Tag Archives: investing

Utility ETFs For Portfolio Stability And Income

At the tail end of the earnings season, the retail and utility sectors are the only ones with a number of companies yet to report results. As per Earnings Trend report, earnings of all the utility companies that have reported so far are down 5% year-over-year for the fourth quarter of 2015, with 21.4% of the companies beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate. Meanwhile, revenues are down nearly 13.3% for the quarter, with none of them surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate. The utility sector failed to impress in its fourth-quarter results with earnings and revenue miss from some of the major players in the space, including Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE: DUK ) and Dominion Resources Inc. (NYSE: D ). Although some companies like NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE ) managed to beat on earnings, revenues came short of expectations. However, the slowdown in U.S. economic growth, Chinese market turbulence and plunging oil prices along with other factors resulted in a bearish environment, which led to demand for securities from sectors that provide a safer option. Thus, the utility sector, which is considered to be one of the safer options when the market is exhibiting a high level of volatility, managed to remain in the green over the last one month despite lackluster results. Below we have highlighted the quarterly results of the aforementioned utility companies in detail. Duke Energy Duke Energy reported adjusted earnings of 87 cents per share for the quarter that fell short of the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 94 cents by 7.4%. However, quarterly earnings increased by a penny year over year on the back of higher retail pricing and wholesale margins in the regulated business. Total revenue was $5,351 million, lagging the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $5,709 million by 6.3%. The company has provided 2016 earnings guidance in the range of $4.50 to $4.70 per share. Shares of the company declined 1.4% (as of February 19, 2016) since its earnings release. NextEra Energy NextEra Energy’s quarterly adjusted earnings of $1.17 per share beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.11 by 5.4%. Earnings climbed 13.6% year over year on the back of higher revenues from Florida Power & Light Company. However, revenues of $4,069 million missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 2.6% and decreased 12.8% from the year-ago level. NextEra reiterated its earnings guidance of $5.85-$6.35 for 2016. Shares of the company went up 7.5% since its earnings release (as of February 19, 2016). Dominion Resources Dominion Resources’ quarterly earnings of 70 cents per share lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 87 cents by 19.5%. Earnings decreased 16.7% from 84 cents per share in the prior-year quarter due to mild weather conditions in its service territories, absence of a farm-out transaction and the impact of bonus depreciation. The company’s operating revenues of $2,556 million also missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $4,092 million by 37.5% and declined about 13.1% year over year. Dominion expects to earn 90 cents to $1.05 per share for the first-quarter 2016 compared with 99 cents per share in the year-ago period. The company expects earnings for 2016 in the range of $3.60 to $4.00 per share. Shares of the company fell 3.8% since its earnings release (as of February 19, 2016). ETFs in Focus Mixed results notwithstanding, many utility stocks managed to hold up gains over the past one month, sending the related ETFs higher. This has put the spotlight on utility ETFs. Below we discuss four of these ETFs having a sizeable exposure to the above stocks, holding Zacks ETF Rank #3 (Hold) with a Medium risk outlook. Utilities Select Sector SPDR (NYSEARCA: XLU ) XLU is one of the most popular products in the space with nearly $7.6 billion in AUM and average daily volume of roughly 14 million shares. The fund tracks the Utilities Select Sector Index and holds 31 stocks with NextEra Energy, Duke Energy and Dominion Resources among the top five spots with a combined exposure of nearly one-fourth of its total assets. Sector-wise, Electric Utilities (57.82%) dominates the fund followed by Multi-Utilities (38.85%). The fund charges 14 bps in investor fees per year. The ETF has posted gains of 7.3% in the past month. Vanguard Utilities ETF (NYSEARCA: VPU ) This ETF tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index. The fund holds 82 stocks in its basket. Duke Energy, NextEra Energy and Dominion Resources occupy the top four positions in the fund with a combined exposure of a little more than 20%. More than half of the fund’s assets are invested in Electric Utilities followed by Multi-Utilities (33.8%). The fund has amassed almost $2 billion in its asset base and trades in a moderate volume of 175,000 shares per day. The fund has a low expense ratio of 0.10%. The ETF has surged 7.6% in the last one-month period. iShares Dow Jones US Utilities (NYSEARCA: IDU ) The fund follows the Dow Jones U.S. Utilities Sector Index and holds 59 stocks in its basket. Duke Energy, NextEra Energy and Dominion Resources are placed among the top five stocks in the fund, together accounting for a share of more than 21% of total assets. On a sectoral basis, Electric Utilities (53.28%) and Multi-Utilities (34.51%) hold the top two positions in the fund. The fund manages an asset base of around $764 million and exchanges about 199,000 shares per day. It is a bit expensive with 44 bps in annual fees. IDU was up 7.5% in the last one-month period. Fidelity MSCI Utilities ETF (NYSEARCA: FUTY ) This ETF tracks the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. The fund holds 83 stocks in its basket. Duke Energy, NextEra Energy and Dominion Resources are among the top four in the fund with a combined exposure of a little more than 20%. More than half of the fund’s assets are invested in Electric Utilities followed by Multi-Utilities (33.8%). The fund has amassed almost $231 million in its asset base and trades in a moderate volume of 140,000 shares per day. The fund has an expense ratio of 0.12%. FUTY was up 7.5% in the last one-month period. Original Post

Covered Call ETFs Sidestep Market Volatility

Many investors have now transitioned to a lower stock allocation during the midst of this early 2016 decline. In fact, it has likely created a new sense of reality that it may be time to transition to a structure of low volatility to wait out the storm. A conventional and highly touted method has been to own stocks with lower historical price fluctuations than their peers like the iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: USMV ). However, there is also another way for ETF investors to own a basket of stocks with built-in options to collect income and potentially reduce price volatility. Covered call ETFs are also often referred to as a “buy-write” options strategy. This process involves owning a group of publicly traded stocks and selling call options on the underlying securities to collect the premium. This can be done by sophisticated investors on individual positions or you can effectively own an ETF or two that will do it for you on a diversified basket of stocks. The end goal is to collect income from the options contracts, which will ultimately reduce the effectiveness of these ETFs during a sustained uptrend in the market. Nevertheless, they have shown far less relative drawdown than their fully loaded index peers during the last two recent corrections. The oldest and most established fund in this group is the PowerShares S&P 500 BuyWrite Portfolio (NYSEARCA: PBP ). This ETF debuted in 2007 and has accumulated $312 million in assets. As you can see on the chart below, PBP has been able to sidestep a great deal of the decline versus the broad-market SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ). It was also able to accomplish that same feat in the summer 2015 swoon as well. It’s worth noting that over longer periods of time, the PBP performance story falls short of the stock-only SPY. This is primarily due to the drag of the options buy-write strategy on 3, 5, and 10-year time horizons. In addition, PDP charges a premium expense ratio of 0.75% for the implementation of its unique approach. The income from PBP is interesting because it often experiences big changes over time. Distributions are paid on a quarterly basis to shareholders and over the last 12-months the trailing yield is 5.40%. Some of those distributions have included short and long-term capital gains as well. Another worthy contender in this space is the Recon Capital NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (NASDAQ: QYLD ). This ETF implements a similar strategy based on the NASDAQ-100 Index. The end result is a more concentrated mix of stocks with concentrations in technology and consumer discretionary sectors. This ETF has been able to achieve a similar pattern of reduced draw down relative to the PowerShares QQQ (NASDAQ: QQQ ) during periods of market stress. QYLD charges an expense ratio of 0.60% and income is distributed on a monthly basis to shareholders. This may be a more attractive feature for income investors who are searching for a more regular dividend stream . The trailing 12-month distributions indicate a yield of 10.49% based on the current share price of QYLD. These buy-write strategies have traditionally been a more obscure way to generate income while reducing draw down during sideways or falling markets. This likely means that they are going to be more of a tactical opportunity in the context of a diversified portfolio rather than a dedicated core position. Investors considering these funds should closely research the underlying mechanics of how the income is generated and compare against other potential low volatility alternatives as well. Disclosure: I am/we are long USMV. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: David Fabian, FMD Capital Management, and/or clients may hold positions in the ETFs and mutual funds mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell, or hold securities.