Tag Archives: nasdaq

Should I Sell My First Energy Stock?

Oddly, this isn’t the first time this thought has popped in to my mind. Last year I wrote a piece titled ” 3 Reasons I Would Sell a Stock .” The listing was created to help me identify holdings that have fallen out of favor in my portfolio or have not performed. After elaborating on the 3 reasons I would sell, I reviewed my portfolio for any stocks that met the criteria. Any takers on guessing which one of the stocks that was discussed in the article? First Energy! Shocker, right? After one heck of a run by the stock that has brought me close to break even, I now find myself asking the question again. Is it finally time to sell my stake in First Energy? First Energy (NYSE: FE ) has been a problem child for me from the beginning. Unfortunately, it sometimes works out like that. Historically, FE has been a stock that pays a high stagnant dividend yield. It is an electric utility after all. Despite the fact that the company’s recent dividend growth rate was non-existent, I was willing to overlook this fact due to the high yield (Which was above 5% at the if I recall). First big mistake right there; I was caught chasing yield and boy did I learn the hard way. Months after I purchased the stock, FE slashed their quarterly dividend from $.55/share to $.36/share. Ugh! That decrease caused a massive sell-off and my position turned red really fast. Isn’t the phrase dividend cut becoming too common on this website? Especially after what happened with KMI and then BBL over the last few months? Finally, after over two long, painful years, my position is at the breakeven point due to dividend re-investment and I have the opportunity to potentially re-coup my initial investment. To determine if I should sell the stock, I want to be able to answer one simple question. If I did not own a stake in the company and had extra capital lying around, would I purchase stock and initiate a position in First Energy? If FE does not pass our stock screener and I would not purchase shares, then why on earth am I holding on to them? Especially considering the fact that I own a small stake in another electric utility that happens to be one of our 5 foundation dividend stocks . Outside of the fact that I am being really stubborn here and don’t want to realize a loss. To answer this question, I decided to run FE through the Dividend Diplomats Dividend Stock Screener to see if FE would pass this daunting test. Let’s see how FE performed. Price to Earnings Ratio Below the S&P 500 – Using FE’s forward EPS per TheStreet.com of $2.84, FE is currently trading at a forward PE multiple of 12.6X, which is well below the PE ratio of the S&P 500. For comparison sake, ED is trading at a multiple of 18.71X. So FE is trading at both a discount to the market and one of the major players in the industry. Payout Ratio below 60% – Using the forward EPS from the line above, FE’s payout ratio is 50% while ED has a payout ratio of 66%. Again, FE passes our metric and shows a better figure than ED. Paying an Increasing Dividend – As I already mentioned earlier, FE cut their dividend to $.36/share per quarter in 2013 and has not increased their dividend since. So this point represents a big negative as my stagnant dividend stream is losing purchasing power each year. For comparison sake, ED is a Dividend Aristocrat and has a 5 year average dividend growth rate of 1.9%. This really isn’t much better; however, at least their dividend is growing at a rate near inflation. Dividend Yield – This isn’t one of the metrics on our stock screener, but it is worth pointing out. FE’s current dividend yield is about 4% while ED has a current yield of about 3.56%. Debt to Equity Ratio – Again, this metric is not a part of our initial stock screener. I began focusing on the impact of debt on a company when my KMI dividend was slashed significantly. However, I really should have begun looking at a company’s debt burden when I purchased stock in First Energy. Per finviz.com, FE has a Debt to Equity Ratio of 1.78X and ED has a Debt to Equity ratio of 1.09X. I understand that debt is not always a necessarily a bad thing, but I am a little “debt averse” after my recent experiences. So much so that I even created a Top 5 list to identify Dividend Aristocrats with low debt to equity ratios. We all have flavors of the month and mine is currently LOW DEBT! Now that I have run some numbers, let’s get back to my original question. Would I purchase shares in First Energy today based on the information above. The answer is…..no. So why am I not logging into Capital One Investing now and selling my stock? Where is my hesitation and why am I struggling to make a decision here? What has me torn is that while the stock may not have passed all metrics in our screener, it didn’t fail all of the screeners. In fact, when compared to another company in its industry, the company appears to be trading at a significant discount while sporting a higher dividend yield. The fact the company is trading at a discount makes perfect sense to me when you consider some of the negative factors I mentioned above. Is the dividend growth rate terrible? Yes. Do they have a lot of debt? Yes. However, their payout ratio is well below our 60% threshold. So the answer isn’t as clear as I was hoping it would be by the time I reached the end of this article. So all of you, I am asking you for your help here. You offered Lanny some great advice about his internet package this week and I have loved reading your responses as they have come in. So I would love to get your take on my dilemma. If you were me, would you sell your stake in First Energy? If so, what other companies would you recommend? I am thinking I would go the ultra safe route and purchase a foundation stock or one of the stocks on my “Always Buy” list with the proceeds. Are there other utilities I should consider as well? Please everyone, help me out here! -Bert

Cutting Losses With Fisher’s 3 Golden Sell Rules

Returning readers to Investing Caffeine understand this is a location to cover a wide assortment of investing topics, ranging from electric cars and professional poker to taxes and globalization. Investing Caffeine is also a location that profiles great investors and their associated investment lessons. Today we are going to revisit investing giant Phil Fisher , but rather than rehashing his accomplishments and overall philosophy, we will dig deeper into his selling discipline. For most investors, selling securities is much more difficult than buying them. The average investor often lacks emotional self-control and is unable to be honest with himself. Since most investors hate being wrong, their egos prevent taking losses on positions, even if it is the proper, rational decision. Often the end result is an inability to sell deteriorating stocks until capitulating near price bottoms. Selling may be more difficult for most, but Fisher actually has a simpler and crisper number of sell rules as compared to his buy rules (3 vs. 15). Here are Fisher’s three sell rules: 1) Wrong Facts : There are times after a security is purchased that the investor realizes the facts do not support the supposed rosy reasons of the original purchase. If the purchase thesis was initially built on a shaky foundation, then the shares should be sold. 2) Changing Facts : The facts of the original purchase may have been deemed correct, but facts can change negatively over the passage of time. Management deterioration and/or the exhaustion of growth opportunities are a few reasons why a security should be sold according to Fisher. 3) Scarcity of Cash : If there is a shortage of cash available, and if a unique opportunity presents itself, then Fisher advises the sale of other securities to fund the purchase. Reasons Not to Sell Prognostications or gut feelings about a potential market decline are not reasons to sell in Fisher’s eyes. Selling out of fear generally is a poor and costly idea. Fisher explains: “When a bear market has come, I have not seen one time in ten when the investor actually got back into the same shares before they had gone up above his selling price.” In Fisher’s mind, another reason not to sell stocks is solely based on valuation. Longer-term earnings power and comparable company ratios should be considered before spontaneous sales. What appears expensive today may look cheap tomorrow. There are many reasons to buy and sell a stock, but like most good long -term investors, Fisher has managed to explain his three-point sale plan in simplistic terms the masses can understand. If you are committed to cutting investment losses, I advise you to follow investment legend Phil Fisher – cutting losses will actually help prevent your portfolio from splitting apart. DISCLOSURE : Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients own certain exchange traded funds, but at the time of publishing SCM had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC “Contact” page.

VIX: A Hedge To Consider For Your Portfolio

It is not uncommon to see the markets follow irrational trends. Sometimes, the markets will climb up or drop down on information that may indicate contrary trends. This past month I’ve been watching the markets with immense caution; I was a little surprised that we have seen US stocks rise for a fifth straight week. For the long run, I have a handful of stocks I think will grow exceptionally, but for the most part I believe we are entering a bear market, and I have thus prepared myself with hedges. The headlines, and the data and statistics that are coming in from Central banks and governments across the world are not exactly signaling optimism for the markets, yet the markets are trending towards all-time highs. ^SPX data by YCharts I think it’s absurd that the S&P 500 is approaching all-time highs, especially at a time like this. I will not go in depth as to why I think we are due for a major correction (again), but I will simply write a basic summary about why we are likely going to continue falling into a bear market, and about why investing in the VIX index might be smart. The reasons for a bear market heavily outweigh the reasons for a bull market right now. Commodities have staged an odd recovery the past couple of weeks that hasn’t exactly made much sense. Most importantly right now is the prices of oil; oil has proved to be latched on to the movement of stocks and vice versa. Brent Crude Oil Spot Price data by YCharts Brent crude oil has spiked over $10 USD in less than a couple months, but why? The world oil supply has remained at roughly 98 mb/d the past couple of months and demand has also been idle. I firmly believe oil will stage a recovery, but this recovery seems fake and is happening way too fast, which is alarming. In addition to the suspicious rise in commodity prices, there is tons of debt everywhere. People are getting crushed by margin calls, people are still accumulating debt, and energy companies are on the brink of bankruptcies. Banks are also having a hard time. Many major banks are hitting 52-week lows, although they have recovered slightly; but that point aside, they are still going to have to deal with lower interest rates. Nations around the world are following a general trend of lowering interest rates, even into the negative and this will likely hurt major bank stocks. Banks have also proven to be central to market crashes in recent history. It was a little surprising to see the markets react so positively to the Fed’s latest press release. Yellen gave the people a lot of “ifs” and “buts” and “maybes”, and I feel it did not justify the market spike we have just seen. On top of all this, we are seeing a ton of political turmoil, which inevitably affects the markets. There are a lot of problems right now in the world: Brazil is on the brink of a political and economic collapse, Europe is dealing with the refugee crisis which in turn is giving right wing groups serious power and support, Brexit is a serious possibility and would have potential consequences on markets worldwide (and in my personal opinion the Brexit would negatively impact the world markets), and then there’s the Middle East tension. I don’t want this article to be a sensationalist piece, but there are a lot of similarities between what is going on right now and the 1930s. Basically, I believe we are in for a roller coaster ride, and if there are people out there who are long on the markets as a whole, maybe a hedge or two would greatly benefit your portfolio. The VIX index The VIX is an index that uses options to predict stock market volatility, and it is commonly referred to as the fear gauge. ^VIX data by YCharts As you can see from the chart we have had numerous spikes in a short span of time. The last time we’ve seen this type of market volatility was in 2011, and I believe this time there is potential for the volatility to be even greater. Depending what market one invests in, it is entirely possible to put some money in an index that tracks the movement of the VIX. When the time comes for the market to crash, one’s portfolio will be protected with a hedge in the VIX, but this is definitely a highly risky trade. For example, Canadians, or those who invest in the TSX can invest in HVU. As I write this article the VIX is approaching lows it hasn’t seen since early 2015, but I believe the market volatility has just begun. Catching the bottom of the VIX and riding it up during a major spike could be very profitable, but once again this is to be used as a swing trade, and the ETF should not be held for more than a couple of weeks at most. Generally, I want readers to tread with caution in this current market environment. Everything seems off, and the markets are being irrational at the moment, thus a crash or a longer bear market might be in store for us. Hedging your portfolio is important, and remember to do your own research. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.