Tag Archives: seeking

Technically Speaking: The Real Value Of Cash

With the ” inmates running the asylum ” during a holiday-shortened trading week, the upward bias to the market is set to continue. However, as I addressed last week: ” As we progress through the last two months of the year, historical tendencies suggest a bias to the upside . This is particularly the case given the weakness this past summer which has left many mutual and hedge funds trailing their benchmarks. The need to play ‘catch-up’ will likely create a push into larger capitalization stocks as portfolios are ‘window dressed’ for year end reporting . This traditional ‘Santa Claus’ rally, however, does not guarantee the resumption of the ongoing ‘bull market’ into 2016. The chart below lays out my expectation for the market through the end of the year. ” (click to enlarge) ” With the markets currently oversold on a very short-term basis, the current probability is a rally into the ‘Thanksgiving’ holiday next week and potentially into the first week of December . As opposed to my rudimentary projections, the push higher will likely be a ‘choppy’ advance rather than a straight line. ” So far, the analysis over the last several weeks has continued to play out as expected. However, and this is crucially important, a near-term expectation of a bullish advance due to the recent correction and seasonal tendencies is not the same as long-term bullish outlook . As stated above, while seasonality likely holds the cards through the end of this year, projecting much beyond that window is foolishness. The Real Value Of Cash This brings to mind a call I had on the radio show recently discussing his advisor’s reluctance to hold cash . The argument against holding cash goes this way: ” If you hold cash, you lose value over time to inflation .” This is a true statement if you hold cash for an EXTREMELY long period. However, holding cash as a ” hedge ” against market volatility during periods of elevated uncertainty is a different matter entirely. As I discussed previously: ” I have written previously that historically it is relatively unimportant the markets are making new highs. The reality is that new highs represent about 5% of the markets action while the other 95% of the advance was making up previous losses. ‘ Getting back to even’ is not a long-term investing strategy . ” (click to enlarge) In a market environment that is extremely overvalued, the projection of long-term forward returns is exceedingly low. This, of course, does not mean that markets just trade sideways, but in rather large swings between exhilarating rises and spirit-crushing declines. This is an extremely important concept in understanding the “real value of cash.” (click to enlarge) The chart below shows the inflation-adjusted return of $100 invested in the S&P 500 ( using data provided by Dr. Robert Shiller ). The chart also shows Dr. Shiller’s CAPE ratio. However, I have capped the CAPE ratio at 23x earnings which has historically been the peak of secular bull markets in the past. Lastly, I calculated a simple cash/stock switching model which buys stocks at a CAPE ratio of 6x or less and moves back to cash at a ratio of 23x . I have adjusted the value of holding cash for the annual inflation rate which is why during the sharp rise in inflation in the 1970s, there is a downward slope in the value of cash . However, while the value of cash is adjusted for purchasing power in terms of acquiring goods or services in the future, the impact of inflation on cash as an asset with respect to reinvestment may be different since asset prices are negatively impacted by spiking inflation. In such an event, cash gains purchasing power parity in the future if assets prices fall more than inflation rises. (click to enlarge) While no individual could effectively manage money this way, the importance of “cash” as an asset class is revealed. While cash did lose relative purchasing power, due to inflation, the benefits of having capital to invest at lower valuations produced substantial outperformance over waiting for previously destroyed investment capital to recover. While we can debate over methodologies, allocations, etc., the point here is that ” time frames ” are crucial in the discussion of cash as an asset class. If an individual is “literally” burying cash in their backyard, then the discussion of the loss of purchasing power is appropriate. However, if cash is a “tactical” holding to avoid short-term destruction of capital, then the protection afforded outweighs the loss of purchasing power in the distant future. Much of the mainstream media will quickly disagree with the concept of holding cash and tout long-term returns as the reason to just remain invested in both good times and bad. The problem is that it is YOUR money at risk. Furthermore, most individuals lack the ” time ” necessary to truly capture 30- to 60-year return averages. For individuals, trying to save for their retirement, there are several important considerations with respect to cash as an asset class: Cash is an effective hedge against market loss. Cash provides an opportunity to take advantage of market declines. Cash provides stability during times of uncertainty (reduces emotional mistakes) Importantly, I am not talking about being 100% in cash. I am suggesting that holding higher levels of cash during periods of uncertainty provides both stability and opportunity. With the fundamental and economic backdrop becoming much more hostile toward investors in the intermediate term, understanding the value of cash as a ” hedge ” against loss becomes much more important. As John Hussman recently noted: ” The overall economic and financial landscape, then, is one where obscene valuations imply zero or negative S&P 500 total returns for more than a decade – an outcome that is largely baked-in-the-cake regardless of shorter term economic or speculative factors. Presently, market internals remain unfavorable as well. Coming off of recent overvalued, overbought, overbullish extremes, this has historically opened a clear vulnerability of the market to air-pockets, free-falls and crashes. ” As stated above, near zero returns do not imply that each year will have a zero rate of return. However, as a quick review of the past 15 years shows, markets can trade in very wide ranges leaving those who ” rode it out ” little to show for their emotional wear. Given the length of the current market advance, deteriorating internals, high valuations and weak economic backdrop; reviewing cash as an asset class in your allocation may make some sense. Chasing yield at any cost has typically not ended well for most. Of course, since Wall Street does not make fees on investors holding cash, maybe there is another reason they are so adamant that you remain invested all the time. Just something to think about.

ETF Deathwatch For November 2015: Investors Shun Smart Beta

ETF Deathwatch membership rolls increased by eight for November, with 21 additions and 13 removals. Eight of the funds were removed from the list because they went out of business in October. Five others were discharged due to improved health, a more honorable way to get off the list. The net increase leaves the count at 343: 246 ETFs and 97 ETNs. Thirteen of the 21 (62%) additions this month are smart-beta funds. “Smart beta” is the industry terminology applied to ETFs that weight each stock using factors other than market capitalization. Thirteen of the 21 (62%) additions this month are smart-beta funds. These alternative factors might include volatility, yield, momentum, value, earnings, revenue, or a combination of these and other factors. The ETF industry is currently enamored with smart-beta funds, and many new products coming to market carry the smart beta label. The reason for this is easy to see because nearly all of the traditional market-capitalization-weighted indexes are already well-represented in the ETF space. Smart-beta approaches can use a virtually unlimited combination of factors to produce a unique ETF. It is much easier to claim an investment vehicle is “new” when it is not based on a traditional capitalization index. However, despite the industry push and hype surrounding smart beta, ETF investors have been slow to embrace many of these vehicles. We categorize ETFs into seven broad categories. Unleveraged equity ETFs and ETNs are classified as either a sector, international, or a style & strategy ETF. There are currently 65 ETFs from our style & strategy classification on ETF Deathwatch. All 65 of these funds carry the smart beta label. Within the international classification, 52 of the 72 funds on Deathwatch are smart-beta funds. With 100% of the style & strategy funds and 72% of the international funds on ETF Deathwatch categorized as smart-beta funds, it is easy to see that investors have not fully embraced this corner of the ETF universe. Liquidity is a major concern when trying to buy or sell any ETF or ETN on ETF Deathwatch. Only 16 traded every day in October. The other 327 (95%) had at least one day with zero volume. In a true display of illiquidity, 15 of these ETFs and ETNs went the entire month of October without a single trade. The average asset level of products on ETF Deathwatch increased from $6.3 million to $6.8 million, and the quantity of products with less than $2 million decreased from 76 to 73. The average age decreased from 48.8 to 48.0 months, and the number of products more than five years old held steady at 114. Here is the Complete List of 343 Products on ETF Deathwatch for November 2015 compiled using the objective ETF Deathwatch Criteria . The 21 ETPs added to ETF Deathwatch for November: AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap (NASDAQ: SMCP ) ALPS STOXX Europe 600 ETF (NYSEARCA: STXX ) Barclays Inverse U.S. Treasury Aggregate ETN (NASDAQ: TAPR ) DB 3x Japanese Govt Bond Futures ETN (NYSEARCA: JGBT ) Deutsche X-trackers DJ Hedged Intl Real Estate (NYSEARCA: DBRE ) Deutsche X-trackers S&P Hedged Global Infrastructure (NYSEARCA: DBIF ) EGShares EM Quality Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: HILO ) First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (NASDAQ: FEUZ ) Global X Guru Activist ETF (NASDAQ: ACTX ) iShares Commodity Optimized Trust (NYSEARCA: CMDT ) iShares FactorSelect MSCI Global (NYSEARCA: ACWF ) iShares FactorSelect MSCI International (NYSEARCA: INTF ) iShares FactorSelect MSCI International Small-Cap (NYSEARCA: ISCF ) iShares FactorSelect MSCI USA Small-Cap ( OTC:SMLF ) PowerShares Multi-Strategy Alternative (NASDAQ: LALT ) PowerShares S&P International Developed High Beta (NYSEARCA: IDHB ) PowerShares Wilderhill Progressive Energy (NYSEARCA: PUW ) ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil Capped (NYSEARCA: UBR ) Recon Capital FTSE 100 ETF (NASDAQ: UK ) RevenueShares ADR (NYSEARCA: RTR ) SPDR MSCI USA Quality Mix (NYSEARCA: QUS ) The 5 ETPs removed from ETF Deathwatch due to improved health: BLDRS Asia 50 ADR (NASDAQ: ADRA ) IQ Hedge Market Neutral Tracker (NYSEARCA: QMN ) ProShares Short Oil & Gas (NYSEARCA: DDG ) ProShares UltraShort Industrials (NYSEARCA: SIJ ) ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (NYSEARCA: EFU ) The 8 ETPs removed from ETF Deathwatch due to delisting: AdvisorShares Pring Turner Business Cycle ( DBIZ ) Global X Brazil Financials (NYSEARCA: BRAF ) Global X Central Asia & Mongolia Index ETF (NYSEARCA: AZIA ) Global X Guru Small Cap Index ETF (NYSEARCA: GURX ) Global X Junior Miners (NYSEARCA: JUNR ) Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 2x (NYSEARCA: SYTL ) Direxion Daily Basic Materials Bull 3x (NYSEARCA: MATL ) Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 2x (NYSEARCA: MDLL ) ETF Deathwatch Archives Disclosure covering writer: No positions in any of the securities mentioned . No positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned. No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.

Farmland: A Growing Investment Option

By Tim Maverick The last 20 years have seen a new asset category grow in popularity… farmland. And it’s easy to see why, because farmland is profitable. In fact, the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries’ ((NCREIF)) Farmland Index had an average annual return of 12% over 20 years. That beat the NCREIF’s Commercial Property Index and the S&P 500’s return of about 9%. It also topped investment-grade corporate bonds, which had returns in the 7% range. Institutional Money Going Country Not surprisingly, farmland’s outperformance has caught the attention of institutional investors. In the past two years alone, institutional investment into U.S. farmland topped $2 billion, according to iiSearches, the data arm of Institutional Investor. And the trend seems to be continuing. In August, TIAA-CREF announced that it raised $3 billion for its second global farmland investment partnership. Institutions, however, still own less than 1% of the $2.4 trillion U.S. farmland market. And their share of farmland ownership is sure to rise in the years ahead. It’s the perfect investment for institutions with long-range investment goals, such as pension funds. It’s a real asset, not correlated with stocks and bonds. And it pays steady income, as farmers pay rent on the land. The average rent for U.S. farmland over the past 16 years rose about 5% annually. It was about $141 per acre in 2014, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture . Farmland REITs Farmland is a real asset tied to a megatrend – rising global food demand. The middle class is expected to grow from 1.8 billion in 2010 to 3.2 billion in 2020 and 4.9 billion in 2030, with 85% of that growth coming from Asia. This real asset pays a steady income, making it suitable for mom and pop investors, too. And the good news for those looking to invest in farmland is that there are now three farmland real estate investment trusts, or REITs. These are equity REITs that lease the land to farmers. The three REITs, from the oldest to the most recent, are Gladstone Land Corp. (NASDAQ: LAND ), which IPO’d in 2013, Farmland Partners Inc. (NYSE: FPI ), which IPOd in 2014, and American Farmland Co. (NYSEMKT: AFCO ), which IPO’d this year. Farmland REIT Breakdown Each REIT focuses on a different type of farmland: Gladstone Land began with fruit, vegetable, and berry operations mainly in California and Florida. It has since expanded to other states. Farmland Partners is focused on crops such as corn, wheat, soybeans, rice, and cotton in the central and southeastern United States. American Farmland’s acreage is roughly a third grapes, nuts, and specialty crops, a third in crops similar to Farmland Partners’, and a third in farmland being developed to grow grapes, nuts, and citrus. Thanks to University of Illinois professors Paul Peterson and Todd Kuethe, this graphic shows the geographic breakdown. The Outlook To date, none of these REITs have performed well – though, to be fair, American Farmland is new to the market. Perhaps the companies were overpriced when they IPO’d. They’ve also been hit by Wall Street concerns over commodities in general. But in typical Wall Street fashion, investors are only looking at the short term. One thing is certain in farming, and that’s Mother Nature’s tendency to be fickle. This year may be great for growing crops, leading to oversupply and weak prices. But next year may bring vastly different conditions, leading to soaring crop prices. Investors should take the institutional perspective on these farmland REITs and hold them for the long term. The Wall Street Journal even quoted some institutional investors as saying that it’s like “gold with a coupon.” Link to the original post on Wall Street Daily Editor’s Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.