Tag Archives: industry

Basic Maths – If An Industry Has A Longer Economic Cycle, Valuation Metrics Should Reflect This

By Kevin Murphy Why might an investor look at a business trading at the top of its historic price range and think it cheap yet, on a different date, look at the same business trading near its lows and think it expensive? It should not really be possible, but it can happen if the investor is using a one-year earnings number – be that forward-looking or historic – to arrive at their valuation metric for a business. The inherent problem with this approach is that a business’s earnings can vary very significantly from year to year. As such, a single year’s figures may be good, bad or indifferent and, unless you have studied the history of the business, you are not going to know which it is. Far better, we would argue, to use a valuation metric that better takes account of the economic cycle. Long-term visitors to The Value Perspective will by now have guessed we are warming up to an article on our preferred valuation metric, the cyclically adjusted price/earnings ratio. Known for short as the ‘CAPE’, this effectively smooths out the peaks and troughs of an economic cycle by dividing a business’s current share price by its average profits over a number of years, adjusted for inflation. The idea of the CAPE was originated in the 1930s by value gurus Ben Graham and David Dodd, who suggested that seven or, better still, 10 years was enough to reflect the earnings cycle of a business or market. We, however, are no longer sure that universally holds true and since that may sound close to sacrilege – especially coming from a site dedicated to value investing – we should quickly explain why. Over the last 12 months or so, basic materials businesses – in other words, mining shares – have been showing up as increasingly cheap on a CAPE basis. Until recently, however, we have held back from investing and the reason we have done so is because we do not believe that even 10 years comes close to encompassing a full economic cycle for a mining company. From the initial discovery of iron ore, copper or whatever it may be – through obtaining planning permission to develop the site as well the necessary permits to operate it to sorting the transportation network, buying plant and machinery, hiring workers and so on – it perhaps takes a mining company five years just to bring a mine up to speed. In short, these are long-cycle businesses. So while we could just set up our computers to screen the market for Graham and Dodd profits, we believe it makes more sense to get to the bottom of what the CAPE metric is aiming to do, which of course is to arrive at an average. And if we believe seven or 10 years is not a long enough time period to generate a meaningful valuation for this sector, the answer is obvious – use a longer period. The past 18 months notwithstanding, the last decade has broadly been a very good one for miners. Go back 20 years, however, and commodity prices were much lower than they are now – as, by extension, were mining company profits. Averaging out these two contrasting decades should thus offer a much more holistic view of the profitability of the basic materials sector – so that is what we have done. (click to enlarge) Source: Schroders Datastream, 2015 As you can see, the sector currently stands on a 20-year CAPE valuation of 10x, which is very close to every other trough over the period. What particularly catches our eye is the way the sector has tended to bounce each time it has approached those lows while the potential upside, should valuations revert towards their long-term mean of 16.2x, helps to explain why almost every stock we have been looking at over the course of the last month has been in this space.

What Will Happen To Utility Stocks If The Fed Raises Rates?

Summary Relative to the yield on the 10-year Treasury, utilities actually look cheap today. Based on earnings, however, they look expensive. The decline in utility prices so far this year is likely the market preparing for a rate increase. If rates do go up, the worst of the damage has likely already been done; and there won’t be a large amount of additional downside. Utilities are often thought of as a “bond substitute”. They have fairly steady earnings and usually have regulatory support to keep them healthy. Investors often think of utility dividends as a revenue source comparable to a bond’s interest payment. Ever since 2008’s financial crisis, utility valuations have been influenced by the artificially low interest rate environment the Fed created. Since the returns available from bonds have been so terrible, investors have naturally moved to utility stocks as a way to increase their income. As the Fed discusses the possibility of higher rates, investors should think about the implications for their utility holdings. You can really see how interest rates have impacted utility stocks (as measured by the Philadelphia Utility Index (UTY) since 2014 in the following chart. Chart 1 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet In 2014, while interest rates were falling, all stocks were basically rising (as shown by the S&P 500), but the utilities seemed to be receiving an added boost. Utilities peaked early this year, and since then, as Treasury yields have risen, they have taken a fall much greater than the rest of the market. A large amount of the utility drop is likely from investors anticipating a Fed rate increase and trying to get out before a big fall. Expanding this chart to the turn of the century provides additional observations. Chart 2 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet First off, you can see that utility dividend yields were lower than the 10-year treasury essentially until late 2002. At that point Enron, the California Electricity Crisis, and unwise investments by many players in the industry, finally took its toll, and utility values crashed. The yield on the 10-year treasury was actually falling because of the recession, but utilities performed terribly even with their “safe haven” status. Then over the next few years, as 10-year Treasury rates rose, utilities actually performed well. Utility dividend yields again were below 10-year Treasury until the 2008 financial crisis. The next thing to look at is the rise in the 10-year rate in 2013. There was a sizable initial drop when interest rates bounced off their lows, but the UTY stabilized before the upward move in rates was complete. Also, UTY components Exelon (NYSE: EXC ) and FirstEnergy (NYSE: FE ) were going through dividend cuts at this time, which may have had a bigger impact on the group’s underperformance than the rise of the 10-year. The next chart shows the ratio of the UTY’s dividend yield to the 10-year Treasury. Since the turn of the century, utility yields have been about 1.2x the 10-year Treasury. Today’s ratio is about 1.9x, which is more than one standard deviation above the average over the past fifteen years. Chart 3 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet The above chart basically says that utilities are cheap today relative to the 10-year Treasury. You could also argue that the historical average ratio between utility yields and the 10-year is actually artificially high because of industry issues early in the century, making today’s ratio look even further cheaper compared to the “true” average. An alternative way to look at this data is to take the spread between utility dividend yields and the 10-year. This still basically leads to the same conclusion that utilities are cheap against Treasuries on a yield basis. Chart 4 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet So if we just limited the analysis to the impact of interest rates, utility investors wouldn’t have much to worry about. Treasury rates are still so low that there will be plenty of investors looking for a way to get higher income with relative safety. Utility yields have such a cushion that as 10-year rates increase, the spread would likely just shrink from the higher Treasuries. If utility yields were to increase, it would just keep spreads at today’s extreme levels. Of course utilities trade on more than just dividends, and another big driver for valuations is earnings. Chart 5 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet On this basis things don’t look as good for the utility group, but it isn’t a disaster waiting to happen. P/E ratios have come in a lot since they reached their peak at 18x earlier this year, but the current utility P/E of 14.8x is still above its 14.1x average over the last 15 years. If you look at the middle of the last decade, Treasury yields were 200-300bp greater than they are today, and utility P/E ratios were equal to or greater than today’s levels. So there is precedent for earnings valuations to be at today’s levels in an interest rate environment higher than today’s. This chart seems to imply that the drop in utilities this year has just been a preemptive move by the market, and if a Fed rate increase leads to higher interest rates, utilities have already made the majority of their adjustment. The post-Enron period was mentioned earlier in this article, and that is an event that could have artificially skewed the average P/E of the group below its “true” level. Of course, other unique things have happened in the past that could artificially move the average higher. For example, in the time period right before the Financial crisis, competitive power generation had a very positive outlook. It looked like these assets were only going to rise in value. Shale gas did a number on that prediction, but you could argue that the unique situation inflated the historical group average. (And maybe utilities with competitive assets are entering another period with increasing values. See here for more on that possibility.) Since there are reasons to adjust the average utility P/E up or down to get a “true” number, this article just uses the 14.1x based on the historic values. Another thing to note from chart 5 is that during the rising rate period of 2003-2004, when utilities made a substantial upward run, P/E ratios started much lower than today’s levels. This should wipe out any hope that a rise in rates today would come with an increase in utility stocks similar to 2003-2004. That was really a unique situation that doesn’t currently apply. This year’s move from an 18x P/E to a 14.8x P/E means about an 18% drop in utility stocks. If the P/E were to fall to the 14.1x historic average, this would require a further drop of 4.7%. If the group were to really get hit hard, and P/E ratios went to 13x, then the group would have to drop 12% from today’s level. If utility P/E ratios started going much lower, you would expect value investors to start moving into the space and prevent a freefall. Of course, when thinking of P/E ratios we also need to think about how the group compares to the market in general. The following chart shows the P/E of utilities compared to the P/E of the S&P 500 over time. Chart 6 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet Based on this chart we again have a situation where utilities are trading a little rich compared to historical averages, but not outrageously so. Treasury yields have been more than 200bp higher than today’s level with utility P/E ratios compared to the S&P even higher than today. There could be some downward pressure on utilities based on this metric, especially if P/E ratios in the S&P 500 contract, but there is no reason to think things will go back to the way they were at the turn of the century. One last area that will be mentioned in this note is the impact of higher rates on utility earnings. Regulators set utility rates based on an allowed return on equity. As interest rates have been falling, these allowed ROEs have been falling as well. Chart 7 (click to enlarge) Source: SNL A Fed increase in rates should slow down this drop in utility ROEs, and help support utility earnings in the future. So a rate increase is not all bad news for utility investors. Conclusion While a rise in interest rates is not a good thing for owners of utility stocks, a tightening by the Fed in the near future should not lead to a disaster in these names. Right now it seems that low interest rates have increased demand for utilities by attracting investors looking for yield. As these investors have come into the space they have driven up P/E ratios in the sector, and investors focused on this valuation metric have likely stayed away. As rates rise, the balance between these two forces should gradually shift. But rates are starting at such a low level that utility yields will still be attractive to people looking to juice up the income in their portfolio, so there shouldn’t be a mad rush out from dividend-focused investors. The Philadelphia Utility Index has already fallen almost 18% off of its peak earlier this year. Utility P/E valuations were extremely high at that time, and it is likely the drop was in anticipation of interest rates falling later this year. Utilities would have to fall about 5% to bring their P/E back to this century’s average of about 14.1x, and they would only have to fall 12% to get down to 13x. If valuations start reaching these lower levels, then value investors would likely start moving back into utilities. The other thing to remember is that a rate increase is not all bad news for utilities. Higher rates should be beneficial in utility rate cases, allowing them to earn higher returns. So, even with a Fed increase, interest rates are likely to remain low and income investors will still want to own utilities for the added income. If too many income-driven investors leave and utilities go down by more than 12%, earnings valuations should start to look cheap, and it would put a floor under these names. Also, higher rates should help utilities in their rate cases, benefiting future earnings. So while you should expect a decline from the utility group if rates go up, it shouldn’t be a giant one. Housekeeping Items I am making the assumption that an increase in rates by the Fed will lead to a general increase in all Treasury rates. In theory, there are scenarios where you could say a rate increase at the Fed might lead to lower rates elsewhere in the financial world. (Maybe the Fed’s increase signals increased confidence in America’s economy, and money floods into US Treasuries lowering rates.) I’m not going to get in any type of complicated repercussions from a Fed increase. This analysis makes the simple assumption that if the Fed increases rates, Treasury rates will also increase. Historic utility performance was based on the Philadelphia Utility Index. The current components of the index are: AES Corp. (NYSE: AES ), Ameren (NYSE: AEE ), American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP ), CenterPoint Energy (NYSE: CNP ), Consolidated Edison (NYSE: ED ), Covanta (NYSE: CVA ), Dominion Resources (NYSE: D ), DTE Energy (NYSE: DTE ), Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK ), Edison International (NYSE: EIX ), El Paso Electric (NYSE: EE ), Entergy (NYSE: ETR ), Eversource Energy (NYSE: ES ), Exelon, FirstEnergy, NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE ), PG&E (NYSE: PCG ), Public Service Enterprise Group (NYSE: PEG ), Sourthern Company (NYSE: SO ), Xcel Energy (NYSE: XEL ). Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

iShares North American Tech-Multimedia Networking ETF: All The Right Connections

Summary A concise fund consisting of 24 companies providing media focused hardware, software and security. Covers a broad spectrum of media services for retail, commercial and government demands. Although classified as a ‘cyclically sensitive’, IT seems to have become a ‘consumer necessity’. One might consider the date ‘May 24, 1844’ as ancient history and of no particular significance. However, it is a rare thing in the study of world history when a precise date may be pinpointed as the dawning of a new era. ” What hath God wrought? ” was the first telegram message , transmitted from Washington, D.C. to Baltimore using a Morse/Vail telegraph system. To be sure, it wasn’t the first use of the telegraph but was the first of what would set a standard. More importantly, the message itself wasn’t something practical or utilitarian. It was an expression of emotion and awe. From that day on, long distance communication would become a tool of the masses, a means to disseminate culture, art, events, news and ideas. Naturally, right on the heels of this innovation was investment capital. It was a pattern that would be transmitted down through the decades. The objective of the iShares North American Tech-Multimedia Networking ETF (NYSEARCA: IGN ) is to “… track the investment results of an index composed of North American equities in multimedia and networking technology …” As noted, the fund focuses on North American companies. Technically, the companies of the fund are classified as members of the ” Information Technology ” sector or simply ‘ IT ‘ sector for short. This is important since IT is classified as cyclically sensitive , that is to say consumers and business will spend less during economic downturns. Morningstar classifies ‘ Communication Services ‘ and ‘ Technology ‘ separately and as ‘ Sensitive Super Sector ‘ components; i.e., in theory they will rise and fall with the economic tide. Now, with the Asia-Pacific region in the midst of a ringing economic contraction and although Europe is finally showing signs of recovery, it still might be some time yet before the European economies are generating self-sustainable growth. Lastly, many South American economies, too dependent on commodity exports are experiencing recession as well as inflation . Even though the fund restricts its investments to North America, in a global economy, regional recessions have global consequences. However, by the same token, the investor must ask whether the IT sector of today is the same IT sector of a decade or more ago, in the time which classified it. Even as recently as the great recession the IT market has drastically changed. In particular, before the evolution of Facebook (NASDAQ: FB ) , Twitter (NYSE: TWTR ), Amazon Prime Video (NASDAQ: AMZN ), Hulu, Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ) or Apple TV (NASDAQ: AAPL ), streaming news, sports, and shopping, not to mention Uber (Pending: UBER ) or Airbnb, GPS and just simple too many apps to list. Today, a consumer without a mobile device is at a distinct disadvantage. For example, a mobile device is as important to a student today as was a ‘laptop’ just ten years ago! The point of the matter being that Information Technology now goes well beyond consumer discretionary spending. It has evolved into a near necessity. Personalized mobile network accessibility has been a cultural sea change in our society in which providing secure network conduits critical to consumers . (click to enlarge) (Data From BlackRock) iShares North American Tech-Multimedia Networking ETF ( IGN ) is small but includes major league hitters like Cisco (NASDAQ: CSCO ), and Juniper (NYSE: JNPR ). The table below highlights a few companies. It should be noted that although the fund concentrates on North American companies, many of the fund’s holdings are global corporations. Also, the ten listed companies in the table are not by weightings, but rather demonstrates the range of core IT services provided in order to give the investor an overview of the range of the fund’s network services composition. Company Name (Symbol) Services Provided % Institutionally Owned Appx Market Cap (millions) dividend Motorola Solutions (NYSE: MSI ) Communications Infrastructure; devices, software, accessories 89.92% $14286.00 1.97% Palo Alto Networks (NYSE: PANW ) Enterprise Security Platform; Cyber defense 82.24% $14841.00 0.00% Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM ) Manufacture devices, integrated circuits for different platforms; e.g. CDMA, Frequency Division Multiple Access, and other radio systems 82.43% $86934.00 3.47% F5 Networks (NASDAQ: FFIV ) Full proxy software (TMOS) to provide seamless cloud data center cross platform deployments N/A $8502.00 0.00% Arris Group (NASDAQ: ARRS ) Entertainment/Communication solutions for media; IP Data and voice; IPTV digital video; both commercial and retail services N/A $4075.00 0.00% Echostar (NASDAQ: SATS ) Provides satellite services for video, broadband, set top boxes 91.80% $4033.00 0.00% Polycom (NASDAQ: PLCM ) Voice, video, content management/sharing, cloud delivered solutions for conferencing, healthcare, education and manufacturing N/A $1395.00 0.00% Lumentum (NASDAQ: LITE ) Optical and Photonic products; commercial and industrial lasers, data communications, telecom networking solutions 0.00% $864.00 0.00% (Information from multiple sources) As the table above demonstrates, these holding cover the entire spectrum of the industry, from the mega sized Cisco Systems with $131.49 billion market cap down to the relative small market caps the such as Adtran (NASDAQ: ADTN ) with a market cap of $757.00 million. The fund does have regular distributions, however, most of those distributions emanate from the larger companies. Further, according to iShares, although the fund was incepted in July of 2001, but it did not distribute a dividend until September of 2007 (click to enlarge) A word about the index: It is one of S&P benchmark indices “… that represents U.S. traded securities classified under the GICS® [ Global Industry Classification Standard ] communications equipment sub-industry. ..” The fund has net assets totaling $143,128,463.00 and trades on the NYSE-Arca and has 3.850 million shares outstanding with a 20 day average volume of about 3,896 ETF shares. The expense ratio is 0.48%, just a bit above the industry average 0.44%. The fund is marginable and with open option interest and is trading nearly at par with its underlying NAV. The fund’s recent P/E ratio is 20.17, and its price is about 2.78 times its book value. The fund is rather volatile with a Beta of about 1.52 times the market and a price standard deviation of 14.87% either side of the norm. The TTM yield is 0.63% and a forward looking distribution yield of 0.42%. Lastly, its returns are summed up in the chart below: Type of Return 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 10 Year Inception 7/10/2001 Total Return 6.06% 13.18% 8.31% 2.44% 0.43% Market Shares 6.07% 13.17% 8.31% 2.43% 0.43% S&P Benchmark 6.53% 13.61% 8.63% 2.92% 0.88% The methods of access to communication, even as recently as five to ten years ago, made it imprudent for providers to invest it infrastructure upgrades in those early days of ‘Wi-Fi’ and ‘Hot-Spots’. The retail consumer’s equipment was less far sophisticated: a cell phone, laptop, desktop and television with a ‘set-top box’. Also, with contracts and ‘package plans’, price competition was less dynamic. Lastly, and most importantly, network security was of far less concern than anyone might have imagined. Today, network retail consumers are ‘living on the fly’ with ‘intelligent’ mobile devices, utilizing once wasted time profitably, to manage finances, catch up on favorite programming or music, last minute shopping, seeking employment opportunities, conducting business, monitoring health or sports activities, sharing thoughts, news, photos, gaming; simply an incomprehensible number of conveniences held in the palm of one’s hand. Mobile networking has become an integral part of advanced economy culture. Hence, the tide may have turned for access providers in such a way so that it is now critical to keep up with capital-expenditures to maintain or compete for market share, perhaps even more so during cyclical downturns. To be sure, there is no shortage of network technology funds, however the iShares North American Tech-Multimedia Networking ETF with respectable returns and focus on multimedia might prove far less cyclical than its classification implies. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: CFDs, spread betting and FX can result in losses exceeding your initial deposit. They are not suitable for everyone, so please ensure you understand the risks. Seek independent financial advice if necessary. Nothing in this article should be considered a personal recommendation. It does not account for your personal circumstances or appetite for risk.