to identify stocks below their true worth. The Vanguard U.S Value Fund (MUTF: VUVLX ) has shown some impressive improvement over the last several years compared to its benchmark: Russell 3000 Value Index. The fund is actively managed and in some years will be quite different from the Russell index. VUVLX had a slow start, but in the last five years has started to improve with new management and a higher turnover rate. This fund will primarily be invested in large companies, but the managers have no restrictions on what size companies they buy. The main focus of the fund’s advisors is to attempt to find stocks which are below their true worth and have strong growth potential EXPENSE RATIO The expense ratio for VUVLX is .29%. There’s no 12b-1 Distribution Fee and .26% of the expenses are management fees. Turnover rate from the last fiscal year was 66.10%. The management team saw some changes a few years ago including James D. Troyer joining the team. Troyer didn’t show up until 2012 according to Vanguard, but the fund starting improving in relationship with its benchmark in 2011: YIELD With a yield of 2.58% this stock becomes great for a long term holding. With a value fund I am looking for a long-term time horizon as an investor since it’s fully exposed to the stock market. A yield this high gives me a good opportunity to reinvest or to have a portfolio based around a yield for income. Diversification The following chart gives the top ten holdings of the fund: VUVLX has 247 holdings and 21.8% of the equity is in the top ten stocks. Great sector exposure being show here without having too much equity in the top holdings. The few holdings with over 2% equity, especially Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE: XOM ), have positioned themselves in the market strategically to flourish in an up market and survive comfortably if the market stagnates or hits a rough patch. Exxon has an impressive management team and a strong culture to succeed. While most of the competition is cutting jobs and decreasing amount spent on projects, Exxon is moving forward. If the price of crude oil begins to go up Exxon will be at a fantastic advantage. Even if the market for oil doesn’t rebound, the company is powerful and profitable: beating analysts’ third-quarter consensus report by $0.88 per share. If the market continues to fall XOM is a powerhouse with a high proven dividend and a large enough company to survive low oil prices. While I’m long XOM, there are still some risks to consider. Allegations and legal issues should be considered when looking at this stock. Here’s an article that gives good insight into potential problems. Legitimate or not, no one likes to get probed. Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC ) is a great long term investment. CEO John Stumpf has publicly stated multiple times the importance of being disciplined; I believe disciplined sums up what makes this stock so strong. The strategy for loans has helped Wells Fargo for many years and makes them a fantastic long term and safe investment. There are some large banks which would benefit more if rate go up, but I don’t believe the risk is worth it. With such great arguments for rates not going up; I would much rather have my money invested in WFC. Even if rates do go up, Wells Fargo will still have a steady growth. Great diversification here even with financials being at 30.4%. Keep in mind the financial sector includes real estate, investment funds, banks, and insurance companies. With the demutualization of the insurance companies it is acceptable to have financials with so much equity. I was glad to see telecommunications and basic materials so low. Telecommunications does have the ability for some serious upside but the issue is knowing where it will come from. Everyone wants to sell you their new device. The competition is rising and causing the sector to buckle down and intelligently decide what to do next. We have seen some major flops even by the telecommunication giants and now would be a bad time to fall behind. There are plenty of good arguments for who will come out on top but I’m sure we’re all in for a few surprises. With companies working on snazzy new features and trying to be the first one to market breaking technology it is not a position I want to be heavily invested in. Conclusion VUVLX has progressively been increasing its performance, especially over the last five years: The new management team led by James D Troyer has been able to outperform the benchmark for the last five years. There are a couple risks to consider when investing in this mutual fund, even though I am bull a long term investment. Firstly, with only 0.5% foreign holdings, the fund is heavily invested in the domestic market. Secondly, there is a high turnover rate with the current management. Although there has been great performance recently, there’s extra risk when switching the fund around so much and only being invested in 247 stocks compared to the benchmark’s 1997. On a positive note, the holdings have a large percentage in companies that are safe buys which will perform over a long period of time. VUVLX is a mutual fund I would invest in if I were looking for a dividend portfolio.

S&P 500 Posts 3rd Best October Returns In 25 Years

After losing -8.35% over the prior 2 months, the S&P 500 was up +8.44% in October. Abnormally high monthly returns like this are uncommon by historical standards. The stock market in 2015 continues to illustrate a volatile and highly unstable investment environment. We have often heard investors refer to October as being one of the worst months to invest in the stock market. To the degree that we have even witnessed investors hastily move their investments to cash. Perhaps this lies in some deeply rooted market fears that can be traced back to Black Monday , when on October 19th, 1987 the U.S. stock markets lost nearly -22% in a single day of trading. Whatever the cause for trepidation may be, the reality is that over the past 25 years October has actually been one of the best months to be an investor in domestic equities. After two consecutive months of negative returns for the S&P 500, investors entered October 2015 spooked by such technical omens as a break in the 200 day moving average, a death cross , and the Hindenburg Omen , among others. And yet, after all of the technical damage that had been wrought in recent weeks the S&P 500 managed to shock us all by turning in the best October return since 2011, up +8.44% for the period. While that last statistic may not sound overwhelmingly impressive, one must further consider the context. That unexpected +8.44% monthly return was actually the third best October return in the past 25 years! Perhaps even more incredulous is the fact that that was actually the 7th best return generated in any month over the past 25 years period (including the “go-go” markets of the 90’s)! In other words, out of the past 397 months of S&P 500 returns, last month’s return came in 7th. And let’s be blunt, no one saw it coming. In October of 2011, the S&P 500 generated the highest return of any month over the past 25 years, up +10.93%. This came after 5 consecutive monthly losses over which the S&P 500 suffered a cumulative decline of -16.26%. Losses over this period were exacerbated by an August S&P downgrade of U.S. long-term debt from AAA to AA and growing fears that the Euro may break up, all of which led to capitulation by worrisome market participants. As is the case in most instances, the markets overreacted to the downside and rebounded with strength shortly thereafter. In October of 2002, the S&P 500 generated the 2nd highest October return over the past 25 years, up +8.80%. This came at the height of the bursting of the Tech Bubble, where over the prior five month period the S&P 500 experienced an outsized cumulative loss of over -28%. So here again, we witnessed capitulation followed by a strong rebound. Even coming out of the Great Recession, when in early March of 2009 we finally found our bottom, the S&P 500 generated a monthly return of +8.76%. However, this strong return to the upside only came after the markets had lost a gut wrenching -41.83% over the prior 6 month period. So forgive us if we find it somewhat peculiar that the S&P 500 was up over 8% last month. In nearly every instance in which returns of this magnitude have been generated in a single month over the past 25 years, they have come only after the markets had suffered significant losses. While we recognize losses of any size may be difficult to bear, a loss of slightly more than 8% over a two month period is exceedingly commonplace in the stock market. What is uncommon are returns north of 8% in a single month without coming after significant losses. In 2002 when October returns were this strong, the S&P 500 still finished down -22.10% for the year. In October of 2011, when the S&P 500 posted it’s strongest monthly return over the last 25 years, the S&P 500 finished up a modest +2.11% (all of which was attributable to dividends, without them the return was actually 0.0%). Where we end up for 2015 is really anyone’s best guess, but after taking a look at monthly returns over the past 25 years, it should be clear to see that volatility has increased and the markets appear undecided for the time being as to whether our next leg will be up or down. It should also be clear that listening to the noise that is so widely disseminated in our industry, should largely be ignored. What is more important is that investors follow an investment discipline devoid of emotional influence. With that said, we would be remiss if we did not impart a word of caution regarding our current investment environment. One should be weary of market head-fakes , as the markets in 2015 have grown increasingly prone to lead investors in one direction, only to quickly reverse course. Adding new monies into equities at this time may very well prove to be an exercise and lesson in chasing returns. For tactical investment managers, employing an asset rotation based investment approach, whipsawing markets such as we have seen thus far in 2015 can prove to be challenging, as underlying trends become less stable. However, if executed properly the purpose of reducing volatility in returns and achieving low correlations to both the equity and bond markets should be evident. For those unfamiliar with tactical portfolio management, you may refer to our previously published article on SeekingAlpha, How To Beat The Market With Tactical Asset Rotation or our recently published book by Wiley & Sons, “Asset Rotation” . In each we illustrate a rudimentary approach to tactical portfolio management and provide a root foundation for understanding the benefits of this type of investment philosophy. Lastly, since we have attached a table with monthly returns on the S&P 500 for reference pertaining to this article, there are a couple ancillary points we will leave you with that may surprise you: Over the past 25 years, October has generated a negative monthly return only 7 times (tied for third best). 3 out of the 7 best monthly returns over the past 25 years have come in October. Surprisingly, July and September posted monthly losses in 12 out of the past 25 years (tied for the worst month for investors over the period). Never underestimate the power of the jolly fat man… December has posted a negative rate of return in only 4 out of the past 25 years (by the far the best month for investors over the past 25 years). (click to enlarge)