Tag Archives: real estate

Investors’ Biggest Mistake: Home Bias

By Tim Maverick Everybody loves to cheer for their home team when it comes to sports. But, it turns out that investors around the world do the same with their money. Let me give you an example. Brazil is suffering through its worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. Its currency, the real, is near record lows. And its stock market is down by 40% over the past five years. Add in other factors such as the Zika virus – and it’s bad times, to say the least. But what are Brazilian investors doing? They’re liquidating their overseas holdings and buying Brazilian stocks. Are they nuts? Nope, it’s just human nature. In investing, it’s called “home bias.” And U.S. investors are among the most guilty. It’s Not 1950 In my years giving advice to clients, I found a very strong aversion among investors to investing overseas. People confuse familiarity with safety. I once had a client who stormed out of the office saying he would never invest a penny of his money outside the United States. Now, that was an extreme circumstance. But people do invest as if it’s still 1950, and the U.S. is the dominant economic power. Back then, the U.S. made up a huge part of the world’s market capitalization. Today, that’s down to about 50%. Yet, people invest as if nothing’s changed. A study by the mutual fund company Henderson Global Investors found that Americans were the second-most guilty of home bias globally, trailing only Canadians. This is backed up by an analysis done last summer by robo-advisor SigFig. It found that the median individual investor had a mere 6.6% of their portfolio in international equities. The study also found that bigger, and presumably more sophisticated, portfolios had less home bias. This makes sense. I can guarantee people like George Soros don’t have most of their portfolios in the U.S. The World Is Waiting The U.S. economy produced only 22.5% of the world’s GDP in 2014. That’s quite a change from just after World War II when the U.S. accounted for half of global GDP. Overall, developed economies now make up less than half of global GDP. Developing economies now account for just over half. Let’s just think about Asia for a moment – specifically China, India, and Indonesia. In terms of population, they rank first, second, and fourth respectively. The U.S. is third. There are over 2.8 billion people in these three countries. Are you, as an investor, going to ignore them as if they don’t exist? Wall Street wants you to. They want you to buy U.S. stocks. That’s why most Wall Street firms badmouth China every chance they get. Use Your Common Sense Investing overseas is really just common sense. Most people wouldn’t put 100% of their money into one stock. Nor would they limit themselves to stocks from Pennsylvania just because they live in that state. Why then would you limit yourself to just one country? My favorite analogy is that it would be like grocery shopping in only one aisle of the store. But investors continue shopping in one aisle. Home bias remains a big problem for even financial professionals. The toughest sell remains getting clients to diversify. Many stubbornly cling to putting all or most of their eggs into one basket. At a conference for registered investment advisors in November, Charles Schwab’s Jeff Kleintop said, “That’s exactly the opposite of what they should be doing now.” Now Is the Time to Diversify I would put the emphasis on the word now. The U.S. market has outperformed international markets since 2009. I can assure you it won’t continue. Markets will revert to the mean. In simple terms, underperforming markets will begin outperforming – and vice versa. As someone who has been in the investment business since the 1980s, I can tell you it’s a basic fact of financial markets. It’s like the sun rising and setting every day. Many markets – particularly the emerging ones – are at valuations not seen in decades. That’s thanks largely to U.S. fund managers selling. In other words, home bias. I think it’ll be a lot easier and more profitable to find companies that are serving those 2.8 billion-plus consumers in Asia, than finding an undiscovered gem in the U.S. The mass of Wall Street research makes that near possible, except for an occasional penny stock. I’d like to end with a piece of advice from famed investor, Jim Rogers. He said you should wait until you see money lying in the corner and all you have to do is go over and pick it up. That describes overseas markets right now more than the U.S. Link to the original article on Wall Street Daily .

Bumps In The Road

There are frost-heaves ahead. Is your portfolio ready? Click to enlarge Photo: Kevin Connors . Source: Morguefile At this time of year in New Hampshire, we have to deal with frost heaves. Rain and melt-water from winter storms seep into the roadbed, then lift the road when the water re-freezes. How we deal with the bumps says a lot about what kind of people we are. Some folks sail blithely through, figuring that their car’s shocks can handle the stress. That’s fine as long as they have a good suspension – and strong stomachs! Some of the bigger bumps can really rattle you. Others slow down, picking their way through, creeping over the biggest heaves. That’s fine as long as you don’t need more momentum later, like when you’re going uphill on a snowy day. Still others start to cruise moderately through, but they seem to find perfect speed to maximize effect of the bumps. Their vehicles shake more and more violently, until it looks like their cars are skipping and hopping. From behind, you can see them bouncing inside the car. My engineer daughter tells me that they’ve found a resonance frequency that does the maximum damage. It’s like this in investing. If you see a rough patch ahead, you can just cruise through, riding down and riding back up, if you have the stomach for it – and no loose fillings! Or you can raise cash, lowering your expected return in the short run in exchange for the peace of mind that comes from having dry powder. That’s the go-slow approach. But you really don’t want to be shaken around and panic, selling as the market tanks and buying back in after things get more expensive. That’s a sure way to bottom out – or get launched right off the road! Click to enlarge S&P 500 over the last 20 years. Source: Bloomberg Frost heaves present us with bumps in the road – like the squiggles and jiggles of the market. It’s good to know how to deal with them. Because after they subside, it will be time for mud season.

Dumb Alpha: Accelerating Momentum

By Joachim Klement, CFA I used to consider momentum investing an insult to my intelligence. After all, why should prices go up just because they have gone up in the past? Maybe this is what happens to you if you are bullied once too often in high school, but I have always taken the most pride in my non-consensus views. Momentum investing is the exact opposite. You invest in the popular stocks of the day hoping that the views of the general investing herd are right. More appealing to me are value and contrarian investing because they seem so much more “intelligent.” And in both of these investing traditions, success originates from betting against “the wisdom of the crowds.” Seemingly Stupid, But It Works There is plenty of evidence that momentum investing works in the medium term. While winning investments of the last three to five years tend to underperform as mean reversion kicks in and winning investments of the last month tend to underperform as well, winning investments of the last three to 12 months tend to outperform in the subsequent months. As Cliff Asness and his associates at AQR summarize , this momentum effect has persisted for more than 200 years, exists across many different asset classes, and can be profitably exploited by almost every investor. Today, dozens of systematic anomalies in asset returns are known, but many of them seem to be artifacts of data mining, as Campbell R. Harvey of Duke University and his colleagues have shown . Two of the few anomalies that survive their scrutiny: value and momentum. Dealing with Momentum Crashes The problem with momentum investing is that a market full of momentum investors will likely end up in a bubble as prices deviate more and more from fundamentals. In these circumstances, momentum investing will become very risky and investors might suffer severe losses from sudden changes in momentum that lead to so-called “momentum crashes.” Predicting bubbles and crashes is extremely difficult, but at the forefront of the current research is Didier Sornette at ETH Zurich. His research into log-periodicity and hyperbolic growth may be quite complex, but recently he and his associates published a paper that shows how one can improve the results of traditional momentum investing by looking at momentum acceleration. They calculate a simple measure of past change in momentum – for example, the return over the last six months minus the return over the preceding six months – and show that this simple difference of momentums can predict future performance. Stocks with the highest acceleration (i.e., those that have increasing momentum) tend to have higher returns in the future than stocks with lower acceleration. The returns generated with a simple acceleration strategy tend to be higher than those generated by momentum strategies. Creating Smarter Momentum Strategies To me, this is like smart momentum investing because, effectively, this approach tries to identify trends right when they take off, before more and more investors jump on the bandwagon. As more investors follow a specific trend, the trend accelerates until the influx of fresh investors abates and the trend decelerates again. Acceleration may thus allow momentum investors to invest in a trend early and get out before it is too late. The research on the acceleration factor is still in its infancy and my optimism may well be premature. After all, I am a person who frequently gets on a scale hoping that my weight has dropped only to find that the momentum has in fact accelerated in the opposite direction. But recent research from Morningstar indicates that the acceleration factor may not only be used to improve the returns of traditional momentum strategies, but may predict future episodes of negative skewness (i.e., market declines or even crashes). What seems clear at this point is that acceleration is clearly a dumb alpha generator that is so simple it is hard to believe investors hadn’t discovered it earlier. Disclaimer: Please note that the content of this site should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute.