Tag Archives: investment

3 Strong Buy Wells Fargo Advantage Funds

Wells Fargo Advantage Funds has over $121.5 billion (excluding money market assets) of assets allocated across a wide range of mutual fund categories. The company manages more than 110 mutual funds, which include both domestic and foreign funds, asset allocation funds and fixed-income funds. The Wells Fargo fund family boasts, “Each fund is guided by a premier investment team chosen for its focused attention to a particular investment style. There’s a fund to meet the investment goals and risk tolerance of almost any investment portfolio.” Meanwhile, Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC ), the owner of Wells Fargo Advantage Funds brand, is one of the four largest banks in the U.S. and has a legacy spanning 150 years in the financial services sector. It is a highly diversified financial services company with operations spanning the globe. In 2010, the Boards of Trustees of Wells Fargo Advantage Funds and Evergreen Funds had approved the merger of the fund families to create the new fund lineup under the Wells Fargo Advantage Funds brand. Below we share with you 3 top-rated Wells Fargo Advantage Funds. Each has earned a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and is expected to outperform its peers in the future. Wells Fargo Advantage Pennsylvania Tax-Free A (MUTF: EKVAX ) seeks to provide tax-exempted income. EKVAX invests a large chunk of its assets in municipal securities that are expected to provide interest income free from Pennsylvania individual income tax and federal income tax, which also include federal alternative minimum tax (AMT). However, EKVAX may invest a maximum of 20% of its assets in municipal securities that pay interests, which are not exempted from federal income tax. The Wells Fargo Advantage PA Tax-Free A fund has returned 2.6% over the past one year. Robert J. Miller is one of the fund managers of CSGEX since 2009. Wells Fargo Advantage Small Company Growth A (MUTF: WFSAX ) invests a major portion of its assets in equity-related securities of small-cap companies. Companies with market capitalizations similar to those included in the Russell 2000 Index are considered small-cap ones by the WFSAX advisors. WFSAX is expected to invest 100% of its assets in the Small Company Growth Portfolio. The Wells Fargo Advantage Small Company Growth A fund has returned 3% over the past one year. As of September 2015, WFSAX held 126 issues with 1.75% of its assets invested in SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: SSNC ). Wells Fargo Advantage Core Bond A (MUTF: MBFAX ) seeks total return through growth of capital and income. MBFAX invests the lion’s share of its assets in bonds that are rated investment-grade. MBFAX may invest a maximum of a quarter of its assets in asset-backed securities, which are not from mortgage-backed category. Not more than one-fifth of MBFAX’s assets are expected to be invested in foreign debt securities that are denominated in dollar. MBFAX is expected to maintain a dollar-weighted average effective duration of not more than 10% of that of fund’s benchmark. The Wells Fargo Advantage Core Bond A fund has returned 1.6% over the past one year. MBFAX has an expense ratio of 0.78% as compared to the category average of 0.82%. Original Post

EZR: Is This A Useful ETF Or Symptom Of Wall Street Excess?

WisdomTree just introduced a new exchange traded fund. The Europe Local Recovery Fund sounds great, but is it? My gut tells me it’s another sign of an overextended ETF industry. Exchange traded funds, or ETFs, are amazing products in many ways. In fact, used properly, ETFs can be the basis for a solid portfolio. However, if you don’t pay close enough attention or make aggressive fund choices, ETFs can be very dangerous. WisdomTree’s (NASDAQ: WETF ) new Europe Local Recovery Fund (BATS: EZR ) falls into the riskier category in my book and is another sign that ETFs are, perhaps, too hot a product. The new fund EZR, WisdomTree’s new fund , is designed to, “…maximize exposure to European companies that may benefit from Europe’s economic recovery…” It goes about this by focusing on companies that generate 50% or more of their revenues from within Europe. According to the fund’s fact sheet, the portfolio gets about 70% of its revenues from this region. So an investment in EZR really does get you focused on Europe. There’s more to it than that, though. EZR’s portfolio excludes telecom, utilities, consumer staples, and health care, which aren’t as impacted by economic recoveries. Instead, it focuses on the industrial, materials, consumer discretionary, IT, finance, and energy sectors. All of which WisdomTree expects to benefit more from a regional upturn. But wait, there’s still more… EZR’s holdings: …are weighted by their correlation to the [European Commission’s Economic Sentiment Indicator]. Those whose returns show higher correlations to monthly changes in the indicator will be tilted toward higher weights-and vice versa. So the most economically sensitive stocks have the highest weight. Is EZR good, bad, or indifferent? Here’s the thing. EZR isn’t exactly a bad ETF. But it is a risky one. If Europe is doing well economically, the fund should perform well. If Europe isn’t doing well economically, EZR is likely to be a dog. Don’t overlook this simple fact. By its basic design, EZR is leveraged to Europe’s economic performance up and down. It’s not your typical European stock fund. You need to understand that very clearly when you buy it, otherwise you could be getting something you didn’t expect. If EZR is exactly what you’re looking for, great. But I consider this a pretty esoteric investment product. It’s highly focused around just one positive outcome. WisdomTree has other European funds, so I’m not sure why this one was needed. Except, perhaps, to bring out a new product so the fund sponsor could bring in more assets. Which is the first thing I thought about when I saw the news release on this ETF. Maybe there are a few highly sophisticated investors out there for which this product would make complete sense. But for most, it’s way too targeted. While WisdomTree suggests pairing it with its more broadly diversified Europe Hedged Equity Fund (NYSEARCA: HEDJ ), EZR is really meant for a trader. Someone who thinks the European economy is going to pick up. But that same investor needs to be savvy enough to sell EZR when he or she thinks the European economy is going to head south. If you aren’t that type of investor than owning EZR is far more likely to be dangerous to your financial health than helpful. Got to make a living This isn’t to suggest that WisdomTree is doing anything bad or wrong. If there’s a market for a niche product like EZR they have every right to fill it. In fact, if they want to keep growing, they pretty much have to find unique products to bring in more and more assets under management because the ETF market is pretty saturated with product at this point. And that’s what worries me. ETFs are a huge business and a relatively new one. We’ve quickly moved past the basics, like broad-based index funds, to increasingly focused and sometimes highly unique investment options. To give you a sense of where we’ve come from and where we are going, the Investment Company Institute’s data shows that there was about $45 billion of ETF issuance in 2002. That number was over $240 billion in 2014. So nearly six times as much money went into ETFs in 2014 as went in in 2002. If you are like me, you like to see new ideas for no other reason than they are interesting. They make you think about things in a different way. And to that extent, EZR is very interesting. But it’s also a product that isn’t appropriate for most investors. It’s also a product that’s taking such a specialized focus that it makes me question if ETFs have grown too far (I’ve long felt this, so it’s really just a symptom of an issue I’ve already been concerned about). It makes me think that ETFs are increasingly more about marketing than creating low-cost, freely traded, and broadly useful investment products. Which is what the goal was when ETFs were first created. The Global X Yieldco Index ETF (NASDAQ: YLCO ) is another fund I’d throw up as questionable so you don’t think I’m picking on WisdomTree. EZR is just a new fund that highlights my concern about increasingly esoteric ETFs. The sad truth is that it wouldn’t take me long to create a substantive list of ETFs that might be more dangerous than they are helpful. (Throw in most of the 2X and 3X ETFs on that score.) If you are an ETF investor you don’t have to run for the hills. But you do need to think carefully about what you own and why. Make sure you understand the ETFs in your portfolio and all of the implications you face from owning them-good and bad. My gut says that ETFs are a product where simple is better, particularly as ETFs get more and more complicated. As for EZR, most investors should avoid it.

Northwest Natural Gas’ (NWN) CEO Gregg Kantor on Q3 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Northwest Natural Gas Company (NYSE: NWN ) Q3 2015 Earnings Conference Call November 3, 2015, 11:00 am ET Executives Nikki Sparley – IR Gregg Kantor – CEO Greg Hazelton – SVP & CFO Analysts Spencer Joyce – Hilliard Lyons Operator Good day and welcome to the Northwest Natural Gas Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions]. After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions]. Please note that this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Nikki Sparley. Please go ahead. Nikki Sparley Thank you, Kasia. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our third quarter 2015 earnings call. As a reminder some of the things that will be said this morning contains forward-looking statements. They are based on management’s assumptions, which may or may not come true. You should refer to the language at the end of our press release for the appropriate cautionary statements and also our SEC filings for additional information. We expect to file our 10-Q later today. As mentioned, this teleconference is being recorded and will be available on our website following the call. Please note these conference calls are designed for the financial community. If you are an investor and have questions, please contact me directly at (503) 721-2530. Media may contact, Melissa Moore, at (503) 220-2436. Speaking this morning are Gregg Kantor, Chief Executive Officer and Greg Hazelton, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Kantor and Mr. Hazelton have some opening remarks and then will be available to answer your questions. Also joining us today are other members of our executive team, who are available to help answer any questions you may have. With that, I will turn it over to Mr. Kantor for his opening remarks. Gregg Kantor Thanks, Nikki. Good morning, everyone and welcome to our third quarter earnings call. I’ll start today with highlights from the period and then turn it over to Greg Hazelton to cover the financial details. Finally, I will wrap up the call with a brief update on our regulatory proceedings and our priorities for the remainder of the year. Let me begin with the quarterly financial results. We had a solid performance with higher utility margin and lower expenses in the period. Margin gains were largely from customer growth which increased to 1.5% from 1.3% last year. This growth rate translated into an additional 10,500 new customers on a rolling 12-month basis. On the expense front, we reduced O&M levels by almost $1 million on a quarter-over-quarter basis and I’m proud of the work we have done this year to control costs after the negative financial impacts of a record warm winter and a significant regulatory disallowance. As we look forward, there are several factors that suggest our local economy continues to experience solid growth. For example, in Portland Metro area about 40,000 new jobs have been added year-over-year which equates to over a 3% increase. And Oregon’s average wage today is the highest it has been relative to the national average in at least a generation according to the Oregon Office of Economic Analysis. Another metric of economic growth obviously is the unemployment rate which in September fell to 5.2% in the Portland Metro area from 5.9% last year. Also in the period home sales were up about 25% in Portland and average home prices increased by almost 6% compared to the third quarter of 2014. In Vancouver, Washington, home sales were up about 13% in the quarter compared to last year and average home prices were up just over 8%. All of these factors are signs that our local economy continues to move in the right direction. Due to following natural gas prices over the past year, we filed and received approval for a 7% rate reduction for Oregon residential customers, and a 14% reduction for Washington residential customers during the quarter. This decrease means our customers will be paying less for their natural gas this winter than they have in the past 15 years. Currently natural gas has up to a 60% price advantage over electricity and oil for home heating in our service territory. And this price advantage coupled with the environmental benefits of natural gas continue to boost our competitive position. Let me comment now on two other developments during the quarter. First, in September the Oregon commission adopted an all party settlement that determines how we would recover cost associated with seven wells we drilled under our amended gas reserves agreement. This $10 million additional investment, like our original investment with Encana, provides a long-term price protection for Oregon utility customers. Under the order, this investment will be recovered at a rate of about $0.47 per therm. We are pleased with this collaborative settlement and the positive conclusion to the dock. Going forward, we are working with the commission and other gas utilities in Oregon on a policy docket that will explore commodity hedging, including what world gas reserve should play. Finally this morning, I’m proud to report in September we learned that for that sixth time in nine years, we ranked first in the Annual J.D. Power Residential Customer Satisfaction Study for natural gas utilities in the west. In addition, we have strengths among the top two highest scoring utilities in the nation eight out of the last 10 years. These results reflect our continued commitment to operate reliably, safely, and with high quality customer service in the communities we serve. With that, let me turn it over to Greg to cover the financial details. Greg Hazelton Thank you, Gregg, and good morning everyone. Turning to our results for the third quarter we reported improved performance with a consolidated net loss of $6.7 million or $0.24 per share versus a loss of $8.7 million or $0.32 per share for the same period last year. As a reminder, a majority of our business was seasonal in nature. And the third quarter typically realized the loss due to decreased heating requirements impacting customer usage. Year-to-date earnings through September were $0.88 per share on net income of $24 million compared to $1.11 per share in net income of $30.2 million for the same period last year. As previously discussed in the first quarter, the company recorded a $15 million pretax or $9.1 million after tax environmental disallowance related to the February OPUC Order. This charge is included in O&M expense. Excluding the charge, year-to-date consolidated earnings were $1.21 per share or $33.1 million. This reflects a $2.9 million increase in net income from last year primarily driven by higher utility margins and an increase in other income. At our utility, we reported a net loss of $7.5 million for the quarter, an improvement of $1.3 million from the prior year. Results were driven by higher utility margin, lower O&M expense, and decreased interest expense. For the nine months period, utility net income was $23.1 million or a decrease of $6.4 million from last year, mainly due to the environmental charge. Excluding the disallowance, utility net income increased $2.7 million year-over-year. Positive year-to-date drivers included higher utility margins and increase in other income, lower interest expense; these were partially offset by an increase in O&M expense. Utility margin for the quarter increased $1.5 million driven by customer growth and gains from gas cost incentive sharing. And as you may recall, utility margin for the year-to-date period was impacted by warm weather in our service territory during our peak heating season in the first quarter. Overall average temperatures for the first nine months of the year were 15% warmer than 2014, and 22% warmer than normal. Total gas deliveries decreased almost 10% and gross revenues were down 4% during the year-to-date period. Although our utility margin is generally protected from the weather, we do have about 11% of our customers in Washington who do not have weather normalization, and 7% of our Oregon customers are left out of the weather normalization program. In spite of the weather driven decline in volumes and gross revenues, net margins increased $2.7 million mainly due to continued customer growth and gains from gas cost, incentive sharing mechanism, as we took the advantage of lower gas prices to achieve savings for our customers. Moving to our gas storage segment, net income for the quarter increased approximately $800,000 compared to the prior year. The increase was driven by higher operating revenues from slightly higher contract prices for the 2015/2016 gas storage year and a reduction in operating expenses at our Gill Ranch facility. For the first nine months, net income for gas storage was over $800,000, an increase of nearly $400,000 from the prior year. Results included a reduction in operating expenses and interest expense, partially offset by a decrease in operating revenues due to lower contract prices during the first quarter of 2015 at Gill Ranch. As Gregg mentioned earlier with regards to consolidated O&M, as a result of our cost control initiatives undertaken to partially offset the environmental write-off and record warm weather, we achieved a decrease of over $900,000 in O&M expense versus last year. For the nine months period, however excluding the regulatory disallowance, O&M expense increased $3.4 million. The increase was primarily due to utility payroll and benefit increases which included a new Union labor contract that was effective June 1, 2014. Partially offsetting the increase in payroll costs were lower repair and power cost at our Gill Ranch facility. For the first nine months, other income increased $4.9 million compared to last year, primarily due to the recognition of $5.3 million of equity earnings on deferred environmental expenditures as a result of the February environmental order. Over the last 12 months, the utility redeemed $40 million of debentures without reissuance using environmental insurance proceeds to pay down the maturing long-term debt balances and defer new issuances of long-term debt. Consequently interest expense decreased nearly $700,000 for the quarter and $3 million for the first nine months of the year. Cash flow from operating activities for the first nine months of 2015 was $173 million compared to $215 million a year ago. Last year’s cash flow was significantly enhanced by $102 million of insurance recoveries partially offset by other working capital changes. Finally, today the company has reaffirmed its 2015 guidance for reported earnings in the range of $1.77 to $1.97 per share which includes the $15 million pretax charge. Our adjusted guidance for 2015 excluding the charge remains unchanged at $2.10 per share to $2.30 per share. The company’s guidance assumes continued customer growth from our utility segment, average weather conditions going forward, slow recovery of the gas storage market, and no significant changes in prevailing legislative and regulatory policies or outcomes. With that, I will turn it back over to Gregg for his concluding remarks. Gregg Kantor Thanks, Greg. At this point in the year, our focus is two-fold. First, we will be moving toward a decision on our open environmental compliance proceedings. And at the same time, we will continue to work necessary to advance our growth initiatives. As you know, in the first quarter, we received the Commission’s decision on our environmental cost recovery mechanism and the application of an earnings test to environmental expenditures. As part of the decision, the OPUC required a compliance filing that describes how we would implement their order. We submitted a revised compliance filing at the end of September and we’re currently working through the review process with OPUC staff and other parties. We believe the two main issues in question are whether the company is required to forego recovery of interest on the original regulatory disallowance and on how certain costs are allocated between Oregon and Washington. The filing will be subject to final commission approval which we expect early in 2016. On our growth initiatives, we’ve been working with the Oregon Commission and parties on a Carbon Solutions Program under Oregon’s greenhouse gas reduction legislation. As we’ve discussed before, Senate Bill 844 allows the OPUC to incent natural gas utilities to undertake projects that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Our first proposal was submitted in June and is designed to further the use of combined heat and power in Oregon, a goal that the state has had for a number of years. Under our CHP proposal, industrial and commercial customers in the market could submit CHP projects for consideration. In our view, this is an important effort that could provide a significant carbon reduction benefit for our customers and for Oregon. The OPUC has set a schedule for review of our CHP filing that calls for a decision early in 2016. And we’re currently working with parties on a number of items including the proper level of incentives and how to measure the carbon emissions. Now let me give you a quick update on the potential expansion projects at our underground storage facility in Mist, Oregon. As you know, last December, we received approval from Portland General Electric to move forward with the permitting and land acquisition work required for the expansion project. The project would require no notice storage services to PGE’s — I’m sorry to provide no notice storage service to PGE’s natural gas fired generating plants at Fort Westwood. It would include a new reservoir, providing up to 25 billion cubic feet of available storage, an additional compressor station, and a new pipeline. In April, we submitted an application to the Oregon Energy Facility Siting Council for an amendment to our existing Mist site certificate, a step required to support the expansion. And in early October, we held a public open house with the local community near the expansion site and received positive feedback from attendees. The next step in the process will occur when the Department of Energy and Siting Council publish a proposed order later this year. Between now and the issuance of that proposed order, we will continue to work with both organizations to address any questions about our filing. And our team also continues to work on obtaining other required permits and property rights. Assuming successful and timely completion of those items, the current estimated cost of the expansion is approximately $125 million with a potential in-service date in the 2018/2019 winter season, again depending on the permitting process and the construction schedule. I will end my comments today by noting that in quarter, our Board approved a dividend increase making this the 60th consecutive year of increasing dividends paid. It is a record of which we are very proud. And with that thanks for joining us this morning and now I will open it up for questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Spencer Joyce of Hilliard Lyons. Please go ahead. Spencer Joyce Hi good morning guys. Great quarter here. Gregg Kantor Thank you. Thank you, good morning Spencer. Spencer Joyce Just a couple of real quick ones from me. First want to go back and talk about the $13 million of environmental cost that we’re going to be able to start recovering in Oregon, I guess beginning just a couple of days ago on November 1. I guess first question is this going to be strictly a cash flow statement item or will we see this flow also through the income statement part one there. And then part two, I guess this recovery subject to a final review. Are we pretty comfortable with the $13 million or can you kind of put odds on the likelihood we see some change to that number? Greg Hazelton Spencer, this is Greg Hazelton. I will take those questions in order. First of all the recovery of the $13 million, we will see an increase in revenue for that amount and you’ll see an offsetting increase in expense or amortization. As we have reported as an operating expense as we amortize the deferred balance. So the net-net would be it will be a positive cash flow perspective but net zero from an income or net income perspective. Spencer Joyce Okay, perfect. That’s what somewhat what I assume there. Greg Hazelton Sure. Now we’re collecting the $13 million which has been authorized this is not something that’s subject to refund, this is something that we’re collecting amortizing those balances any adjustments to collections on a — of deferred balances would be done on a perspective basis as we go through each calendar year. Gregg Kantor And once it gets put into the PGA, we’re collecting it has — those are dollars that have been approved for collection by the commission and there is no second look at it, right. Spencer Joyce Okay, perfect. I guess totally separately jumping up to the O&M lines, a real nice quarter here sounds like you’ve got a couple of cost tailwinds there. I would expect some of those to perhaps show up in Q4 and may be into early next year as well any color there, I know it’s somewhat baked into guidance. But I know previous quarters, we have talked a little bit about some increased cost or maintenance cost or some of the storage facilities, it seems like that may be unwinding a bit, but just any additional color to help us model that O&M over the next few quarters? Greg Hazelton Yes I think may be a couple of things would be helpful here. Gill Ranch, we had about $1.8 million recorded last year on the storage segment which increased Gill Ranch’s O&M which we wouldn’t expect to be repeated this year or something that would be recurring. As we think about O&M or generally, we have implemented cost controls to try to offset some of the impact for weather and the write-off, frankly coming off ’14, which was actually a pretty, we had a pretty low level of O&M expense that year based on FTEs and so forth. So we’re coming off a pretty low base. From a budgeting perspective, we actually expect it to be up fairly significantly year-over-year in the 7% area. In fact that we’ve held it to relatively close to flat year-over-year is acknowledgement of the effort that we’ve taken this year which are probably not sustainable next year. At some point, we have to have — we have to adjust staffing, we have to reflect increases in cost that are baked into third-party expenditures and other things. So I would say if you look at our — if you look year-over-year, if you think our O&M of $121 million which is reported year-to-date and we adjust out of that the about $16 million in write-off, environmental write-off and other adjustments. And then, if we look at some of the baked in increases that we had to offset which included bargaining unit labor increases and compensation increases. Again we’ve kept that flat relative to last year. So that in total that gets you somewhere in the $4 million plus area in terms of savings that we’ve been able to achieve which are baked into our forecast numbers. Spencer Joyce Okay, perfect, great color there. That’s all I had. Thanks guys. Operator [Operator Instructions]. Gregg Kantor Okay, doesn’t seem to be any additional questions. I want to end by thanking you all again for joining us this morning and for your interest in our company. We appreciate it. Take care. Greg Hazelton Thank you. Operator The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!