Tag Archives: management

Market Neutral Funds: The Best And Worst Of October

By DailyAlts Staff Morningstar’s aggregated Market Neutral category returned +0.67% in October, besting September’s returns of +0.12%. Invesco’s All Cap Market Neutral Fund (MUTF: CPNAX ) was the category’s top performer for an impressive second-straight month, adding 3.03% gains in October to the prior month’s +7.03%. But, while the top funds generally posted lighter gains in October than they did in September, the worst performers sustained even steeper losses. (click to enlarge) Top Performing Funds in October As stated above, the Invesco All Cap Market Neutral Fund was the Market Neutral category’s top performer for the second straight month. Through October 31, the fund had year-to-date returns of +10.88%, and even more impressive three-month and one-year gains of 13.42% and 11.40%, respectively. The fund, which debuted in December of 2013 and has $35 million in assets under management (“AUM”), is available in A (CPNAX), C (MUTF: CPNCX ), R (MUTF: CPNRX ), and Y (MUTF: CPNYX ) shares. The other top performers last month were the Nuveen Equity Market Neutral Fund (MUTF: NIMEX ) and the Zacks Market Neutral Fund (MUTF: ZMNAX ), which posted respective one-month gains of 2.72% and 2.58%. NIMEX, which debuted in June of 2013 and has $55.7 million AUM, had one-year returns of +2.97% through October 31. ZMNAX, which has been around since July 2008 but has just $9.8 million in AUM, was up 7.67% for the year ending on Halloween, ranking in the top 8% of the Morningstar category. All three of October’s top performers had positive returns over the past one, three, ten, and twelve months ending October 31. The Zacks Market Neutral Fund also had positive returns over the past three and five years ending October 31, as well. (click to enlarge) Worst Performing Funds in October The Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (MUTF: HSGFX ) was October’s very worst market-neutral fund to own, losing 6.53%. This is quite a bit worse than last month’s biggest loser, the Castlerigg Event Driven and Arbitrage Fund (MUTF: EVNTX ), which fell just 4.72% in September. HSGFX was down 9.58% for the year ending on October 31. The fund has been around since 2005, producing annualized three- and five-year losses of 7.96% and 7.93%, respectively, though the end of October. The fund has a one-star “negative” rating from Morningstar. The PSI All Asset Fund (MUTF: FXMAX ) and the BlackRock Emerging Market Long/Short Equity Fund (MUTF: BLSIX ) were the next worst performers in October, posting respective losses of 4.77% and 3.01% for the month. FXMAX launched in 2010 and has gone on to generate negative returns across the one-, three-, and ten-month periods ending October 31, in addition to three- and five-year annualized returns of -6.05% and -5.14%, respectively. BLSIX launched in 2011 and also has negative returns across all of Morningstar’s default time frames, including respective one- and three-year annualized losses of 7.01% and 2.54% for the periods ending October 31. (click to enlarge) September’s Best and Worst: Follow-Up Invesco’s All Cap Market Neutral Fund held on to its crown as the best-performing market-neutral fund for a second straight month, but what happened to September’s other top performers? The AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund (MUTF: QMNIX ), which posted a 5.79% gain in September, added just 0.09% in October, ranking in the bottom 38% of the category despite the modest gains. The Vanguard Market Neutral Fund (MUTF: VMNIX ), which returned +5.11% in September, lost 0.85% in October, putting it in the bottom 15% of all market-neutral funds for the month. And what about September’s worst performers? The previously mentioned Castlerigg Event Driven and Arbitrage Fund lost 4.72% in September, but bounced back (a bit) with a 0.62% gain in October. September’s other bottom-three funds in the category – the Visium Event Driven Fund (MUTF: VIDIX ) and the Arbitrage Event-Driven Fund (MUTF: AEDNX ) – which posted respective declines of 4.70% and 3.73% in September, improved with returns of +0.11% and +0.55% in October. Past performance does not necessarily predict future results. Editor’s Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.

CenterPoint Energy: Investors Have Nothing To Fear

Summary The stock continued to decline after Q3. Equity investment write-down doesn’t reflect the investment’s true value. Results from core operations improved from last year. The market continues to be bearish about CenterPoint Energy (NYSE: CNP ). Given the company’s performance in 2015, it would seem that investors are doubting the stability of the utility company. After falling 20% from $23.43 at the beginning of the year to $18.68 before Q3 earnings, shares have since dropped another 8% to $17.10. Do the fundamentals support this rapid decline? Revenue continued to fall. Following Q2’s 19% drop, Q3 revenue decreased by 10% ($1.8 billion to $1.6 billion) as well, primarily as the result of lowering natural gas prices. However, this was offset by the drop in natural gas expense, which decreased from $702 million to $527 million. Due to various cost reductions, the company was able to decrease its operating expense from $493 million to $479 million. This impact may seem small, but this allowed the company to increase its operating income by 14% when compared to Q3 2014. This rise in operating profit is the first time the company achieved growth in 2015. Q1 and Q2 operating profit decreased by 13% quarter on quarter, and Q3 operating profit was flat. Isn’t this evidence that the company is improving? What are investors worried about? Possible Concern One thing that could trouble investors is the loss from equity investment ($794 million), which is the biggest reason that the company delivered a $900 million loss before taxes. The equity investment consisted solely of Enable Midstream (NYSE: ENBL ), a stock that I’ve talked about before. You can read my previous articles ( here and here ) to learn more about the company. Enable Midstream Partners is a midstream company that is suffering from industry headwinds. However, the company continues to deliver good cash flows due to its fee-based contracts. Furthermore, it is well capitalized with a good interest rate coverage ratio. Enable’s transported volume continued to grow in Q3, offsetting declining prices that negatively impacted product sales. Going forward, I believe Enable will come out on top even if natural gas prices don’t improve. What does all of this mean? I believe that the write-off of equity investment is not representative of Enable Midstream Partners’ true value. Core Operation Remains Stable Enough about Enable, what about CenterPoint’s existing operation? In my last article , I talked about the company’s stability. The Electric segment is not directly affected by commodity movements since it is not involved in power generation activities. The Natural Gas Distribution segment does have some exposure to commodity movements due to a time lag between purchases and deliveries, but the company actively uses derivatives to hedge any uncertainty. So overall, I would expect profit to be stable over the long term. CenterPoint’s stability is once again evident in Q3. Every single segment improved quarter on quarter. Operating income for the Electric segment rose 5%, Natural Gas Distribution’s operating income recovered from last year’s volatility, improving from a loss of -$8 million to a gain of $11 million, and Energy Services’ operating income increased by 17%. Takeaway I believe there’s nothing in the third quarter that was particularly alarming. The company continued to deliver stable profits amid a volatile commodity environment. Unfortunately, investors have been focusing on the wrong things. In particular, the Enable Midstream fear is overblown. Results from core operations should continue to improve, and that is what will really support the company as a whole.

Korean ETF Offers Investors Chance For Growth

EWY is weighted heavily towards the information technology and consumer discretionary sectors. Korea is a technology-based economy composing of companies who are industry leaders in their respective fields and have strong earnings. EWY provides targeted access to Korean stocks and is a good measure of the economic strength of Korea; rating agencies are optimistic in growth prospects of Korean economy. By Harry Lee Korea is currently offering investors a solid mid-term growth opportunity at a good value through the iShares MSCI South Korea Capped ETF (NYSEARCA: EWY ). EWY is down 16% overall from its high at 62.93 in April, due to a strong U.S. Dollar, the devaluation of the Chinese yuan, and the crash in equity prices in China this past summer. Fundamentally, however, the Korean economy itself not remarkably declined in a way that justifies the 16% decline in EWY’s price since July of 2014. This has created a solid entry point for investors looking for strong growth potential over the mid term. EWY’s Sector Weights and Sector-Specific Performance EWY is heavily weighted towards the information technology and consumer discretionary sectors. Hence, when evaluating EWY, we must examine the individual performances of those individual sectors and their long-term growth prospects, rather than solely scrutinizing at the performance of the national economy as a whole. Samsung Electronics ( OTC:SSNLF ) is the largest component, at 21.99%; Hyundai Motors ( OTC:HYMPY ), Naver Corp. ( OTC:NHNCF ), and others trail between 2~3%. In its most recent earnings report, Samsung posted quarterly revenue of $45 billion, up 8.9% year-over-year. Profits were $6.45 billion, up an astonishing 82%. Despite mounting pressure from competitors such as Apple and Huawei on both the high and low-ends, respectively, Samsung’s profits expect to be relatively protected due to its semiconductor business. Samsung’s semiconductor business supplies Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) with the A9 chip processor used in Apple’s flagship iPhone 6 and iPhone 6S models. Hyundai Motors is also expected to have good growth prospects. Despite posting record low profits in Q3 of 2015, they recently announced that they would launch a new global luxury car brand called Genesis, targeting large fat profit margins from the higher end of the market. Building off of its current luxury models, the Genesis line will launch with two luxury sedans aiming to combat both the European luxury brands of BMW ( OTCPK:BAMXY ), Mercedes-Benz, and Audi ( OTCPK:AUDVF ), but also Nissan’s ( OTCPK:NSANY ) Infiniti and Toyota’s (NYSE: TM ) Lexus. Investors reacted positively to the news, with Hyundai shares closing 1.85 percent higher at a one-month peak. Considering all these factors, the prospects for growth in the mid-term are quite optimistic. Performance of the South Korean Economy as a Whole Investing in an ETF that closely tracks the performance of the Korean economy is a solid investment because South Korea has a number of economic advantages, including a highly advanced economy (nominal GDP is ranked at 13th highest); a low debt-to-GDP ratio and an accommodative central bank. Recently, the Bank of Korea maintained interest rates at 1.5 percent, but drastically cut the benchmark borrowing costs in half over the past three years in an attempt to defend domestic exporters against the Chinese exporters in a climate of a devalued Chinese yuan. Moreover, Standard & Poor’s upgraded Korea’s credit rating to AA- this past September, the highest rating in nearly two decades. It expressed optimism in the growth prospects of the peninsula, claiming that it was likely to maintain economic growth higher than the bulk of the developed economies in the next three to five years. S&P also expressed optimism at the overall decline in external debt owed by Korean banks and reduced short-term borrowing in total external debt. Conclusion Korea’s world-leading electronics industry, along with optimism in the auto industry appears encouraging for the information technology and consumer discretionary sectors within Korea, both of which are significant components in EWY. A vigorous but an accommodating central bank that is willing to devalue its currency to defend domestic producers and exporters should prove encouraging for the mid-long term growth prospects of the economy as a whole. Despite these positive facets, an investment in EWY is not entirely risk free. Samsung Electronics’ flagship mobile division could underperform, leading to the firm missing analysts’ expectations and driving both the equities of the firm and EWY down; Hyundai’s new luxury brand may not become a cornerstone of automotive luxury as Lexus and Infiniti have become. In conclusion, though, there are many factors that point to an optimistic long-term future for Korea, though it is not without risk. The current pricing appears to be a good point of entry, as a series of recent global circumstances have depressed EWY below its true value. Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.