Tag Archives: investment

PIMCO Total Return: 1 Bill Gross-Less Year Later

Summary The PIMCO Total Return Fund assets under management have shrunk from $293B in early 2013 to less than $100B today. The new managers of the fund were part of the investment committee working with Bill Gross during his tenure so management style should remain consistent. The fund, at least in the year-to-date period without Gross managing, has outperformed its benchmark and Morningstar category. The managers are currently retaining a cautious approach to the portfolio in anticipation of future rate hikes. In the relatively mundane world of mutual fund investing there was perhaps no news bigger than last year’s surprising announcement that Bill Gross was leaving PIMCO – the company he founded – to jump over to Janus. The move resulted in a mass exodus from Gross’ Total Return Fund (MUTF: PTTRX ). Once the largest mutual fund in the world back in 2013 with $293B in assets now has less than $100B. Many investors felt that Gross was the key that drove the engine and fled for greener pastures when he departed (although his current fund – the Janus Global Unconstrained Bond Fund (MUTF: JUCDX ) – has just $1.5B in assets). For investors that have stuck around it’s worth wondering if the “new” PIMCO Total Return fund is the same now as it was when Gross was in charge. Gross himself has said in the past that investors maintain at least a five year outlook when formulating their portfolios. However, Gross has been known to quickly change directions. This is perhaps most notable in his 2011 call on interest rates. Gross thought that interest rates would rise once QE was done and took his portfolio’s allocation in Treasury bonds all the way down to zero. Of course, interest rates went down, the fund badly underperformed its benchmarks and the flow of money out of the fund began. The new fund managers for their part have pledged largely to maintain the groupthink investment style that was part of the decision making process even when Gross was involved. Style-wise, the fund still falls into Morningstar’s intermediate term bond category where it’s been for the last many years. There are a couple of important things to note in the figure above. First, performance on a one year basis can’t really be used as a long term predictor of success but at least the new managers are off to a reasonable start. Year-to-date, the fund is beating its benchmark index by 27 basis points and the broader intermediate term bond fund category by 64 basis points. That puts Total Return in the top 15% of funds – a notable departure from recent performance that saw the fund fall into the bottom half three of the last four years. Second, turnover and trading frequency remain at comparable levels to the end of Gross’ tenure. The fund is running at a turnover rate of about 265% which is fairly comparable to the past two years’ rate of 227%. Going forward, the fund’s managers are limiting duration in the United States anticipating coming rate hikes maintaining roughly ⅔ of the portfolio in government and mortgage-backed securities. Smaller allocations to corporates, high yields and even some emerging markets adds return potential and yield to the portfolio. Consistent with its more defensive outlook, the current portfolio duration is around 4 years – much lower than the benchmark’s 5.6. Conclusion It’s understandable that investors would begin looking elsewhere following Gross’ departure. But shareholders who have stuck around have done just fine in the meantime. I think we’ve seen in the first year post-Gross that the fund is managed in a substantially similar way. The consistency of the portfolio management team that worked behind Gross is still largely intact. Gross’ decades of expertise may no longer be around but Total Return is still in able and, at least thus far, in solidly performing hands. Despite the wave of outflows that is still occurring yet today there’s no reason why the current PIMCO Total Return fund shouldn’t at least be considered for the income part of a portfolio. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

The One Thing You Must Do When The Market Tanks

By Tim Maverick It’s a scenario that repeats itself during every stock market downturn: At the first sign of distress, mom and pop investors head for the hills. And the year 2015 is no exception. During July and August, investors withdrew money from both stock and bond mutual funds. According to Credit Suisse, this is the first time withdrawals have occurred in both categories in consecutive months since 2008. That was, of course, during the last financial crisis. I believe Yogi Berra said it best: “It’s like déjà vu all over again.” Here’s What You Need to Do I’ve been in the investment business since the 1980s and have been through every market selloff since 1987. Even though I’m no longer a professionally licensed advisor, I do have a few thoughts on investor behavior during selloffs. First of all, if you’re in your 20s, 30s, or 40s, don’t worry. The stock market’s long-term track record is undeniable. For those of you in your 50s or 60s, I would’ve, at one point in time, warned about bear markets possibly lasting as long as a decade. But with the Federal Reserve reacting to every market sniffle with lots of money, the dynamics have changed. Look at last week’s turbulence. Already, prominent voices like Bridgewater Associates Founder Ray Dalio have said that further turmoil would encourage more quantitative easing (QE). Thus, for regular investors, the only real danger point – as I’ve described in a previous article – is shortly before and shortly after your retirement . And if you’re in such a time frame, your stock allocation should’ve already been lowered. Thus, the one thing investors should do during this current downturn is take a serious look at their portfolios and make sure everything is allocated properly. Most likely, a rebalancing is in order. Rebalancing Really Works Rebalancing a portfolio between stocks, bonds, and cash is important – and it can actually improve your returns. In 2012, Columbia Business School professor Andrew Ang conducted a study. He looked at returns from January 1926 through December 1940, a period that includes the Great Depression. Here’s what he found: A portfolio of 100% stocks returned 81% with dividends reinvested. A portfolio of 100% government bonds returned 108%. But a portfolio of 60% stocks and 40% bonds, rebalanced quarterly, returned 146%! Now, I don’t think rebalancing quarterly is necessary. And you definitely shouldn’t rebalance in the midst of market volatility. Instead, get your game plan in order now, and put it in place after the dust has settled. That will likely be in a few months. After all, we’re in that nasty seven-year cycle period (1987, 1994, 2001, 2008, 2015) when bad things tend to happen to the stock market. One final point: If you do rebalance in a taxable account, there will be tax consequences. How to Reallocate What do I mean by reallocating or rebalancing your assets? Well, I use the words of legendary investor Sir John Templeton as a guide. He recommended “to buy when others are despondently selling and to sell when others are greedily buying.” This translates to a counter-intuitive action: Sell a portion of your winners and add those funds to lagging categories. But only do so if your percentages are seriously out of whack. Here’s a hypothetical, simplified example: A year ago, in the stock portion of your portfolio, you had 20% in technology and biotechnology stocks, and 20% in energy and emerging market stocks. But now, with tech and biotech red-hot, these stocks represent 30% of your portfolio. Meanwhile, ice-cold energy and emerging markets stocks are down to 10% of your holdings. You should sell where the greed is – where analysts are saying the “trees will grow to the sky” – and buy where investors are fleeing en masse. In other words, bring them back into balance at 20% each. This strategy will still keep you exposed to the current winning sectors while also boosting your exposure to tomorrow’s winners. Take a look at this data from Franklin Templeton on emerging markets. It shows that the bull phases are longer and stronger than the bear phases in these markets: Thus, you want to be positioned to take advantage of such situations. You also don’t want to be highly exposed to a hot sector if it crashes, a la tech stocks in 2000-01. John Wooden on Investing To summarize, I’d like to quote legendary basketball coach John Wooden: “If you’re too engrossed and involved and concerned in regard to things over which you have no control, it will adversely affect the things over which you have control.” That’s a great philosophy for life – and it applies to investing, as well. Don’t worry about the stock market. You can’t control it. On the other hand, you can control how you put your money to work for you. Original Post

PIMCO High Income Fund – Next Stop, NAV

$PHK is a closed-end fund that had historically habitually traded at a large NAV premium, with the irrational bull thesis predicated on an unsustainable dividend. We had correctly predicted a dividend cut would be forthcoming. Now that dividend has been cut, the next stop for $PHK is NAV using $PHT as an analog. Target price of $7.11, represents -18% downside from current $8.62 price. This thesis is very simple. For the reasons articulated in our previous PIMCO High Income Fund (NYSE: PHK ) article , the bull thesis for $PHK trading at a significant premium to NAV was highly misguided as the dividend level was unsustainable. On 9/1/15, Pimco announced the predicted dividend cut in the September dividend announcement , cutting the monthly dividend by 15% to $0.103 from $0.122. $PHK’s stock price has decreased significantly today given the announcement, -8.8% currently to $8.62 from yesterday’s close of $9.45. Investors in $PHK or potential short-sellers may believe that the selling pressure will subside given the observed price action. However, this is misguided, as we have an analog for another high yield closed-end fund that had historically traded at a premium and had its dividend cut. Pioneer High Income Trust (NYSE: PHT ), which launched in Apr-2002 and cut its dividend in Feb-15 to $0.115/month from $0.1375/month (-16% dividend cut). This caused the fund to trade down dramatically from a ~45% premium to a current -1.5% discount to NAV, causing significant capital loss for CEF investors. (click to enlarge) $PHK’s current NAV is $7.11 (see ” Daily Statistics “), meaning that the current $8.62 price still represents a 21% premium to NAV. Now that the “dividend consistency” bull argument for $PHK has been discredited, there is no “NAV premium” floor for the fund and we expect $PHK to follow a very similar trajectory to $PHT, with $PHK ultimately trading to NAV in the near future. Note: In addition, there is adequate borrow for short-sellers. Caveat emptor. Disclosure: I am/we are short PHK. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: The author and/or others he advises holds short a position in PHK at the time of publishing this article. The author may make trades in securities mentioned without notification. The information contained in this article is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. The author shall not be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. The opinions expressed in this article are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. The article is not a recommendation of, or an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy, any particular security, strategy or investment product. The research for this article is based on public information that the author considers reliable, but the author does not represent that the research or the article is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. The views and opinions expressed herein are current as of the date of this article and are subject to change. Any projections, forecasts and estimates contained in this article are necessarily speculative in nature and are based upon certain assumptions. In addition, matters they describe are subject to known (and unknown) risks, uncertainties and other unpredictable factors, many of which are beyond the author’s control. No representations or warranties are made as to the accuracy of such forward-looking assumptions. It can be expected that some or all of such forward-looking assumptions will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual result.