Tag Archives: lightbox

The Difference Between Investing And Speculating

Investing isn’t always easy, and 2016 has certainly proven that volatility in the stock market can lead to significant shifts in investor sentiment and philosophy. A correction of this nature should be viewed as an opportunity to analyze your current strategy to ensure it is measuring up to your expectations. What it should not do is cause you to deviate from a sound philosophy of investing to a gambler’s streak of speculation. Let me explain what I mean. Investing is when you create a rational plan to grow your earned capital through a systemic process of investment in multiple securities or asset classes. It may include converting your cash to stocks, bonds, commodities, mutual funds, or ETFs in a manner that conveys a disciplined approach to risk management alongside a defined process and time horizon. For most investors, this simply means building a balanced portfolio that takes into account their specific risk tolerance, experience, and goals. That plan will then be subtly adjusted over time as your life changes, you accumulate or redeem capital, or your philosophy takes on a different form. The themes change, yet overall, the basic building blocks of investment in the stock and bond markets have been similar for generations. Speculation , on the other hand, is a completely different mindset that is more akin to gambling than true investing. You don’t wake up one day and put $5,000 in the Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 3x ETF (NYSEARCA: NUGT ) as a long-term investment opportunity — you do it because you think you can make a killing in a short period of time. This chart should illustrate that point distinctly: Click to enlarge Sometimes that opportunity pays off through timing, and maybe a bit of skill in reading the fundamental or technical tea leaves. Other times, you get scorched, and end up selling at a loss, with a big helping of regret and earnest promises to never to do it again. The former is honestly far more damaging than the latter. Bear markets bring about a sense of frustration with the fact that the “normal” system you have relied on for years is not working. But you keep hearing about those guys trading gold stocks, volatility futures, Treasury contracts, leveraged ETFs, bear funds, and options bets that are making a killing. Naturally, you ask yourself, why can’t I do that too? I can own all those types of investments through an ETF in most of my retirement or brokerage accounts. So you buy a little NUGT or ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (NYSEARCA: UVXY ), and BOOM! in a matter of a few days, it jumps 15%. You sell, bank the profits, and all is right with the world. Suddenly this speculating stuff doesn’t seem so hard. In fact, you can probably fire your advisor or redeem your basket of diversified stocks and bonds. Timing the market is easy when you only have to hold for a couple of days and can magnify your returns! No more riding through those pesky bear markets or fretting over rising interest rates. It’s a whole new world. Of course, that last paragraph is totally sarcasm in contrast to my true beliefs. Speculating in high-risk investments is one of the last things you should be doing as volatility expands. Even though you may hit a few singles with some well-timed trades, the same correlations and patterns you are using to time the market may look completely different a few weeks from now. To state the obvious, it’s just as easy to experience a double-digit percentage drop in leveraged or inverse funds, as it is to make that much on the upside. This same mantra holds up for individual stocks too. There is a big difference between buying Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO ) because it has fallen 50% and you are hoping for a face-ripping bounce or buyout offer rather than because you love the platform and think it’s a solid company to own long term. Make sure you consider your motives before putting money to work, as unintended price action can have deleterious effects on your decision-making process once you are committed. I think it’s also worth noting that trading does not automatically equate to speculating . There are some very methodical traders with short-term time horizons and a risk-aware approach that are candidly investing in a more active manner. The difference is that they have time, tools, and discipline that have been honed by experience, and the most successful stay within their refined process. Remember that volatility is not a transient event. It is something that is constantly with us and causes the market to move both up and down in unpredictable ways. If you have found yourself straying from a sensible portfolio strategy, take the time to evaluate your decisions to determine if you are making changes for the better or possibly worse. Sometimes that simple exercise is all you need to snap back to reality and re-focus on a plan that makes sense to reach your goals. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: David Fabian, FMD Capital Management, and/or clients may hold positions in the ETFs and mutual funds mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell, or hold securities.

Best And Worst Q1’16: Materials ETFs, Mutual Funds And Key Holdings

The Materials sector ranks fourth out of the ten sectors as detailed in our Q1’16 Sector Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter , the Materials sector ranked seventh. It gets our Neutral rating, which is based on aggregation of ratings of nine ETFs and 15 mutual funds in the Materials sector. See a recap of our Q4’15 Sector Ratings here . Figure 1 ranks from best to worst the eight Materials ETFs that meet our liquidity standards and Figure 2 shows the five best and worst-rated Materials mutual funds. Not all Materials sector ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 26 to 121). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings. Investors seeking exposure to the Materials sector should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings The Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (NYSEARCA: FMAT ) is excluded from Figure 1 because its total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings The iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (NYSEARCA: IYM ) is the top-rated Materials ETF and the Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (MUTF: FMFEX ) is the top-rated Materials mutual fund. Both earn an Attractive rating. PowerShares S&P SmallCap Materials Portfolio (NASDAQ: PSCM ) is the worst-rated Materials ETF and the Rydex Basic Materials Fund (MUTF: RYBMX ) is the worst-rated Materials mutual fund. PSCM earns a Dangerous rating and RYBMX earns a Very Dangerous rating. 161 stocks of the 3000+ we cover are classified as Materials stocks. Monsanto Company (NYSE: MON ) is one of our favorite stocks held by IYM and earns an Attractive rating. Over the past decade, Monsanto has grown after-tax profit ( NOPAT ) by 16% compounded annually. Over this same time, the company has improved its return on invested capital ( ROIC ) from 7% to 14%. Despite the long-term profitability of the company, shares remain undervalued. At its current price of $88/share, Monsanto has a price to economic book value ( PEBV ) ratio of 1.1. This ratio means the market expects Monsanto’s profits to grow by only 10% over its remaining corporate life. If Monsanto can grow NOPAT by just 5% (under a third of historical rate) compounded annually for the next decade , shares are worth $140/share today – a 59% upside. Vulcan Materials (NYSE: VMC ) is one of our least favorite stocks held by Materials ETFs and mutual funds and earns a Dangerous rating. Vulcan Materials business has yet to recover from the global recession in 2008. Since 2007, the company’s economic earnings have fallen from -$88 million to -$463 million on a trailing twelve months basis. Over this same time, its ROIC has declined from 8% to a bottom quintile 3%. Despite the deterioration of the business, the stock trades at the same prices it did prior to the recession, which leaves it significantly overvalued. To justify its current price of $82/share, Vulcan must grow profits by 14% compounded annually for the next 25 years . This expectation is awfully optimistic given that since 1998, Vulcan’s NOPAT has actually declined by 1% compounded annually. Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Materials ETFs and mutual funds. Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst ETFs Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Mutual Funds Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings D isclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector or theme. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.