Tag Archives: management

Stocks Are Cheaper Than Bonds, And Other Falsehoods

Summary Currently, the crowd continues to advance the notion that stocks are the only investment to be considered, despite the overvalued condition in risk assets. The notion that bonds are overvalued and underperform stocks, and that cash is earning 0% is also advanced by the crowd. In reality, cash and bonds offer investors tremendous value in a world of declining economic growth. This is especially true given that the economic risks are rising. Stock Market Valuations within the Context of Global Economic Instability: Implications for Portfolio Construction Stocks are cheaper than bonds, or so we are told by the crowd which was out in full force again for the September FOMC meeting, calling for a rise in interest rates, despite the fact that we have not met any of the conditions for such a rise in rates. One of the major reasons investors, and more specifically savers, have for why the Fed should raise interest rates is the notion that cash is currently earning close to 0% on savings, and money market balances. However, when viewed within the context of the global economic environment, and when we take into account the impact of a rising dollar on purchasing power, cash is providing investors with a very nice return. In a previous piece , I explored the reasons behind holding cash. As risk asset prices have risen to lofty levels, investors are far better, in my opinion, holding a majority of their assets in Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury Bonds and cash. The Global Economy and the Rise of Deflationary Forces Why would I pursue a strategy of largely abandoning risk assets for fixed income and cash? For several reasons: 1. CAPE valuation The first reason is valuations. Valuations in the US are trading at levels that are more than 53% above its arithmetic mean and 65% above its geometric mean, as seen in the charts below. As the earnings season begins, the street is expecting a 4.6% decline in S&P earnings. I would contend that this is far more modest than what the actual numbers will turn out to be. The strong dollar continues to be a headwind, as is the decline in overall demand. This, combined with the complete decimation of the commodities complex , declining fundamentals in the global economy, and a FED that keeps the markets uncertain will likely lead to a severe drawdown in risk assets. In such an environment, cash and Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury Bonds are excellent investments. (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) 2. The Real Yield on Cash The U.S. dollar has been rallying in the face of rising deflationary forces globally. Over the past three years, the U.S. dollar has soared 14.6%. I expect further economic weakness, and growing challenges overseas, combined with extraordinary monetary policy from the BOJ and the ECB will drive the US dollar higher relative to the yen and euro as well as other foreign currencies. As the value of the dollar rises, so does the buying power of Americans cash balances, making the real yield on cash much higher than the current minimal rate of interest. 3. Deflationary Forces and Tepid Economic Growth The challenges overseas are well documented. Japan remains in an economic malaise, even as Abenomics attempts to bring it out of the doldrums. The eurozone remains entrenched in an extremely slow-growing economic environment on the verge of recession, with deflationary forces rising. Canada is currently in recession, and in the United States, many try to make the case that the economy is doing just fine. But the reality is that the economy is a patient in need of ICU classification, as the charts below will indicate. The labor force participation rate is at its lowest level since 1978. (click to enlarge) To those who believe this is largely caused by the retirement of the Baby Boomer generation, the next chart will be particularly useful in dispelling this idea. (click to enlarge) Falling industrial production and ISM Manufacturing (below) are not indicative of an economy running on all cylinders. (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) The data point that I find most concerning is the complete collapse in velocity to the lowest levels in more than 50 years. Despite the Fed’s massive QE program, velocity has continued to decline. (click to enlarge) Implications for Portfolio Construction The world is currently on the verge of a recession . Conventional investment planning has largely failed to protect client assets multiple times in the 21st century, largely due to its reliance on risk assets for the majority of client capital. I believe in a more conservative approach that protects investor capital through a complete investment cycle. On February 18, 2013, Dr. John Hussman wrote an excellent commentary entitled ” The Sirens Song of the Unfinished Half-Cycle ,” in which he explains the overvaluation of the market and the likely drawdown that will result in the completion of this market cycle. (click to enlarge) Since Dr. Hussman wrote this commentary, valuations have only extended further, making the current conditions all the more unstable. These are not conditions in which I would, in good conscience, be overweight risk assets. Especially that which is needed for retirement, regardless of age. I believe capital preservation is the key objective, and I am willing to miss excess gains on the upside when the market gets expensive, rather than be exposed to a severe drawdown due to speculation in an overvalued market. As we seek to preserve capital, cash and cash equivalents (Treasuries) appear to be the best investment vehicles in a world of slow economic growth with rising deflationary and recessionary risks and overvaluations on risk assets that make future returns minimal. While the equity risk premium has already been debunked , the future will likely give us a further case study. One thing I have learned in my decades of investment experience is that the habits of successful investing are often contrary to common human behavior. This is why we seek to ignore the crowd and the noise that accompanies them. I have been writing about our extensive exposure to U.S Treasury bonds for some time. Currently, Treasury bonds are one of the most vilified assets around, and yet, from 2008-2015, long-term Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury bonds have returned 107.91%, while the S&P 500 has returned 64.89%. During this entire period of time, the crowd was vilifying Treasury bonds and telling investors to favor equities. In this case, following the crowd would have cost you a 43.02% gain. Conclusion While many investors and savers may be frustrated by the lack of interest they are earning on their cash balances, the buying power of their cash continues to rise as the value of the US dollar increases. In this environment, cash and cash equivalents are king, and as major headwinds from global growth concerns and U.S. dollar strength, among other factors, begin to reduce the earnings power of U.S. companies, the market will correct in tandem. Additionally, we face continued market uncertainty surrounding monetary policy and the possibility of a government shutdown later this year, which could cause additional stress on the market. I continue to feel comfortable with the majority of our assets in cash and long-term Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury securities as well as select short positions, with an underweight in equities, favoring cheaper-priced foreign equities over those of the expensive U.S. market.

XBI: An Aggressive ETF That Keeps Capturing Massive Returns

Summary XBI is an almost pure play on the biotechnology sector. For investors that want to rely on modern portfolio theory rather than assessing biotechnology companies, this is a solid option. The ETF has shown stronger correlations with international equity than domestic equity which suggests investors may want to limit international exposure when going heavy XBI. The negative correlation for XBI with long term treasury bonds is only mediocre. Compared to the S&P 500, it is more difficult to diversify away the portfolio risk through treasuries. Investors should be seeking to improve their risk adjusted returns. I’m a big fan of using ETFs to achieve the risk adjusted returns relative to the portfolios that a normal investor can generate for themselves after trading costs. The biotechnology sector has been hot and despite being high risk it can be a very profitable area to invest. The challenge is that investors either need specialized knowledge to pick the companies they will hold or a simple strategy for buying into an ETF in the sector. As you might guess, I prefer the second method. My strengths are in analyzing ETFs and mREITs. I’d rather not be forced to figure out which biotechnology companies are most likely to patent the next breakthrough. That makes using an ETF a great way to get exposure. One of the biggest options for that exposure is the SPDR Biotech ETF (NYSEARCA: XBI ). Expense Ratio The expense ratio on XBI is .35%. Sector XBI is not confused about their role. The portfolio is very close to a pure play on the biotechnology sector. Largest Holdings The largest holdings are shown in the chart below: While I usually recognize all the companies within an ETF, this isn’t one of those cases. I know precisely zero of these companies, but I do appreciate that the fund has been designed to be relatively equal weight. For comparison, I also grabbed a chart of the holdings for the index. Index Holdings You may notice that the order of holdings is very materially different. XBI is not just passively tracking the index. Investors might think that means their returns would be very different from the index, but it turns out they actually track the index quite closely. Comparison The following chart shows the performance numbers for several time periods: (click to enlarge) Some investors may have a much easier time visualizing the returns with graphs, so I grabbed a bar chart as well: (click to enlarge) I think the bar chart really drives this home. Even though XBI is using a very different portfolio structure than their index, they have extremely similar returns over each time period. When I check an ETF against their index, I usually expect them to slightly underperform because of the expensive ratio. They have trailed their index, but only by around .05% on an annualized basis which is very good when you consider that the expense ratio is .35%. If they can continue to deliver that performance over the next decade it will be a testament to the management doing a solid job of deciding which companies deserve to be overweight in the portfolio. Building the Portfolio The sample portfolio I ran for this assessment is one that came out feeling a bit awkward. I’ve had some requests to include biotechnology ETFs and I decided it would be wise to also include a the related field of health care for a comparison. Since I wanted to create quite a bit of diversification, I put in 9 ETFs plus the S&P 500. The resulting portfolio is one that I think turned out to be too risky for most investors and certainly too risky for older investors. Despite that weakness, I opted to go with highlighting these ETFs in this manner because I think it is useful to show investors what it looks like when the allocations result in a suboptimal allocation. The weightings for each ETF in the portfolio are a simple 10% which results in 20% of the portfolio going to the combined Health Care and Biotechnology sectors. Outside of that we have one spot each for REITs, high yield bonds, TIPS, emerging market consumer staples, domestic consumer staples, foreign large capitalization firms, and long term bonds. The first thing I want to point out about these allocations are that for any older investor, running only 30% in bonds with 10% of that being high yield bonds is putting yourself in a fairly dangerous position. I will be highlighting the individual ETFs, but I would not endorse this portfolio as a whole. The portfolio assumes frequent rebalancing which would be a problem for short term trading outside of tax advantaged accounts unless the investor was going to rebalance by adding to their positions on a regular basis and allocating the majority of the capital towards whichever portions of the portfolio had been underperforming recently. Because a substantial portion of the yield from this portfolio comes from REITs and interest, I would favor this portfolio as a tax exempt strategy even if the investor was frequently rebalancing by adding new capital. The portfolio allocations can be seen below along with the dividend yields from each investment. Name Ticker Portfolio Weight Yield SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF SPY 10.00% 2.11% Health Care Select Sect SPDR ETF XLV 10.00% 1.40% SPDR Biotech ETF XBI 10.00% 1.54% iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF IYR 10.00% 3.83% PowerShares Fundamental High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio ETF PHB 10.00% 4.51% FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index ETF TDTT 10.00% 0.16% EGShares Emerging Markets Consumer ETF ECON 10.00% 1.34% Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF FSTA 10.00% 2.99% iShares MSCI EAFE ETF EFA 10.00% 2.89% Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF BLV 10.00% 4.02% Portfolio 100.00% 2.48% The next chart shows the annualized volatility and beta of the portfolio since October of 2013. (click to enlarge) Risk Contribution The risk contribution category demonstrates the amount of the portfolio’s volatility that can be attributed to that position. You can see immediately since this is a simple “equal weight” portfolio that XBI is by far the most risky ETF from the perspective of what it does to the portfolio’s volatility. You can also see that BLV has a negative total risk impact on the portfolio. When you see negative risk contributions in this kind of assessment it generally means that there will be significantly negative correlations with other asset classes in the portfolio. The position in TDTT is also unique for having a risk contribution of almost nothing. Unfortunately, it also provides a weak yield and weak return with little opportunity for that to change unless yields on TIPS improve substantially. If that happened, it would create a significant loss before the position would start generating meaningful levels of income. A quick rundown of the portfolio I put together the following chart that really simplifies the role of each investment: Name Ticker Role in Portfolio SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF SPY Core of Portfolio Health Care Select Sect SPDR ETF XLV Hedge Risk of Higher Costs SPDR Biotech ETF XBI Increase Expected Return iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF IYR Diversify Domestic Risk PowerShares Fundamental High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio ETF PHB Strong Yields on Bond Investments FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index ETF TDTT Very Low Volatility EGShares Emerging Markets Consumer ETF ECON Enhance Foreign Exposure Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF FSTA Reduce Portfolio Risk iShares MSCI EAFE ETF EFA Enhance Foreign Exposure Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF BLV Negative Correlation, Strong Yield Correlation The chart below shows the correlation of each ETF with each other ETF in the portfolio. Blue boxes indicate positive correlations and tan box indicate negative correlations. Generally speaking lower levels of correlation are highly desirable and high levels of correlation substantially reduce the benefits from diversification. (click to enlarge) Conclusion XBI is an extremely aggressive allocation that easily brings in the heaviest level of risk in the portfolio. Despite being a major source of risk, the correlation with the S&P 500 is only .56% and the resulting beta is “only” 1.44 which is very good when you consider how volatile the ETF has been. The thing that may be even more interesting is what happens when investors run the regression over a longer period. When I extended the sample period back to February of 2006, the correlation goes up to .68 but the beta drops down to .91 because the ETF was dramatically less volatile in the earlier years. Lately the sector has been substantially more volatile. The strong performance of XBI also extends back quite a ways. Since February 2006 the ETF has returned over 400%. I also extended this sample by running another regression of returns on XBI against a long term government bond index. The negative correlation in that case came in at -.35 compared to the S&P 500 coming in at -.54. The risk that comes from the weaker negative correlation is that it makes it more difficult to really drive portfolio risk lower. However, for an investor that is willing to hold a portfolio that is already overweight on equities, it would seem perfectly reasonable to include XBI as an allocation. It is a highly aggressive allocation, but it has done very well. The one other interesting note that I would make in that regard is that it has shown a substantially higher correlation with international ETFs than with domestic equity. If you’re planning to run XBI as a large holding, you may want to consider reducing the international equity allocation.

Getting Out In Front Of The Next Bear Market

Summary Anyone that has been investing for any reasonable length of time knows that bear markets are inevitable. Most of the financial media and experts agree that the definition of a bear market is a drop of 20% or more from the high water mark. Keep an open mind to multiple scenarios and avoid becoming overly confident in a specific outcome. Anyone that has been investing for any reasonable length of time knows that bear markets are inevitable. It’s just part of the normal cycle of capital flows that swing from risk to safety with little dependable timing or logic. Most of the financial media and experts agree that the definition of a bear market is a drop of 20% or more from the high water mark. Of course, there is no way to accurately forecast when or where the next bear market will appear. They simply come and go with only hindsight as our guide as to what perceived causes led to the pernicious drop in your portfolio. Right now the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) is approximately 11% off its all-time high. I think that most people would probably put that number next to “correction” in the dictionary rather than bear market. Nevertheless, many experts are already saying this is the big one. The first bear market since the 2008-2009 financial crisis. It’s already here and you better prepare yourself for Armageddon. If you bear with me for a moment (no pun intended), I want to lay down some thoughts as to the motivations for this sentiment. This may very well be the start of the next bear market, but no one knows with absolute certainty where the bottom might be or how the pattern will play out. My advice is to keep an open mind to multiple scenarios and avoid becoming overly confident in a specific outcome . Everyone wants to be the guy or gal who “called it”. They knew from the beginning that this time was different, and after a half-decade run, that the probabilities are favoring a down cycle. This is probably more driven by ego and self-satisfaction than trying to guide your hard earned nest egg or protect capital. Be wary of those who scream the loudest on the way down, for they are likely the ones who will be left on the sidelines as the market heads higher. Changes to your portfolio during a correction or bear market should be made with calculated steps. This may include selling into rallies or making subtle changes to your asset allocation in order to reduce your overall risk profile. That also means fighting the urge to capitulate on big down days or making drastic changes at inopportune times. Nothing goes straight up or straight down in a perfect sequence. The market does move fast, but you have to pick your spots in order to avoid making a big mistake born out of short-term panic rather than sound logic. The Bottom Line I find myself fighting the same cycles of fear and greed that everyone else does. It’s simply a natural psychological reaction to get more pessimistic on the way down and more optimistic on the way up. Yet, letting those impulses translate to big shifts in your portfolio may result in taking too much risk near a top and being too conservative near a bottom. In addition, I always find it helpful to tune out the noise of the financial pundits who thrive on this emotional roller coaster. They don’t know anything more than you do with respect to where the market is headed and they certainly don’t know anything about your personal needs. You should be working with an advisor or managing your own portfolio with well-defined parameters that relate to your specific situation. Share this article with a colleague