Tag Archives: investing

How To Fly In Turbulent Emerging Markets

By Sammy Suzuki Emerging markets may be stormier these days, but they’re still brimming with opportunities. You just need to know how to find them. That’s going to take some skillful piloting – and highly sensitive downside-risk radar. The developing world’s economic growth engine is losing steam. Commodity prices have collapsed, and some of the largest nations are facing structural and political struggles. Demand in the developed world has been persistently weak, and the prospect of rising US interest rates is adding uncertainty to the outlook. In this environment, simply buying an index isn’t likely to generate the easy outsized returns it had for most of the past decade. Investors may be tempted to bail. But writing off the developing world altogether means missing out on many of the world’s most dynamic, fast-growing economies and companies. The secret to success, then, is being able to identify pockets of strength – even in weak economies – and to catch nascent trends before they become obvious to others. In our view, that means investing actively, taking the long view and adopting preemptive tactics for riding out stormy times. It Pays to Deviate Generally speaking, we are indifferent to the benchmark. The reasons for this are clear: it pays to deviate liberally from the crowd. Emerging equity markets are less transparent than developed ones, and news tends to travel more slowly than it does in the developed world. As a result, developing-market stocks are more prone to overreactions and mispricings – but also far richer in opportunities for attentive stock pickers to exploit. That’s the beauty of emerging-market investing. Being active means leaning into reliable, long-term sources of equity outperformance. In other words, simply follow the basic tenets of good stock-picking: Buy stocks when they are cheap, when they are delivering stronger-than-average and/or more consistent profitability, or are more likely to score positive earnings surprises. Because emerging-market indices are so inefficient, the payback potential from such a back-to-basics strategy is high. Buffett’s Rule #1: Don’t Lose Money In storm-prone emerging markets, defense counts more than offense. So we’re especially vigilant about avoiding excess volatility. For years, the conventional thinking was that volatility was part and parcel of being an emerging-market investor. Since those risks were fully understood and accepted, active emerging-market managers didn’t have to control for it. Many professional investors merely track the ups and downs of a benchmark and call that risk control. We see things differently. In our view, the key to success in emerging stocks is to hold onto as much of your gains as possible over a full market cycle. That means being proactive and thoughtful about absolute – not relative – risk. One way to do that is by maintaining a consistent tilt toward companies with stable cash flows, good capital stewardship and/or lower sensitivity to the business cycle. Another way is to be ever watchful for looming macro risks. We rely more heavily on our country-specific economic insights for avoiding risk than for selecting stocks or return potential. This risk-aware approach is akin to constantly buying downside protection, in our view. Hunt for Durable Trends In times of increased economic turbulence, earnings quality and consistency become paramount. Some examples of companies with these attributes include South Korean biopharmaceutical company Medytox, which is getting a lift from the surging demand for an improved, next-generation botulinum toxin (commonly known as botox), an affordable form of eternal youth. When they travel abroad, Chinese vacation-goers are snapping up expensive skincare products from South Korean luxury cosmetics company Amorepacific. And emerging-Asian yarn spinners, fabric mills and sneaker makers are riding the phenomenal growth of “athleisure” sportswear. All of these companies are beneficiaries of enduring lifestyle trends. While generally shunning commodity-centric countries, we see further growth potential for many of the low-cost manufacturing centers. For example, Mexico, Vietnam, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic should all continue to gain from China’s waning status as a source for low-cost labor. Winning investments can be found even in sectors with uncertain or dismal outlooks. For example, global demand for electronic devices appears to have reached saturation, from personal computers to laptops to tablets and smartphones. Yet certain niche players in the sector, such as camera lens makers and flexible printed circuit-board makers in South Korea and Taiwan, look headed for strong revenue growth as smartphone makers rush to add desirable features and slimmer designs. In the face of the likely economic squalls ahead, we believe that combining active, high-conviction investing with a greater sensitivity to risk is the best strategy. To get the most out of emerging-market equities, there’s no contradiction between finding returns and reducing risk. The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Sammy Suzuki – Portfolio Manager – Strategic Core Equities

Utility Investors: Embrace Pending Rate Hikes

Utility investors should be more afraid of declining interest rates than rising. History points to rate cycle turns in 2004-2007, 1993-2000, and 1986-1989. Overall annual total return for utility stocks during the previous three rates hike cycles was 7.5%. In July 2014, I penned an article investigating the effect of previous interest rate cycle upswings on share prices of utilities, and with the pending rate hikes anticipated to begin in just a few weeks, it may be time to revisit this topic. The premise of the previous article was to review the performance of some well known utilities stocks after the previous three turns in the rate cycle. History points to rising interest rate cycles of 2004 to 2007, 1993 to 2000, and 1986 to 1989. I will not reiterate all the finer historic points of the previous article, including the graphs of the respective yield curves, but will analyze stock performance over the time frames. As background, I suggest reviewing the previous article. Many investors believe utilities are negatively hurt by rising rates. The most common reasoning is: •Higher rates increase interest costs for utilities and the capital-intensive nature of their business makes profits more sensitive to leverage expense. In addition, weak share prices reduces the effectiveness of equity raises to fund capital expenditures, along with raising the cost of the debt portion of billions in cap ex budgets. •Higher rates cause income-oriented investors to gravitate to bonds where principal risk is perceived to be lower. •If interest rates are increasing to stem the tide of rising inflation, utility operating costs, such as coal fuel costs, will also increase along with labor cost pressures. A traditional cost-push inflation cycle could be distressing to more than just a few utilities. Yes, corporate interest costs go up as new borrowings reflect current yield conditions. However, interest expense is part of operating expenses that are incorporated in most rate decisions. While there is a delay between cash out due to greater interest costs and inclusion in rate decisions, the higher expense is usually passed on to customers. While income investors will gravitate to safer bonds as their yield rises, selectively reviewing top quality utilities with a higher spread to 10-yr Treasuries will mitigate downward pressure in stock prices. Currently, rising rates are not being caused by cost-push pressures but due to stronger economic growth. Stronger growth usually leads to higher energy demands. In addition, a large percentage of infrastructure growth and cap ex is upgrading older assets and accommodating new sources of green energy, which are not as sensitive to underlying population and economic growth. The age of sector ETFs is relatively short and most do not encompass the above listed time frames. For example, S&P Utility ETF (NYSEARCA: XLU ) started trading in Dec 1998. In order to evaluate utility stock performance during these periods, a list of some of more popular stocks was chosen. These include: Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK ), NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE ), Dominion Resources (NYSE: D ), Southern Co (NYSE: SO ), American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP ), PPL Corp (NYSE: PPL ), and PCG Corp (NYSE: PCG ). Combined, these represent 45% of the current value of XLU. Below are two tables outlining each stock’s performance during the last three up cycles in rates. The first table lists the starting and closing price of each stock, the individual performance of its share price and the value of an equal weight holding for these seven firms. The Fed Fund Rate is listed as well. The second table relies on information from buyupside.com to calculate the overall total return for each stock, the number of days held, and the value of an investment of $10,000 at the start date. As most utility investors realize, returns from utility stock dividends is an important portion of total return, and an overriding reason for buying utility stocks. The table also compares these with the return of S&P 500. These tables support the strategy of buying potential weakness in utilities when investors mistakenly sell at the turn in the rate cycles. Many utility stocks have declined from their 52-week highs, with the most common reason being a fear of rate hikes. For example, Duke Energy is trading -24% below its 52-wk high and 1% over its low, NextEra Energy -12% and 8%, Dominion Resources -16% and 3%, Southern Co -15% and 10%, American Electric Power -15% and 6%, PPL Corp -11% and 17%, and PCG Corp -12% and 13%, respectively. If an investor were to buy as the total return table outlines, their investment would have been a total of $210,000 combined, $70,000 each cycle. The value of these investments at the end of the respective rate hike cycle would be $350,000, or a total annual return of 7.5% over the 8.5 year covered. Utility investors should embrace the beginning of the rate up cycle by not dumping their stock holdings. If anything, investors should be looking for bargains as others are fearfully selling. Author’s Note: Please review disclosure in Author’s profile.

Van Eck Partners With Merk On Deliverable Gold ETF

By DailyAlts Staff The Van Eck family of funds is well-known for its popular Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (NYSEARCA: GDX ) and Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (NYSEARCA: GDXJ ) exchange-traded funds. Its mutual fund, the Van Eck International Investors Gold Fund (MUTF: INIVX ), rounded out Van Eck’s precious-metals offerings – until recently. On October 26, the firm announced it had begun to act as the marketing agent for the Merk Gold Trust, now known as the Van Eck Merk Gold ETF (NYSEARCA: OUNZ ). Physical Delivery of Gold Despite the name-change, the fund is keeping its “OUNZ” ticker symbol, which is also how investors commonly refer to it. OUNZ was originally launched by Merk President and CIO Axel Merk and his team, who sought to give investors a liquid and cost-efficient way to buy and hold gold, while also giving them the option of taking physical delivery , if and when desired. To date, OUNZ is the only gold ETF that provides this option – and it’s patented. “Through OUNZ, investors may buy gold with the ease of an ETF, but also have the option to take delivery of their gold when they want, where they want, in the form they want,” said Van Eck CEO Jan van Eck, in a recent statement. “We’re pleased to be teaming up with Merk Investments to offer the fund to more investors.” Natural Partnership Van Eck has a long history of gold investing. GDX was the first gold-mining ETF on the market, and before that, the Van Eck International Investors Gold Fund was the first gold mutual fund. These distinctions made Van Eck a “natural partner” for Merk, according to Mr. Merk. “Van Eck’s long and storied history in gold investing makes them a natural partner for us as we continue to educate investors about OUNZ and the role that physical gold exposure can play in a portfolio,” he said. “Our unique approach to providing investors with the opportunity to redeem their shares for physical gold coupled with Van Eck’s deep knowledge base, marketing acumen and outstanding reputation make this a very exciting partnership.” OUNZ originally launched in May 2014 . Through October 27, 2015, the ETF had lost 10.4% since its inception. The SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GLD ) – which also tracks the price of physical gold – lost 10.3% over the same period. Past performance does not necessarily predict future results.