Tag Archives: nasdaq

Southern Company: A Safe High-Yield Dividend Stock For Retirees

Yield-starved investors should familiarize themselves with Southern Company (NYSE: SO ), a highly dependable business that has paid dividends every quarter for more than 65 consecutive years. With a high yield of 4.4%, low stock price volatility, and a track record for outperforming the S&P 500 Index over the last 30 years, Southern Company is the type of business that we like to review for our Conservative Retirees and Top 20 Dividend Stocks portfolios. Business Overview The Southern Company is a major producer of electricity in the U.S. that has been in business for more than 100 years. The holding company’s four retail regulated utilities serve approximately 4.5 million customers across Georgia, Alabama, Florida, and Mississippi. Approximately 90% of Southern Company’s earnings are from regulated subsidiaries, and the company also has a small wholesale energy company. Industrial customers account for 28% of the company’s sales, followed by commercial (27%), residential (27%), and other retail and wholesale (17%). By power source, coal generated 33% of Southern Company’s total megawatt hours in 2015, gas accounted for 47%, nuclear was 16%, and hydro power was 3%. The company’s mix of business and geographies will significantly change in the second half of 2016 when it closes its acquisition of natural gas utility AGL Resources. Southern Company’s customer count will double to roughly 9 million, and its energy mix will shift from 100% electric to a 50/50 mix of electric and gas. Business Analysis Utility companies spend billions of dollars to build power plants and transmission lines and must comply with strict regulatory and environmental standards. As capital-intensive regulated entities, utility companies typically have a monopoly in the geographies they operate in. As a result, the government controls the rates that utilities can charge to ensure they are fair to customers while still allowing the utility company to earn a reasonable return on their investments to continue providing quality service. Each state’s regulatory body is different from the next, and some regions have been better to utilities than others. The Southeast region has been friendly to businesses, and Southern Company operates in four of the top eight most constructive state regulatory environments in the U.S. according to RRA: Click to enlarge Source: Southern Company Investor Presentation Southern also maintains strong relationships with regulators in part due to its reputation and the reasonable rates it currently charges, which are below the national average and perceived as being more customer-friendly. The South region is also one of the fastest-growing in the country, which makes Southern Company a relatively more attractive utility than many others. While regulation protects Southern Company’s monopoly business and helps it generate consistent earnings, it also makes growth more difficult. The company’s earnings have grown by about 3% per year historically, but its planned merger with AGL Resources is expected to boost earnings growth to a 4-5% annual clip. In late 2015, Southern Company announced plans to acquire AGL Resources for approximately $8 billion. AGL is the largest U.S. gas-only local distribution company, serving about 4.5 million customers in seven states and generating approximately 70% of its earnings from regulated operations. The combined company will now serve roughly 9 million customers and diversify Southern Company’s revenue mix from being 100% electric to a 50/50 mix of electric and gas customers. The deal also somewhat reduces the impact from the company’s large construction projects that have been delayed and provides a new array of growth projects to invest in. Furthermore, we like that AGL will provide some regulatory diversification for Southern Company by expanding its reach into several new states. Finally, it’s worth mentioning that Southern Company is the only electric utility in the country that is committed to a portfolio of nuclear, coal gasification, natural gas, solar, wind, and biomass. The company has committed $20 billion to developing a portfolio of low- and zero-carbon emission generating resources, including investments in natural gas, solar, wind, and integrated gasification combined cycle technology. As seen below, the company’s mix of resources is expected to become more diversified over the next five years, reducing its dependency on coal. A diverse generation fleet reduces the company’s risk of being overly dependent on any one source of energy. Click to enlarge Source: Southern Company Investor Presentation Southern Company’s Key Risks Utility companies generally have lower business risk than many other types of businesses. Their biggest risks are usually regulatory in nature – customer rates are decided at the state level and materially impact the return a utility company gets on its major capital expenditures. In Southern Company’s case, its main states in the Southeast have historically had generally favorable regulatory rulings. The acquisition of AGL Resources will also diversify the company’s regulatory risk. EPA regulations are another challenge. There is increased scrutiny around coal and nuclear power, which could result in higher spending to remain compliant with safety and emissions standards. If Southern Company cannot pass these costs through to customers, shareholders would take the hit. Project execution is another big risk facing the company. Southern Company has taken on several major capital projects in recent years. The company is building a coal-fired power plant in Kemper County, Mississippi, and two nuclear plants at Plant Vogtle in Georgia. The coal gasification project in Mississippi was originally expected to cost $5 billion and go into service in 2014, but it has been delayed by two years and experienced over $1 billion in additional costs. While the Kemper County facility is finally nearing completion, it’s uncertain how the project will be paid for. A Wall Street Journal article from May 22, 2015, cited that Southern informed state regulators that it might need to raise electricity rates by as much as 41% a month for households to pay for the project. The company was ultimately bailed out by an approved 18% rate increase in August 2015, although the increase was temporary and later revised to 15% . Southern Company is only about 26% finished with construction of its nuclear plants in Georgia. This project has seen its costs escalate from an estimated $14.1 billion in 2009 to over $20 billion today (Southern’s share of the project’s cost is less than $10 billion). It has also been delayed by more than three years. While the cost overruns and delays on these massive projects are certainly a black eye for the company and do not help its regulatory relationships in the effected states, we do not believe they impair Southern’s long-term earnings power. However, there is risk that these projects receive unfavorable rate treatment with regulators. Finally, Southern Company’s acquisition of AGL Resources creates some risk. This was a large deal that comes at a time when the management team is already facing challenges with the company’s large capital projects. AGL gets Southern into a new business (gas utility) and brings exposure to new states that have different regulatory bodies. Dividend Analysis: Southern Company We analyze 25+ years of dividend data and 10+ years of fundamental data to understand the safety and growth prospects of a dividend. Dividend Safety Score Our Safety Score answers the question, “Is the current dividend payment safe?” We look at factors such as current and historical EPS and FCF payout ratios, debt levels, free cash flow generation, industry cyclicality, ROIC trends, and more. Scores of 50 are average, 75 or higher is very good, and 25 or lower is considered weak. Southern Company’s dividend payment appears very safe with a Dividend Safety Score of 86. If we exclude charges related to increased cost estimates for the company’s large construction projects, Southern’s earnings payout ratio in 2015 was 75%. While we prefer to see a lower payout ratio for most businesses, we can see that Southern Company’s payout ratio has remained between 70% and 80% for most of the last decade. Source: Simply Safe Dividends Utility companies can also maintain relatively high payout ratios compared to most businesses because their financial results are so stable. Customers still need to use a certain amount of electricity and gas regardless of economic conditions, making utilities one of the best stock sectors for dividend income . As seen below, Southern Company’s sales only fell by 8% in fiscal year 2009, and its stock was flat in 2008, outperforming the S&P 500 by 37%. Utility companies are generally great investments to own during economic downturns. Source: Simply Safe Dividends We can also see that Southern Company’s reported earnings have remained remarkably stable over the last decade. The dip in recent years was caused by constructed-related charges. Otherwise, the steady earnings results look almost like interest payments coming in from a bond. Southern’s earnings growth isn’t exciting, but it’s dependable. Source: Simply Safe Dividends As a regulated utility company, Southern generates a moderate but predictable mid-single digit return on invested capital. The slight dip was due to write-offs on its capital projects, but the favorable regulatory environment in its key states has helped it earn somewhat higher returns than many other utility companies. We expect the company’s returns to improve as its large projects finally come on-line. Source: Simply Safe Dividends Utility companies maintain a lot of debt to maintain their capital-intensive businesses. Southern Company most recently reported $1.4 billion in cash compared to $27.4 billion in debt on its balance sheet. While this would be a concern for most companies, the stability of Southern’s earnings and strength of its moat alleviate much of this risk. The company also has over $4 billion available in its credit facility and maintains investment grade credit ratings with the major agencies. Click to enlarge Source: Simply Safe Dividends Despite the challenges Southern Company is facing with its major construction projects, the safety of its dividend still looks great. The company maintains a reasonable payout ratio for a utility company, earnings are predictable each year, and its key operating states have provided a historically favorable regulatory environment. Dividend Growth Score Our Growth Score answers the question, “How fast is the dividend likely to grow?” It considers many of the same fundamental factors as the Safety Score but places more weight on growth-centric metrics like sales and earnings growth and payout ratios. Scores of 50 are average, 75 or higher is very good, and 25 or lower is considered weak. The dependability of utility companies’ dividends comes at the price of growth. Southern Company’s dividend has grown at a 3.9% annualized rate over the past decade, and the business has a very low Dividend Growth Score of 9. The company most recently increased its dividend by about 2% in April 2015, marking its 14th consecutive raise. Source: Simply Safe Dividends While Southern Company is 11 years away from joining the dividend aristocrats list , we believe it has a good chance of getting there. The company’s dividend growth rate could even increase in coming years. Management believes the AGL Resources merger could increase Southern’s long-term earnings per share growth from 3% to 4-5%, which would allow for slightly greater dividend raises. Valuation SO’s stock trades at 17.4x forward earnings estimates and has a dividend yield of 4.36%, which is below its five-year average dividend yield of 4.46%. If the AGL merger increases the company’s long-term earnings growth rate to 4-5% as management expects, the stock appears to offer total return potential of 8-9% per year. We think the stock looks to be about fairly valued today, and it’s worth noting how the predictability of Southern’s business has resulted in very low stock price volatility. The chart below shows the volatility of each of the 20 utilities in the Philadelphia Electric Utility Index (UTY). Southern Company had the lowest level of volatility through the five-year period ending on 12/31/2014. Source: Southern Company Annual Report Conclusion Southern Company is a blue chip dividend payer in the utilities sector. The last few years have been disappointing due to delays and cost overruns with some of the company’s major construction projects, but the long-term outlook appears to be intact. Southern Company’s stock appears to be reasonably priced and offers a dependable income stream for those living off dividends in retirement. It’s hard not to like a business as sturdy and reliable as this one. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Is The Value Style Outperformance Sustainable?

Until the market’s (S&P 500 Index) recent rebound from the February 11, 2016 low, investors have essentially gone two years with flat returns in stocks. Certainly it has not been a market that has just traded sideways, but one with significant volatility, both up and down. The most recent recovery has pushed the S&P 500 Index back into the trading range in place since late 2014. Technically, this recent rally into the higher range opens up the potential for the Dow to move to the top of this higher range, 18,300 and the S&P 500, 2,130. Contributing to the improved equity market since the February bottom has been the strength in value and cyclically oriented sectors: energy, financials and industrials. As the below chart shows, energy is up 15.8%, financials are up 14.4% and industrials are up 11%. These three sectors are more heavily weighted in the value oriented indices like the iShares S&P 500 Value Index (NYSEARCA: IVE ). Financials account for over 25% of the value index versus an 8% weighting in the growth index (NYSEARCA: IVW ). Energy represents 12% of the value index versus only 1% in the growth index. The improvement in the value segments of the market has led to the large value index outperforming its large growth counterpart since the February bottom and so far in all of 2016. One reason investors should consider maintaining a written record of their thoughts around their market decisions is the ability to go back and review the outcome of those decisions. With respect to this value/growth phenomenon taking place in 2016, the market went through a similar adjustment in early 2014. I wrote a post on March 26, 2014, almost exactly two years ago, Why It Matters That Value Stocks Are Outperforming Growth Stocks . Subsequent to that post, and for the following two years, growth actually outperformed value. Click to enlarge One factor I noted in the 2014 post was value would outperform if economic activity was strengthening. What actually occurred though was a peak in GDP growth at 4.6% in Q2 2014 which declined to 2.1% in Q4 2014 and .6 in Q1 2015. In fact, economic growth weakened and growth resumed leadership until the beginning of this year. One economic variable discussed in the post from two years ago was the strength in industrial production. Until January’s data was reported in February, the monthly change in industrial had been negative for three consecutive months. As the below chart shows, industrial production exhibited strength in January. Additionally, manufacturing was positive on a year over year basis with Econoday noting, “Total year-on-year industrial production also remains in the negative column, at minus 0.7 percent, a disappointment but a contrast to manufacturing where the year-on-year rate is modest but accelerating, at plus 1.2 percent.” “A negative in the report is a downward revision to December, to minus 0.7 percent from minus 0.4 percent. But the revision doesn’t take much away from the January surprise where strength, based in manufacturing and underscoring January’s rise in retail auto sales, should help ease concern over the economy’s first-quarter performance.” As seen in the sector chart earlier in this post, energy and financials have been strong performers in this value rebound. Energy related stocks have seen an improvement due to the increase in oil prices into the high $38/BBL area from the mid $20/BBL reached on February 11th. I am not convinced this rally in oil is sustainable given the continued oversupply in the oil market. Lastly, both large and small value have outperformed the S&P 500 Index on a long term basis going back to 1927. Of late though, value has lagged its blended index counterparts over the last 10-year time period as can be seen in the below chart. Click to enlarge Source: The BAM Alliance The takeaway for investors is the risk of going all in or all out of any one style. One can invest in the blended index of course, or simply tilting one’s allocation between growth or value may be a better approach. With that said, maybe a tilt towards value is an opportunity at this point in time. The one caution is the much higher weighting in energy within the value index and the anticipated volatility in energy prices.

5 Costly ETF Mistakes You Can Easily Avoid

ETFs are becoming increasingly popular with investors due to their low cost, transparency, easy tradability and tax efficiency. The ETF revolution has made it possible for individual investors to get a convenient, diversified access to almost any investment strategy in virtually any corner of the investing world. Retail investors now have access to many investment opportunities that were earlier available only to sophisticated, high net worth individuals. Despite their widespread use, there are many misconceptions regarding ETFs leading to costly errors, which can be easily avoided. This article aims to help investors avoid some of those mistakes and become more successful ETF investors. Buying an ETF above Its NAV ETFs usually trade at fair prices, i.e. close to their intrinsic values or aggregate values of their holdings. But at times certain ETFs’ prices deviate from their NAVs and they can trade at a premium or discount to their NAVs. If you buy an ETF (or an ETN) when it is trading at a premium, you can incur losses if you sell after the premium crashes. The popular oil ETN, the iPath S&P Crude Oil Total Return Index ETN (NYSEARCA: OIL ), was trading at an almost 50% premium over its NAV for some time earlier this year. In fact, Barclays had issued a notification warning investors about ETN premiums. As expected, the premium plunged after some time, making investors vulnerable to unexpected losses. Investors should make sure to check the previous day’s closing indicative value on the sponsor’s website. They can also check the intraday indicative value on Yahoo Finance using the ticker for the ETF and adding “^” and “-IV” at the beginning and end. So, for OIL ETN, the ticker for intraday indicative value is ^OIL-IV. Avoiding Low Volume ETFs Many investors confuse low trading volumes with the liquidity of an ETF and some even avoid newer ETFs, which may have better strategies but low trading volumes, in favor of older, more popular products with higher trading volumes. ETFs are different from stocks in this area and their trading volume should not be interpreted like stock trading volume. The liquidity of an ETF is not determined by its trading volume but by the liquidity of underlying shares (ETFs’ holdings). At the same time, low volume does usually lead to wider bid-ask spreads, which add to the trading costs. So, these ETFs are not suitable for frequent trading. And it does make sense to use limit orders while trading in low-volume ETFs. Using Market Orders during Volatile Markets The market mayhem on Monday, August 24, last year (ETF Flash Crash) left some harsh lessons for ETF investors. Many ETFs fell 20% or more and some as much as 30%-45% that morning, even though their underlying stocks had not declined so much. Large dislocations in ETFs’ prices were seen not only in smaller ETFs but in some very large and popular ETFs such as the Guggenheim S&P Equal Weight ETF (NYSEARCA: RSP ) and the Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (NYSEARCA: VDC ). While these discrepancies lasted only for a short period of time, none of the trades executed during that time were canceled. There were many factors that caused ETFs’ pricing problems. But the biggest mistake that ETF investors could have avoided was using “market orders” during those turbulent market conditions. Investors who had left a sell market order or a sleeping stop-loss sell order for one of the ETFs that had severe distortion in pricing probably saw their orders hit at worst possible prices, much below fair values. Ignoring the Contango Impact on Commodity ETFs While some commodity ETFs, mainly those tracking precious metals hold the physical commodity, most commodity ETFs use futures contracts to track the price of commodities due to high storage costs. These futures contracts are required to be rolled over when they are close to expiration. At times, futures price of the commodity is higher than the spot price – known as “contango” – which results in losses at the time of rolling over the contracts. Contango affects the performance of ETFs since the futures contracts’ return will be lower than spot price returns of the commodity. A recent article in WSJ highlighted this issue in the performance of ETFs that track the performance of oil using futures, including the PowerShares DB Oil ETF (NYSEARCA: DBO ), the United States Oil ETF (NYSEARCA: USO ) and OIL. While US crude futures were down about 20% through February 22 this year, oil funds fared much worse. Always Buying Currency Hedged International ETFs Currency hedged ETFs have been quite hot in the past couple years as the US dollar surged against most other currencies. By hedging out the currency exposure, through currency hedged ETFs, investors get access to pure equity returns in international markets. Investors should also remember that often stocks and currencies move in the same direction. That is, if an economy strengthens, its stock market as well as the currency will perform well. In such cases of positive correlation, hedging will actually work against investors. However in some cases, particularly in cases of export oriented economies, stocks and currencies have shown a negative correlation historically. That’s why currency hedged Japan funds performed so well in the recent past. That said currency hedging is not always a good idea. Take the example of Japan ETFs – while currency hedged products like the WisdomTree Japan Hedged ETF (NYSEARCA: DXJ ) outperformed the unhedged ones like the iShares MSCI Japan ETF (NYSEARCA: EWJ ) over the past couple years, as the yen weakened against the dollar, they have underperformed over the past 2-3 months, as the Japanese currency rebounded, thanks mainly to its safe-haven status and worse-than-expected stimulus measures announced by the BOJ. Original Post