Tag Archives: nasdaq

Terraform Power’s Recent Moves Support Dividend Growth Of At Least 15% In 2016

Summary Terraform Power closed the first part of their planned transaction with Invenergy, 832MW of net wind power plants, increasing their current portfolio from 1.9GW to 2.8GW. I found it interesting that the company ended up changing the financing package for this transaction, which is expected to deliver unlevered CAFD of $139mil in 2016. Terraform also recently updated their purchase agreement with SunEdison for the producing assets of SunEdison’s deal to buy Vivint Solar. The updated deal projects that Terraform will pay $799mil to purchase 470MW of producing assets. These assets should produce annual CAFD of around $73-75mil. Both transactions support an increased dividend in 2016. The actual amount will depend on the timing of the transactions, but I expect 2016 exit rate of at least $1.60/share. Terraform Power (NASDAQ: TERP ) has had a pretty busy last couple of weeks. The company completed a large part of their planned transaction with Invenergy on Wednesday, buying 832MW of wind assets. This comes on the heels of the announcement last week of a renegotiation of the terms of SunEdison’s (NYSE: SUNE ) purchase of Vivint Solar (NYSE: VSLR ). The updates have removed many of the concerns investors have had with TERP, and the stock has responded in kind, as it has almost doubled from its late November lows. As I explain below, these transaction also support a continued dividend increase in 2016. TERP data by YCharts TERP came out with solid 3rd Quarter results in early November, but management’s unwillingness to confirm their previously estimated 2016 dividend increase to $1.75, and liquidity concerns at sponsor SUNE, led to the stock plunging over the next two weeks $6.73. At that point, the current yield was 20%. The market finally came to its senses when David Tepper announced a large stake and sent an open letter to management. Invenergy Transaction: Sources/Uses of Fund Changed One of the interesting takeaways from TERP’s announcement of the Invenergy transaction is the fact that they changed the way they ended up financing it. Back in July when the deal was made, the plan (see page 17) was to place half the MW into TERP immediately, and hold the other half in a SUNE warehouse. From August thru the 3Q earnings call in November, the plan (see page 18) was to only drop down 265MW and place the rest in a structured warehouse. Now it seems that management has decided to place all of the projects directly into TERP immediately. Sources of Cash   Uses of Cash   Non-Recourse Project Debt assumed or incurred with respect to transaction $801m 832MW of Wind Assets located in US and Canada $1,962m Pro-rata portion of $500mil new non-recourse term loan $417m     Cash on Hand (incld proceeds from TERP $300mil senior note offering in July 2015) $744m       $1,962m   $1,962m The press release notes that, “once all projects are operational, the first year adjusted EBITDA (before minority ownership) is expected to be $147 million, and unlevered CAFD (before all project and HoldCo debt payments) is expected to be $139 million.” Unfortunately, this doesn’t clarify how much we should expect the project and HoldCo debt payments to be, so it’s tough to predict how much of the unlevered CAFD will actually be available for dividend payments. My best estimate is to use the initially projected cash on cash yield of 8.4%, which equates to about $62mil (8.4% x $744mil cash on hand). We’ll have to wait for TERPs 4Q results for more details. The new $500mil term loan charges LIBOR + 5.5%, with a 1% LIBOR floor, meaning that TERP is currently paying 6.5%. It matures in 2019 and can be prepaid anytime, so it’s very likely that TERP will refinance this as soon as they can organize something with better terms. Vivint Transaction Terms Improve Last week TERP and SUNE announced that they had improved the terms of the Vivint transaction. TERP was able to reduce their initial purchase commitment from $922mil down to $799mil, by only paying for completed installations, and paying a reduced fee of $1.70/MW. The final total will depend on the actual number of producing MW transferred when the Vivint deal closes sometime during Q1 2016. In their Q2 earnings presentation, management noted that they expected the 523MW to generate average unlevered CAFD of $81 annually, so I project that the 470MW delivered at close will generate $70-75mil annualized unlevered CAFD. Considering the fact that TERP used substantially all of their cash on hand at the end of Q3 to fund the Invenergy transaction, it’s likely that they will be drawing on their revolver for much of the $799mil. The revolver’s rates are currently under 3%, so the annual interest would be about $24mil. Thus, I expect final CAFD to be about $50mil. 2016 Updated CAFD Projection Based on their 3Q presentation, TERP expected to generate CAFD of about $208mil before taking into account the Invenergy and Vivint transactions. If we assume that the Vivint transaction closes by the end of Q1, we should see annualized CAFD at the following levels next year: Quarter End Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Annualized CAFD $270m $320m $320m $320m CAFD distributed (85%) $230m $272m $272m $272m Per Share Quarterly Distribution $.35 $.40 $.40 $.40 The quarterly distribution estimates include the effect of SUNEs IDRs. I don’t expect TERP to actually increase the dividend to $.40 for Q2, even though it seems that operations would allow this. Rather, it’s likely that they will prefer to show steady quarterly increases up to $.40/share in Q4. This confirms my view that these transactions will cause TERP to increase their dividend by at least 15% over the next year.

Market Lab Report – Premarket Pulse 12/17/15

Markets jumped higher yesterday on mixed volume. Both the S&P 500 and NASDAQ Composite closed above resistance levels at their 50-day moving averages. The Fed hiked rates 25 basis points for the first time in nearly a decade, but the move was expected. Their dot plot projects four rate hikes in 2016. This telegraphs to the market that they believe the economy is resilient enough to withstand such rate hikes. The bullish reaction came as no surprise, and the market appears set to rally into Christmas Eve, just as it did last December 2014 following a sharp sell-off early in the month. This rate hike does not imply the Fed will necessarily hike rates again soon. CME FedWatch projects a rate hike when the Fed meets next in January at just 10%. On the other hand, odds rise to 55% when the Fed meets April 27, 2016. Pharmaceutical maker Ligand Pharmaceuticals (LGND) had a pocket pivot breakout. Earnings are strongly accelerating, institutional sponsorship has grown over the last 11 quarters, pretax margin 49.4%, ROE 85.8%, group rank 54. Workforce management software company Ultimate Software Group (ULTI) had a pocket pivot through its 50-day moving average. Earnings and sales are accelerating, ROE 26.9%, group rank 13.

Proposed SEC Rules Could Shake Leveraged ETFs

Leveraged ETFs have been investors’ darlings this year thanks to stock market volatility. This is because these funds try to magnify returns of the underlying index with the leverage factor of 2x or 3x on a daily basis by employing various investment strategies such as swaps, futures contracts and other derivative instruments (read: 10 Most Heavily Traded Leveraged ETFs YTD ). Due to the compounding effect, investors can enjoy higher returns in a very short period of time provided the trend remains a friend. However, these funds are extremely volatile and are suitable only for traders and those with high risk tolerance. These run the risk of huge losses compared to traditional funds in fluctuating or seesawing markets. Further, their performances could vary significantly from the actual performance of their underlying index over a longer period when compared to a shorter period (such as, weeks or months). Despite this drawback, investors have been jumping into these products for quick turns. Will these allure continue in the months ahead if the new rules proposed by the SEC are enacted? Inside the New Proposed Rules Under the proposed rules , the fund has to limit its notional exposure to derivatives of up to 150% of the net assets or 300% if the fund actually offers lower market risk. Additionally, it should manage the risks associated with derivatives by segregating certain assets (generally cash and cash equivalents) equal to the sum of two amounts: Mark-to-Market Coverage Amount: A fund would be required to segregate assets equal to the amount that the fund would pay if the fund exited the derivatives transaction at the time of determination. Risk-Based Coverage Amount: A fund would also be required to segregate an additional risk-based coverage amount representing a reasonable estimate of the potential amount the fund would pay if the fund exited the derivatives transaction under stressed conditions. Apart from these, the fund would implement a formalized derivatives risk management program administered by a risk manager. ETF Impact These rules, if enacted, would shake the leveraged ETF world, in particular the triple leveraged funds. This is because the funds might be forced to increase exposure to low risk and low-return safe assets like cash and equivalents in order to offset the risk of derivatives exposure. This could eat away the outsized returns that the leveraged ETFs have been providing to investors (see: all Leveraged Equity ETFs here ). Notably, there are 135 leveraged products and 87 leveraged inverse products as per xtf.com. Of these, 46 leveraged and 36 leveraged inverse products have three times exposure to the underlying index and would be the most in trouble. In particular, the proposed rules would hurt the leveraged long and short ETFs structured via the Investment Company Act of 1940, potentially forcing providers to change the legal structure or leverage factor, or to close them. Notably, Direxion and ProShares are the two issuers that would be the most impacted as they have several equity and fixed income ETFs that rely on three times derivatives-based leverage and has been structured via the Investment Company Act of 1940. Some of the most popular ones are the ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF (NASDAQ: TQQQ ) , the Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: FAS ) , the ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: UPRO ) , the Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: TNA ) , the Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bear 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: TMV ) , the ProShares UltraPro Short S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPXU ) , the Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: TZA ) and the ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF (NASDAQ: SQQQ ) . However, some commodity leveraged ETFs providing investors’ triple exposure to the index could escape the new rules by virtue of their registration as commodity pools with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). In Conclusion While the SEC proposal is a concern for leveraged ETF providers, it is not yet finalized or may fall apart. Even if the rules are adopted, it will take months or a year to have a full impact on the ETF world. Link to the original post on Zacks.com