Tag Archives: income

Irrational Pessimism – Throwing The Baby Out With The Bath Water

Since first publishing kortsessions.com in February 2013, I have tried not to get into the weeds on individual stocks ideas. We are all about the media and the adverse outcomes in store for those who rest their investment policy on their pronouncements. When I did mention a name for illustrative purpose, I did my best to make certain that I acknowledged my fallibility and ownership position (if I had one), and to advise all readers consuming my work to make certain companies mentioned were suitable to their own investment circumstance and tolerance for risk before they considered purchase… caveat emptor. Today’s post is going to sound like a recommendation. But because of the irrational pessimism surrounding a certain segment of the market, the securities covered have great illustrative value. Nonetheless, I urge you refer to the admonition in paragraph one before rushing out and buying any of the two names that I will refer to. I own positions in both names. Background of the craziness My example today comes from a former client, Tortoise Capital Advisors . As their name implies, “Slow and steady wins the race.” They are not trying to hit the ball out of the park every time they come to the plate. Singles do just fine. Tortoise manages both separate accounts, closed-end, exchange-traded funds and open-ended funds (AUM $13 billion), the majority of which specialize in the shares of Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs). I have owned their shares in the past, and recently initiated positions in their flagship fund, the Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corporation (NYSE: TYG ), and the Tortoise MLP Fund (NYSE: NTG ). These two funds, in particular, are midstream (processing, storage and pipelines – not production ) oriented. They are conduits and not terribly sensitive to commodity prices. The management at Tortoise is very conservative. I can vouch for this from personal experience. As an institutional broker with both A.G. Edwards and Wells Fargo, I had the opportunity to bring managements in for meetings with their PMs and analysts. I will attest that they were an extremely tough sell. They have scrupulously avoided commodity risk and the risk of anything questionable in financing plans/needs and capitol structures (excessive leverage). They looked for simple businesses with long-term repeatable revenue streams. They did their homework. Both TYG ($23.58, yielding 11%, a/o-2/26) and NTG ($15.20, yield 11%, a/o- 2/26), after making all-time highs in 2013 ($50.64 and $30.18 respectively), began precipitous declines in 2014. Interestingly, TYG, because it had the word “Energy” in its name, began to plummet first; even though none of its MLP investments owned oil and gas reserves or production. Its holdings were all fee-based conduits, storage or processors, whose prices had collapsed due to oversupply issues in commodities that they transported, but whose demand (ergo, fee-generating capacity) continued to grow. This was crazy, but par for the course for the stock market. Linn Energy LLC (NASDAQ: LINE ) and Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE: KMI ) exacerbate matters In the case of Linn, it is an upstream (ergo, highly exposed to commodity risk via owned oil and gas production) MLP that came under bear attack for its hedge accounting (completely unwarranted). The company made a large acquisition, with the idea that it could swap out pieces for lower-risk producing assets and sell equity to finance the rest. It did this on the credit card. The crude market turned. Linn Energy could not sell or swap assets. When oil collapsed, its stock price collapsed. The company could not sell equity to pay down debt. Linn’s stock, which at one time traded as high as $42, is now less than $.50 per share. Importantly, Linn and the upstream partnerships are outliers. Though midstream MLPs, for the most part, have little commodity exposure, investors did not want to be confused with the facts and sold. KMI was another case of a bear attack on what was considered at one time “best of breed” in the midstream MLP space. It was also a situation where an acquisition was made in a market that was not sympathetic to financing MLPs. Ergo, to put itself back on sound financial footing (which it did – see here ), the company slashed its dividend 75%, proving the naysayers correct and causing further group-wide liquidation… throwing the babies out with the bathwater. The Elephant in the Room: Is the MLP model broken? According to Tortoise portfolio manager, Matt Sallee …Looking at the facts, midstream MLPs, their fundamentals are not broken. Our portfolio has average cash flow growth of 20% year over year looking at EBITDA, 10% per unit. And while not every company has announced their 4th quarter distributions, north of half of our portfolio has, and that weighted average distribution as I mentioned previously is up about 3% over the prior quarter, so we feel pretty good about that. Along with that, our MLP portfolio companies, have not experienced any distribution cuts. You read that? Over half their portfolio companies in the last year increased distributions with no distribution cuts! Source: Transcript of Tortoise first quarter 2016 conference call (Additional context: Video presentation by Tortoise CEO, Kevin Birzer) How irrational has the pessimism been in the MLP space? My favorite recent example came on January 20, 2016. In the wake of a horrific (pardon my sarcasm) 1/4 point increase in the Fed Funds rate, a continuing collapse in the price of oil, the Chinese market in free fall, a potential European banking crisis (punctuated by rumors of problems at Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB )), the market opened and fell almost immediately by 550 Dow points. During the panic selling that ensued, TYG hit a low of $18.50 (yielding 14%) and NTG fell to $11.60 (yielding 14.5%). Don’t confuse us with the facts! We can’t stand this anymore! Get us out! The above panic is a descriptive of what one normally sees at a market bottom, not at a top … an example of – “… nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror … (- Franklin D. Roosevelt ).” It is Irrational Pessimism of the highest order. I believe that the MLP space is a good proxy for much of the craziness afoot in today’s market… healthy babies being tossed out with the bath water. What is your take? Disclaimer: The information presented in kortsessions.com represents my own opinions and does not contain recommendations for any particular investment or securities. I may, from time to time, mention certain securities for illustrative purpose, names where I personally hold positions. These are not meant to be construed as recommendations to BUY or SELL. All investments and strategies should be undertaken only after careful consideration of suitability based on the risks, tolerance for risk and personal financial situation.

Who Wants To Be Short Volatility? I Don’t

Nearly 5 years ago, I noted how the iPath S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (NYSEARCA: VXX ) was ” Designed To Fail. ” Since then, excluding some rather terrifying spikes, it has reliably melted away as I suspected that it would. If you put the position on back in 2010, you made something better than 98% on your money. If you re-weighted the position on spikes in volatility, you did a good deal better. Longer term, this publicly traded ETN is designed to continue melting away; however, in times of increased volatility this product can not only rally aggressively, but go into backwardation where the roll yield increases the value of the equity, rather than the negative roll yield that this trade is based off of. For instance, during much of 2008, volatility was in backwardation and being short volatility was a losing proposition unless you were aggressively trading it. I’m not trying to make a market call here, but as I survey the world, between the untried experiment with ZIRP, to the pending massive write-offs caused by shale oil , to the increasingly bellicose relations in the Middle East, to the continued economic collapse of Europe and possibly China, to the unorthodox US election, to the beginning of competitive currency devaluations, to a myriad of other issues, I have to wonder if I want to be short volatility under 20. The answer is-I don’t. For much of the past few months, the 1-2 month VIX has been in backwardation. I wouldn’t be surprised if this backwardation continues along with an overall increase in volatility. In that case, there will be another time to put this trade on. During a market crash, you want to have cash to buy bargains-not a headache caused by a short volatility position that is rapidly going against you. This has been a winner for a very long time and it’s now time to book VXX and wait for a better moment to short it again. I have had very few investment positions for a while now, but there’s a growing list of undervalued companies that I want to own after there has been a washout. For the first time in quite some time, I’m finding exciting things to invest in. Sitting in cash worried about the global economy, as I have been for the past few years, isn’t all that entertaining or lucrative. That’s how short vol feels when you’re on the wrong side…

The V20 Portfolio Week #21

The V20 portfolio is an actively managed portfolio that seeks to achieve an annualized return of 20% over the long term. If you are a long-term investor, then this portfolio may be for you. You can read more about how the portfolio works and the associated risks here . Always do your own research before making an investment. Read the last update here ! Current Allocation *Only available to Premium Subscribers Planned Transactions *Only available to Premium Subscribers ————– It’s been a while since I gave a public weekly update. Premium subscribers have continued to receive weekly updates regarding allocation and planned transactions. It was quite encouraging to have some readers email me regarding this short hiatus, I am glad that I have provided value to you. Since the last update , the V20 Portfolio rose by 12.8% while the S&P 500 (NYSEARCA: SPY ) was virtually flat. As we wrap up February, the V20 Portfolio suffered a minor setback towards the end of the month, shedding 2.3% while the S&P 500 gained a modest 1.6% over the past week. Portfolio Update When the portfolio declined significantly in January, we took the opportunity to make some moves. Now that the portfolio is rebounding, we shall sit and wait patiently. One of our minor holdings, Intelsat (NYSE: I ), reported earnings on Monday. Shares have almost halved since then, falling from $3.01 to $1.69 as of Friday, contributing to 81% of the decline over the past week. On the bright side, the company is now trading at less than 1x TTM P/E. As I’ve mentioned in previous updates, the problem with Intelsat is not a matter of profitability, but one of liquidity. As the result of the meltdown in the high yield market, it is becoming increasingly probable that a restructuring will take place due to the company’s large debt load ($15 billion), assuming current market conditions persist. While it sounds scary, it is a risk that we should be willing to take. For one, the underlying business is still generating healthy amount of cash flows. Secondly, I believe that the equity holders (Silverlake, BC Partners, and Fidelity, controlling 80% of shares) have enough incentives to put together a deal that would be favorable to shareholders in the event of a restructuring. Of course, this is not just blind faith. Given the fact that they haven’t sold shares during the IPO, it is fairly clear that it is in everyone’s best interest to not let creditors get away with a low ball offer. Furthermore, the risk to the portfolio is also contained through Intelsat’s small allocation in the V20 Portfolio (2.4%). Looking Forward While half of our holdings have reported earnings ( SAVE , ACCO , I), Conn’s (NASDAQ: CONN ) and Magicjack (NASDAQ: CALL ) (58% of long position) have yet to announce their fourth quarter results. In Conn’s case, two big questions have already been answered thanks to the company’s monthly updates. Sales have continued to grow at a rapid pace (+7.4% in Q4) and delinquency rates have started to decline. As for MagicJack, the company recently initiated two previously announced initiatives: a new service offering with Movistar and a new SMB (small medium businesses) subsidiary. There isn’t significant fixed costs for the Movistar deal, but for the SMB initiative, there will be an initial investment of around $10 million this year. However, both of these initiatives will drive growth, which is a critical component to turning around investor sentiment, an important step that could push the stock back to its fair value quickly. Performance Since Inception Click to enlarge Disclosure: I am/we are long ACCO, CONN, CALL, I, SAVE. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.