Tag Archives: seeking-alpha

VTTVX: This Is A Great Option For The Investor Nearing Retirement

Summary The Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Fund has a simple construction and a low expense ratio. Despite being a very simple portfolio, they have covered exposure to most of the important asset classes to reach the efficient frontier. This is quite simply one of the best constructed portfolios I’ve seen for a worker nearing retirement. Lately I have been doing some research on target date retirement funds. Despite the concept of a target date retirement fund being fairly simple, the investment options appear to vary quite dramatically in quality. Some of the funds have dramatically more complex holdings consisting with a high volume of various funds while others use only a few funds and yet achieve excellent diversification. My goal is help investors recognize which funds are the most useful tools for planning for retirement. In this article I’m focusing on the Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Fund Inv (MUTF: VTTVX ). What do funds like VTTVX do? They establish a portfolio based on a hypothetical start to retirement period. The portfolios are generally going to be designed under Modern Portfolio Theory so the goal is to maximize the expected return relative to the amount of risk the portfolio takes on. As investors are approaching retirement it is assumed that their risk tolerance will be decreasing and thus the holdings of the fund should become more conservative over time. That won’t be the case for every investor, but it is a reasonable starting place for creating a retirement option when each investor cannot be surveyed about their own unique risk tolerances. Therefore, the holdings of VTTVX should be more aggressive now than they would be 3 years from now, but at all points we would expect the fund to be more conservative than a fund designed for investors that are expected to retire 5 years later. What Must Investors Know? The most important things to know about the funds are the expenses and either the individual holdings or the volatility of the portfolio as a whole. Regardless of the planned retirement date, high expense ratios are a problem. Depending on the individual, they may wish to modify their portfolio to be more or less aggressive than the holdings of VTTVX. Expense Ratio The expense ratio of Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Fund is .17%. That is higher than some of the underlying funds, but overall this is a very reasonable expense ratio for a fund that is creating an exceptionally efficient portfolio for investors and rebalancing it over time to reflect a reduced risk tolerance as investors get closer to retirement. In short, this is a very solid value for investors that don’t want to be constantly actively management their portfolio. This is the kind of portfolio I would want my wife to use if I died prematurely. That is a ringing endorsement of Vanguard’s high quality target date funds. Holdings / Composition The following chart demonstrates the holdings of the Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Fund: (click to enlarge) This is a fairly simple portfolio. Only four total funds are included so the fund can gradually be shifted to more conservative allocations by making small decreases in equity weightings and increases in bond weightings. The funds included are the kind of funds you would expect from Vanguard. The top 4 which carry almost all of the value are extremely diversified funds. The Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund is also available as an ETF. The ETF version is the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (NYSEARCA: VTI ). To be fair, Vanguard has a great reputation for running funds but not for coming up with creative names. I have a significant position in VTI because it carries an extremely low expense ratio and offers excellent diversification across the U.S. economy. Volatility An investor may choose to use VTTVX in an employer sponsored account (if their employer has it on the approved list) while creating their own portfolio in separate accounts. Since I can’t predict what investors will choose to combine with the fund, I analyze it as being an entire portfolio. Since the fund includes domestic and international exposure to both equity and bonds, that seems like a fair way to analyze it. (click to enlarge) When we look at the volatility on VTTVX, it is dramatically lower than the volatility on SPY. That shouldn’t be surprising since the portfolio has some very material bond positions. Investors should expect this fund to retain dramatically more value in a bear market and to fall behind in a prolonged bull market. Because the S&P 500 has been significantly outperforming international equity markets and 26.4% of the fund is currently in international markets, there has been an additional source of drag on the portfolio. Since October 2003 the international mutual fund is up 102.8%, just under the total return for VTTVX. Had international markets been doing better relative to domestic markets, this fund would’ve been able to stay closer to SPY while still delivering the significantly lower levels of volatility. Conclusion VTTVX is a great mutual fund for investors looking for a simple “set it and forget it” option for their employer sponsored retirement accounts. It is ideally designed for investors planning to retire around 2025, but can also be used by younger employees with lower risk tolerances or older workers with higher risk tolerances. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, but may initiate a long position in VTI over the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: Information in this article represents the opinion of the analyst. All statements are represented as opinions, rather than facts, and should not be construed as advice to buy or sell a security. Ratings of “outperform” and “underperform” reflect the analyst’s estimation of a divergence between the market value for a security and the price that would be appropriate given the potential for risks and returns relative to other securities. The analyst does not know your particular objectives for returns or constraints upon investing. All investors are encouraged to do their own research before making any investment decision. Information is regularly obtained from Yahoo Finance, Google Finance, and SEC Database. If Yahoo, Google, or the SEC database contained faulty or old information it could be incorporated into my analysis.

Investing In A Turbulent Market

Summary In turbulent times, investors need a plan and stick with a few basic rules. Assess macro conditions to guide investment decisions. Recognize the fact that danger and opportunities usually go hand in hand. Actively tweak winning odds to our favor as frequently as we can. It’s been two months since I left my role as a systematic global macro manager to focus on a few equity strategies I have been developing over the past few years. The timing was not great as world equities have been in a tailspin. Many blame China, the US Federal Reserve, and anemic world economic growth as the causes of the selloff. To me, they are just excuses. The real culprit of the market downturn is the investor jitters. Disciplined investors should follow some basic principles for investing in a turbulent environment. Here are some rules I follow: 1. Assess macro conditions to guide investment decisions 2. Recognize the fact that danger and opportunities usually go hand in hand 3. Actively tweak winning odds to our favor as frequently as we can. Assessing Macro Conditions to Guide Investment Decisions An old saying “rising tide lifts all boats” has found new meaning in stocks since 2009. Central banks around the world injected trillions of dollars into the world financial system. Ample money supply is undeniably one of the most important reasons for the current equity bull market. An equity investor should have done well if he recognized this simple macro factor. Therefore, accurately assessing the global macro environment is instrumental in performance. Differing opinions of economic conditions are the root cause of investor anxiety. So where are we now? China, as the world economic growth engine for the last decade, is facing some headwinds. It needs to absorb the excess from multi-decade economic expansion, rein in speculation, transition its economy from low-cost manufacturing to service and consumption, and steady investments and long-term growth to a sustainable level. Such a transition is not going to be easy and painless at all times. As someone who grew up in China before the reform began in earnest, I often found investors not giving enough credit to the success of China’s economic policies that has elevated a poor country with food rationing to a world economic powerhouse. Over the past 20 years, there were many calls of hard landing in China by market “gurus,” but none materialized. There is a certain arrogance to those calls. Is China facing hard landing again this time? I doubt that! Just as we like to say in the West “quiet water runs deep,” people in the East like to say, “narrow water runs far.” Publicizing policies has never been a strong suit of running things in China. Nevertheless, I believe China has economic means and a deep bench of highly skilled policy makers to navigate choppy waters. Everyone can make mistakes, but so far, there is no indication that China won’t be successful again in turning the ship around this time. In my view, they are proactively using policy tools to minimize the negative impact in a changing world. Investors are fickle. Before the two-day US Federal Reserve policy meeting last week, futures market implied a 30% chance of an interest rate hike in September. The market was right, the Federal Reserve did not hike interest rates. At the same time, investors reacted poorly to the decision as the US dollar sold off and interest rates dropped immediately after the announcement. Was the decision a surprise or was it expected? Investors cannot make up their mind. In my view, the timing of the Fed rate hike is not that important. There is no urgency to a rate hike in the absence of inflationary pressures. Nevertheless, barring significant economic deterioration, we will get a rate hike in December. Otherwise, Chairman Yellen’s credibility will be at risk as she previously indicated a hike this year. Given that outlook, I suspect both US dollar and interest rates will trade higher in the next two months. Moreover, according to some studies, a 25 basis points hike will only roughly translate into a 0.1% decline in GDP growth. There is simply no reason to be fixated on that. Accurate macro assessments can not only help us achieve long-term profitability, but also guide our short-term trading. A number of recent selloffs in global equity markets were in sympathy to selloffs in the Chinese equity market. Given the Chinese National Day is coming on October 1, an imminent meltdown in China is almost impossible. Therefore, any significant selloff could create short-term buying opportunities. Recognize the Fact that Danger and Opportunities Usually Go Hand in Hand Novice investors tend to chase markets and hang on to losers too long. It is much better to pick up quality names in a down market when everyone else is selling. In addition, losers tend to go down less than quality names precisely because some investors cannot psychologically part with losers, and instead sell stocks with gains to raise funds during a market downturn. Do not be afraid of selling losers! Better yet, pick up some winners in a down drift by selling losers for harvesting capital losses to reduce realized capital gains. Furthermore, global economic conditions are getting better, not worse – Europe is finally getting ahead of its sovereign debt crisis, the US economic growth is intact, China is working out short-term pains for long-term gains, the weak energy price should largely be stimulative to growth, and global monetary policies will remain accommodative for the foreseeable future. Therefore, there are opportunities to be had in the current passing danger. Actively Tweak Winning Odds to Our Favor as Frequently as We Can I consider myself as a long-term investor as I look to profit from fundamental research and typically hold stocks for an extended period of time. Fundamentals never play out overnight. However, I question the effectiveness of the “buy, hold and do nothing” strategy in the current market environment where information is so readily available through the internet, media, and social networks, affecting investor psyche constantly, and generating market volatility. Because of daily marks to market, professional hedge fund managers cannot sit idle and do nothing during market turbulence. I would argue that individual investors who look after their own portfolios should also be actively looking for ways to increase winning odds by using available tools such as listed equity options. Here are a few suggestions: a. If one wants to buy 100 shares of stock XYZ, he can sell one contract of put option at a strike price lower than or close to the current stock price. At maturity, if the stock price is higher than the strike price, one gets to keep the put option premium; otherwise, one acquires the stock at a price lower than the current price. b. When a stock in a portfolio has appreciated significantly, one should consider selling some covered calls to lighten up the load. At maturity, if the stock price is higher than the strike price, one effectively sells the stock at the strike price plus option premium; otherwise, he gets to keep the option premium. c. In fact, instead of following the red-hot “dividend investing” strategy, a) and b) can be viewed as a “create-your-own-dividend” strategy on any stock. With weekly options, one can aim to generate 10% annual yield by selling options. That’s 10% income and/or cushion one doesn’t have if he does nothing. d. During a market downturn, instead of buying quality stocks outright, one can buy calendar spreads, i.e. buying long-term calls against selling short-term calls at appropriate strikes to further reduce risk. e. Shorting high beta, richly valued stocks can be a more effective hedge than shorting index futures in the portfolio. There are many strategies that can be deployed day in and day out to generate consistent returns or opportunistically in turbulence when everything is out of whack. But one should always have a plan to deal with different market conditions and follow a set of rules so that he is not caught off guard. Let me know what you think. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Leveraged Cybersecurity ETFs Are Debuting At A Dangerous Time

Summary Direxion launched two leveraged cybersecurity ETFs this past week. These ETFs may be debuting at a time when the popularity of cybsecurity stocks has already cooled and valuations are still very high. History has taught us the dangers of investors choosing to chase past performance or chasing “hot” stocks. It was probably just a matter of time before Direxion – one of the primary issuer of leveraged and inverse ETFs – jumped on the popularity of cybersecurity stocks. This past week, Direxion launched the Direxion Daily Cyber Security Bull 2X Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: HAKK ) and the Direxion Daily Cyber Security Bear 2x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: HAKD ) options on the cybersecurity sector. But like many products that get launched after the initial popularity soars, the timing often proves to be a dangerous investor trap. The first ETF to jump on the trend – the PureFunds ISE Cybersecurity ETF (NYSEARCA: HACK ) – has quickly racked up well over $1B in assets and was up over 30% within 8 months of its debut. Cybersecurity stocks have cooled off though thanks to the global economic environment and now the fund is up just marginally since it opened. HACK data by YCharts Followers of behavioral finance will tell you all about investors’ tendency to chase past returns and how it often results in buying high and selling low. You probably won’t be surprised to learn that AUM began ramping up at their fastest pace as cybersecurity stocks were peaking earlier this summer. Just in time for these investors to experience the subsequent pullback. Which is why launching a leveraged cybersecurity ETF right now is dangerous. Investors are still being told in the mainstream media that cybersecurity companies are “hot” and money is still pouring into these products. Even after the recent pullback, many of these cybersecurity companies are trading at very rich multiples. Many of these companies still have yet to turn a profit so measuring them by P/E would be unfair. Instead, let’s use the P/S ratio to try to gauge valuation levels. The S&P 500 as a whole currently trades at a P/S multiple of 1.63. Popular stocks in the sector include Palo Alto Networks (NYSE: PANW ) at 16.98, FireEye (NASDAQ: FEYE ) at 11.13, Fortinet (NASDAQ: FTNT ) at 8.97 and Checkpoint (NASDAQ: CHKP ) at 9.33. While the P/S ratio isn’t necessarily an all-in-one measure, it does go to say that even after the recent pullback cybersecurity companies are still very expensive and could indeed fall much further. Looking back at the Nasdaq bubble in 2000 gives us many examples of investments launched at the wrong time. Take the Jacob Internet Fund (MUTF: JAMFX ). This fund was one of the first mutual funds targeting primarily internet stocks at the time. In the six month period from roughly October 1999 through March 2000, the Nasdaq Composite rose over 175%. The Jacob Internet Fund debuted in December 1999 right as tech stocks were about to hit their peak. What happened next is still a good lesson in the dangers of chasing performance or “hot” stocks. The Jacob Internet rose around 20% in the few months after its debut but by the second half of 2001 the fund had lost around 95% of its 2000 peak value. JAMFX data by YCharts That’s not to suggest that a crash like that is imminent in cybersecurity companies but it does make very clear that jumping into a cybersecurity ETF – especially a leveraged cybersecurity ETF like the two launched last week that are designed to magnify the returns of the sector – could be especially dangerous. Conclusion Direxion is well within their boundaries launching these two ETFs right now but it might not be doing the average investor any favors. These ETFs have a triple whammy of risks – investing in risky cybersecurity stocks, investing in leveraged securities and investing when much of the frothy returns may have already been had. These ETFs are very much a case of “buyer beware” for investors. Disclosure: I am/we are long FEYE. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.