Tag Archives: lists

Movers And Shakers Post-Fed

Below is a snapshot of recent asset class performance using key ETFs traded on U.S. exchanges. For each ETF, we highlight its performance over the last 2 days (since Wednesday’s close), so far in September, and so far in 2015. As shown, while the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) and the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (NYSEARCA: DIA ) are both down month to date, the Nasdaq 100 (NASDAQ: QQQ ) and mid-caps and small-caps are up nicely. Growth ETFs are up 1%+ month to date while value ETFs are in the red. Looking at sectors, Energy (NYSEARCA: XLE ) and Financials (NYSEARCA: XLF ) have gotten hit hard over the last two days since the Fed opted not to hike rates. Industrials (NYSEARCA: XLI ), Materials (NYSEARCA: XLB ), and Technology (NYSEARCA: XLK ) are all down as well. The Utilities ETF (NYSEARCA: XLU ) is the only sector that’s up post-Fed. Outside of the U.S., Brazil (NYSEARCA: EWZ ) continues to paint the tape red. It’s now down 35.44% year to date after falling 3.32% over the last two days. India (NYSEARCA: INP ) was bouncing Friday, but that’s about the only area in the green. Treasury ETFs have been the main winners since the Fed held rates unchanged, with the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: TLT ) up 2.25% since Wednesday’s close. Gold (NYSEARCA: GLD ) and silver (NYSEARCA: SLV ) are up nicely as well. Share this article with a colleague

TAN Vs. YLCO: Which Is The Better Solar ETF?

With the recent update from the Obama administration regarding the allocation of more than $120 million for clean energy programs developing solar power and other renewable technology, ETFs focusing on top solar firms are definitely on our radar. The fund will be deployed across 24 states to help Americans gain access to cleaner and low-cost energy sources. Although solar stocks have got a beating due to plunging oil prices and the meltdown in the Chinese stock market, they hold greater promise. Surging demand for solar power, massive panel installations, advanced technologies, global warming issues and Obama’s ‘Climate Action Plan’ will ensure that the solar boom is not fizzling out anytime soon. The good news is that solar energy systems have increasingly become affordable, indicating its potential for wide acceptance among the masses. According to the White House report, solar energy is now cost-competitive with conventional energy, such as coal or natural gas, in 14 states. According to a report by GTM Research and Solar Energy Industries Association, solar photovoltaic installations are expected to go up to 7.7 gigawatts (“GW”) this year from 6.2 GW in 2014, where a GW represents 1 billion watts, enough to power roughly 164,000 homes. Here we will discuss two ETFs, Guggenheim Solar ETF (NYSEARCA: TAN ) and only a few months old Global X YieldCo ETF (NASDAQ: YLCO ). Both focus on the renewable energy sector expecting to ride on the bullish trend in solar space. Though TAN and YLCO have similar exposures, there are certain key differences between the products. Below, we have highlighted the products in greater details. TAN Launched in April 2008, this ETF follows the MAC Global Solar Energy Index, holding 27 stocks in the basket. First Solar Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR ) and SolarCity Corp. (NASDAQ: SCTY ) take the first and second positions with a combined 15.3% share. The U.S. firms dominate the fund’s portfolio with 34%, followed by China (28%). The product has amassed over $264 million in its asset base and trades in solid volume of around 260,000 shares a day. It charges investors 70 bps in fees per year. The fund shed around 10.3% in the year-to-date time frame (as of Sep. 16, 2015) and has a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 or ‘Hold’ rating with a High risk outlook. YLCO Launched this May, the fund targets a unique segment of the market, namely the YieldCo. A Yieldco is a dividend growth-oriented public company that bundles renewable and/or conventional long-term contracted operating assets. It is often compared to MLPs as they are both energy-related assets, created by their parent company, in order to deliver stable cash flows to investors. To attain its objective, the fund tracks the Indxx Global YieldCo index. The ETF holds only 20 securities with Brookfield Renewable Energy Partners (NYSE: BEP ) and TerraForm Power Inc. (NASDAQ: TERP ) (formerly a SunEdison (NYSE: SUNE ) Yieldco) taking up the first and second spots. Both account for an 18.3% share in the basket. The fund has a global footprint as well with the U.S. occupying the top spot at 39%, followed by Canada with 28%. YLCO has gathered a meager $3.4 million in assets and charges 65 bps in fees. It trades at an average volume of more than 4,600 shares. The product was down 26% since its inception. The Verdict Both funds charge comparable fees and are a tad expensive. However, TAN is widely diversified as it holds more securities and is less concentrated in its top 10 holdings compared to YLCO. Further, TAN is higher in AUM and relatively more liquid as it trades in a higher volume compared to YLCO. The higher volume of TAN also suggests that bid ask spreads should be relatively tight for this fund and total trading costs shouldn’t be much higher than the explicit 0.70% expense ratio. Notably, TAN has higher yield compared to YLCO. Both the funds have higher exposures to U.S. stocks with TAN lagging behind YLCO. However, the good thing about YLCO is that it has no exposure to Chinese firms, which could be affected by the economic turmoil in the world’s second largest economy. Further, YLCO is expected to be less volatile in nature than TAN as it tracks companies that have spun off their more steady power producing operations as Yieldco. Though YLCO doesn’t look bad, we pick TAN as the winner due its higher exposure to top solar firms, diversified nature, higher liquidity and better yield. Data Point TAN YLCO Expense Ratio 0.70% 0.65% Total Holdings 27 20 Top 10 Holdings 54.9% 66.7% Assets in the U.S. 34% 39% Dividend Yield 2.2% 1.2% AUM $264 Million $3 Million Average Volume 260,000 4,600 Original Post

A Cure May Be In Store For The SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF

When I warned about market correction in mid-August, I also discussed what factors would eventually cure what ails us. One of those factors is presenting itself Thursday, as the Federal Reserve offers clarity on an uncertainty weighing on investors’ minds and weighing down stocks. The probability of Fed inaction on interest rates or the possibility of a minor action with the removal of concern about October should serve stocks immediately. I expect such a scenario should provide immediate & significant upside to the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF, returning it toward its highs above $210 and higher as longer term factors. Risk to this thesis could come from a Fed rate action of 0.25% or if the Fed does not clear away concern about a potential action in October. When I authored my warnings about market correction in early to mid-August, I also indicated what the cure for stocks would eventually be. One of those factors appears to be about ready to help out, and that is clarification from the Fed. No matter what happens Thursday afternoon, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will provide some clarity to investors. Stocks should benefit from the removal of some uncertainty, and I see immediate upside of 2.5% to 5.0% probable for the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) post the Fed meeting. But any gains and the length of duration of upward direction will depend on the specifics of what the Fed does and says. The longer term for stocks and the SPY will continue to depend on the U.S. economy, energy sector issues, emerging market implications, seasonal capital flow factors and the Fed path and accuracy moving forward. 1-Year Chart of SPY at Seeking Alpha In my early to mid-August warnings of imminent market correction (see several links within the summary piece), I suggested the eventual cure for stocks would require a cocktail of medicines. I discussed the implications of seasonal capital flows and that the passing of time toward November 1st and a more welcoming capital flow environment would serve stocks then. I also suggested the U.S. economy mattered far more than the Federal Reserve, and that we would need to see health in the economy to gain traction. That means that the U.S. energy sector must heal or at least not meaningfully infect the rest of the economy. It also means that China only stumbles and does not fall, and that growth recovers in that important sector of the global economy. Finally, I said we needed Fed clarity, and that uncertainty about the Fed’s path was not serving stocks. Thursday, we will receive some clarity on the Fed’s path. Most likely, the Fed will succumb to market pressures and refrain from raising rates at this meeting. However, I’m not sure that is the best case scenario. Rather, I believe a minor rate hike of less than a quarter of a percentage point would serve to satisfy expectations that Fed action is happening this year while also easing concern that the Fed could act prematurely. If the Fed makes a minor move and indicates it is not likely to act in October, pushing expectations for the next hike to possibly December or March, it will serve stocks well. It is also likely to reiterate its data dependence and to note risks to the U.S. economy including China and emerging markets, the U.S. energy sector, and the strength of the dollar. But I also anticipate the Fed will note the strength of U.S. labor and the lack of inflation, which are positives. I suggest such an outcome would be just what the doctor ordered for the stock market. The result, in my view, would be a surge in stocks and a marching of the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF back towards previous highs certainly above $205, and probably to $210 or higher without much disturbance. Much depends on the specifics of the very complex data set we will get from the Fed. A risk lies in the possibility that the Fed raises rates by a quarter of a point. Such a scenario, I believe, would send a shock through the market and spur a selloff back to correction lows. That is not perfectly clear, given that investors would like to see the Fed finally get started at some point. However, I expect that given the latest poor indications from China and emerging markets, the Fed will refrain from further disturbing the global economy and the U.S. economy as a result. Despite the likelihood of inaction, in my opinion, the FOMC vote could be closer than in previous meetings. Investors will need to have some indication that October is not a threat as well, or this period of volatility will simply extend to the next Fed meeting. So if the Fed does not act, but leaves the possibility of an October action on the table for investors to worry and debate about, stocks could see their upside limited or completely erased. Over the long-term, what matters far more than the Fed are the health of the U.S. economy and the health of sectors of the global economy that threaten the U.S. economy. That means, not only must U.S. data continue to reflect progress, especially in the labor market and GDP data, but weakness in the U.S. energy sector and manufacturing (relative to it) must dissipate. Also, China must stabilize rather than deteriorate; if this occurs, expect global stocks to rally significantly. Finally, as September and October pass, significant capital flow pressure from institutions ending their fiscal years will dissipate and likely offer support to stocks as the institutions look forward with many securities trading at relative value. We are in a complex period now, where the market is supersensitive to news flow. It is the worst possible time for the Fed to be contemplating action, but it is our situation. Long-term investors should be patient now, but remain focused on the matters discussed herein. I cover the market closely, and invite relative interests in the SPY security and the market to follow my column here at Seeking Alpha . Disclosure: I am/we are long SPY. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.