Tag Archives: income

15 Top Performing Fidelity Funds In Q3 2015

The performance of Fidelity mutual funds fell in the third quarter from the second quarter and mirrored the broader trend of declining returns in July-September 2015. The third quarter of 2015 ended up giving the worst performance for the benchmarks since Sep 2011. In the third quarter, the Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq declined 7.6%, 7% and 7.4%, respectively. Obviously, it was difficult for mutual funds as well. In fact, calling the third quarter a bloodbath will not be far from the truth. Just 17% of mutual funds managed to finish in the green in the third quarter. This was a slump from 41% in the second quarter, which was also a sharp fall from 87% of the funds that ended in the positive territory in the first quarter. Reflecting the broader trend of slumping returns, Fidelity’s top-gainer in the third quarter, Fidelity Spartan Long Treas Adv (MUTF: FLBAX ), could post only 5.5% return. In fact, except for this fund’s Investor class fund, Fidelity Spartan Long Treas Inv (MUTF: FLBIX ), there was no other that managed a 5% plus gain. The majority of gainers in the third quarter posted flimsy returns of 1-2%. However, FLBAX’s gain of 5.5% helped Fidelity to beat other key fund families, which we will discuss later. Fidelity’s Performance in Q3 vs. Q2 Out of the 971 funds we studied, just 111 funds managed to finish in the green. However, the gains were very modest as all these funds posted an average gain of 1.2%. In comparison, 504 funds out of 950 funds had finished in the positive territory in the second quarter. But the larger concern here is that while only 22 funds suffered above 5% loss in the second quarter, 655 funds ended the third quarter with more than 5% negative returns. Out of the 857 funds that finished in the red in the third quarter, 189 funds lost at least 10%. The average loss for these 857 funds was a worrying 8%. (Note: These numbers include same funds of different classes). The biggest loser among the Fidelity funds in the third quarter was Fidelity Adv China Region C (MUTF: FCHKX ), which nosedived 26.3%. This is completely in contrast to what happened in the second quarter, when Fidelity’s best gainer Fidelity China Region Fund (MUTF: FHKCX ) added 11.6%. China region funds were robust gainers in the second quarter and the country was the third-best category performer in the first half of 2015 as well. However this time, the worst performer is the China category. This is a result of the market rout that the China region suffered since mid June. In fact, China-led global growth worries were primarily responsible for the market rout in key markets across the globe; eventually pushing most mutual funds lower. Also, the 11.6% gain from FHKCX had helped Fidelity to beat other prominent fund families like Vanguard, BlackRock and American Funds to mention a few in the second quarter. In the third quarter, Fidelity failed to beat Vanguard, the best gain of which hit 8.4% by Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury Index Fund Institutional (MUTF: VEDTX ). In a quarter ravaged by headwinds, mutual funds from the Vanguard Group gave a decent performance. However, Fidelity managed to beat both BlackRock and American Funds. From the American Funds stable, American Funds US Govt Sec R5 (MUTF: RGVFX ) was the best performer with timid gains of 1.7% in the quarter. BlackRock’s best performer was Blackrock US Real Estate Sec Str I (MUTF: BIREX ), which gained 2.4%. Franklin Templeton’s best gainer also belonged to the Real Estate category. Franklin Real Estate Sec R6 (MUTF: FSERX ) gained 3.4%, falling short of Fidelity. Watch out for our Mutual Fund Commentary section in the coming days, wherein we will be reporting on performances and best picks from fund families and varied categories. Top 15 Fidelity Funds in Q3 Below we present the top 15 Fidelity funds with best returns in 3Q 2015: Fund Name Objective Description Q3 Total Return Q3 % Rank vs Obj YTD Total Return % Yield Expense Ratio Beta vs S&P 500 Load Fidelity Spartan Long Treas Inv Government 5.49 1 – 2.55 0.2 -0.06 N Fidelity Select Retailing Other 3.17 1 9.78 0.22 0.81 1.03 N Fidelity Spartan Rl Est Index Inv Real Est 2.84 10 -3 2.25 0.23 0.53 N Fidelity Real Estate Investment Real Est 2.76 12 -2.7 1.62 0.78 0.51 N Fidelity Spartan Inter Treas Inv Government 2.59 4 2.98 1.79 0.2 -0.01 N Fidelity Adv CA Muni Inc A Muni CA 1.7 37 1.69 2.87 0.79 -0.02 Y Fidelity Adv NY Muni Income A Muni NY 1.59 23 1.91 2.69 0.78 -0.03 Y Fidelity Series Real Estate Eqty Real Est 1.59 40 -3.65 1.56 0.75 0.54 N Fidelity Adv Muni Income A Muni Natl 1.49 26 1.32 3.14 0.8 -0.01 Y Fidelity Adv Real Estate Fund A Real Est 1.44 41 -3.93 1.27 1.11 0.55 Y Fidelity Government Income Fund Government 1.41 10 1.33 1.35 0.45 -0.01 N Fidelity Adv Government Income A Government 1.33 11 1.09 1.04 0.77 -0.01 Y Fidelity Mortgage Securities Govt-Mtg 1.32 11 1.78 2.14 0.46 0.01 N Fidelity Spartan US Bond Index Inv Corp-Inv 1.28 3 0.99 2.28 0.22 – N Fidelity Adv Mortgage Secs A Govt-Mtg 1.24 16 1.51 1.79 0.82 0.01 Y Note: The list excludes the same funds with different classes, and institutional funds have been excluded. Funds having minimum initial investment above $5000 have been excluded. Q3 % Rank vs Objective* equals the percentage the fund falls among its peers. Here, 1 being the best and 99 being the worst. The best 15 Vanguard mutual fund performers are primarily from three varied categories. These are Government Bond, Real Estate and Municipal Bond mutual funds. This was expected, as Long Government was the second best performing category in the third quarter, according to Morningstar. From this category, four funds made it to the best gainers’ list. These are Fidelity Spartan Long Treas Inv, Fidelity Spartan Inter Treas Inv (MUTF: FIBIX ), Fidelity Government Income Fund (MUTF: FGOVX ) and Fidelity Adv Government Income A (MUTF: FVIAX ). While FLBIX and FIBIX carry a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy), FGOVX and FVIAX carry a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2 (Buy). Meanwhile, Fidelity Mortgage Securities (MUTF: FMSFX ) and Fidelity Adv Mortgage Secs A (MUTF: FMGAX ) from the Government Mortgage category also found a place in the list. Both FMSFX and FMGAX carry a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1. Separately, many sub Municipal fund categories, such as Muni California Long, Muni Pennsylvania and Muni New York Long, featured in the top performers’ list for the third quarter. However, the gains were modest, with Muni California Long performing the best, notching up a 1.7% gain in the quarter. Three funds from this category, Fidelity Adv CA Muni Inc A (MUTF: FCMAX ), Fidelity Adv NY Muni Income A (MUTF: FNMAX ) and Fidelity Adv Muni Income A (MUTF: FAMUX ) featured in the best performers’ list. While FCMAX and FNMAX carry a Strong Buy rank, FAMUX has a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #3 (Hold). Apart from the Government and Municipal categories, Real Estate was also in the top list of fund category performers. The sector returned nearly 1.4% in the third quarter. Four Fidelity funds feature in the list of the top 15 gainers. These are Fidelity Spartan Rl Est Index Inv (MUTF: FRXIX ), Fidelity Real Estate Investment (MUTF: FRESX ), Fidelity Series Real Estate Eqty (MUTF: FREDX ) and Fidelity Adv Real Estate Fund A (MUTF: FHEAX ). However, FRESX and FHEAX carry a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4 (Sell) and Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5 (Strong Sell). FRXIX is the only fund here that carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 while FREDX carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #3 (Hold). Original post .

Black Hills’ (BKH) CEO David Emery on Q3 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Black Hills Corporation (NYSE: BKH ) Q3 2015 Earnings Conference Call November 04, 2015 11:00 AM ET Executives Jerome Nichols – Director, IR David Emery – Chairman, President and CEO Rich Kinzley – SVP and CFO Analysts Dan Eggers – Credit Suisse Insoo Kim – RBC Capital Markets Operator Good day, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Black Hills Corporation Third Quarter 2015 Earning Conference Call. My name is Malerie and I’ll be your coordinator for today. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Following the prepared remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the presentation over to Mr. Jerome Nichols, Director of Investor Relations of Black Hills Corporation. Please proceed, sir. Jerome Nichols Thank you, Malerie. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Black Hills Corporation’s third quarter 2015 earnings conference call. Leading our quarterly earnings discussion today are David Emery, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Rich Kinzley, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin today, I would like to note that Black Hills will be attending the EEI Financial Conference next week in Hollywood, Florida. You’ll find our presentation materials and webcast information on our Web site at www.blackhillscorp.com, under the Investor Relations heading. During our earnings discussion today, some of the comments we make may contain forward-looking statements as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission and there are a number of uncertainties inherent in such comments. Although we believe that our expectations and beliefs are based on reasonable assumptions, actual results may differ materially. We direct you to our earnings release, Slide 2 of the investor presentation on our Web site and our most recent Form 10-K, Form 10-Q another document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for a list of some of the factors that could cause future results to differ materially from our expectations. I will now turn the call over to David Emery. David Emery Thank you, Jerome and good morning everyone. I will be starting on Slide 3 of the webcast deck and then we will be following a format similar to that of previous quarterly calls. I’ll give an overview of the quarter and some highlights. Rich Kinzley will go over the financials from the quarter and then I’ll talk a little bit about forward strategy and then we’ll answer questions. Moving to Slide 5, the third quarter was another strong quarter for Black Hills Corporation. We posted solid earnings and made great progress on our growth goals for our existing businesses and we also made excellent progress towards our pending acquisition of SourceGas. Related to SourceGas on August 10th, which was less than 30 days after the deal was announced we filed joint applications for acquisition approvals in all four states. A week later, just a little over a week later, we received our Hart-Scott-Rodino antitrust clearance, we now have procedural schedules established in three of the states with the fourth state pending. The discovery process is ongoing and we still remain on track to close on the first half of 2016. Also, on the acquisition front we did close on July 1st, on our $17 million acquisition of about little less than 7,000 customers in Northwest Wyoming and notably related to that acquisition they were 100% integrated on to all of our systems and process on day 1 after close. From a business environment perspective, during the quarter we had warmer than average weather in our utility service territories, a slight positive for the electric utilities and a negative for the gas utilities and then energy commodity prices particularly oil and gas remained at very low levels. Moving on to Slide 6, utility highlights for the quarter, Black Hills Power is preparing to commence construction later this quarter on 144-mile, $54 million electric transmission line routed from Northeast Wyoming to Rapid City, South Dakota. Cheyenne Light recorded a new all time peak load of 212 megawatts on July 27th, that’s the third new peak for Cheyenne Light this summer, highlighting the strong growth in the Cheyenne area service territory. On October 21st, Colorado Electric received approval from the Colorado PUC to acquire the planned 60 megawatt Peak View Wind project which will help our utility meet the Colorado renewable energy standards. A third-party wind developer will build the project, we executed a build transfer agreement with that developer and we’ll take ownership upon commercial operations in the fourth quarter of 2016. Total cost of the project will be approximately $109 million. Our capital investment and a return on that capital and all expenses will be recovered through customer adjustment clauses and a base rate increase won’t be required for the first 10 years of the project. Moving on the Slide 7, a continuation of our utility highlights, we continued construction on our $65 million, 40 megawatt gas combustion turbine at our Pueblo Airport Generating Station, that’s being built for our Colorado Electric subsidiary and is expected to be in service in the fourth quarter of 2016. We also completed here just in a last couple of weeks our field service optimization project. We rolled it out to all of our utility techs in all of our states. Really that project is a deployment of tablet and GPS technology to automate and improve the efficiency of the lot of our field processes, including dispatching. We’re excited about the benefits of that project. On the non-regulated side or non-utility side we initiated a process to evaluate the possible sale of a minority interest in our Colorado IPP generating assets and we drilled the last of 13 horizontal Mancos Shale gas wells for our 2014 and ’15 drilling program in the Southern Piceance Basin in Colorado. We have six wells on production and we just started to flow back operations for the final three wells. We expect to have the test results on those three wells by year-end. And our results for the program continued to meet or exceed our expectations. Slide 8, which is corporate highlights for the quarter, the Board last week declared the quarterly dividend of $0.405 continuing the level we’ve been at for this year equivalent to an annual rate of $1.62 per share. During the quarter, we entered into the $250 million of interest rates swaps, really to mitigate any future interest rate risk associated with some of our future debt issuances, primarily related to the SourceGas transaction. And we continued our cost containment efforts which we started earlier this year to really help mitigate the impacts of low oil and gas prices and the moderate weather that we had earlier in the year. Moving on to Slide 9, financial highlights for the third quarter we earned $0.64 per share as adjusted from continuing operations during the quarter about a 5% increase compared to the same quarter last year, a really good result considering the negative impacts of our oil and gas business. Slide 10 provides a reconciliation of our third quarter 2015 income from continuing ops as adjusted against our 2014 results for the third quarter. Strong performance in nearly all of our businesses more than made up for poor performance in our oil and gas subsidiary. With that I’ll turn it over to Rich for the financial update. Rich? Rich Kinzley All right, thanks Dave. As Dave mentioned our core utility and utility like businesses continue to demonstrate strong performance. In the third quarter each of these businesses improved operating income compared to the third quarter of 2014, in particular our electric utilities posted strong year-over-year operating results. Our oil and gas business continued to manage through a challenging commodity price environment. Despite that challenge we posted a strong quarter. On Slide 12, we reconcile GAAP earnings to earnings as adjusted on non-GAAP measure. We do this to isolate special items and communicate earnings to better indicate our ongoing performance. In each of the first three quarters of 2015, we’ve incurred non-cash ceiling test impairments at our oil and gas business and in the second quarter of 2015 we also impaired in an equity investment at our oil and gas business. These impairments are due to low natural gas and crude oil prices and our non-cash charges that are not reflective of ongoing operational results. We also incurred external acquisition related cost in the second and third quarters of 2015 associated with the SourceGas acquisitions, such as financing and other third-party costs which were non-recurring in nature. Our third quarter as adjusted EPS reflective of ongoing operations was $0.64 per share compared to $0.61 per share in the third quarter last year and our trailing 12 months as adjusted EPS was $3.05. Slide 13 displays our third quarter revenue and operating income, on the left side of the slide you’ll note that revenue was flat in 2015 due to the lower gas utility revenues from the lower pass-through gas cost in 2015 and lower revenue from the oil and gas business due to lower receipt prices. These revenue reductions were offset by strong revenue growth at our electric utilities. On the right side of the slide you can see that strong performance in the third quarter at our core utilities, coal mine and Power Gen businesses more than offset decreased performance at oil and gas, resulting in a more than 10% increase in consolidated operating income as adjusted year-over-year. I will elaborate on each business unit in the following slides. Slide 14 displays our third quarter income statement comparing third quarter 2015 to third quarter 2014 gross margin increased 7% driven by strong electric utility results. Operating expenses increased 6% due largely to margin additive activities at our electric utilities. DD&A and interest expense increased primarily from added plant in-service and borrowings associated with our October 1, 2014 in-service of the $222 million Cheyenne Prairie Generating Station. The DD&A increase was partially mitigated by lower ongoing depletion at our oil and gas business, which I’ll explain in a few slides, as adjusted EPS grew 5% year-over-year and EBITDA increased by 8%. Moving to our business unit results, Slide 15 displays electric and gas utilities’ gross margin and operating income. In 2015 we changed from discussing revenue to gross margin for our utilities, as we feel gross margin is more relevant to understanding ongoing results, since revenue includes fuel cost pass throughs. On the left side of the slide you’ll see our electric utilities’ third quarter 2015 gross margin increased by 14 million from 2014. 9.5 million of this increase was driven by additional return from investments in our generation facilities with completed rate cases in late 2014 and early 2015 in Colorado, South Dakota and Wyoming. Gross margin also benefitted by nearly 3 million from the combination of higher commercial and industrial demand and the addition of two small Wyoming natural gas utility acquisitions in 2015 that Dave mentioned. These small utilities our subsidiaries of Cheyenne Light and we report their results in the electric utilities segment. Residential usage was favorable across our electric service territories and totaled up 4.6% comparing third quarter 2015 to 2014. Cooling degree days in our electric utility service territories for the quarter were 36% above 2014 adding 3.3 million to margin year-over-year. Overall weather impacts at our electric utilities were $300,000 favorable compared to normal. Operating income during the third quarter for our electric utilities improved by 8 million or 19% year-over-year, as a result of increased gross margin and solid cost management. Operating expenses including depreciation increased only 6 million year-over-year despite the addition of Cheyenne Prairie and the two small Wyoming acquisitions, the combination of which accounted for approximately half of the $6 million expense increase. Looking at the right side of Slide 15, our gas utilities gross margin increased slightly in 2015 compared to 2014. Increased margins from a rate case completed in Kansas in late 2014 and higher transport and industrial volumes were offset by unfavorable weather impacts. While weather isn’t a large driver for our gas utilities in the third quarter, it’s worth noting 2015 heating degree days in our gas utility service territories were 61% below 2014 and 57% below normal for the period, resulting in a 400,000 negative impact to margins in the third quarter compared to the prior year and compared to normal. So, if you take the electric and gas utilities combined weather was really flat compared to normal and total for the third quarter. Third quarter 2015 operating income at the gas utilities increased 800,000 compared to 2014 thanks to strong cost management which reduced operating expenses 600,000 year-over-year. On Slide 16, you’ll see Power Gen’s operating income improved by 1.4 million compared to last year’s performance. Power generation benefited from annual power purchase agreement price increases partially offset by decreased capacity payments since we sold the 40-megawatt CT2 to the City of Gillette in the third quarter of 2014. These last revenues were partially mitigated by the cost sharing benefits we enjoy as we operate this facility for the city. Cost management efforts at Power Gen have allowed us to reduce operating cost by 300,000 year-over-year. On the right side of Slide 16 our coal mining segment saw improved operating income in the quarter by $400,000 from 2014. While tonnes sold were slightly down year-over-year, our average overall coal price received increased 13% comparing Q3 2015 to Q3 2014. And strong cost management contributed to another solid quarter at the coal mine. Power Gen and coal mining continue to deliver solid results. Moving to oil and gas on Slide 17, you’ll see we sustained and as adjusted $7.2 million operating loss for the quarter. Commodity prices negatively impacted results in the third quarter of 2015 as our average received prices inclusive of hedges were down 27% for crude oil and 37% for natural gas compared to the third quarter of 2014. Overall, third quarter production increased 17% comparing the same period in 2014, driven by increases in both natural gas and crude oil production. On the cost side, our Q3 operating expenses increased slightly comparing 2015 to 2014 due primarily to employee severance cost as we reduced staff in the third quarter, which will reduce future period’s operating costs. Despite increased production volumes, DD&A decreased by $0.5 million in the third quarter compared to 2014 due to a substantially lower depletion rate. The reduction in the depletion rate resulted from a lower-cost pool due to the ceiling test impairments we incurred in the first and second quarters of 2015. In the third quarter we incurred a $62 million pretax ceiling test impairment charge related to our oil and gas holdings, in addition to the impairments we incurred in the first and second quarters. The ceiling test utilizes rolling 12 month average prices for crude oil and natural gas, prices for these commodities began to fall in the fourth quarter of 2014 and have remained low throughout 2015 compared to 2014. Consequently the average prices used in our ceiling test impairment evaluations have continued to drop each quarter in 2015. We are likely to incur an additional impairment charge in the fourth quarter, if crude oil and natural gas prices remain at current depressed levels. Also as a result of the third quarter ceiling test impairment we expect and a lower depletion rate again in the fourth quarter. Despite the challenges presented by the low commodity price environment we continue to be pleased with the momentum we have improving up our Piceance Mancos Shale play. We expect to substantially complete our drilling, completion and testing program as we finish out 2015. The play is well-positioned to potentially serve our cost of service gas model we filed in six states for regulatory approval and for additional upside value capture when commodity prices improve. We have right sized our cost structure in the oil and gas segment and expect a much lower depletion rate in 2016. We’ve also substantially reduced our expected capital spending in our oil and gas segment for 2016 and 2017. Dave is going to talk a little more about that in a couple of slides. Slide 18 shows our current plans for the SourceGas financing as well as other financing activities in the 2016-2017 horizon. We completed syndication of a bridge facility to give us flexibility with the timing and structuring for the permanent financings for the SourceGas acquisition. As previously disclosed we will be assuming 700 million of existing SourceGas debt and financing the remainder of the acquisition through potential asset sales and new debt and equity issuances. At our recent Analyst Day we discussed our financing plans for the SourceGas acquisition and indicated we will finance the acquisition in a manner that will support our strong investment grade ratings. We are currently reviewing our options for financing the recently announced $109 million Peak View Wind project and our other strong utility growth oriented capital activities in 2016 and beyond. To support an ongoing CapEx associated with our continued growth for SourceGas acquisition closing, we are considering the implementation of an at-the-market equity program in 2016. Slide 19 shows our current capitalization, at quarter end net debt to cap was 56.7%, an increase from June 30th that was primarily driven by the third quarter non-cash impairment charge in our oil and gas segment. Given expected cash flows from operations for the remainder of the year in our revolver capacity, we have ample funding available for planned CapEx and dividends in the fourth quarter. Slide 20 demonstrates our strong earnings growth performance over the last six years. Our third quarter results demonstrate the continuing strong operational performance and growth characteristics of our core businesses. While low crude oil and natural gas prices impacted our oil and gas segment in 2015 and tempered 2015 earnings growth, we expect to grow earnings again in 2016, which brings us to Slide 21. In our press release on October 7th, we increased our 2015 earnings guidance range to $2.90 to $3.10 per share as adjusted which we reaffirmed with our press release yesterday. We also yesterday issued our initial earnings guidance for 2016 to be in the range of $3.15 to $3.35 per share as adjusted. The assumptions for this guidance are listed on Slide 21. Most notably the assumptions exclude the SourceGas acquisition any material asset sales and any significant new debt or equity issuances. If any of these items occur we will issue updated guidance. As we previously disclosed, we believe the SourceGas acquisition if closed in the first-half of 2016 as planned will be meaningfully accretive to 2017 earnings per share. And with those comments I’ll turn it back to Dave. David Emery Thank you, Rich. Moving onto Slide 21 forward strategy, we group our strategic goals in to four major categories and we’ve done this for a couple of years. The overall objective being an industry leader in all that we do. Those four major goals are profitable growth, valued service, better every day in a great workplace. On Slide 24, I noted this earlier but we’re making excellent progress on our acquisition of SourceGas, we’re on track for closing in the first-half of 2016 as I said earlier and we have a very experienced leadership team guiding our integration effort. Our goal on the integration is to be fully integrated by the end of the year 2016. Moving on to Slide 25, strong capital spending drives our earnings growth and we forecast the total of 1.25 billion of investment for 2015 through 2017. Our projected capital spending far exceeds depreciation driving earnings growth. It’s important to note that this table on Slide 25 does not include any capital related to either the SourceGas acquisition or capital spent in the SourceGas territories post acquisition. On Slide 26 as I said earlier, we’re continuing to make great progress constructing a new turbine at the Pueblo Airport Generating Station. We commenced construction in June, we’ve spent about 27 million to-date out of the projected total of 65, construction is a little over 20% completed and we have no safety incidents to-date. On Slide 27, Monday of this week we announced that we received the necessary approvals and executed the necessary agreements to purchase 109 million 60 megawatt Peak View Wind Project in Colorado. I mentioned this earlier it will help us meet the renewable energy standard in Colorado for our Colorado electric customers. We expect construction to commence in the second quarter of ’16 and be completed by year-end. Slide 28, our electric utilities have demonstrated solid earnings growth year-to-date in 2015 and Rich covered that earlier. One aspect of that has been strong industrial growth in all three of our electric utilities. The overall growth rate has been 16% year-to-date. That growth has come from several different industrial customers and industry segments with the data center load growth particularly in Cheyenne Wyoming being the most notable. On Slide 29 a significant growth opportunity that we are pursuing is this utility cost to service gas supply program that we’ve been talking about for a well over a year now. Under cost of service gas program our direct investment in natural gas reserves would provide long-term price stability for customers while providing increased earnings for shareholders, an excellent win-win situation. We submitted cost of service gas regulatory applications now in a total of six dates, we hope to pursue and receive approvals on those programs in 2016. We’re continuing to evaluate producing properties and growing prospects for inclusion in that program and that certainly includes our Mancos Shale gas properties in the Piceance Basin in Colorado. On Slide 30 and we discussed this in quite a bit of detail on our Analyst Day, but in light of continued low oil and gas prices, our oil and gas strategy is really focused on providing cost to service gas cost effectively to our utilities. We’re working to finish up our 2014 and 2015 Mancos drilling program and then focusing on minimizing other capital expenditures and operating costs. On Slide 31, there’s an illustration of the impact that low crude oil and natural gas prices have had on our quarterly forecast ceiling test that Rich mentioned earlier. We do expect another impairment in the fourth quarter as Rich stated earlier if product prices remain at current levels. Slide 32, provides a well by well detail for our Mancos drilling program, it includes all wells drilled from 2013 through 2015. The top-six wells on the page have all been placed on production in 2015. We have good test results on those wells. We just started flowing back the three final wells that we intend to produce this year, that are in the Whittaker Flats area and should be tested and on production prior to year-end. On Slide 33, we continue to be very proud of our dividend track record, having increased our annual dividend to shareholders for 45 consecutive years. On Slide 34, we do have a strong balance sheet, strong cash flows and solid investment grade credit ratings and as we’ve discussed last quarter all three agencies reacted favorably as we expected to our SourceGas announcement. Slide 35, illustrates the continuing focus we place every day on operational excellence and on being a great workplace. Our safety performance year-to-date has been outstanding, our total case incident rate for the year of 0.7 is the lowest ever for Black Hills Corporation. Finally, on Slide 36, is our scorecard, this is our way of holding ourselves accountable to you our shareholders, we’ve done this for quite a few years now, we lay out our goals at the beginning of the year and literally keep you informed as to our progress throughout the year as we make progress towards those goals. Now, that concludes all of our remarks. We’d be happy to take questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator Ladies and gentlemen, we are ready to open the line for questions. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Dan Eggers with Credit Suisse. Your line is now open. Dan Eggers I guess, if we step back and kind of think about the priorities around the earnings outlook, the commodity price assumptions in the E&P business are above the street, can you just explain how you kind of got to those numbers, or the sense to at least slog and kind of why you guys have settled, decided to settle above the curve right now? David Emery The curve changes every day and typically what we do Dan is we take a basket of multiple forecasts and try to use that to come up with a reasonable estimate for the future year. I mean, literally the curve changes every day and if we revise our forward look every time the curve changes, that’s all we do. So, we try to look at several forecasts, and bank forecasts the strip and other things, obviously weighted a little more heavily probably towards the strip and some of the other things and set a forecast at the beginning of the year that we think we can live with regardless of whether that price fluctuates up and down a little bit throughout the year. Dan Eggers And then, did I hear you currently say that on the Wind acquisition that there is no base rate increase for the first 10 years? David Emery Correct, yes, the way that we are going to get recovery for that is it’s basically going to flow through three different cost adjustment clauses that we have and we’ll earn the same amount basically but it’s going to go through the adjustment clauses, and then it’s going to be up to us to decide whether we want to continue that or go in for a base rate case in year 10, I think the commissions preference at least at this point would probably be that we do a base rate case in year 10. Dan Eggers Now we’re going to see a distortion in your tax build because the DTC is being generated will bring your tax expenses down, so a part of the return is going to come on that asset through the tax line effectively? David Emery That’s correct, Dan. Dan Eggers And then how much will that effect the tax rate for the next year or the year after if we want to try and bear any expectations? David Emery It won’t affect ’16 obviously because it’s going to go into service late in ’16 but in ’17 I don’t even want to guess. Dan Eggers I am sorry maybe I should ask what’s the right utilization rate you guys are expecting off the project? David Emery Yes, high-30s, low-40s right in there for our capacity effects. Operator [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Insoo Kim with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open. Insoo Kim Just back to SourceGas, are you able to give any more guidance on potential timing of the equity issuance whether it’d be before the end of the year or after? David Emery Basically what we wanted to do is get our third quarter financials out and then essentially we’re going to watch the market conditions and be prepared to go to the market. There is obviously some holiday and things in there, but we’re looking at anytime basically between a couple of weeks from now and closing would be our idea of timing. And we’re just going to evaluate market conditions and make a decision on timing as things evolve. Insoo Kim And regarding the financing of the deal, are you currently actively looking for buyers of your non-core E&P assets to help with the funding or is there not really a good market right now given the lower oil and gas prices? Rich Kinzley Yes the non-core assets in E&P aren’t going to generate I would say a material amount into that the Colorado IPP is the big thing there obviously. So we’ll opportunistically look for opportunities on the non-core E&P but it’s not going to be a huge number. David Emery Yes, it’s more just cleaning up the portfolio on the labor involved in managing it all than it is about big dollars on the capital side. Rich Kinzley Right. Insoo Kim And finally if the deal does close on time in the first-half of ’16, I know in ’17 you do expect some material earnings accretion, but in ’16 do you still expect some neutral to slightly accretive scenario for the ’16? David Emery It really depends on timing Insoo and if you think about SourceGas is no different than most gas utilities that makes a huge portion of its income in the first quarter. And so if you called after the first quarter as already you have relatively small piece of the income remaining and a relatively large piece of the expenses remaining for the year. So it’s going to depend on timing if we close right after winter for example we’re going to have three quarters of a year of expenses and roughly and half a year in income. Insoo Kim And then just one more question if I may, at the utilities with the strong industrial growth there that you’re seeing for the year is there any re-through to forecast for 2016 and potentially beyond? David Emery Well, I think we’ve accounted for that growth in our guidance if that’s what you’re asking. Insoo Kim Yes, I was just wondering if, I mean it’s pretty 16% industrial growth you say that is very strong and just wondering modeling out for ’16 kind of what levels we should be expecting? David Emery Well we’ve talked a little bit — the biggest piece that will be continuing is really the Microsoft piece and there is quite a few public disclosures around Microsoft they have made some announcements in Cheyenne related to their plans and they are continuing with additional expansions of datacenters there in Cheyenne. So we expect that to continue for a while. Operator Thank you. [Operator Instructions] I am showing no further questions. I’ll turn the call back to David Emery for final remarks. David Emery All right, well thank you everyone for attending the call this morning. We certainly appreciate your continued interest in Black Hills and for those of you who are going to be at EEI we look forward to seeing you next week. Thanks and have a great day. Operator Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today’s conference. This does conclude the program. And you may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!

Transener’s 2021 Yankee Bonds Yielding 12% Will Spark Your Portfolio

Summary High 9.75% coupon offers excellent cash flow. The company has had two years of improving net income. A virtual monopoly business, as it owns, operates, and maintains 90% of the high-voltage transmission system in Argentina. This week, we look to South America, where an Argentine utility monopoly continues to improve its profitability and ratios. This is our third look at Transener, which we first profiled in August 2014 , then again in June 2015 . After two solid, profitable years in 2013 and 2014, Transener has continued to improve its position with consolidated net income for first six months of 2015 of AR$ 117.5 Million (or $12.3 Million in USD) compared to a consolidated net loss of AR$ 4.0 Million ($0.4 Million in USD) for the same period in 2014. Interest coverage has also improved since our last review, going from 1.7x to its current level of 2.3x. At their current yield of 12.5%, these relatively short-term bonds exceed the current 5-year U.S. Treasury yield of 1.40% by nearly nine times. With Argentine elections leaning away from socialism, expectations are that the next ruling party will at last review and adjust the outdated tariff rates that have prevailed for over a decade. Investment interest in Argentina is growing, and these outstanding 12.5% yielding bonds present a perfect opportunity for investors to participate in Argentina’s recovery. Therefore we have marked these high cash flow, six year bonds for addition to our FX1 and FX2 portfolios. Essential Services for Argentina For any modern country and economy, electricity is absolutely essential for its citizens. Transener transports 90% of the electricity in Argentina. In spite of the tariff freezes imposed since the 2001/2002 economic crisis, Transener has continued providing this essential service, as it is virtually a monopoly. In addition, there is very little possibility for any competitor to enter this space, as the costs would be prohibitive (in excess of USD $1 M per mile according to a study by Black and Veatch). For the investor, a company with a virtual monopoly, providing an absolutely essential service in an industry with extremely high barriers to entry is a welcomed addition to any investment portfolio. About the Issuer Founded in 1993, Transener owns, operates and maintains 90% of the high voltage transmission system in Argentina. Prior to 1992, almost all of the Argentine electricity industry was owned and managed by the government. In the early 1990’s, a privatization program was initiated with the ultimate objective to protect consumer rights, encourage investment and improve the quality of service. Currently, Transener has over 11,000 miles of transmission lines within Argentina. Pampa Energia (NYSE: PAM ), the largest integrated energy company in Argentina, has a co-controlling stake in Transener, and has traded on the NYSE in form of ADRs since October 2009 (ticker PAM). Transener’s revenue streams are largely determined by the government via the Secretariat of Energy, who approves wholesale electricity prices. Transener receives monthly revenue for transmission, capacity charges and connection charges from CAMMESA, a national organization responsible for managing operations in the wholesale electricity market. Tariffs (what they can charge for electricity) have been kept artificially low since the 2001 / 2002 Argentine economic crisis, when Transener’s original concession agreement was renegotiated and tariffs of electricity distributors and transmission companies were frozen. As a result, the monies collected from electric customers and consumers did not cover Transener’s cost of operations. This rolling deficit has been continually covered by federal subsidies paid to CAMMESA. After years of petitioning the government to adjust payments from CAMMESA to reflect actual production costs, Transener received some financial relief in 2013. The Renewal Agreement compensates the company for cost variations (the cost of operations not covered by tariffs and subsidies) retroactive to December 2010 and continues to December 2015. At our last review of Transener in June 2015, we noted the excellent recent performance of Transener stock, which at that time had appreciated a whopping 210% over the previous 52-weeks. It is also worth noting that Transener stock was the top performer for 2014 in the Buenos Aires Merval Index with a gain of 206%. The stock is currently trading around AR$ 5.07, which is still well above its current 52-week low of AR$ 2.80. Argentina’s Elections There has been a great deal of interest from the financial investment world in the upcoming Argentine elections scheduled to take place in late October. (Preliminary results now require a run off vote.) The prevailing opinion is that the new ruling government will take the much needed steps to remedy the policies set in place by current President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner that have damaged the Argentine economy and made it difficult for the country to gain access to international lending and international investment. This election optimism was evidenced earlier this year, when Transener bonds were up 23% for 2015 on the speculation of a more market friendly government once the elections are held. Financials As stated in our last Transener review earlier this year, the company was able to register profits in 2013 and 2014 thanks in part to the revenues from the Renewal Agreement. The company’s financials for Q1 and Q2 of this year continue to show solid growth as well. For Q1 2015, consolidated net sales increased 12.6% as compared to Q1 2014. Consolidated net profits showed even more impressive growth, with a profit of AR$18.2 Million ($1.9 Million in USD) compared to a net loss of AR$92.8 Million ($9.8 Million in USD) for Q1 2014. Transener’s last reported quarterly results (which include results from Q1 2015) should also encourage investors and bondholders. Consolidated net revenues for six months ended 6/30/15 were 32.1% higher than same period for 2014. (AR$ 823.9 M vs. AR$ 623.7 M) Consolidated net income for first six months of 2015 was AR$ 117.5 Million ($12.3 Million USD) compared to a consolidated net loss of AR$ 4.0 Million ($0.4 Million USD) for the same period in 2014. Operating income increased for six months ended 6/30/15 – registering at AR$136.1 Million ($14.3 Million USD) compared to AR$ 71.9 Million ($7.6 Million USD) for the same period in 2014. Transener’s interest coverage ratio has also improved. At our last review, the company had an interest coverage ratio of 1.7x for 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, Transener had operating income of $14.3 Million USD and finance expenses of $ 6.2 Million USD, for an interest coverage ratio of about 2.3x. Transener also had cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2015 of $44.9 Million USD. Risks The default risk is Transener’s ability to perform. It is encouraging that the company has produced two profitable years, and continues to improve even in the wake of tariff rates that are still in need of adjustment to reflect market rates for the cost of electricity. With the election set for the end of this month and the expected tariff reviews that many expect will follow, Transener margins should continue to benefit from any action to move electricity rates closer to actual costs for transmission and distribution. Any investment in a company domiciled outside of the U.S also presents geopolitical risk. Argentina’s socialist government has long subsidized public utilities in the country, attempting to foster economic growth by freezing costs for basic services such as water and electricity. While this strategy did help the country to recover from the 2001/20012 economic crisis, recent growing budget deficits have meant the end of many long-running public utility subsidies giving way to higher utility bills for the consumer. Reliable electric power is of vital importance to Argentina’s growth and economic viability. With a new government poised to take control at the end of this year, there will certainly be positive changes on the horizon for Argentina’s many subsidized utilities. Transener’s business operates primarily in Argentina and as such, its revenues are received in Argentine pesos. This debt is issued in US Dollars so the company is exposed to risks in the fluctuations of the exchange rate between Argentine pesos and US dollars, especially as it relates to payments of interest and principal to bondholders. These 12.5% Transener 2021 bonds appear to have similar risks, features and maturities to other Yankee bond issues such as the 7.75% Hidroelectrica Piedra Del Aguila, the 9.5% Autopistas Sinking Bonds, and the 10% Transportadora de Gas Del Sur (NYSE: TGS ), previously reviewed on our Bond-Yields.com website. Summary and Conclusion Transener’s electrical distribution services are absolutely essential for Argentina. Without an option to replace or rebuild high voltage transmission lines, we think Argentina is highly likely continue to ensure that Transener remains a viable utility. As the country prepares for its next chapter with a new government later this year, Transener is also more likely reap the benefits of a reassessment of tariff rates and subsidy reductions. These relatively short-term 71 month bonds, which are currently yielding an outstanding 12.5% have been marked for addition to both our Fixed-Income1.com and Fixed-Income2.com managed portfolios. Issuer: Compania de Transporte Energia (Transener) Coupon: 9.75% Maturity: 8/2/2021 Ratings: CCC- CUSIP: P3058XAK1 Pays: Semi-annual Price: 88.5 Yield to Maturity: ~12.5% Disclosure: Durig Capital and certain clients may have positions in Transener 2016 bonds. Disclaimer: Please note that all yield and price indications are shown from the time of our research. Our reports are never an offer to buy or sell any security. We are not a broker/dealer, and reports are intended for distribution to our clients. As a result of our institutional association, we frequently obtain better yield/price executions for our clients than is initially indicated in our reports. We welcome inquiries from other advisors that may also be interested in our work and the possibilities of achieving higher yields for retail clients.