Tag Archives: management

Myopia & Market Function

Benartzi defines myopic loss aversion as making “investment decisions based on short-term losses in their portfolio, ignoring their long-term investment plan.”. Myopic loss aversion can arise when investors check their account balances or the prices of their holdings which thanks to technology has become increasingly more convenient to do. We know that there will be future bear markets and probably another crisis or two in most of our lifetimes. By Roger Nusbaum AdvisorShares ETF Strategist The Wall Street Journal posted an article written by Shlomo Benartzi who is a professor at UCLA specializing in behavioral finance. The article primarily focuses on the behavioral problems, like myopic loss aversion, that can arise when investors check their account balances or the prices of their holdings which thanks to technology has become increasingly more convenient to do. Benartzi defines myopic loss aversion as making “investment decisions based on short-term losses in their portfolio, ignoring their long-term investment plan.” Benartzi cites that the stock market has a down day 47% of the time, a down month happens 41% of the time, a down year 30% of the time and a down decade 15% of the time. We’ve talked about this before going back before the crisis albeit with some different wording. Before and during the last major decline, as well as many times since then, I’ve said that when the market does take a serious hit that it will then recover to make a new high with the variable being how long it takes. While this seems obvious now it is one of many things frequently forgotten in the heat of a large decline. Additionally we know that there will be future bear markets and probably another crisis or two in most of our lifetimes. And those future bear markets/crises will take stocks down a lot which will then be followed by a new high after some period of time. This is not a predictive comment this is simply how markets work with Japan being a possible stubborn exception that proves the rule. It took the S&P 500 five and half years to make a new nominal high after the “worst crisis since the great depression.” If you are one to use some sort of defensive strategy, it is hopefully one that you laid out when the market and your emotions were calm and your strategy probably doesn’t involve selling after a large decline. My preference is to start reducing exposure slowly as the market starts to show signs of rolling over. Very importantly though is that if you somehow miss the opportunity to reduce exposure, time will bail you out….probably. I say probably based on when a bear market starts in relation to when retirement is started. If a year after retiring, a 60% weighting to equities that cuts in half combined with a life event at the same time that requires a relatively large withdrawal (this is not uncommon) it will pose some serious obstacles. I think the best way to mitigate this is, as mentioned, a clearly laid out defensive strategy but not everyone will want to take on that level of engagement. In that case it may make sense for someone very close to retirement and having reached their number (or at least gotten close) to reduce their equity exposure. Not eliminate, but reduce. Back to the idea of myopic loss aversion and how to at least partially mitigate it. Knowing how markets work and then being able to remember how they work will hopefully provide an opportunity to prevent emotion from creeping in to process and giving in exactly as Benartzi describes.

Tech Mutual Funds That Were Better Off In Q3

The technology sector has impressed with the third-quarter earnings numbers. The encouraging quarterly results have come at a time when the overall growth picture remains challenged. In such a backdrop, tech bellwethers such as Google’s parent Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG ), Facebook (NASDAQ: FB ), Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ) have came up with impressive results, raising hopes of a sustainable momentum in this key sector. The tech sector’s stock-price performance reflects strength as tech stocks in the S&P 500 have outperformed the index over the trailing 4-week period. We at Zacks had predicted the momentum the tech sector should enjoy, as there were many key tech companies with positive Earnings ESP. However, the sector’s mutual funds were far from enjoying such encouraging trends. In a tough third quarter, Morningstar data reveled that the Technology fund category lost 7.7%. This dismal return is in line with the broader trends as benchmarks suffered their worst quarterly performance in four years. The Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq declined 7.6%, 7% and 7.4%, respectively. Just 17% of the mutual funds managed to finish in the green. This was a slump from 41% in the second quarter, which was again a sharp fall from 87% of the funds ending in the positive territory in the first quarter. However, the tech sector’s 7.7% loss was narrower than Healthcare’s loss of 13.7% and much narrower than the Energy sector’s 22.1% slump. Nonetheless, much like these two sectors, none of the technology mutual funds could finish in the positive territory in the third quarter. While the smallest loss from the tech sector came from the ICON Information Technology S Fund (MUTF: ICTEX ) that lost 1.4%, the biggest loser was the Matthews Asia Science & Tech Fund (MUTF: MATFX ) that lost 16.7%. Keep reading our Mutual Fund Commentary section, where we are reporting on performances and best picks from fund families and varied categories. Comparative Study: Technology Funds in Q3 As mentioned, much like the healthcare and energy fund categories, none of the technology mutual funds could finish in the green. However, technology was better off than the two sectors. In fact, the biggest loss among technology mutual funds was narrower than the smallest loser in the energy category. For the energy sector, the minimum loss was 16.9% posted by the Calvert Global Energy Solutions Y Fund (MUTF: CGAYX ). The ProFunds Oil Eqpmt Svc & Distr Svc Fund (MUTF: OEPSX ) was the biggest loser in third quarter with a 33.6% slump. As for the healthcare category, the smallest loser was the Turner Medical Science Lng/Srt Fund (MUTF: TMSFX ), which lost 5.4%. As for the biggest loser, the ProFunds Biotech Ultra Sector Svc Fund (MUTF: BIPSX ) lost 24.3% in the quarter. (Please Note: Two energy funds (same fund with different asset classes) ended in the green, but they were Trading Inverse or Bear funds that bet against the energy sector.) All the 199 technology funds we studied ended up in the red. The average loss for these 199 funds was 8%. This too compares favorably with the average losses recorded by the energy and healthcare categories. As for the energy sector, the average loss for the 103 funds was a staggering 23%. The average loss for the 115 healthcare funds was 13.4%. However, the technology mutual funds’ third-quarter performance lags the second-quarter performance. In the second quarter, 126 funds out of the 201 funds we studied had finished in the positive territory. The average gain for these 126 funds was 2.4%. While one fund had break even return, the remaining 74 posted an average loss of 1.2%. Coming back to the third-quarter performance, only 30 out of the 199 tech funds posted less than 5% loss. Meanwhile, 33 funds posted above 10% loss. Note: The above mentioned numbers include the same funds with varied asset classes. 15 Technology Funds with Least Losses Below we present the top 15 Technology mutual funds with best returns in Q3 2015: Fund Name Family Name Q3 Total Return YTD Total Return Average EPS Growth Expense Ratio Beta vs S&P 500 ICON Information Technology A (MUTF: ICTTX ) ICON Funds -1.41 1.94 21.7 1.75 1.19 MFS Technology Fund A (MUTF: MTCAX ) MFS -2.36 0 13.49 1.3 1.05 Fidelity Select Sftwr & Comp Svcs (MUTF: FSCSX ) Fidelity -2.43 -1.92 23.49 0.77 1 Saratoga Technology & Comm A (MUTF: STPAX ) Saratoga Adv -2.46 -2.28 15.21 2.27 0.99 T. Rowe Price Global Technology (MUTF: PRGTX ) T. Rowe Price -3.14 4.87 16 0.91 0.98 Goldman Sachs Tech Tollkeeper A (MUTF: GITAX ) Goldman Sachs -4.34 -1.06 20.63 1.49 0.91 Dreyfus Tech Growth A (MUTF: DTGRX ) Dreyfus Prem -4.45 -0.65 18.88 1.29 0.89 Red Oak Technology Select (MUTF: ROGSX ) Oak Associates -4.46 -7.18 13.92 1.11 1.14 Columbia Global Technology Growth A (MUTF: CTCAX ) Columbia -4.98 0.61 14.06 1.4 0.93 T. Rowe Price Media & Telecom (MUTF: PRMTX ) T. Rowe Price -5.24 1.09 9.77 0.79 0.6 Putnam Global Technology A (MUTF: PGTAX ) Putnam Funds -5.37 -2.44 15.57 1.26 0.91 Wasatch World Innovators (MUTF: WAGTX ) Wasatch -5.92 0 23.77 1.77 0.74 Deutsche Science and Technology A (MUTF: KTCAX ) Deutsche AWM -6.08 -3.25 15.45 0.98 1.21 Henderson Global Technology A (MUTF: HFGAX ) Henderson -6.25 -1.73 8.24 1.36 0.85 Victory Munder Growth Opport Fd A (MUTF: MNNAX ) Victory -6.39 -1.4 16.97 1.49 1.02 The list of 15 smallest losers in the third quarter is spread across diverse fund families, with key names like Fidelity, T. Rowe Price, Goldman Sachs and Putnam Funds. Except for two funds from the T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund and the T. Rowe Price Media & Telecom Fund, all fund families have only one fund featuring in this list. However, among the fund families we mentioned, Fidelity’s Fidelity Select Sftwr & Comp Svcs Fund lost the least and was followed by T. Rowe Price, Goldman Sachs and Putnam Funds. Meanwhile, seven of these mutual funds carry a favorable Zacks Mutual Fund Rank. Funds such as the MFS Technology Fund A, the Fidelity Select Sftwr & Comp Svcs, the Dreyfus Tech Growth A Fund, the T. Rowe Price Media & Telecomm and Putnam Global Technology A Fund sport a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy). Separately, the Columbia Global Technology Growth A Fund, the Wasatch World Innovators Fund and the Deutsche Science and Technology A Fund hold a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2 (Buy). Only three funds carry a Sell rating. These are the Saratoga Technology & Comm A Fund, the T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund and the Goldman Sachs Tech Tollkeeper A Fund. They presently carry a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4 (Sell). Notably, 13 out of these 15 funds boast an average EPS growth over 10%. This is encouraging and compliments the positive earnings season the sector enjoyed. Among the 52 of the 64 tech companies in the S&P 500 that have reported results, total earnings jumped 7% year on year on 4.8% higher revenues. While 69.2% beat EPS estimates, 57.7% beat revenue estimates. Investors will thus hope to see a rebound in the fourth quarter. Link to the original post on Zacks.com

Nigeria Offers Investors A Unique Opportunity For Strong Growth

Summary NGE is weighted heavily towards the consumer defensive and financial services sectors, which are poised to benefit from Nigeria’s impressive GDP and population growth (population expected to double by 2045). NGE is down 50% since July of last year due to the oil price crash and the Boko Haram attacks from earlier this year, creating an attractive, unique entry point. The weakness of the Nigerian Naira in 2014 has put downward pressure on NGE, and the central bank is again deciding whether or not to devalue the Naira. Nigeria is currently offering investors a unique long-term growth opportunity at a great value through the Global X MSCI Nigeria ETF (NYSEARCA: NGE ). NGE has been beaten down recently due to the strong U.S. Dollar, the oil price crash, and Boko Haram. Fundamentally, the Nigerian economy has not significantly changed in a way that warrants the ~50% decline in NGE’s price since July of 2014. This has created a great entry point for investors looking for strong growth potential over the long term with a nearly 4% dividend as an added bonus. NGE’s Sector Weights & Nigeria’s Demographics As you can see from the chart below, NGE is heavily weighted towards the financial services and consumer defensive sectors. So when considering an investment in NGE, we need to look at how these sectors are performing individually and their prospects for long-term growth rather than solely looking at how the Nigerian economy as a whole is doing right now. This is because the recent drop in oil prices has had a larger impact on the Nigerian economy than it does the holdings of NGE in particular, which I’ll discuss later in this article. Demographically, Nigeria’s population is expected to double over the next few decades, a gain of over 200 million people, with the majority of this growth expected to be in urban areas . This will drive a huge, ongoing demand for companies currently operating in the consumer defensive and financial services sectors. Together, these two sectors make up over 75% of NGE’s total holdings, making it an excellent long-term investment in my opinion. (click to enlarge) (Source: TD Ameritrade & Global X’s Semi-Annual Prospectus ) Dylan Waller made some excellent observations in a prior article that I want to reference as well. He noted that the Nigerian banking sector holdings of NGE, as of last summer, are experiencing over 50% annual growth as of late with a very low average P/E ratio of 5.8. The basic materials sector is in a similar situation as well. So this is very bullish news considering how heavily NGE has bought into these sectors. Also important to note though that the consumer defensive industry has a rather high P/E ratio and some say it is currently in a bubble. For example, Nigerian Breweries PLC has a P/E ratio of 27 and Nestle Nigeria PLC has a P/E ratio of 28. These companies make up 17.68% and 7.3% of NGE’s total holdings respectively, together comprising the majority of the consumer defensive holdings of NGE. So while it may be beneficial to wait for this bubble to pop, you won’t want to miss this great opportunity waiting for something that may not happen. The Effect of Oil Prices With NGE’s current energy holdings at 7.65% of assets, ~30% lower than energy’s contribution to Nigeria’s GDP, it has been less exposed to oil than the Nigerian economy as a whole. This is good because the Nigerian economy, Africa’s largest oil producer, is in dire need of diversification away from oil. Oil currently comprises about 9.8% of GDP (which due to the oil price collapse, is much lower than it has been historically). If you look at the numbers more closely, non-oil GDP growth averaged at a lower, but still respectable 4.5% in the first 2 quarters of 2015 while the oil GDP averaged -7.47% over the same time period. In the first 2 quarters of 2014, non-oil GDP growth averaged at 7.46%. Some of this loss year over year can be accounted for by the effect oil GDP has on the rest of the economy, but also one must consider the temporary effect of increased Boko Haram activity in 2015, which I’ll discuss later in this article. Oil currently accounts for the vast majority of the Nigerian government’s revenue, so for the government to successfully neutralize Boko Haram and develop infrastructure, oil cannot go below the $40 range for an extended period of time. The longer these low oil prices persist, the more negative the effect they’ll have on the country’s government. Taking all of this into account, if you think that oil will stay above $40 for the foreseeable future, this is somewhat bullish for NGE. I believe that there is not much more downside for the oil related portion of the economy with substantial upside potential for the financial and consumer defensive sectors in the long term. (click to enlarge) (Source: Nigerian National Bureau of Statistics ) The Naira and the Central Bank of Nigeria As you can see in the chart below, in 2014, the Central Bank of Nigeria devalued the Naira significantly. This pushed down the relative price of NGE because the shares are purchased in Naira, but NGE itself is priced in U.S. Dollars. Currently, there are strict currency controls in place, which have temporarily stabilized the value of the currency. President Buhari has been a strong advocate of these currency controls in order to slow the rampant inflation (~9% currently). As of 11/11/2015 president Buhari chose Kemi Adeosun , a strong advocate of not devaluing the Naira, as his Finance Minister. (click to enlarge) (Source: xe.com/currencycharts ) Many critics say that not devaluing the Naira and keeping the currency controls in place decreases foreign investment, making doing international business in Nigeria more difficult. Some banks are estimating the Central Bank of Nigeria will have to devalue the Naira from about 200 per dollar now to 220-230 per dollar sometime between Q4 2015 and Q1 2016, but what the Central Bank of Nigeria will do over the next few months is still uncertain. It’s not totally clear the effect the higher inflation will have relative to the increased international investment that would occur as a result of a devaluation of the Naira, so I will leave this up to the readers to review. Boko Haram and Nigeria Boko Haram attacks have also had a definite effect on the Nigerian economy. GDP will fall as people will move from economically productive areas threatened by Boko Haram into safer areas where they can work. This insurgency also diverts more government spending to the military, at a time where government revenue has fallen significantly due to low oil prices. This means less money can be spent on badly needed infrastructure projects like President Buhari has publicly stated he has a desire to build. President Buhari made national security one of his primary promises on the campaign trail, and has made great strides in the fight against Boko Haram. They are considered to be severely weakened compared to the last few years, and recently have shown decreased interest in conducting attacks within Nigeria. While still very much active, Boko Haram has been pushed into the less economically productive, northeastern corner of Nigeria and now have significantly less influence than they did previously. Below is a chart showing the relationship between NGE’s stock price and mentions of Boko Haram on Twitter as well as on publicly accessible news websites. It can be assumed that when Boko Haram is actively operating, there will be a large amount of mentions on Twitter and in the media. (click to enlarge) (Source: TickerTags.com) For example, you can see the stock price of NGE goes down and mentions go up around early January when the devastating attack on Baga took place, and again in mid July when a series of Mosque bombings took place. Of course, there are many factors that affect the stock price of NGE, but Boko Haram is one that has a definite impact whenever they stage a major attack. Conclusion Nigeria’s extremely fast growing urban population bodes well for the consumer product, construction, and banking industries within Nigeria, all of which are major holdings in NGE. The success the government has had in fighting Boko Haram should be applauded as well, which will go a long way to creating a much more stable country that will bring increased interest from foreign investors. All of this combined with low oil prices and a devalued Naira have created a unique buying opportunity for long-term investors. An investment in NGE is not without its risks though, as the low oil prices, potential Boko Haram resurgence and the short-term impact of a potential Naira devaluation are serious issues that are not to be ignored. In conclusion, there are many factors that point to a bright long-term future for Nigeria, though it is not without risk. I believe the current pricing provides a great entry point, as a series of temporary and unfortunate events have pushed NGE down far too low in my opinion. I see a strong potential for growth here for investors who are patient, with a nearly 4% dividend yield as an added bonus.