Tag Archives: investing

Nondomestic Equity Funds Continue To Attract Money

By Patrick Keon In every year, except one, since the global financial crisis, nondomestic equity funds have experienced overall net inflows. The one exception occurred in 2012, when the group suffered $3.0 billion of net outflows. Conversely, domestic equity funds have had net outflows every year since the global financial crisis except for 2013, when the group took in just over $79 billion of net new money. This trend has been amplified so far in 2015. The gap between the two types of funds has never been so wide, with nondomestic equity funds experiencing positive flows of over $104 billion for the year to date, while domestic equity funds have seen almost $101 billion leave their coffers. The positive flows into nondomestic equity funds this year have been dominated by funds in Lipper’s International Multi-Cap Core (IMLC) classification; the group has taken in $72.2 billion of net new money, while International Large-Cap Core Funds (ILCC) and Emerging Markets Funds have contributed $14.1 billion and $6.1 billion of net inflows to the nondomestic equity funds’ total positive flows. The Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund (MUTF: VGTSX ) has taken in the lion’s share of the net new money within IMLC, with net inflows of over $54 billion for the year so far. The activity within ILCC has been a little more widespread, with the Bridge Builder International Equity Fund ( BBIEX , +$2.3 billion), the Ivy International Core Equity Fund ( IVIAX , +$1.8 billion), and the T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund ( TROSX , +$1.5 billion) contributing the most to the group’s total. Within the Emerging Markets Funds classification, there have been seven funds that have taken in over $1 billion of net new money for the year to date. The largest net inflows belong to two Fidelity funds: Fidelity Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund ( FSAMX , +$3.5 billion) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund ( FEMSX , $2.7 billion).

Restaurant Investing: What Early Investors Should Look For In An IPO Opportunity

Summary What are the telltale signs that a company’s stock is worth its post-IPO price? Do investors need to look beyond mere hype to make such a crucial decision as putting their money into a business? What are the metrics that an investor needs to closely review before making that investment decision? Photo Courtesy: Value in Wall Street Investing in a company that’s going to IPO is a difficult decision to make. With all the hype surrounding restaurant IPOs these past five years, the abundance of “noise” made by early investors and even the companies themselves drowns out the “right noises” that should be heard by anyone interested in getting in. Introduction The first point to remember is that it is never too late to invest in a stock as long as the company has a solid foundation of financial and operational management. In that respect, the CEO and CFO are the most important people to get to know because they carry the bulk of the responsibility for managing operations and finances. The second point – a deeper one – is how they’ve been performing in the years preceding the IPO. Very often, investors will merely look at the current revenues or average sales volume or unit growth published in the IPO prospectus, read a few articles from expert financial analysts and then jump headlong into the investment. More often than not – and this is because the vast majority of investors can’t actually get in at the IPO price – they are forced to buy at prices much higher than the actual performance of the company warrants. To help investors make better decisions, we’ve studied one of the best performing companies of this decade and showcased their metrics to elucidate what we mean when we say that management and margins should be the factors driving investor sentiment – and not the “campaigning” surrounding an initial public offering. Background For the purpose of this showcase, we’ll be looking at Chipotle (NYSE: CMG ), which is one of the top performers in the fast casual segment. In an earlier article, we discussed how this burrito maker crushed 3 prevalent myths about restaurant investing. In this article, we’ll see something entirely different: what were those early signs that told us that this was going to be a good company to invest in? The end objective here is to allow investors a deeper and broader insight into the decision-making process that should necessarily precede an IPO investment. With close to 1,800 restaurants efficiently serving burritos and other Mexican fare since the 90s, CMG is a fast casual restaurant that boasts one of the highest AUVs in the segment – $2.47 million over the last full fiscal (2014). Consider that its AUV growth for the three years preceding the IPO stood at above 6%, and you’ll know that comp sales growth contributed to a large part of that – growing an average of 16% in the three years before going public – as did aggressive but well-planned unit growth, which saw units go from 229 at the beginning of 2003 to 481 at the end of 2005 – a growth of 210%. When all these factors work together, they produce a solid foundation on which to base an investment decision. Of course, not all companies can boast stellar numbers before their IPO year, but the fact remains that these indications must necessarily be there in part. Anything less would likely miss the whole point of investing – to acquire, hold on to and benefit from a share of a consistently profitable public company. Analysis If you had delved into Chipotle’s margins reports for the five years preceding the IPO, this is what you would have seen: Strong cost control action on several fronts like occupancy, labor, food and pre-opening costs. An operating cost that went from 118% of revenue to 95% of revenue in 5 years. A net income percentage that grew from -18% to over 6% during that time. Five Years Pre-IPO Fiscal year 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Total revenue 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Food, beverage and packaging costs 32.23% 32.75% 33.25% 33.07% 34.37% Labor costs 28.47% 29.63% 29.80% 32.50% 34.99% Occupancy costs 7.59% 7.69% 8.10% 9.15% 8.92% Other operating costs 13.22% 13.65% 13.80% 14.56% 16.38% General and administrative expenses 8.28% 9.53% 10.84% 12.61% 15.72% Depreciation and amortization 4.46% 4.63% 4.78% 5.50% 6.63% Pre-opening costs 0.31% 0.47% 0.52% 0.50% 1.71% Loss on disposal of assets 0.50% 0.36% 1.43% 0.73% 0.06% Total costs and expenses 95.06% 98.70% 102.51% 108.62% 118.79% Income (loss) from operations 4.94% 1.30% -2.51% -8.62% -18.79% Income (loss) before income taxes 4.82% 1.30% -2.44% -8.45% -18.24% Net income (loss) 6.01% 1.30% -2.44% -8.45% -18.24% If that data weren’t sufficient, you could have taken a look at its comparable store sales and average unit volumes, which were equally impressive: 6% growth in average unit volume for the three years preceding the IPO. 16% comp sales growth average for the period. Fiscal Year 2005 2004 2003 Average Restaurant Sales $1,440 $1,361 $1,274 Comparable Store Sales 10.20% 13.30% 24.40% If you still weren’t convinced, you could have looked into how fast it was growing its stores: A jump of 270% in the number of stores – all company-owned – between the beginning of 2001 and the end of 2005. Fiscal Year 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Units 481 401 298 229 177 Conclusion From what you would have seen of its Margins, Comp Sales, AUVs and Unit Growth in the 3-5 year period before it went IPO, you would have realized that this is a company with strong management and bright prospects for the future. So what about companies that are going IPO now or in the near future? Well, take a look at their metrics – just like we did for Chipotle for the years leading up to the IPO. Do they show strong or improving margins? Or both? Are they steadily growing their stores while keeping their pre-opening costs, occupancy and other current liabilities in check? Is their AUV improving or at least holding while they add more units? Are they going overboard on G&A using unit growth as the reason? Are their prime costs (food and labor) within reasonable bounds for the segment? These are questions that every investor in an IPO must necessarily ask. While this is no guarantee that a company that shows these positive indicators will make you money in the future, it gives you as educated a perspective to make your decision from as possible. Over the next week, we’ll be covering several recently-gone IPOs in the restaurant industry to try and arrive at some common denominators that underline strong performance and stability in a company. If you enjoyed this article, we’d be pleased as punch if you would do us the honor of reviewing our extensive coverage of major and minor players in the restaurant industry, and commenting candidly on what you think about them. Click here to see all other articles in our profile page. Some of the companies where investors were affected by “IPO-itis”: Potbelly (NASDAQ: PBPB ) PBPB data by YCharts Wingstop (NASDAQ: WING ) WING data by YCharts The Habit Restaurants (NASDAQ: HABT ) HABT data by YCharts El Pollo Loco (NASDAQ: LOCO ) LOCO data by YCharts Bojangles’ (NASDAQ: BOJA ) BOJA data by YCharts

Profitable Trades Based On USD Changes

Summary A strong USD will affect the value of commodities. Commodities are traded in USD and will therefore be more expensive for non-USD countries when the USD goes up. Changes in commodity prices will affect countries that are highly dependent on export/import of commodities. Many asset classes are affected by changes in the USD, and therefore great investing opportunities. During the last year, the USD had a massive rally. The USD Index hit a multi-year high in March 2015 of 98.66, up 23.6% from the 79.81 level in June 2014. Why did the USD have this strong rally? To answer this question, it is good to look at the USD Index breakdown. The Euro has a weighting of 57.6%, and is therefore able to move the USD Index very easily. One of the reasons why the USD rallied is the fact that the Fed started tapering. It stopped doing POMOs (Public Open Market Operations). During the taper phase, traders and investors expected the ECB to do QE. This would put double pressure on the EUR/USD. Fed tapering lowers the money growth rate of USD in the markets, and the ECB’s QE would push the EUR even lower. The BoJ is doing stimulus too. The main target: devalue the JPY to stimulate exports. QE from both BoJ and ECB means that the two biggest components of the USD Index are too high according to BoJ and ECB. The fact that the USD soared was therefore not really a surprise. Of course, it is easy to predict things after they happened. So that is not the reason I write this article. I want you to understand which asset classes are affected by the USD, so you can avoid “stupid” mistakes and make trades to profit from central planning and major macro changes. Rising USD When the US Dollar rises, commodities, which are priced in USD, will get relatively more expensive. Therefore, demand will decline, which will put downward pressure on commodities. The chart below shows the correlation between USD and commodities. I used the iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust ETF ( GSG) to display the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI) and the PowerShares DB USD Bull ETF ( UUP) for the USD Index. (click to enlarge) Commodities have a high correlation with the USD as shown above. With this info in mind, it makes sense that commodity-related countries and companies have a high correlation too. A country which highly depends on commodity exports will suffer when commodity prices decrease. Most of the commodity-dependent countries are emerging markets. The emerging market is therefore a good tool to trade an USD impact. Not only do many emerging markets export commodities, but they also have a part of their debt in USD because it is cheaper to borrow. If the USD gets more expensive, their debt will weigh heavier and put pressure on their balance sheets. If you want to trade emerging markets, it is very important to know where to invest. Not all emerging markets are the same. If you look at the correlation vs. the USD, you will see huge differences. Brazil, Russia, Malaysia and Poland have by far the highest (negative) correlation vs. the USD. It would not make sense to short an ETF like EWT when you are bullish USD. In fact, it is all about leverage and volatility. Let’s say you expect the USD to rally. Therefore, you want to short emerging markets. There are a few options you can choose from (and many more): Trade the i Shares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEARCA: EEM ) By shorting EEM, you short an emerging markets ETF. By doing so, you are shorting all emerging markets, in particular China, because the weighting of 23% is by far the heaviest. Why would you want to short? You have less volatility because the ETF contains many countries, and therefore a huge amount of companies. On the other side, you are shorting countries that have a low correlation vs. the USD. Trade the iShares MSCI Brazil Capped ETF ( EWZ)/the Market Vectors Russia ETF ( RSX)/the iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF ( EWM) As mentioned in option 1, by shorting, you short countries that have almost no correlation with the USD. You solve this problem by shorting a country like Brazil or Russia. The volatility is higher, but you get way more momentum in case of bigger changes to the USD. Trade single stocks If you have a strong feeling about a certain USD move, i.e. a rally, you can choose to short a single stock. This can be a component of one of the most affected ETFs like EWZ/RSX/EWM or stocks from developed countries that are affected by the USD changes. The table below shows a few options: (click to enlarge) As you can see, most of the companies in my list are oil and gas drilling related. Most of them offer drilling services or provide drilling equipment. These companies are more dependent on a high oil price than the actual drillers. Since drillers can cut production easily when oil prices decline, the actual providers of the services and drilling products however lose a tremendous amount of business. With this in mind, you can short oil drillers in a USD rally or choose to short a Brazilian company for example. Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. (NYSE: ITUB ) has a weighting of almost 10% of EWZ and a 24-month correlation of 90% ( Sources: iShares, TradingView ). ITUB data by YCharts To summarize everything, I made an easy overview: (click to enlarge) On top, you see USD. That’s what it is all about. When the USD rallies, commodities and emerging markets are likely to dip since the correlation is negative. US Bonds and real estate however will profit when the USD goes up. Hence the positive correlation. The table above gives you an overview of possible trades. The higher the position in the table, the lower the volatility. For example, shorting commodities can be done by shorting GSG. If you do so, you are shorting an entire basket of commodities, and have therefore lower volatility. The next step is trading a single commodity. By doing so, you increase not only the potential returns, but also the volatility. If you want to maximize returns, trading a single stock gives the highest potential returns. The chart below confirms the table above: EEM data by YCharts This article gave you an overview of the different asset classes that can be traded in case of an expected USD change. Both the long- and short-side deliver interesting choices that can be trades as outright long/short trades as well as spread trades. Of course, there are way more options than I discussed in this article, but these are the basics of understanding price changes and researching profitable trades.