Tag Archives: management

Beyond The Benchmark: Tracking Error Vs. Active Share

Summary We have reservations about using tracking error to gauge “active investing” because it relies on historical volatility data versus a benchmark to draw conclusions about risk. Active share, in our view, provides a clearer picture of how active a fund manager is as compared with drawing conclusions from standard deviation calculations. We believe the fund has to be meaningfully different to its benchmark to create an opportunity to deliver alpha. We believe active share more clearly shows how a fund and benchmark differ, a key to delivering alpha. By Rob Stabler, Product Director Active share, a tool for demonstrating how a fund’s portfolio differs from its respective benchmark, has been a common term among active investors over the last few years. Tracking error, which has a much longer history, is often regarded as another tool that does the same job. But the differences between the two measures affect how Invesco’s Global Opportunities investment team views their effectiveness and usefulness for investors. Tracking error: Useful from returns perspective Tracking error – the divergence between price behaviors of a portfolio and its benchmark – is a backward looking tool, using historical data to show the volatility of the fund’s returns versus that of its benchmark. It’s useful in demonstrating how closely a portfolio follows its benchmark from a returns perspective. However, it’s important to consider these two questions: What’s the benchmark? A fund with a low tracking error versus a volatile benchmark may not produce the return profile investors seek. Are upside and downside volatility equally important to investors? The most common method of assessing tracking error involves calculating the standard deviation of the fund and benchmark returns, which reflects both upside and downside volatility. In our experience, however, investors have been more concerned about the implications of downside volatility. More importantly, as active investors, our team’s main reservation about tracking error is acceptance of the benchmark as the right reference point for measuring volatility and, by implication, risk. In contrast, the investment world doesn’t revolve around the benchmark for our fund managers. We define risk as the potential for permanent loss of capital, using maximum drawdown and downside volatility as indicators. And we often view volatility – at least in the short term – as an opportunity to exploit valuation anomalies in the stock market. Active share: Looks at holdings and weightings Active share is a much simpler calculation that provides a snapshot in time. It measures how different a portfolio is from its benchmark by comparing the fund’s holdings and their weightings with those of the benchmark. We believe active share provides a clearer picture of how active a fund manager is than drawing conclusions from standard deviation calculations. In simple terms, a tracker fund that perfectly replicates its benchmark will have an active share of 0%, while an active fund that owns no constituents of its reference benchmark will have an active share of 100%. This measure is increasingly important, given the rise of passive investing and the need to differentiate between quasi-passive and genuinely active managers. Origin of active share The concept of active share was introduced in research by Martijn Cremers and Antti Petajisto, which indicated that portfolios with a high active share were, on average, likely to outperform their benchmarks, suggesting a positive correlation between performance and active share. 1 Additional research by Cremers and fellow economist Ankur Pareek 2 combined active share analysis with portfolio managers’ stock holding period, where long duration is defined as more than two years. The research shows clear outperformance, on average, of those strategies that combine high active share and long duration, or low turnover, of stocks. Of course, past performance does not guarantee future results. Earlier this year, Invesco published a white paper examining the historical outperformance of active management , using active share as the measuring stick for active management. Because high active share offers no performance guarantee, it’s possible to have a high active share portfolio that underperforms its benchmark. However, our team believes that to outperform a benchmark, portfolio construction needs to differ from the benchmark, and active share is a reliable, easy way of measuring this. So while active share doesn’t guarantee performance, we believe it’s a prerequisite – if you aren’t different, then you can’t hope to achieve a different result, good or bad. By-product of investment philosophy While we don’t explicitly target a high active share in the Invesco Global Opportunities strategy, it’s a by-product of our investment philosophy – concentrated and flexible investing that views risk as absolute, not relative. The result is an active share that is typically high, currently at 95%. Put simply, to create an opportunity to deliver alpha for our investors, we believe the fund has to be meaningfully different from its benchmark. In addition, we see no evidence to suggest a direct link between the strategy’s tracking error and performance. Sources “How active is your fund manager? A new measure that predicts performance,” Aug. 7, 2006. Patient Capital Outperformance: “The Investment Skill of High Active Share Managers Who Trade Infrequently,” Sept. 19, 2014. Important information Alpha refers to the excess returns of a fund relative to the return of a benchmark index. Standard deviation measures a portfolio’s range of total returns and identifies the spread of a portfolio’s short-term fluctuations. Drawdown is the largest cumulative percentage decline in net asset value as measured on a month-end basis. Absolute return refers to the return an asset achieves over a certain period of time, without comparison to another measure or benchmark. The information provided is for educational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation of the suitability of any investment strategy for a particular investor. Invesco does not provide tax advice. The tax information contained herein is general and is not exhaustive by nature. Federal and state tax laws are complex and constantly changing. Investors should always consult their own legal or tax professional for information concerning their individual situation. The opinions expressed are those of the authors, are based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Invesco investment professionals. NOT FDIC INSURED MAY LOSE VALUE NO BANK GUARANTEE All data provided by Invesco unless otherwise noted. Invesco Distributors, Inc. is the US distributor for Invesco Ltd.’s retail products and collective trust funds. Invesco Advisers, Inc. and other affiliated investment advisers mentioned provide investment advisory services and do not sell securities. Invesco Unit Investment Trusts are distributed by the sponsor, Invesco Capital Markets, Inc., and broker-dealers including Invesco Distributors, Inc. PowerShares® is a registered trademark of Invesco PowerShares Capital Management LLC (Invesco PowerShares). Each entity is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Invesco Ltd. ©2015 Invesco Ltd. All rights reserved. Beyond the benchmark: Tracking error versus active share by Invesco Blog

Add Diversified Yield To Your Dividend Growth Portfolio With 7 Equity ETFs

Summary ETFs can fill critical gaps in a dividend investor’s portfolio, especially for smaller caps and international exposure. Most so-called dividend growth ETFs have average yields in the low 2% range (scarcely above the 2% yield for the S&P 500/SPY). Screening the universe of ETFs by my DGI and qualitative metrics resulted in 7 ETFs with yields from 3% to 7.5% (DIV, EWA, DBEF, FGD, FUTY, VOE, SCHD). These recommended ETFs represent a diversity of strategies and are sorted by yield with commentary as to the pros and cons of each. (click to enlarge) With so much uncertainty in the markets (valuations, Fed, ISIS, Europe, etc), a well-diversified base of investments (especially those that pay a dividend in good times and bad) is critical. However, many people don’t have the time or expertise to assemble their own diversified holdings (this is especially true for smaller cap or international exposure). While Seeking Alpha readers generally like to be stock pickers, ETFs can provide a critical tool to filling the gaps to gaining the exposure that an investor needs but in a package that is much more practical for many. For the dividend growth investor, ETFs are not without their dangers, especially when it comes to chasing yield. A few broad tips: Understand the fund’s holdings – regardless of the marketing materials, it’s the underlying holdings that drive performance. Keep fees low – fund fees subtract directly from any yield. Avoid closed end funds (CEFs) unless you are very confident in the manager and strategy. Understand fund distribution policies to know when and how the yield will be paid. Unfortunately, most of the current offerings for ‘dividend growth funds’ are hardly better than the S&P 500’s 2% yield (as measured by SPY). For example: Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF (NYSEARCA: VIG ): 2.29% yield WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (NASDAQ: DGRW ): 2.02% yield iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (NYSEARCA: DGRO ): 2.25% yield As a dividend growth investor that expects yields in the 3%+ range, I have attempted to locate the ETFs that I feel are most appropriate for the DGI investor looking for a meatier yield. To identify the best ETFs out there, I have developed and applied a screening methodology which yielded 7 attractive tickers that I believe investors should consider for their portfolio. Background Since I write for Seeking Alpha primarily to improve my own investment portfolio, I think it is important that you know my objectives. Please consider this context when you look at any advice I give and form your own opinions based on your needs and desires. GOAL: Attractive, risk-adjusted, absolute returns (5-15% annually) over a long-term time frame while minimizing capital loss and extreme drawdowns. STRATEGY: ‘Enhanced’ dividend growth ((NYSE: DGI )) and growth at a reasonable price (GARP) hybrid strategy that focuses on a core of diversified holdings (ETFs and individual companies — my screening criteria are generally: P/E

Karoon Gas – Give Me $1.00, I’ll Give You $1.20 And 2 Significant Oil Discoveries

Summary Karoon is a depressed stock trading 20% below cash backing due to a low oil price, and several major shareholders exiting the stock. A major selloff has resulted in Karoon being significantly undervalued. Provides fantastic long term exposure to a rising oil price with 85 mmbbls of 2C reserves from 2 recent oil discoveries. Karoon Gas is currently in the process of buying back up to 10% of stock on issue. Overview Karoon Gas (ASX: KAR, OTCPK:KRNGF , OTC:KRNGY ) is an Australia-headquartered oil and gas company with exploration opportunities focused in North-West Australia, Peru, and Brazil. With a set of great oil prospects, and no major gas prospects, they should consider changing their name to Karoon Oil. Of all the sell-offs in the oil and gas sector, this one has intrigued me the most. On a market cap of AU$450 (US$319) Million at the current share price, they sit on cash of AU$550 (US$390) Million. This cash came from their recent sale of their Browse Basin permits to Origin for the following: An upfront payment of US$600 Million (Received) A deferred cash payment of US$75 Million payable on FID A deferred cash payment of US$75 Million payable on first production A deferred cash payment of US$5 Million for every 100 BCFe of independently certified 2P reserves exceeding 3.25 TCFe Reimbursement of the costs associated with drilling its 40% held Pharos-1 well. (Received) So why are they trading so low? Apart from the oil price, I think it is primarily due to these 3 factors: Several major investors have exited the stock over the last year. IOOF Holdings, Future Fund Board of Guardians, and Paradise Investment Management all ceased to be substantial holders, selling out a major portion of the stock. The company has some corporate governance issues. There are concerns that family members of the chairman Bob Hosking are appointed on key positions at the company, as pointed out by the activist hedge fund manager Pegasus. The majority of shareholders may or may not agree with this, and I myself have questions regarding it, but none of the three candidates that Pegasus put up for election were voted in. A lot of Australian companies have corporate governance issues, and activist investment is much lower than in the US. Like any market risk, this is a risk that must be weighed against the benefits. Speculators pushed the price up to obscene levels, and then pushed the price back down in fear Despite these issues, Karoon has a great track record of increasing the long-term value of shareholders when you normalize for the boom and bust cycle. Past speculation during the boom had driven the share price as high as $12.10 – it currently sits at $1.81 at the time of writing. Karoon is, at present, up over 950% from 2004 and has managed to unlock plenty of cash for the exploration and appraisal of their major Brazil operation in the Santos Basin. (click to enlarge) ( Google Finance ) Offshore Brazil (Two Significant Oil Discoveries) The map below shows the Kangaroo and Echidna resource as well as the Bilby oil discovery dating back to 2014. (click to enlarge) ( Source – Karoon Annual Report 2015) Kangaroo went through further appraisal in 2014, production testing at rates that signaled a single vertical well could flow 6,000-8,000 bopd from a net pay of 135 meters ( Source ). It needs to be noted that Kangaroo 2 also had two side tracks as part of the appraisal that indicate that this may be a complex reservoir which would enhance the cost and difficulty of production. Despite the complexity, it remains a significant find that has a great chance of commerciality. Echidna followed up the Kangaroo discovery with a 103 meter net oil column and a facility constrained flow test 4650 bopd, further enhancing the chance of a commercial discovery for the region. (click to enlarge) ( Source ) From an operational perspective , Karoon is looking at a variety of options for producing the Echidna and Kangaroo discoveries that are less than 50km apart. The lowest capital cost method includes a Floating Production Storage and Offloading Vessel (FPSO) producing roughly 20,000 barrels of oil per day (bopd), then expanding that to 50,000 – 70,000 bopd once the field has been proven. Discussions for the development of Kangaroo have also involved Petrobras for an integrated oil hub in the region, which could be economic as low as $43/bbl according to Citigroup ( Source ). The same article also denotes the drop in costs which could make the project economic at even lower prices “Because it’s a distressed market now worldwide, we are looking at redeployed assets, for example, a redeployed FPSO [floating production storage and offloading vessel]. The labor market is getting cheaper, the labor is getting cheaper; we see there’s a lot of cost savings for us.” One of the primary reasons for investing in Karoon is that there is almost no value attributed to the Kangaroo and Echidna discoveries. After writing off Karoon’s AU$105 (US$76) million tax liability against its cash reserves, the 2C reserves equate to a value of AU$0.41 (US$0.29) /bbl. However, investors must keep in mind that production isn’t likely oncoming until 2018 at the earliest while Karoon moves through engineering and approvals, and this may hold the share price back for the medium term. Offshore Peru and Offshore Australia After all this, Karoon still has more to offer. A possibility of more major discoveries exists offshore Peru and Australia. Nearly 27000 square kilometers of permits sit on the acreage outside of Brazil, with significant long-term potential for Karoon. They have a habit of bringing in joint venture partners to free carry them through the initial drilling stages to minimize the capital outlay from Karoon. These are likely to sit for several years during the current supply glut, however, they provide some great upside for an oil recovery. (click to enlarge) (Karoon Annual Report 2015) Share Buyback One of my favorite things to see a company do is an all-cash share buyback – specifically when their share price is trading at an all-time low. Karoon has bought back 9.4 million shares at $3.27 over the last 12 months as well as announcing plans to buy back a further 25 million shares. That comprises up to 10% of the company’s ordinary shares on issue and will further expose investors to the upside of an oil price recovery in 2-3 years. On top of all that, Karoon has a significant amount of built up exploration expense of $AU485 Million that can be written off against future cash flows. Risks and Uncertainties Karoon is in the early stages of several significant oil discoveries. There are plenty of issues that need to be sorted out, and a significant amount of cash that needs to be spent to bring these oil fields into production. Production is not likely to begin for several years, and the oil price currently sits at levels that would make these projects uneconomic. Most investors would agree that the current supply glut will not extend out to 2018, however, it is possible and poses a significant risk as Karoon spends more on the appraisal process. Karoon also has no source of cash flow, and Origins deferred payments are unlikely in the current environment. Conclusion Having several major investors exit the stock over the last 18 months has left the share price in the doldrums. While Citigroup has calculated a combined development for Kangaroo and Echidna would be economic as low as $43, I would not expect the project to go ahead unless oil moved well into the 60’s – unless the resource is found to be much larger than current estimates. There is plenty of unrealized value in this stock with hardly any value attributed to the Kangaroo and Echidna discoveries, and no value to the significant amount of exploration expense that Karoon can write off against future cash flow. Karoon’s cash reserves can be used to develop these discoveries and increase shareholder value at the same time the share buyback is increasing investors oil exposure per share. As for the remaining Australian/Peruvian blocks, Karoon will likely delay drilling as much as possible to preserve cash for the Kangaroo and Echidna discoveries. Overall, there is a significant amount of risk around Karoon going forward. They are in the early stages of appraising these reservoirs while the oil price has crashed. However, a crashed oil price means cheaper drilling, completions, procurement, and construction. Karoon would not be likely to produce oil until 2018 at the earliest, and there is plenty of time for the oil price to recover in that time period. As the Financial Review quoted from an RBC Capital Markets report “Whilst high risk, this is a freebie and success would open a significant new oil play.” I love Karoon as an asymmetric bet on an oil recovery, and I can confidently see an upside of well over 100% in the next 3-5 years in the event that the oil price recovers. Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.