Tag Archives: management

Building A Bulletproof Portfolio Of Top Likefolio Stocks

Summary An investor can “bullet-proof” his portfolio while maximizing his expected return using the hedged portfolio method. When creating a hedged portfolio, you can start from scratch or start with a list of stock picks. We explore the second method here. The stock picks we start with are ones with promising social data metrics, as determined by Likefolio, a startup that uses social media to measure sentiment about brands. We provide a sample hedged portfolio of top Likefolio stocks designed for an investor unwilling to risk a drawdown of more than 20%. Using Social Data To Gauge Market Sentiment Several years ago, one of the early pioneers in using social media data for investment purposes was London-based Derwent Capital Markets, which launched a hedge fund in 2011 using Twitter (NYSE: TWTR ) data to gauge market sentiment. The idea for the fund came from a research paper by Johan Bollen, Huina Mao, and Xiao-Jun Zeng that claimed to have found a method of using Twitter data to determine the daily direction of Dow Jones Industrial Average with 87.6% accuracy. Derwent’s Twitter hedge fund was shut down, shortly after opening, prompting Martin Bryant of The Next Web to comment : it appears that there simply isn’t much market appetite for investments powered by social media sentiment. It seems that the market simply isn’t ready to put its faith in the wisdom of digital crowds just yet. Bryant may have spoken too soon. Today, both institutional investors as well as retail investors are using social data aggregated by Likefolio (for example, TD Ameritrade (NYSE: AMTD ) now offers its retail customers social data provided by Likefolio, as AMTD managing director Nicole Sherrod explains in this Fox Business interview). Unlike earlier approaches such as Derwent Capital’s short-lived fund, Likefolio’s approach isn’t to gauge market sentiment directly, but to gauge sentiment about brands that roll up to publicly traded stocks. Using Social Data To Source Stock Ideas There’s a lot of chatter on social media about individual stocks, but a challenge with generating any useful data from it is the tendency of an investor to ” talk his book “: anyone who is long a particular stock is likely to make bullish comments about it, and vice-versa. Likefolio avoids this challenge by mining comments about brands owned by publicly traded companies, rather than the stocks themselves, as the image above from its website illustrates. Someone who comments about Yum Brands (NYSE: YUM ) on Facebook (NASDAQ: FB ), Twitter, or other social media platforms, may be talking his book, but, for every YUM investor there are many more Taco Bell, KFC, and Pizza Hut customers, and they are sharing their thoughts about those brands on social media constantly (to see an example for yourself, enter “Taco Bell” in the search field on Twitter now, and click the “Live” tab). According to Likefolio, a drop in social data sentiment and volume on Yum Brands offered a warning in late June that was confirmed by the company’s dissappointing earnings release in October. The Risks of Investing in Social Data-Sourced Stocks As with any style of stock investing, when using social data to source stock picks, you face two kinds of risks: idiosyncratic risk , the risk of something bad happening to one of the companies you own, and market risk , the risk of your investments suffering due to a decline of the market as a whole. Two Ways of Limiting Stock-Specific Risk One way to limit stock-specific risk is via hedging; another way is via diversification. In a previous article (“How to Limit Your Market Risk”), we discussed ways to limit market risk for a diversified portfolio. In this post, we’ll look at how to “bulletproof” a concentrated portfolio of top Likefolio stocks using the hedged portfolio method . In that method, you limit both stock-specific and market risk via hedging. Top Likefolio Stocks In a recent post (“5 Stocks with Sizzling Social Data Metrics”), Likefolio co-founder Andy Swan highlighted five stocks for which social data trends were strongly bullish: Michael Kors Holdings (NYSE: KORS ) Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN ) Crocs (NASDAQ: CROX ) Walmart (NYSE: WMT ) GoPro (NASDAQ: GPRO ) We’ll use those stocks as a starting point to construct a “bulletproof”, or hedged portfolio for an investor who is unwilling to risk a drawdown of more than 20%, and has $400,000 that he wants to invest. First, though, let’s address the issue of risk tolerance, and how it affects potential return. Risk Tolerance and Potential Return All else equal, with a hedged portfolio, the greater an investor’s risk tolerance — the greater the maximum drawdown he is willing to risk (his “threshold”, in our terminology) – the higher his potential return will be. So, we should expect that an investor who is willing to risk a 25% decline will have a chance at higher potential returns than one who is only willing to risk a 15% drawdown. In our example, we’ll be splitting the difference and using a 20% threshold. Constructing A Hedged Portfolio We’ll outline the process here briefly, and then explain how you can implement it yourself. Finally, we’ll present an example of a hedged portfolio that was constructed this way with an automated tool. The process, in broad strokes, is this: Find securities with promising potential returns (we define potential return as a high-end, bullish estimate of how the security will perform). Find securities that are relatively inexpensive to hedge. Buy a handful of securities that score well on the first two criteria; in other words, buy a handful of securities with high potential returns net of their hedging costs (or, ones with high net potential returns). Hedge them. The potential benefits of this approach are twofold: If you are successful at the first step (finding securities with high potential returns), and you hold a concentrated portfolio of them, your portfolios should generate decent returns over time. If you are hedged, and your return estimates are completely wrong, on occasion — or the market moves against you — your downside will be strictly limited. How to Implement This Approach Finding promising stocks In this case, we’re going to start with the five stocks mentioned in the Likefolio blog post we linked to above. To quantify potential returns for these stocks, you can, for example, use analysts’ consensus price targets for them, to calculate potential returns in percentage terms. For example, via Nasdaq’s website , the image below shows the sell-side analysts’ consensus 12 month price target for AMZN as of October 9th, 2015: Since AMZN closed at $539.80 on October 9th, the consensus price target suggests a 20% potential return over 12 months. In general, though, you’ll need to use the same time frame for each of your potential return calculations to facilitate comparisons of potential returns, hedging costs, and net potential returns. Our method starts with calculations of six-month potential returns. Finding inexpensive ways to hedge these securities Whatever hedging method you use, for this example, you’d want to make sure that each security is hedged against a greater-than-20% decline over the time frame covered by your potential return calculations (our method attempts to find optimal static hedges using collars as well as protective puts going out approximately six months). And you’ll need to calculate your cost of hedging as a percentage of position value. Select the securities with highest, or at least positive net potential returns When starting from a large universe of securities, you’d want to select the ones with the highest potential returns, net of hedging costs. In this case, we’re starting with just a handful of securities, but we’ll at least want to exclude any of them that has a negative potential return net of hedging costs. It doesn’t make sense to pay X to hedge a stock if you estimate the stock will return 70% over 6 months, maybe it’s worth it to you to pay up to hedge your downside risk. Despite the high cost of the GPRO hedge, the overall hedging cost of the portfolio is negative. Possibly More Protection Than Promised In some cases, hedges such as the GPRO one, or the other ones in the portfolio above can provide more protection than promised. For an example of that, see this instablog post on hedging the iPath S&P 500 VIX ST Futures ETN (NYSEARCA: VXX ). [i] To be conservative, this optimal collar shows the puts being purchased at their ask price, and the calls being sold at their bid price. In practice, an investor can often buy the puts for less (i.e., at some point between the bid and ask prices) and sell the calls for more (again, at some point between the bid and ask). So the actual cost of opening this collar would have likely been less.

The Excesses Of Capitalism And The Concept Of Sheepdogs

This is weekend macro and thought piece. I share my view on how a select few profiteers are poising the well. I provide three examples of bad actors that hurt investors directly and indirectly . In the 2014 film American Sniper written by Jason Hall and directed by Clint Eastwood, at an early age, Chris Kyle’s father teachers his then two younger sons the about the three type of people in the world (wolves, sheep, and sheep dogs). Compliments of IMdb, here is a snapshot of the quote directly from the movie. Although this quote is used in the concept of war, I am going to apply it to investing. I have written many articles here on Seeking Alpha where my investment thesis was to recommend that retail investors “sell” the underlying stock. In the disclosure section, I write that I am not short. This is the case as a family member works for a Tier 1 U.S. investment bank, so I am restricted from shorting any security, period. There are no exceptions. Therefore, many people have doubted or questioned my motives and accused me of secretly shorting the stocks. Otherwise, what would my true motivation for writing these articles be. Trust me, I am not short and I am not going to violate the investment bank’s policy. Some people might then question why would I write a negative piece about a company if I can’t short it. Why would l suggest that someone else take the medicine, but I myself wouldn’t take the medicine. They say isn’t this hypocritical. Here is where the concept of the sheepdog comes to play. Although I only I have five direct years of professional experience, working as a Senior Investment Associate in Liberty Mutual’s investment grade group, I acquired a lot of experience and observed a lot that I want to share. This along with the fact that I have passionately been following markets since high school (I graduated in 1999 – so I am now 35) is why I write these articles. Unfortunately and perhaps sadly, Wall Street and the investing community is made of up wolves, sheep, and the rare sheepdogs. No question, at least in my mind, the concept of capitalism is the greatest system for lifting people up and creating economic opportunities. During my career, I have worked or informally come into contact with many different interesting and diverse individuals who came to the U.S. for educational and economic opportunities. I don’t want to sound like a politician and start spouting off platitudes, but I do truly people that U.S. is the great place in world for anyone with a dream of working hard, getting an education, and trying to make economically. What makes our country great is how we are a melting pot of immigrants and we welcome people with varied backgrounds, religions, ethnicities, political views, etc. The economic opportunities, the rule of law, and the upside optionality for entrepreneurs and the educated are second to none here in United States. However, no system is perfect. Given the Federal Reserves policies of QE and the fact that the fed funds rates has been zero since December 2008, has created many excesses, which have led to the misallocation of capital, and led many people to reach for elusive yield. This yield reaching has taken the form chasing equity dividends, REITs, MLPs, bonds, leveraged products, or simply capital appreciation. Given the reality that there is this massive pool of idled savings and capital that could no longer generate low risk adjusted returns, investors were forced to wade into the riskier pool, a pool with undercurrents and sharks, and risk getting in over their heads. When I think of the economic income inequality pioneers, people highlighting and framing the issue, I think of French economist Thomas Piketty and U Cal Berkeley’s Emmanuel Saez. As Seeking Alpha is not a political website, I am going to move away from this line of writing, as I don’t want the court room to object and get called out by the judge. However, I simply wanted to raise the topic of income inequality, as it is very timely, especially given the phenomenon of Bernie Sanders’ improbable meteoric rise into the political lime light. That is all I will say about the topic and I will get back on point now. So, now I will get back to the concept of wolves, sheep, and sheepdogs. Wall Street and the financial industry in general is a no holds barred place full of wolves. There is plenty of regulation designed to help protect individual investors from bad behavior, but no amount of regulation or policy can prevent or stop the wolves in the financial industry from trying to slaughter the retail sheep. I don’t want to be overly dramatic or patronizing, as after all, I only rose to a Senior Investment Associate level at a second tier insurance company. After all, how can have these strong opinions when I have worked on Wall Street and never had a storied career or a Managing Director’s title? I am not a true insider and I don’t know what I am talking about, right? I can envision skeptical people thinking that I am embellishing my experience and over inflating my strong opinions. Look, everyone is entitled to their views and opinions, but trust me I am a rare sheep dog, at least at heart. Yes, I like buying securities that appreciate in value. However, I only write what I truly believe and my money is where my mouth is as I eat my own cooking. Even during my time at Liberty Mutual I was very vocal about the bad behavior and the first to bring to my boss’s attention the misdeeds within the financial industry. Of course, I was the first person on the bond desk to read Michael Lewis’ The Big Short. I still can’t believe that Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS ) was selling securities to clients and then shorting them. At least Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS ) believed in what they were putting their clients into as they took their medicine in the form of big losses. You get the idea. Although some people may have shared my views, although with less fervor, when you work in the industry no one want to hear about this stuff. I wasn’t supposed to highlight and discuss this stuff. This was like Don Draper’s famous “We are Quitting Tobacco Letter” to the New York Times. Everyone agreed with what he wrote, but he greatly diminished his future prospects to other firms the moment he the letter was published because he took a principled stand. Ok, enough sizzle, here is the beef. The financial industry is full of wolves and the many member of our country practice the art of avarice. However, my target of my criticism isn’t Wall Street investment banks per se, it is actually private equity, some not all corporate insiders, and some hedge funds. I am actually much less critical of Wall Street Investment banks as their clients are sophisticated institutional investors not the retail public. Wall Street is simply a consultant or a conduit for market participants to conduct their business. They actually play an important role of helping global investor more efficient allocate capital. They underwrite important deals for investors to raise capital for economic growth, they are deal makers for mergers and acquisition, they take companies public, they write research, and they facility trading and provide liquidity so market participants can transact more easily. The real wolves and they are allowed to roam free because of the unfortunate spill over effects of the Fed’s excessively accommodative policies are a select group of bad actors in the private equity and some hedge funds realms. Let me be clear, I am not painting a broad brush and saying all private equity and hedge funds are bad actors. Some are brilliant long term investors that generate consistent risk adjusted outsized returns on behalf of noble pension funds and endowments that help John Q. Public fund their retirement. However, avarice and outright profiteering of some private equity funds is abhorrent. The short term quarter to quarter managing your stock prices so insiders can exercise their stock options and ride the wave of riches until it blows up is another major issue for another piece, but it exists. In this greedy and short term vortex, many, many retail investors get hurt. Unfortunately, some mutual funds are unwittingly enablers of this bad behavior by their apathy and lack of passion for fighting proxy wars. No question Mr. Icahn is as savvy as he is greedy, but I give him credit for playing an important Gordon Gekko role. He pushes management teams and through the power of his brand, his capital, and outspoken approach, important issues bubble to surface and find their way onto the front page of major newspapers. Anyway, I wrote this piece to call out the profiteering of some private equity funds and two hedge fund managers. There are many others and I sincerely hope in the comments section, if readers have enough stamina and interest to have read this far along that they too will join me as sheepdogs to protect those that are in the earlier stages of their enlightened investment education process. Please help me in my quest to shine the light of transparency for the world to opens its eyes to this profiteering. These bad actors are poisoning the well by their self serving and greed. Let’s call it out. I trying to fire the proverbial first shot and I will only highlight a few examples. Here are probably hundred if not more examples. Exhibt A – Axovant. Axovant (NYSE: AXON ) made big splash with the largest ever U.S. biotechnology IPO in history earlier this year. Nathan Vardi of Forbes wrote a well balanced piece on Axovant’s CEO and its 11 employees. Aron Pinson, CFA actual was one of the first to write an excellent piece published on June 12, 2015 called “How bubbles are blown: Biotech Edition (NASDAQ: III )”. I was so outrage when I read about this that spent twenty minutes ranting about this at work, even though the industry I work in has nothing to do with biotechnology. That that morning the stock was $30 and I said it would be single digits within six months. It isn’t yet, but we are close. Also here is a snapshot of a comment I made in the comments section of another Seeking Alpha article. I’m sure most readers are aware of Axovant because it is so ridiculous and Vivek Ramaswamy is the quintessential profiteer using his god given high IQ, Harvard and Yale educations to get rich selling expensive high priced lottery tickets, in the form of Axovant common shares, to retail investors. This is and always was a Hail Mary low probability bet. Anyone that buys this stock (lottery ticket) is better suited betting it all on “red” in Las Vegas. Either way, through sheer audacity and the underwriting of tier 2 Jefferies , this gem of an IPO was taken public. I’m not one bit surprised that Jefferies led the deal as the Tier 1 I-banks wouldn’t want their name on a bad deal like Axovant. Either way, of course, readers can read up on the topic and form their own view. Exhibit B – Shake Shack I have written two articles on Shake Shack (NYSE: SHAK ), so I will keep my gripping brief on this one. Shake Shack is a perfectly legitimate and real business. They offer a simple menu and offer hamburgers, hot dogs, fries, and shakes. Yet because of its cult following in Manhattan, a land of high disposable incomes and population destiny they have sporty 30% contribution margins in their Manhattan store base. The market has incorrectly extrapolated these financials and falsely assumed that the concept can be rolled out nation wide. Investors incorrectly took the 30% gross margin figure and multiplied by some nonsense pie in the sky 2030 unit count and figured the stock must be worth three or four billion. What is a billion dollar between friends. Lo and behold, yours truly, your honest broker and opinionated sheep dog decided to act like Don Quixote. I spent the time searching through the SHAK IPO documents. Sure enough insiders contributed laughably low amount of capital and the early insiders own shares at $0.38. Besides the fact that people have to be on LSD to buy stock in a hamburger and hot dog joint with a then $3 billion dollar valuation, these profiteers are cashing out as fast as humanly possible before this house of cards collapses. The truth is that the model and margins aren’t scalable. Here is my recent article published here on Seeking Alpha about Shack Shake. Exhibit C – Turing Pharmaceuticals Led by former hedge fund manger, Martin Shkrelli, this company had the audacity to raise the price of Daraprim from $13.50 per pill to $750. There was no new R&D expenditures or any new science that went into the drug. This is simply profiteering at its finest. Only in America can you legally bilk patients and system of million of dollars, yet if a poor kid from a disadvantaged background steals a TV from Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT ) then they face jail time. What kind of bizarro world do we live in? I wrote this piece to share more about myself and thought process. More importantly, I want to unite the other sheepdogs. I’m not the New York attorney general, or a power politician. I am just a simple man, with simple ideas, that strives to have integrity and do the right thing. I am deeply flawed just like everyone else. Yes, I am throwing stones and live in a glass house, but I would argue I am throwing pebbles not baseball sized rocks. As a society we need to be vigilant to this type of profiteering and bad acting as it gives capitalism a bad name. I think most people try to live meaningful, principled lives, and strive for high ideals. Through the collective power of Seeking Alpha’s platform and network, will you join me in my investing sheepdog quest?

This New Hedged Global ETF Meets The Demand Of Time

It is in years like 2015 that the spotlight falls on the hedged global investing strategy. The world economy is presently mulling over two starkly different policy tools. While the biggest economy, the U.S., is planning for a tightening, other developed nations are turning their loose policies to ultra-loose. Agreed, the recent soft jobs data put off the rate hike speculations to a large extent this year, but this hardly dampened the greenback. The U.S. currency is still stronger despite bets over the imminent Fed lift-off subsiding. The U.S. dollar is 13.5% stronger than the euro in the last one-year time frame, trading 12.3% higher than the yen and 24.4% above the Australian dollar (as of October 6, 2015). This makes the case for hedged global ETF investing stronger. Moreover, the wave of easy money policies across the globe, be it in Europe or Asia, has brightened the appeal for dividend investing lately. Several nations are resorting to further easing as growth, investments and consumer demand have failed to exhibit sustained recovery so far in the year. Though the Fed is aiming policy normalization later this year or early next year, the modest U.S. growth momentum indicates a slower rate hike trajectory in the future. All these will likely keep bond yields at check globally. As a result, investors looking for steady current income might shift their focus to high dividend global stocks. It is this economic backdrop that can make the new ETF – the SPDR S&P International Dividend Currency Hedged ETF (NYSEARCA: HDWX ) – a star performer. HDWX in Detail The fund is nothing but the currency-hedged version of an already popular fund, the SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: DWX ), and follows the S&P International Dividend Opportunities USD hedged Index. In total, the underlying fund DWX holds 119 high-yielding securities with none holding more than 3.36% of assets. Fortescue Metals ( OTCQX:FSUMF ), National Grid plc (NYSE: NGG ) and Berkeley Group ( OTCPK:BKGFY ) are the top three holdings. All stocks need to deliver positive 3-year earnings growth and profitability, as calculated by positive earnings per share before extraordinary items over the last 12-month period. Financials and Utilities take the top two spots with each accounting for about one-fourth share, followed by Telecom (15.9%) and Energy (14.7%). Australian firms dominate the returns at 23.2% while the United Kingdom and Canada make up for 17.4% and 10% share, respectively. From a market cap look, mid caps and large caps combine to make up for 88%, leaving little room for the small caps. The fund has amassed about $4 million of assets within less than one month of its launch. It charges 48 bps in annual fees. It has an annual dividend yield of 6.67% (as of October 6, 2015) and added about 5% the same day. Can It Continue to See Success? Focus on dividends and hedging technique in the global equities ETF space is no longer a fresh idea as individually there are plenty of similar options. Products like the PowerShares International Dividend Achievers Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: PID ) and the First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index ETF (NYSEARCA: FGD ) have already accumulated considerable investor wealth in the dividend ETFs space and could pose as threats to the tenderfoot. However, taking both factors – dividend payments and currency-hedging – into consideration, the list gets shortened. Still, HDWX might have to compete with similarly-themed products like the WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Hedged Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: DXUS ), the Deutsche X-trackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DBAW ) and the Deutsche X-trackers MSCI EMU Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DBEZ ). The trio charges in the range of 40-45 bps in fees. However, like HDWX, none of these are heavily weighted on Australia. Since commodities bounced back after a muted U.S. jobs report, heavy presence of the commodity-rich Australia in the portfolio showered ample gains on HDWX. Once this boom fizzles out, HDWX may not be able to sustain the momentum. Still, investors can ride on this new ETF as long as the trend is your friend. Original Post