Tag Archives: outlook

The ETF Monkey Vanguard Core Portfolio: 2016 Q1 Update

This article is an update to the following articles: On July 1, 2015, I wrote an article for Seeking Alpha introducing The ETF Monkey Vanguard Core Portfolio . On January 4, 2016, I wrote the 2015 year-end update for the portfolio. On February 11, 2016, following the severe market decline during the first part of 2016, I wrote a follow-up article that detailed a rebalancing transaction that I executed to bring the portfolio back in line with my target weightings. In this article, I will report on the performance of the portfolio for the quarter ended March 31, 2016. Evaluating the Portfolio: Q1 2016 Here is the corresponding Google Finance page for the portfolio as of the market’s close on 3/31/16. Have a look, and then I will offer a few comments. Click to enlarge First, as a reference point, the S&P 500 index closed at 2,043.94 on December 31, 2015 and 2,059.74 on March 31, 2016, for a gain of .77% for the period. Second, the portfolio received dividends totaling $208.56 during this period, bringing the cash balance in the portfolio to $251.53. This came from the 3 ETFs as follows: Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF ( VTI) – $132.00 Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF ( VEU) – $45.88 Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF ( BND) – $30.68 So how did the portfolio perform? All told, not too badly. The closing value of the portfolio was $49,076.43 as of March 31 vs. $48,348.37 on December 31, for a gain of 1.51%. Therefore, the portfolio outperformed the S&P 500 by .74% over this period. Let’s break down the performance, and reasons, by asset class. Domestic Stocks – During the period, VTI grew from $27,120.60 to 28,825.50, an increase of $1,704.90. Subtracting the $1,382.85 added from the February 11 rebalancing leaves us with a net gain of $322.05. Add in the $132.00 of dividends and VTI gained $454.05 on a base of $27,120.60, a gain of 1.67%. This is a slight outperformance when compared to the S&P 500 index. Foreign Stocks – During the period, VEU grew from $12,588.90 to 13,376.50, an increase of $787.70. However. removing the $761.40 added in the rebalancing transaction leaves us with a net gain of only $26.30. Add in the $45.88 of dividends and VEU gained $72.18 on a base of $12,588.90, a gain of .57%. As compared to the U.S. market, this reflects the continued underperformance of foreign markets. Bonds – During the period, the value of BND declined from $8,076.00 to $6,623.20. However, if we add back the $1,648.20 used in the rebalancing transaction, BND actually increased in value by $195.40. Add in the $30.68 of dividends received and BND gained $226.08 on a base of $8076.00, a fairly stunning increase of 2.80%. This reflected a firming of bond prices as the signs of economic malaise during Q1 appeared to lead the market to conclude that interest rates would remain low for a longer period of time than previously anticipated, including the likelihood of the Fed having to modify it’s goal of raising rates as often in 2016. No Transactions or Rebalancing This Period Here’s how the portfolio stood in terms of its asset allocations at 3/31/16. Click to enlarge As can be seen, due to my February 11 rebalancing and the strong performance of the domestic stock market through March 31, domestic stocks are a little overweight and bonds are underweight. As noted in my rebalancing article, I did this on purpose. I am going to monitor this as time moves forward. My preference will be to increase the bond weighting by using dividends that I will receive moving forward. However, if the weightings get severely out of line, I may have to effect another rebalancing transaction. Summary and Conclusion The portfolio did very well during the quarter, outperforming the S&P 500, my chosen benchmark, by approximately 3/4 of a percentage point. Sadly, it is still down a little over 3% from its inception date of June 30, 2015. As can be seem from the graphic, weakness in foreign stocks is the main culprit, as these entered a very weak period almost immediately following the establishment of the portfolio. Still, it is my belief that a disciplined allocation to foreign stocks will prove beneficial over the long term. Disclosure: I am not a registered investment advisor or broker/dealer. Readers are cautioned that the material contained herein should be used solely for informational purposes, and are encouraged to consult with their financial and/or tax advisor respecting the applicability of this information to their personal circumstances. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Readers are solely responsible for their own investment decisions.

GeoInvesting’s Dan David: 6 Things You Can Learn From My Shorting Mistakes

By Dan David, Co-Founder and VP of GeoInvesting Shorting stocks is rarely easy. In keeping with our practice to not only bring investors quality research, but also educate them, I wanted to run down some of the top mistakes I have made in the past when shorting stocks. If you are considering short selling or are already short selling, perhaps knowing the mistakes I’ve made in the past will help you become a better investor. Over the last seven years, our research-based, on-the-ground due diligence has led to over 10 U.S.-listed China-based stocks delisted or halted. In addition, we have exposed over 10 pump-and-dump stocks that have resulted in 90%+ gains for those who shorted them. Shorting U.S.-listed China-based companies can be grueling, mostly due to the fact that the companies you are up against can make up or fabricate information to combat your allegations. Many times I have opened a short position and have been immediately greeted by the company announcing a buyback or issuing a dividend in hopes of driving the short position out of the company. This happened when I shorted China Green Agriculture (NYSE: CGA ) in 2014, and management declared a special dividend. The issue is that some of these companies have stolen so much money from the capital markets through stock offerings that they have money to play with even when their companies are not generating real revenue. Shorting Stocks Opens You Up To Infinite Losses Shorting stocks is a far more inherently dangerous practice than going long companies, and there is more risk in being short. The most you can make when going short is 100%, but your loss can be infinite ( Remember KaloBios (NASDAQ: KBIO )?). Even if you are right, your short position can be forced to be closed. Furthermore, you can pay ridiculous amounts of interest, sometimes 100% per year, on the shares you have shorted. Apparently usury is not illegal in the stock market. As such, we wanted to lay out that risk here today. Here are some of the top mistakes I have made over the years short selling that hopefully you can avoid. Leave Your Emotions For Your Romantic Life, They Will Kill Your Portfolio This is a universal shorting rule, but must be said; take emotion out of it. It’s also one of the hardest rules. If you know you are right, dig deep inside and realize that when fraudulent stocks rally, they will likely eventually come down. One of the sickest feelings I have had is when I cover a rallying stock out of fear, only to see shares come right back down. Assuming That Insiders Will Not Lie Is Naive Failing to pay attention to insider ownership, which includes funds that have “special” relationships with management, is a mistake I made early in my investing career. The bigger the ownership, the more the chance that management will try to pump its stock by issuing false press releases in response to a short report. This has taught me to keep some powder dry for the pump. Know The Risks Of Being A Hero Be careful shorting shares of a state-owned enterprise (“SOE”). Accusing an “SOE” of fraud is accusing the China government of fraud. From my experience, the SOEs I have run into are frauds or at least have some material accounting misrepresentations, but the government will crush you before it ever admits that fact. Always have a second or third account to play the “PR pump.” Remember, a fraud can say anything since they have nothing to lose once they are exposed, so more often than not they will put out a PR pump to squeeze you and dump their shares. I learned the hard way that if you just cover and try to short again at the top, you will never find the borrow again. Go long in an alternate account to box your short. Putting Too Much Faith In The System Will Cost You Money Do not count on the exchanges to halt a security. In my view, as a matter of policy, both the NASDAQ and NYSE are hard pressed to halt. They have come to realize that the risk of a suit by the halted company is much greater than the risk of any individual investor – and lest we forget, the exchanges themselves are for-profit companies that are paid by companies they list. You also can’t count on the SEC to halt a U.S.-listed China-based company. The SEC has no power or resource to investigate inside of China. ‘Nuff said. Not Covering Enough Shares Ahead Of A Halt Trading halts have gone from a desired outcome for shorts to a nightmare for all. As I already touched on, brokers are now known to raise interest rates from the high teens to over one hundred percent during a halt on borrowed shares! This gives the halted company insiders the ability to collect on the majority of that interest from their broker on shares they lent out to be short, which acts as an incentive to insiders of halted companies to prolong a halt as long as possible. This new trading dynamic is causing chaos on both sides of the trade. Remember that shorting stocks is a volatile enterprise, and even experts have to expect the unexpected in situations where they are short. So, if you plan on involving yourself with this kind of investing, I hope that these tips and tools help you out going forward. This article originally published on geoinvesting.com on 3/29/16. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Best Performing Bond ETFs Of Q1

Chances for the 33-year bull run in the bond market to fall flat in 2016 increased when the Fed enacted a rate hike in December 2015 after almost a decade. But in reality, bonds kept bouncing throughout the first quarter on a low-yield environment in most developed markets across the world. Thanks to China-led global market worries and the 12-year plunge in oil prices, the global market went berserk to start this year. All these buried risk-on sentiments and boosted relatively safer fixed-income securities in the quarter, pulling bond yields down. In fact, the impact of the global financial market turmoil was so deep-rooted that the Fed halved its number of rate hike estimates for 2016 from four to two in its March meeting. Also, Fed chair Yellen reaffirmed a ‘cautious’ stance on future policy tightening. Needless to say, the very move dragged down the U.S. benchmark bond yields and pushed up its prices. Notably, yields on 10-year Treasury notes dropped 41 bps to 1.83% (as of March 30, 2016) in the quarter, leading U.S. Treasury valuation to soar. Meanwhile, deflationary threats led the central banks of Japan and Eurozone to widen their already ultra-easy monetary policies. At its January-end meeting, BoJ set its key interest rate at negative 0.1%. BoJ then hinted at further cuts in interest rates if the economy fails to improve desirably. In Europe, the ECB president Mario Draghi turned super dovish in March by raising the monthly bond purchase size to EUR 80 billion from 60 billion previously. Also, ECB lowered the deposit facility rate to negative 0.4%, down from the previous rate of negative 0.3%. It also cut its main refinancing rate and marginal lending rates by 0.5% each to zero percent and 0.25%, respectively. Quite expectedly, the twin boosters of easy money policy globally and a delayed rate hike in the U.S. made fixed-income securities a winner in the first quarter. It would thus be interesting to note the ETFs that were the leaders in the bond space during the quarter. Returns are as per xtf.com . 25+ Year Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury Index Fund (NYSEARCA: ZROZ ) ZROZ follows the BofA Merrill Lynch Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index, which focuses on Treasury principal STRIPS that have 25 years or more remaining to final maturity. It charges just 15 basis points in expenses while the 30-day SEC yield is 2.62% currently (as of March 29, 2016). ZROZ has added 14.3% so far this year (as of March 30, 2016). The fund has a Zacks ETF Rank #2 (Buy) with a High risk outlook. DB German Bund Futures ETN (NYSEARCA: BUNL ) German bonds and the related ETFs also made an impressive rebound as these offer safety. Following extremely lower yields due to accommodative ECB policies, “German government bond yields are set to record their biggest quarterly fall in 4-1/2 years ” on March 31, 2016. The note looks to provide investors exposure to the U.S. dollar value of the returns of a German bond futures index, replicating the performance of a long position in Euro-Bund Futures. The note is up 14.3% so far this year (as of March 30, 2016). Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (NYSEARCA: EDV ) The fund seeks to match the performance of the Barclays U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index. This means that this benchmark zeroes in on fixed income securities that are sold at a discount to face value, and then the investor is paid the face value upon maturity. The fund charges 10 bps in fees. This Zacks Rank #2 ETF yields 2.71% annually. The fund has returned 13% so far this year (as of March 30, 2016). DB Japanese Govt Bond Futures ETN (NYSEARCA: JGBL ) Very low bond yields following Bank of Japan’s decision to push key interest rates to the negative territory to engineer the sagging economy were behind JGBL’s surge. Many analysts are of the view that ” negative bond yields are here to stay in 2016″ for Japanese bonds. The product looks to track the DB USD JGB Futures Index, which is intended to measure the performance of a long position in 10-year JGB Futures. JGBL advanced about 9.9% so far this year (as of March 30, 2016). PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS ETF ( LTPZ ) The fund tracks the BofA Merrill Lynch 15+ Year US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index and is up 9.6% so far this year (as of March 30, 2016). As U.S. inflation improved in the quarter, TIPS ETFs came into the limelight. Original Post