Tag Archives: management

4 Commodity Currency ETFs Outshining Dollar To Start Q4

The China-induced global economic uncertainties lashed out on the most risky asset classes to close Q3 and restrained the Fed from hiking key interest rates almost after a decade. Though the Fed attributed a wavering global financial market and a subdued inflation profile as the main cause for the deterrence of a lift-off, the sailing wasn’t smooth at home too. This was because the U.S. economy reported sub-par jobs data in September. The year-to-date monthly pace of job gains now averages 198K and the pace for the last three months was much lower at 167K. This compares with the monthly average of 260K for 2014. A weaker jobs report crushed all chances of a sooner-than-expected rate hike in the U.S., as it points toward slowing U.S. growth momentum. As a result, this latest bit of employment information stabbed the strength of the greenback which ruled the currency world for over a year and did magic for most commodities and the related ETFs to start of the fourth quarter. Dollar ETF PowerShares DB US Dollar Bullish ETF (NYSEARCA: UUP ) lost about 1.5% in the last 10 days (as of October 9, 2015) while most commodity-centric currencies turned out as surprise winners. Apart from the range-bound U.S. dollar, an oil price rebound following falling crude oil production, the commodities behemoth Glencore PLC’s ( OTCPK:GLCNF ) ( OTCPK:GLNCY ) announcement to close its supply of many actively traded commodities from zinc to copper and a slowly stabilizing Chinese market (which happens to be a foremost user of metals) boosted trading in commodities. Prior to this, commodities witnessed horrendous trading and it goes without saying that such huge and prolonged sell-offs have made the commodities’ valuation so cheap that any single driver would easily take the commodity currency ETFs to new heights. Though we believe the trend might tumble once the rising rate worries are back on the table, at the current level many investors may try to remove some of the dollar risk from their portfolio and focus on currency ETFs that are outdoing the dollar to start Q4: Below, we highlight four such currency funds that are shooting ahead of the greenback in October: WisdomTree Brazilian Real Strategy Fund (NYSEARCA: BZF ) – Up 6.1% Brazilian real was at a two-decade low at the end of September. But central bank intervention, easing political dispute over the budget, a subsiding lift-off and a commodity market bounce added to the real strength to start Q4. Since, Brazil is a commodity-centric economy, the recent surge in real is self-explanatory. Brazil’s Congress okayed most of the budget cuts, pension reforms and tax hikes planned by Rousseff’s government to contain spending and limit above-goal inflation. This fund seeks to achieve total returns reflective of both money market rates in Brazil available to foreign investors and changes in value of the Brazilian real relative to the U.S. dollar. Both AUM and average daily volume are paltry at $15.4 million and 20,000 shares, respectively. The product charges 45 bps in annual fees and is down 23.1% so far this year (as of October 9, 2015). It has a Zacks ETF Rank of 5 or ‘Strong Sell’ rating with a High risk outlook. However, the fund added over 6.1% in the last 10 days. WisdomTree Commodity Currency Fund (NYSEARCA: CCX ) – Up 4.5% This fund provides investors exposure to the currencies and money market rates of countries commonly known as commodity exporters. It seeks to achieve total returns reflective of both money market rates in select commodity-producing countries available to foreign investors and changes to the value of these currencies relative to the U.S. dollar. With this approach, investors can embark upon a variety of economies around the world. The product invests in eight currencies – Australian Dollar, Brazilian Real, Canadian Dollar, Chilean Peso, Norwegian Krone, New Zealand Dollar, Russian Ruble, and South African Rand – almost in equal proportions. The fund is often overlooked by investors as depicted by its AUM of just $6.3 billion and average daily volume of about 1,500 shares. It charges 55 bps in annual fees. The ETF was up 4.5% over the past 10 days. WisdomTree Dreyfus Emerging Currency Fund (NYSEARCA: CEW ) – Up 4.8% Thanks to the commodity strength, even emerging market currencies took the lead. Currently, the fund has a focus on Asian currencies (42%), followed by Latin America (25%) and Europe (17%). This currency ETF also sees solid volume of about 45,000 shares a day on comparable $57.1 million in AUM. CEW charges 55 bps in fees. CEW advanced about 4.8% in the last 10 days (as of October 9, 2015). Guggenheim CurrencyShares Australian Dollar Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: FXA ) – Up 4.3% This fund offers a great play to capitalize on the future rise in the Australian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar. It tracks the movement of the Australian dollar relative to the USD, net of the Trust expenses, which are expected to be paid from the interest earned on the deposited Australian dollars. The product has amassed $180.1 million in its asset base while trades in moderate volume of 45,000 shares per day on average. It has an expense ratio of 0.40% and was up 4.3% over the past 10 days. Original post .

What Deleveraging May Mean For Netflix And Many Of Your Favorite Stocks

One way or another, debt extremes eventually give way to deleveraging. The exact forces that push a high-flyer to incredible heights can send it plummeting 20,000 leagues beneath sea level. And while it is certainly possible that the Fed can deftly maneuver in the near-term, longer-term investors need to be more vigilant. You know those annoying notifications that chime on your cell phone in the middle of the work day? The ones that sound off to let you know when Kim Kardashian’s daughter sits on a commode? Or when Donald Trump insults a member of the media? I get far too many of those. I’ve tried playing with the notification settings on the apps on my iPhone, but somehow, I still get a ton of unwanted messages. Last week, I received a Yahoo Finance notification shortly after the stock market closed shop. The one-liner? “Stocks soar on judgment that Fed will delay rate hike.” Let that sink in for a moment. Stocks are not rocketing because investors are confident about corporate profitability or sales. They’re not climbing due to jobs optimism or economic acceleration. The Dow moved higher for seven consecutive trading sessions (through Monday 10/12) because – in spite of seven years of 0% overnight lending rates – the U.S. economy is still too weak for a token tightening gesture. No doubt about it. This is not the 80s or the 90s anymore. Years ago, money managers, institutional traders and the overall investment community owned stock assets because public corporations were likely to grow their businesses in a strong U.S. expansion. Now? Investors own equities because the “no-go” economy still requires unimaginably cheap credit. So what’s the big deal about leaving interest rates so low for so long? One reason is excess speculation. For example, plenty of folks own Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ) and they have enjoyed a number of years of extraordinary price gains. More recently, however, folks have leveraged account values in order to own even more shares of NFLX. Just as homeowners in 2005 used cash-out refinancing to acquire additional properties with negligible down payments, NFLX shareholders have used rising account values in margin accounts to buy more NFLX stock. As shares of the media giant rise – as NFLX begins looking like a no-lose proposition – speculators employ more leverage to acquire even more shares of NFLX. And why the heck wouldn’t you borrow to buy more? The Fed’s going to make sure that stocks won’t fall, right? Borrowing money for the purpose of leveraging a stock position is known as margin debt . It has been a profitable venture for anyone who arrived early at the reflated asset price party. Of course, parties eventually end. Those who overstay their welcome or who arrive late will will find themselves nursing monstrous losses. Consider the fact that NYSE margin debt cracked at an all-time high near the $500 billion mark in April. By September, margin debt sank 6.7%, down to $473 billion. Why might this matter? There have only been four times since the turn of the century when margin debt pulled back by 6.7% or more – April 2000, August 2007, May 2010 and August 2011. Those are some relatively inauspicious dates. Granted, 2010 turned out to be a short-lived correction in the early stages of the current bull market. The other three occasions – the dot-come tech wreck, the worldwide financial collapse and the euro-zone crisis – resulted in massive drawdowns for world stock benchmarks. Margin debt deterioration is, of course, deleveraging within the stock market. Not only does it signal a lack of confidence that the borrowing-to-buy game can continue indefinitely, but significant declines in markets themselves trigger margin calls that, ultimately, force the sale of the underlying assets. Now let’s revisit shares of Netflix. Margin debt is a function of the underlying “collateral.” Forced liquidation subsequently reduces the value of the collateral (NFLX) which triggers still more margin calls and additional liquidation. The exact forces that push a high-flyer to incredible heights can send it plummeting 20,000 leagues beneath sea level. (Note: My intent is not to pick on Netflix; rather, I am highlighting how leverage often destroys the best laid plans.) How enthusiastic have speculators been relative to actual economic activity here in the fall of 2015? Margin debt as a percentage of GDP is close to 3%; in the fall of 2000 and in the fall of 2007, margin debt-to-GDP hit 2.4% and 2.3% respectively. And it’s not just margin debt that suggests leverage is hitting obscene levels. According to recent research conducted by McKinsey, total debt (consumer, business, government, financial) as a percentage of GDP has surpassed the extremes of 2007: 286% versus 269%. $57 trillion of fresh debt across 7 years at a rate of 5.3%, far outpacing the 2.2% growth in GDP. As my daughter might inquire, “Who’s gonna pay for that?” Optimists say that when consumers use their credit cards at H&M, when drivers take out auto loans for Audis, when students acquire loans for their $40,000-per-year education, the activity shows confidence in the future. And after all, they tell us, the ability to service the debt is all that matters. On the other hand, if debt is expanding at a faster rate than economic activity, will the day not come when the expansion of that debt surpasses the ability to service it? If consumer credit as a percentage of GDP was insanely high at 17.5% leading into the financial meltdown circa 2007, how are people better off when it is at 19.5%? Or should we simply assume the Federal Reserve will be able to keep borrowing costs near historic lows forever? Debt cannot increase indefinitely. Like an economy itself, expansion gives way to contraction. There are credit cycles just as sure as their are business cycles. We should not be surprised, then, that the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the International Monetary Fund (NYSE: IMF ) and the German finance minister have all warned about extremely high debt ratios the world over. Each have used terms like “dangerous over-leveraging” and “credit panic,” while simultaneously fretting a global financial system that would be vulnerable to any amount of monetary tightening by the U.S. Federal Reserve. Can you say, “Catch 22?” One way or another, debt extremes eventually give way to deleveraging. And while it is certainly possible that the Fed can deftly maneuver in the near-term – prompting the federal government as well as American businesses, consumers and market speculators to keep borrowing freely – longer-term investors need to be more vigilant. In essence, one’s equity component should focus on low volatility and quality at this juncture. Consider the iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (NYSEARCA: QUAL ) and/or the iShares USA Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: USMV ). If you’re going to own individual securities, even in a downturn, you will want to think in terms of low leverage companies like Costco (NASDAQ: COST ) and low volatile corporations like PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP ). What’s more, you may want to resist the temptation in thinking that the worst is over for previous momentum standouts like the SPDR Biotech ETF (NYSEARCA: XBI ). Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.

Atmos Energy’s Outlook Contains Multiple Drivers For Earnings Growth

Summary Natural gas utility Atmos Energy has been one of the sector’s strongest performers over the last five years as the discovery of large domestic gas reserves has spurred its demand. The company also benefits from a diverse geographic footprint and the existence of multiple favorable regulatory schemes in its large service area. While a warm spring dampened its FQ3 earnings, the company continued to report customer growth and higher throughput in its pipelines segment. The company’s shares appear to be overvalued on a P/E basis but its outlook contains multiple drivers for future earnings growth, both near term and long term. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, Atmos Energy (NYSE: ATO ) is one of the country’s largest natural gas utilities, handling distribution, pipeline transmission, and storage services in several U.S. states. The company has been one of the top performers over the last several years among U.S. natural gas utilities, generating a total shareholder return result that is roughly 50% higher than the average of its peers. More recently, its share price has begun to move higher following multiple quarters of underperformance compared to the S&P 500, setting a new all-time high last week before settling a bit to $59. While the recent performance of the company’s share price has been the result of the Federal Reserve’s delay of an expected interest rate hike, which broadly supported the utilities sector, Atmos Energy’s outlook has also improved over the last several months due to a combination of changing energy consumption habits, proposed federal regulation, and the development of a strong El Nino. This article considers the company as a potential long investment opportunity in the presence of this operating environment. Atmos Energy at a glance Atmos Energy is divided into both regulated and non-regulated segments that operate in eight different states on both sides of the Mississippi River. While its largest areas cover Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, which combined are the origin of 80% of the company’s total rate base, it also operates within Colorado, Kansas, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia. Its service area covers several urban centers, providing its regulated distribution segment with roughly three million customers that are supplied via 67,000 miles of distribution and transmission pipelines. This segment’s operations are complemented by the company’s regulated pipeline segment, which transmits natural gas from many Texan shale gas basins via 5,600 miles of intrastate pipelines. Finally, Atmos Energy’s non-regulated segment provides natural gas delivery, storage, and transportation services. The regulated distribution segment generated the majority of the company’s earnings at 61% of the total in recent quarters, followed by 30% from the regulated pipelines segment and 9% from the non-regulated segment. The company’s regulated segments operate within very favorable regulatory schemes, resulting in strong allowed returns on equity compared to its peers. The regulated distribution segment has a blended allowed return on equity of 10.4% while that of the regulated pipeline segment is higher still at 11.8%. The allowed returns are further aided by mechanisms that rapidly increase rates in response to higher capex: the company reports that 91% of its capex is recouped via higher rates within six months and 96% is recouped within 12 months. Indeed, 45% of the company’s FY 2015 capex from its regulated distribution and pipeline operations is completely unlagged. 97% of its rates are further covered by weather normalization mechanisms that minimize exposure of the company’s earnings to weather-induced rate volatility, although this does not extend as far as consumption volume volatility. Atmos Energy earnings are very exposed to the utility’s operations within Texas, providing it with both an advantage and a risk. 60% of consolidated margins, 70% of its asset base, and 70% of its FY 2015 capex are linked to the state, and its distribution network serves 1.8 million customers in the state, including the Dallas-Fort Worth metro area. Of the company’s total rate base, Louisiana is second at 8%, followed by Mississippi at 6%. This exposure to Texas has provided strong support for the company’s earnings growth over the last decade due to the state’s above-average economic growth and growing exploitation of its shale gas reserves. The risk is that Texas could at some point introduce an unfavorable regulatory scheme that, because of the company’s exposure to the state, would have an outsized impact on its earnings despite its diverse geographic footprint. That said, the risk of this happening is much lower than that faced by utilities in states such as California or New York, for example. Atmos Energy has achieved 12 straight years of diluted EPS growth and 31 straight years of dividend increases. The most recent dividend hike came in the form of a 5.4% increase in the current fiscal year. Its forward yield is a relatively modest 2.6% at present, although this is more of a function of the fact that the share price has nearly tripled over the last three years than of a low dividend payout ratio. FQ3 earnings report Atmos Energy reported its earnings in August for the quarter ending June 30 that slightly exceeded the consensus analyst estimate despite the presence of warm spring temperatures. Consolidated revenue came in at $686.4 million (see table), down 27% YoY from $942.7 million. The decline from the previous year was primarily due to a 37% fall in the price of natural gas over the same period and reduced demand due to warmer than normal temperatures, although these impacts were partially offset by a customer increase of 4.6%. Atmos Energy financials (non-adjusted) FQ3 2015 FQ2 2015 FQ1 2015 FQ4 2014 FQ3 2014 Revenue ($MM) 686.4 1,540.1 1,258.8 778.7 942.7 Gross income ($MM) 381.7 520.7 423.3 337.7 359.5 Net income ($MM) 56.3 137.7 97.6 23.7 45.7 Diluted EPS ($) 0.55 1.35 0.96 0.23 0.45 EBITDA ($MM) 187.0 317.0 253.9 151.3 170.4 Source: Morningstar (2015). The company reported gross profit of $381.7 million, up from $359.5 million YoY. All three of its company’s segments reported increases over the same period, led by an increase to that of the regulated distribution segment from $257.7 million to $267 million as higher rates were only partially offset by an increase to revenue-related taxes and a decrease to demand resulting from the warm spring. The regulated pipelines segment reported a similar increase to $97 million from $87.2 million YoY as its capex spending quickly generated higher rates. Finally, the non-regulated segment’s gross profit increased from $14.8 million to $17.8 million YoY as falling natural gas prices pushed its margins higher. Adjusted net income rose to $55.1 million, or $0.54 diluted EPS, from $46.1 million, or $0.43 diluted EPS, beating the consensus EPS estimate by $0.03. The adjustment excluded an unrealized gain of $1.2 million, or $0.01 of diluted EPS. The YoY increase to net income would have been higher still but for an increase to O&M costs over the same period from $125.6 million to $132.4 million resulting from higher maintenance capex. Outlook Based on its earnings through the first three quarters of the 2015 fiscal year, Atmos Energy’s management announced during the FQ3 earnings call that it was both tightening and increasing its annual diluted EPS forecast to $3-$3.10. This would ultimately be below the company’s target annual growth of 6-8% through FY 2018, although such a relative slowdown isn’t surprising given its 12% YoY increase in FY 2014. Management expects to support its long-term EPS growth target by maintaining its current high levels of capex, reaching around $1 billion annually through FY 2018 and resulting in a rate base CAGR of 9-10% over the same period. Most of this capex will consist of reliability spending by its regulated distribution segment; only 12% will go towards customer expansion. Atmos Energy’s outlook through FY 2018 will be most impacted by three factors: weather, interest rates, and natural gas demand. Barring an interest rate increase before the end of the year, weather will be the first factor to make its presence felt. Meteorologists now attribute a high degree of certainty to the arrival of a strong El Nino this year, with the only questions remaining relating to its ultimate strength. Previous such events have been characterized by substantially colder than normal temperatures across Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi between January and May. Virginia and Kentucky have also experienced slightly colder temperatures during previous El Nino events, although Colorado and Kansas have experienced warmer temperatures. Given the strong influence of natural gas demand in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi on Atmos Energy’s consolidated earnings, however, the net impact of El Nino should be higher natural gas demand. While weather-normalization mechanisms in its service area will insulate the company from higher rates resulting from strong demand, it will benefit from higher volumes resulting from people running their heaters more than normal. Interest rates will also impact Atmos Energy’s earnings in FY 2016 and beyond. The company ended FQ3 with only $43 million on hand, making it likely that it will turn to the debt markets to finance its planned capex through FY 2018. Higher interest rates resulting from bullish Federal Reserve action will increase the company’s interest costs moving forward compared to in the past. That said, a couple of factors will limit this impact. First, 71% of its long-term debt matures after FY 2024, leaving it with breathing space. Second, its most expensive debt matures over the next few years. Finally, the favorable regulatory environment that the company operates in minimizes regulatory lag, preventing it from finding itself in the unenviable position of many of its peers when higher interest costs are not offset on the earnings statement by higher rates. The company’s longer-term earnings will likely be positively impacted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s [EPA] recent unveiling of its Clean Power Plan, which requires individual states to achieve reductions to the average carbon intensities (pounds of CO2 per MWh of electricity generated) of their power plants between 2022 and 2030. Each state’s required reduction operates as a function of its current average intensity, with those states having the highest intensities being required to achieve the largest reductions, although not necessarily the lowest ending intensities. Texas must achieve a 24% reduction by 2022, increasing to a 33% reduction by 2030, although its ending intensity can ultimately be met by employing natural gas complemented by wind. Arkansas must achieve an even larger reduction. The Clean Power Plan will ultimately drive demand for natural gas in power plant applications, both in Texas and the broader U.S., creating an additional source of demand for Texan shale gas. Atmos Energy’s regulated pipeline segment only operates at 51% of its peak capacity, leaving it with the slack to take on additional volumes at a very attractive allowed ROE. Finally, it is unlikely that the company will need to wait for the Clean Power Plan to go into effect before realizing additional natural gas demand in both its distribution and pipelines segments. The price of natural gas has fallen sharply over the past 12 months as commodity prices have broadly moved lower. This has caused natural gas consumption to move higher even as the number of heating degree-days in the U.S. has decreased, with the replacement of coal by natural gas at power plants providing a major impetus for this trend. Following the recent decline to the price of natural gas, the U.S. Energy Information Administration [EIA] is now forecasting total natural gas consumption to increase by 7% between 2013 and 2016 even as cooling degree-days decline. Texas, with its ample reserves of shale gas, can be expected to meet much of this demand, and Atmos Energy’s pipelines are available to connect the state’s gas fields with the rest of the country’s pipeline network. Valuation The consensus analyst estimates for Atmos Energy’s diluted EPS results in FY 2015 and FY 2016 have moved slightly higher over the last 90 days, the former in response to its FQ3 earnings beat and the latter in response to expectations of a cold winter in the company’s service area and the resumption of the natural gas price’s earlier trend lower. The FY 2015 estimate has increased from $3.04 to $3.07 while the FY 2016 estimate has increased from $3.23 to $3.25. Based on a share price at the time of writing of $59, the company’s shares are trading at a trailing P/E ratio of 19.1x and forward ratios of 18.3x and 17.5x for FY 2015 and FY 2016, respectively. All three of these are notably higher than their long-term historical averages of 14-15x. Conclusion Natural gas utility Atmos Energy has been a top performer from a shareholder return perspective compared to its peer group over the last several years, benefiting from its close proximity to inexpensive and abundant Texan shale gas and a diverse geographic and regulatory footprint. Its P/E ratios have moved higher over the last five years as both its earnings and dividends have moved steadily higher, and the company appears to be overvalued on the basis of these historical values. That said, its outlook contains a number of potential drivers to additional earnings growth, including the strong likelihood of a colder than normal winter across much of its service area resulting from this year’s El Nino event, increased demand for natural gas across the country in response to falling prices, and the implementation of a federal regulation that will spur additional demand for natural gas by electric utilities. While potential investors are unlikely to be interested in the company’s relatively low dividend yield, existing investors should remain in their positions despite the high valuation due to the number of potential positive catalysts on offer.