Tag Archives: investing

New Energy Fund Seeks To Capitalize On Sector Dislocations

The North American energy landscape is changing rapidly, as the shale boom that led to record production and U.S. inventory levels is being followed by a Middle East oil conflict that is driving oil prices vastly lower. In response, OppenheimerFunds has launched the Oppenheimer SteelPath Panoramic Fund, which is designed to capitalize on the industry tumult with a long-term, value-oriented approach to investing in all “links” in the North American energy value chain. “We are investing in companies that are best positioned to gain long-term advantage from these shifts and deliver relative performance across different commodity price scenarios,” said Brian Watson, CFA and Director of Research at Oppenheimer SteelPath, as well as Senior Portfolio Manager for the fund, in a statement. “Our long-term investment view allows us to benefit from expected dislocations in the evolving global energy market.” Targeting More Volatility, Better Returns Mr. Watson also said he thinks the Oppenheimer SteelPath Panoramic Fund will have more volatility than the firm’s other midstream energy-focused funds, but he also expected it to generate better returns. That’s because the fund attempts to identify value by focusing strictly on small- and mid-cap companies, which tend to be more volatile, over large-cap international oil-and-gas juggernauts. In Mr. Watson’s view, this approach should allow the fund’s investors to best benefit from the “U.S. energy revolution.” “The North American energy landscape has transformed, creating a generational shift in relative competitive advantage as well as new opportunities across the entire energy value chain,” said OppenheimerFunds CIO Krishna Memani. “Brian and his team are using their extensive knowledge of the energy sector to identify durable investment opportunities for our clients.” The energy “value chain” includes: “Upstream” companies that explore for and produce oil, natural gas, and other hydrocarbons; “Midstream” companies that gather, transport, store, distribute, or market energy products; and “Downstream” companies that process, treat, or refine hydrocarbons. Total Return Focus The Oppenheimer SteelPath Panoramic Fund, which went live on November 18 of last year, will invest in all three links of this chain, as well as other energy beneficiaries – chemicals and materials manufacturers, engineering and production companies, etc., – that stand to benefit from energy-related activities. The new fund’s stated objective is to provide total return. Its shares are available in A (MUTF: EESAX ), C (MUTF: EESCX ), R (MUTF: EESRX ), Y (MUTF: EESYX ), and I (MUTF: EESIX ) classes, with respective net-expense ratios of 1.55%, 2.30%, 1.80%, 1.30%, and 1.10%. The minimum initial investment for Class I shares is $5 million – the minimum for all other classes is $1,000. For more information, visit the fund’s web page .

There’s The Time Value Of Money – And There’s The Value Of Your Time

An underappreciated benefit of low-cost, index-based investing is the modest time involved. That is, in comparison to the time commitment associated with individual stock-picking or some other variant of active investment management. The low-cost, index-based approach gives an investor more time to enjoy other pursuits. Such as time with family and friends, a good book, music, charitable and civic activities, hobbies (what’s a hobby?)… and on occasion a nice glass of wine. Active investment management in contrast goes hand-in-hand with consistent if not constant dedication to general economic news, industry-specific business news, and company-specific news. Attention to all the topics, risks, and developments described in detail in Securities and Exchange Commission filings or other disclosure documents that few investors read in time-consuming detail. Attention that’s paid by oneself or by compensating another to pay that attention. (It’s commonly forgotten that the word “pay” in the phrase “pay attention” is literal. One pays with one’s time, a precious, perishable, and irretrievable item. A costly item.) “Found time” via indexing has value of course. Value that may be hard to quantify, but quantification matters little. Please remember this: the average human life span is less than one million hours. Concern yourself not with Chinese export trends and currency manipulation, Midwest factory capacity utilization, Janet Yellen’s disposition, Vladmir Putin’s territorial ambitions of the month, Apple’s iPhone sales during the most recently concluded quarter, the price of oil, or the like. Or whether that company of which you hold many shares of stock will successfully bid that contract, win that lawsuit, or get that drug approved. Instead, relax. Yes, index-based investing consumes time – just not much. For example, a little time is involved in prudent rebalancing. That’s time well spent. As is time taking advantage of opportunities to reduce one’s investment costs, as cost pressures on investment managers of all stripes continue to lower costs. And with “robo-advisors” and their increasingly sophisticated auto-pilot portfolios sprouting like weeds these days, the time commitment to be a responsible low-cost, index-based investor decreases even more. Unless an investor consumes the greater part of daily economic news for enjoyment or as a hobby – and seems that’s a tall order with today’s information proliferation – what’s not to like about time saved? Especially when coupled with low-cost, index-based investing that can be expected, as empirical studies time and again show, to yield higher risk-adjusted net returns.