Tag Archives: radio

Financial Ratio Analysis: Sometimes Rules Of Thumb Do Not Work

Anyone who has ever tried to value a company has used some rules of thumb when conducting the financial ratio analysis. For me personally, these form a base upon which various screens and shortlists are structured. Looking for undervalued stocks can at times feel like looking for a needle in a haystack, and these rules of thumb can come in very handy to ease the screening process and get to the shortlist faster, so we can quickly commence the joyous process of reading the appropriate financial statements and conducting a deeper due diligence on each stock. So what kind of financial ratio analysis we are talking about? Which rules of thumb? Let’s start with some key valuation ratios. Insisting on a Low P/E Ratio may Cause You to Miss Greatly Undervalued Stocks Price/earnings ratio is one of the cornerstone ratios upon which many a screen is built. A typical value investor is very likely to add a P/E ratio filter in his or her screen. The rule of thumb that is used in this case is to keep your P/E ratio under 15. Some aggressive value investors (or more conservative, depending on your point of view) might filter out any stocks with P/E ratio above 10. The Problem There are cases where a company may see a temporary drop in earnings. This may be due to short-term difficulty, an unusual non-cash charge to the earnings, or for any multiple reasons. For example, an insurance company may face a large claims payout in a given year due to a vicious hurricane. This event is statistically not likely to be repeated every year and the company otherwise is healthy. This year’s earnings though are abnormally low, and hence, the P/E ratio is likely to be very large (Most sophisticated investors realize the short-term nature of this event and are unlikely to punish the stock price too much knowing that the earnings will recover quickly). Is this stock likely to be undervalued? Chances are, it is. Temporary distress creates opportunities. The problem is that a low P/E ratio screen will filter these opportunities out. The Solution A low P/E ratio screen still remains quite important. However, we would like to find these edge cases because most of the investors will not bother. While undervaluation is hard to find when the P/E ratios are higher, the ones that do exist are likely due to unusual situations, and can show a much larger profit potential. An easy screen to run is to create a screen with very high P/E ratios – let’s say 100 or more. One can also look at negative P/E ratio screens. With the stocks that these screens throw up, we will then go through them one by one and review their situation to find out whether an unusual situation exists (we will review these in detail), or if the stock is just normally overvalued with investor froth (we will ignore these). Insisting on a Low Price/Book Ratio may Cause You to Miss Some Outstanding Ideas Normally, value investors like to keep their Price/book ratio to be under 1. The idea is that there is enough equity in the business to justify the price being paid for the shares, so if something were to happen to the profits in the future, the stock price has assets backing it up and supporting it (so the likelihood of losses is lower). Other investors might be less conservative and will be okay buying a stock with P/B ratio up to 1.5. One should note that the nature of the business also dictates the correct P/B multiple one should be willing to pay. A service company, for example, that relies less on physical assets and more on human capital will sport a larger P/B ratio in normal course of business than a different company with a number of factories and equipment. The Problem It should come as a no surprise to anyone that the book value of the assets can be at large variance with what these assets will truly fetch in the market. Sometimes the book value is overstated, in which case we may consider a stock to be undervalued where as in reality it is not. Sometimes on the other hand, the book value is understated, in which case the stock may appear to be richly valued, even though in reality it may be a great investment. We also have situations where a company may have spent years destroying shareholder wealth to the point that the retained earnings and shareholders’ equity have become very small or even negative. If the business is now in a turnaround situation and the equity can be purchased at distressed levels, this may be a great investment. A very high or a negative P/B ratio will rule out these kinds of investments. The Solution We could screen for very high P/B ratios. Many of the stocks that come up will be anomalies that we will need to review in detail. In the past, we invested in TPL which carried almost a million acres of Texas land on its book at zero value since the land was acquired over 200 years ago and was fully depreciated by now. Given that the reason this trust exists is to monetize this land, its sole asset, it would have been curious if one did not wonder why it carried no real estate on its books, and why its P/B ratio was so high (21.52 at the time of writing). This case though does require looking into the books in greater detail. In case of high P/E ratios, the anomalies are normally easier to find and explain. Assets may be buried in the books for years inflating or deflating the stated book value, and unless we dig deep, we may never know the fact. Conclusion: Use the Rule of Thumb for Convenience, but Venture Outside the Box Occasionally So, if you miss some ideas, what is the big deal? There are many more, right? True. However, these many more ideas have a larger number of eyes already fixed on them. So, while you may find them, they may not have as great a profit potential as the stocks that keep under the radar for one reason or other. These two examples are how some stocks that may be undervalued continue to evade investors as they do not get caught in their screens.

What Do Twitter And Zynga Earnings Mean For Social Media ETF?

The Global X Social Media Index ETF (NASDAQ: SOCL ) is going through a rough patch. The ongoing tech rout, mainly instigated by overvaluation concerns amid broad-based gloom and a weak guidance issued by LinkedIn Corporation (NYSE: LNKD ) , was already there to punish the fund (read: LinkedIn Crashes: Should You Connect with Social Media ETF? ). Then, fresh woes emanated from the fourth-quarter earnings results from social networking site Twitter (NYSE: TWTR ) and social game developer Zynga (NASDAQ: ZNGA ) will likely compel investors to stay away from the social media ETF in the near term. Twitter’s Q4 in Detail The company’s fourth-quarter 2015 loss per share (excluding the stock-based compensation expense) of $0.07 was narrower than the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.13 loss per share. Including the stock-based compensation expense, the company posted a loss of $0.13 per share on a GAAP basis. This was narrower than the year-ago loss of $0.20 per share. The company’s non-GAAP earnings (excluding the stock-based compensation expense) were $0.16 per share, up 33.3% year over year. Revenues of $710.5 million in the quarter missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $718 million. Revenues were up 48.3% from the year-ago period. Absent the impact of negative currency translation, revenues grew 53%. The company finished the quarter with an average 320 million monthly active users (MAU). This indicated no change quarter over quarter and 9% year-over-year expansion. Although this is the first quarter that Twitter has seen no user growth sequentially, investors clearly could not digest the fact. The blow came in the form of guidance as well. Twitter anticipates total revenue between $595 million and $610 million for the first quarter of 2016, way below the Zacks Consensus Estimate which was pegged at $630 million prior to the release. Market Impact The soft MAU metric, an earnings miss and soft revenue guidance dampened investors’ mood as the stock tumbled 3% after hours. Year to date, the stock is down 35.3%. In the last one year, the stock has plunged about 70%. Twitter has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), which is subject to change post earnings release. The stock is a good growth and momentum play with a Zacks Style Score of ‘A’, but it lacks the value quotient as indicated by the score of ‘F’. There is a high chance that Twitter will decline in the coming trading sessions, especially given the ongoing correction in the online and social media space. Zynga’s Q4 in Detail GAAP loss per share (excluding the stock-based compensation expense) of $0.02 cents was narrower than the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.04 cents loss per share. Including the charges, GAAP loss was $0.5 per share, same as the year-ago quarter. Zynga’s revenues of $185.8 million beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $177 million. Zynga also failed to live up of analysts’ projection as it expects first-quarter 2016 revenues in the range of $160-$175 million, below the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $177 million. Market Impact Zynga also saw a landslide in its shares after hours with a 10.8% plunge. Year to date, the stock is down 20.5%. Though the stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3, it looks like that the rank is due for a downgrade. The stock is a decent momentum play with a Zacks Style Score of ‘A’, but its value and growth scores are not optimistic. Social Media ETF in Focus Notably, Twitter does not have a sizable exposure in the overall ETF world, with SOCL holding just 2.7% share in it. However, the company’s results are crucial to the entire social media sector. Plus, a freefall in the shares of Zynga – which accounts for about 3% of SOCL – will make matters worse. However, SOCL has strong long-term fundamentals and carries a Zacks ETF Rank #2 (Buy). So, investors having a strong gut for risks can play this dip. SOCL is down 19.3% so far this year (see all technology ETFs here). Link to the original post on Zacks.com

3 Key Questions To Ask When Considering An ETF

Thinking about investing in exchange-traded funds (ETFs)? Be sure you can answer these questions before you do. Choosing investments for your portfolio is a complex-and sometimes emotional-process. It requires research, a clear understanding of your financial goals and time horizon, and, of course, money. And it can be overwhelming: should you go with stocks, bonds or mutual funds? How about gold? One security that has seen a surge in popularity over the past few years is the exchange-traded fund (ETF) . An ETF is an investment vehicle composed of pooled funds that owns shares of an asset, such as stocks, bonds or commodities, and trades on an exchange, just like a stock. In some cases, an ETF will track an index (the S&P 500, for example), which means it tries to match the index’s performance rather than beat it. According to a 2015 Charles Schwab Investor Study , millennial portfolios have the largest share of ETFs of any investing generation: on average, 40% of a millennial’s investments will be in ETFs. In fact, millennials dig ETFs so much that 61% of millennial investors surveyed said they would increase their ETF holdings in 2016. ETFs appeal to investors for several reasons. First, there’s the price tag. The minimum investment for a mutual fund can range from $500 to $3000 ; the minimum investment for an ETF is the fund’s market price, which can be as low as a couple of dollars. Then there’s the risk factor. Due to their composition, ETFs have more potential to mitigate losses in the event of a downturn than an investment concentrated in a single stock . ETFs also tend to be more tax-efficient than mutual funds because their structure minimizes the opportunity for taxable events-selling holdings, for instance-which can incur capital gains. Considering that there are over 1,500 ETFs available on the market, how do you go about choosing the right one? The following three questions are key when it comes to the ETF selection process. What is the underlying index? Some ETFs track easily recognizable indexes such as the S&P 500 or the Nasdaq 100. Others, such as the Global X Millennial Generation ETF , track new indexes that investors know very little about. Because ETFs usually track an index, it’s often quite easy to find out what their holdings are. Pay attention to what stocks and bonds are included in an ETF, as well as the weight assigned to the holdings. This will allow you to determine which ETFs offer the asset allocation you want. What are the true costs? Each ETF has an expense ratio. This number, which is expressed as a percentage, is a fund’s annual expenses divided by its average assets for the year. The expense ratio lowers your returns, and it isn’t the only cost associated with ETF investing. Given that ETFs trade like stocks, every purchase and sale incurs brokerage commission fees. Do the math and figure out which ETFs seem best positioned to give you the biggest bang for your buck. How liquid is it? The ease with which you can buy or sell shares of an ETF matters a lot: it’s the difference between making money and losing it. When an ETF has low liquidity, it becomes more difficult for an investor to sell their shares and make a profit. So what affects an ETF’s liquidity? Holdings, the holdings’ trading volume, the ETF’s trading volume and the market climate all play a role. Take a look at these factors to get a sense of how liquid or illiquid an ETF is. Keep in mind: the more the underlying holdings are traded, the more liquid they are, which, in turn, makes the ETF more liquid. Like any investment, there are pros and cons associated with investing in ETFs, but if you want to add some to your portfolio, be sure to ask the aforementioned questions. Doing so will help you choose the best ETFs for your investment needs.