Tag Archives: seeking

Staying Level-Headed In The Face Of Fed Uncertainty

By John P. Calamos, Sr. As we know, uncertainty about the Fed’s plans for raising short-term rates remains a key driver of market volatility. It’s understandable that investors are afraid to be in the markets and at the same time, afraid to be out. Whenever rates do rise (probably before the end of the year), there’s every reason to expect continued heightened equity market volatility. Even so, I view a more normal interest-rate environment as long-term positive – for the economy and for the equity market. Here are some points to keep in mind. Higher short-term rates should be viewed as an affirmation of U.S. economic health. The Fed has consistently expressed its commitment to a patient, globally-informed, data-driven approach. It will raise rates when it believes the U.S. economy is strong enough to continue growing without artificially low rates. The “path” of short-term rate increases is likely to be slow and shallow. In other words, I don’t believe we’ll see the Fed move to raise rates significantly and many times, provided that the overall economic landscape remains consistent with what we’ve seen over recent years – slow growth, low inflation. A more normal interest rate environment can support continued economic growth, particularly among smaller businesses. When interest rates are higher, lenders can earn more from borrowing activities. This should provide an increased incentive to lend to small businesses, especially against the supportive backdrop of continued economic growth. With increased access to capital, small businesses can grow and hire more people, contributing to better overall economic growth. Higher short-term rates don’t signal that we’ve entered a bear market. Earlier, I noted that markets are likely to remain volatile when rates rise, but that doesn’t mean there won’t be opportunities, especially for long-term investors who take an active approach. Historically, stocks tend to perform well during periods of economic growth (see point #1). Stocks have continued to advance after the onset of an interest rate increase, as Figure 1 shows. Moreover, as our Co-CIO David Kalis explained in his recent video interview , the prospects for U.S. growth stocks look especially attractive. (click to enlarge) Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Source: Cornerstone Macro. “Positioning For A Fed Tightening Cycle,” September 16, 2015. Convertible allocations may be particularly effective in this sort of environment. Because they have fixed income characteristics, convertibles may be able to mitigate the impact of short-term equity downside. And because they have equity characteristics, convertible securities generally demonstrate less vulnerability to interest rate increases than investment grade bonds. That means that when rates do rise, allocations to convertibles may prove more resilient. (Co-CIO Eli Pars outlines more of these potential benefits in this video interview .) It’s been observed time and again that markets hate uncertainty. That’s not likely to change. More importantly, what’s also not likely to change is this: volatility creates opportunity for those who can tune out the short-term noise and take a long-term view. Share this article with a colleague

How Do Fund Flows Affect Fund Performance?

A study by Morningstar acknowledges that the relationship between fund flow (or investors’ purchases and redemptions of mutual funds) and fund performance may be stronger than previously considered. However, the study based on three-year performance of stock-picking funds between 2006 and 2014 revealed that funds with high inflows, stood a lower chance of outperforming peers. Large-cap funds attracting most inflows had an average return of 7.8%. This compares unfavorably with funds with biggest outflows offering an average return of 8.1%. In many cases, outperformers tend to attract inflows. The strong rally may have run its course, leading to the tepid performance of those high inflow funds. Also, funds with massive inflows will have to employ the cash; otherwise the cash in net assets may swell and thus affect the fund’s allocation style. The positive on the other hand is that increased cash can help fund managers invest them in new stocks or financial instruments, without selling the existing portfolio. This in turn keeps the turnover ratio low. (To learn more about turnover ratio, click Does Turnover Ratio Influence Mutual Funds? ) Thus, fund flows may have an impact, but not necessarily in all cases. This is better explained in Pimco’s legal disclosures to the PIMCO Total Return Fund (MUTF: PTTAX ) investors. It says purchases or redemptions “may cause funds to make investment decisions at inopportune times or prices or miss attractive investment opportunities. Such transactions may also increase a fund’s transaction costs, accelerate the realization of taxable income if sales of securities resulted in gains, or otherwise cause a fund to perform differently than intended. While such risks may apply to funds of any size, such risks are heightened in funds with fewer assets under management.” Fund Category Performance with Highest Inflow & Outflow in August This year, the bleeding continues for funds and particularly for active funds. According to Morningstar data, open-end mutual funds saw outflows of $31.9 billion in August. Interestingly, not all fund categories that saw the largest outflows in August were in the red for August. Similarly, inflows did not necessarily mean that funds ended up in positive territory. Except for Europe stock funds, five fund categories that had the highest August inflows have posted year-to-date losses. In August, all these five categories finished in the negative zone. The magnitude of losses in August for categories with highest inflows was significantly larger than those categories that saw largest outflows. Categories with Highest Inflows in August ($ in Million) Total Return (%) August YTD August YTD Foreign Large Blend 11880 80302 -7.1 -0.8 Multi-alternative 1464 11145 -2.3 -1.3 Managed Futures 1122 6220 -2.7 -1.5 Global Real Estate 982 1644 -5.7 -4.5 Europe Stock 943 4218 -6.1 2.5 Categories with Highest Outflows in August ($ in Million) Total Return (%) August YTD August YTD Intermediate – Term Bond -6711 29175 -0.4 0.1 Large Value -3866 -22052 -6 -5.3 Multisector Bond -3484 1920 -1.1 -0.4 Large Growth -3337 -26518 -6.4 0.3 World Bond -3116 13711 -0.9 -3.1 Source: Morningstar Top & Bottom-Flowing Active Funds Below we present the list of top and bottom flowing active funds for August: Top Flowing Active Funds Net Inflow ($ in million) Performance (%) Aug-15 1 Year Aug-15 1 Year DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund (MUTF: DBLTX ) 965 12245 -0.3 -1 PIMCO Income Fund (MUTF: PONAX ) 750 10659 -1.2 -4.2 Strategic Advisers Core Fund (MUTF: FCSAX ) 743 2549 -4.8 -5 Brown Advisory WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (MUTF: BIAHX ) 680 725 -6.6 -3 T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock ( PRMSX) 649 1940 -9 -20 As we can see, all these top flowing active funds had ended in the red for August and also over the last 1-year period. The reason is not necessarily the inflows, but as we know August has been a cruel month for the broader markets. However, once we compare the performance of active funds that had the biggest outflows, we will see that their loss was much larger. This is in contrast to the trend we noticed for the fund categories in August; where categories with largest outflows suffered relatively less losses. Bottom Flowing Active Funds Net Outflow ($ in million) Performance (%) Aug-15 1 Year Aug-15 1 Year GMO Asset Allocation Bond (MUTF: GABFX ) -2,018 -1,902 -0.6 -11.3 PIMCO Total Return (MUTF: PTTRX ) -2,015 -124,484 -1.1 -4 Templeton Global Bond (MUTF: TPINX ) -1,922 -6,013 -5.4 -14 Franklin Income Fund (MUTF: FKINX ) -1,473 -3,035 -4.4 -14.8 Oppenheimer Developing Markets (MUTF: ODMAX ) -1,059 -1,824 -10.6 -27 Source: Inflow/Outflow data from Morningstar; Performance data calculated using GoogleFinance. For the first time since Bill Gross quit PIMCO to join Janus , the PIMCO Total Return Fund was not at the bottom of funds with the most outflow. It took up the second seat instead. Its 1-year net outflow leads the pack, but the loss is not as much as others. PTTAX has lost 4% over the 1- year period, whereas the others including the Oppenheimer Developing Markets Fund, the Franklin Income Fund, the Templeton Global Bond Fund and the GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund have suffered larger losses. Coming to Zacks Mutual Fund Ranks, the DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund, the PIMCO Income Fund and the Templeton Global Bond are the only ones that currently carry a favorable rank. While DBLTX carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) , the latter two carry Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2 (Buy). The Strategic Advisers Core Fund and the PIMCO Total Return Fund have a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #3 (Hold). Meanwhile, the T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund and the GMO Asset Allocation Bond Fund hold a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4 (Sell) and the Franklin Income Fund and the Oppenheimer Developing Markets Fund carry Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5 (Strong Sell). As said, in certain cases there is more arts than science. Fund flows may be just a fraction of a factor to help a fund’s uptrend. Inflows may not translate into gains for mutual funds. Investors do not necessarily have to buy funds that are seeing strong inflows and vice versa. Link to the original post on Zacks.com

Don’t Be An Investment Hero: Avoid The Temptation Of That Brazilian ETF

MSCI Brazil is down 75% in USD since 2008 which could spark some intrigue for contrarian investors. However, the equity market is still 300% higher than 2003. Given the poor economic picture, valuation levels that aren’t a screaming buy, optimistic analyst expectations for the future, and a very negative technical set-up, investors should be looking elsewhere. For the contrarian investor out there, it is always tempting to invest in downtrodden markets. Many times buying into an equity market that has been out of favor can be a profitability investment strategy. However, this type of strategy takes a lot of patience and time because picking the bottom in any market is extremely difficult. Cheap stocks can always get cheaper. A stock market that is off 75% from a recent high may seem like a screaming buy. But is it actually a screaming buy if that same market is still, amazingly, up over 300% over the past 13 years? Aren’t there plausible scenarios where this market could halve from current levels but that would still mean it is 200% higher over the past 13 years? This is the quandary facing investors who want Brazilian exposure. In USD terms, MSCI Brazil is now back to levels last seen in 2005. However, as we stated above, it is still 300% higher than the 2002 low even as it is 75% off the 2008 high. So is now an interesting time to invest in Brazil? While it feels like it can’t get worse, we believe investors shouldn’t try to be a hero in this market. (click to enlarge) The Brazilian economy is in shambles. Exports are in a free fall down 24% year-over-year. Industrial production is declining at the fastest year-over-year rate since 2009 and has had a negative year-over-year growth rate for 16 months. The unemployment rate has spiked to a five-year high while retail sales are declining at a pace last seen in 2003. Finally, even with excess capacity in the economy increasing and consumption slowing, Brazil is combating inflation as the CPI increased at 9.5% year-over-year rate in August. With this type of economic back drop its fairly easy to understand the pressure that Brazilian stocks have been under. What is harder to understand is how valuations have stayed so high. (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) No matter which valuation level you look at, Brazil still isn’t cheap. The median price to cash flow level for the MSCI Brazil Index is still 8.58x. This is nearly 3x the trough level during the financial crisis. The median price to earnings ratio has fallen much more than price to cash flow, but it to remains well above 2008 lows. It currently stands at 13.84x which is only slightly below the average level since 2007. Where valuations are starting to look intriguing at least is when we look at median price to sales and median price to book ratios. The median prices to sales has dropped to just 1.11x which is the lowest level since 2009. The median price to book is at 1.59x which is on the low end of the last couple of years but still higher than in 2012 and 2008-2009. Overall, valuation levels still aren’t at levels to make it worthwhile for investors to take the plunge. (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) Given the economic backdrop, the outlook for Brazilian stocks remains surprisingly optimistic as analysts’ earnings expectations still seem out of step with the current situation. Over the past decade, Brazilian stocks have increased EPS by 12% annually. Currently, consensus EPS estimates for this year are very negative at -25.8%. However, analysts expect Brazil to be able to make up for this growth in the following three years by averaging a robust 20.3% growth rate from FY2-FY4. This seems like an incredibly high hurdle for Brazil to leap over even as these growth expectations start from a depressed level after this year. Finally, from a relative technical perspective the iShares MSCI Brazil Capped ETF (NYSEARCA: EWZ ) remains firmly in a down trend relative to the MSCI All-Country Index. This ETF looks like it is years away from forming a base relative to the global equity market let a lone beginning to outperform. It recently broke down to a new four-year relative low. All in all, given the poor economic picture, valuation levels that aren’t a screaming buy, optimistic analyst expectations for the future, and a very negative technical set-up, investors should be better off allocating their scarce investment capital to more productive equity markets around the globe. The original posting of this article can be found here . All data was created by the author and sourced from Gavekal Capital, MSCI and FactSet. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.