Tag Archives: income

PNM Resources: Priced Just Right

Summary Management has made significant steps in past five years to improve profitability. Margins are up, energy generation mix is improving. Dividend has followed suit. Heavy interest expenses and overhang of the company’s large ageing coal plant concerns me. PNM Resources (NYSE: PNM ) is a holding company operating two regulated utilities, one in New Mexico and Texas. The company had a rough go of it from 2007-2011; exiting from non-regulated businesses at great cost focus on only serving regulated customers. Management may not have known what they were in for, as the next few years of regulatory environment were tough, with harsh allowed returns and strict oversight. PNM Resources was forced to heavily cut the dividend in between 2007 and 2009 as wholesale electricity prices plunged, chopping it nearly in half from $0.91/share to $0.50/share. The dividend remained stagnant at those depressed levels until a 2012 hike. This marked the start of a company revitalization as PNM Resources has bumped the dividend significantly, averaging 15% per year since then, as operating results recovered. Shares have responded to the flood of good news, rallying off lows near $10/share in 2010 to nearly $30/share today, recovering most of their losses from 2007-2010. Is there more upside for shares? Business Overview The company operates a diversified portfolio of over 2,500MW in generation capacity. Like many utilities, PNM is reducing its reliance on coal, instead shifting to natural gas. However, the largest generation facility for PNM Resources remains its San Juan Generating Station in Waterflow, New Mexico. This plant used to be much larger, but the company was forced to retire 900MW of capacity on regulator and environmentalist pressure – or face heavy capital expenditures related to mandatory upgrade costs. It is likely that this plant will continue to see aggressive treatment by regulators as coal continues its slow-and-steady decline as a source of power in the United States. Investors should expect continued power generation and compliance costs with the overhang of possible additional restrictions on aged coal-fired facilities like this one. PNM Resources expects to keep remaining capacity here online until at least 2022 given the recent contract extension with a local coal supplier for fueling needs. Operating Results (click to enlarge) While 2011 was a much bigger revenue year for 2011, that doesn’t tell the entire story. 2011 was a turning point year where many changes went into place at PNM Resources. The company exited its non-regulated businesses in Texas in 2011 ($329M in proceeds), using the proceeds to pay down debt and repurchase shares. This divesture followed the exiting of New Mexico Gas in 2008 as the company struggled to stay afloat, facing mounting losses in wholesale energy where the company simply couldn’t compete. Tough choices were made and SG&A expenses were cut as well as PNM Resources streamlined its operations. All told after a lot of work, all these changes have resulted in much better operating margins from 2012 forward. (click to enlarge) PNM Resources has run cash deficits as we can see from above, which has been paid for by more than $500M in net long term debt issuance since 2011. Like I feel with most mature utilities, I really want to see these numbers temper. Continued weakness here means no cash flow available for increased dividend payments without increasing leverage through long term debt or dilutive common stock issuance. Interest expense already eats 40% of operating income, well ahead of most other utility businesses I’ve looked at in the past. Conclusion At around 16x 2016 earnings estimates, shares aren’t the most expensive utility shares out there, but they don’t appear to be the cheapest either. The current dividend yield of 2.85% is in-line with historical averages. Management has guided towards 8% dividend growth, which I think is achievable assuming capital expenditures come down and demographic trends continue to be favorable in New Mexico and Texas. The heavy interest expense and lack of operational cash flow concern me. Shares are likely fairly valued at current prices, but investors who are looking to pick up shares of PNM Resources are best served by playing the waiting game and entering around $25.00/share, a spot where shares have tested and experienced solid support over the past year.

Southern Company – Rising Infrastructure Assets But Look Out For Some Challenging Quarters

Summary Southern Company is one of the largest utilities in America. Will grow to #2 spot by customer count after the AGL Resources purchase. Southern announced its plan to acquire AGL Resources for $8B cash – fueled by debt and equity issuance. The company is a dividend contender having raised dividends for 15 consecutive years; 5-yr dividend CAGR is 3.7% and Chowder Rule is 8.56. The Southern Company (NYSE: SO ) is one of the largest utilities company in America. The company serves more than 4.4 million customers and has approximately 46,000 megawatts of generating capacity serving the Southeast through its subsidiaries. Subsidiaries include electric utilities in four states – Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power; a growing, competitive generation company – Southern Power; a licensed operator of three nuclear generating plants – Southern Nuclear; and fiber optics and wireless communications – Southern Telecom and SouthernLINC Wireless, respectively. (Source: September 2015 Southern Company Overview Presentation ) In August 2015, Southern Company announced that it will be acquiring AGL Resources Inc. (NYSE: GAS ) in an $8B cash deal. This combined company will shift Southern from being an electric-only utility company to an electric-and-gas utility company. The customer base is expected to double with this move and pushes Southern to become the second largest utility company in America (by customer count), if the deal is approved. Corporate Profile (from Yahoo Finance) The Southern Company, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a public electric utility company. It is involved in the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity through coal, nuclear, oil and gas, and hydro resources in the states of Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and Mississippi. The company also constructs, acquires, owns, and manages generation assets, including renewable energy projects. As of December 31, 2014, it operated 33 hydroelectric generating stations, 33 fossil fuel generating stations, 3 nuclear generating stations, 13 combined cycle/cogeneration stations, 9 solar facilities, 1 biomass facility, and 1 landfill gas facility. The company also provides digital wireless communications services with various communication options, including push to talk, cellular service, text messaging, wireless Internet access, and wireless data; and wholesale fiber optic solutions to telecommunication providers in the Southeast. The Southern Company was founded in 1945 and is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. A Closer Look The Southern Company has remained focused as an electric utility company through the years. The company has remained a heavy user of dirty fuels such as coal (accounts up to 42%) for its power generation over the years, but has started transitioning to cleaner resources including natural gas, solar and wind. This move will also be welcomed as the company aligns itself with the US government mandate targeting power plants to cut carbon emissions by 32% (by 2030) on the 2005 levels. (click to enlarge) (Source: September 2015 Southern Company Overview Presentation) Acquisition of AGL Resources Inc. In August 2015, Southern Company announced a plan to acquire AGL Resources Inc. for about $8B in cash, fortifying SO’s assets with the natural gas infrastructure. AGL Resources distributes gas in Georgia, Illinois, Virginia, New Jersey, Florida, Tennessee and Maryland. Southern Co. owns utilities in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and Mississippi. (click to enlarge) (Source: September 2015 Southern Company Overview Presentation) This move lowers SO’s dependence on power generation and pushes SO to the #2 spot in the utility sector by customer count after Exelon Corp. (NYSE: EXC ). The combined company will operate 200,000 miles of electric lines and 80,000 miles of gas pipelines. The deal is expected to close in the second half of 2016. Southern Company will be issuing $3B in new stock and also tapping into the debt markets to finance the merger. (click to enlarge) (Source: September 2015 Southern Company Overview Presentation) The deal is expected to raise the long-term EPS growth rates by 4-5%. In addition, the dividend growth is expected to rise faster than current rates. Dividend Stock Analysis Financials Expected: A growing revenue, earnings per share and free cash flow year over year looking at a 10-year trend. A manageable amount of debt that can be serviced without affecting future operations. (click to enlarge) (Source: Created by author. Data from Morningstar) (click to enlarge) (Source: Created by author. Data from Morningstar) Actual: The utility industry is resilient and has seen a slow and steady rise over the years. Revenues and earnings are fairly constant with year-over-year growth ranging between -0.3% to +0.15%. The debt load is also stable and SO enjoys a ‘A-‘ credit rating from S&P. SO has a debt/equity of 1.36 and a current ratio of 0.80. Those numbers can be expected to change significantly over the course of next year or two as the AGL purchase moves closer to closing. Dividends and Payout Ratios Expected: A growing dividend outpacing inflation rates, with a dividend rate not too high (which might signal an upcoming cut). Low/Manageable payout ratio to indicate that the dividends can be raised comfortably in the future. (click to enlarge) (Source: Created by author. Data from Morningstar) Actual: Utility companies are slow and steady growers and are perfectly suited for long-term dividend investors. Southern Company is a Dividend Contender having raised dividends consecutively for 15 years. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year dividend CAGRs are 3.5%, 3.6%, 3.7%, and 39% respectively. Coupled with a current dividend yield of 4.86%, SO has a Chowder Rule number of 8.56. The current payout ratio is 89%. Outstanding Shares Expected: Either constant or decreasing number of outstanding shares. An increase in share count might signal that the company is diluting its ownership and running into financial trouble. (click to enlarge) (Source: Created by author. Data from Morningstar) Actual: The number of shares have risen steadily over the years and are expected to rise more as the company intends to issue $3B of new equity to finance the AGL deal – approx 66M new shares based on current price, an increase in the number of outstanding shares by ~7%. Book Value and Book Value Growth Expected: Growing book value per share. (click to enlarge) (Source: Created by author. Data from Morningstar) Actual: The book value is a bright spot in the company’s financials. The book value has steadily increased over the years maintaining a nice upward trajectory, although we can expect this to stumble when more debt and shares are issued in the coming years. Valuation To determine the valuation, I use the Graham Number, average price-to-earnings, average yield, average price-to-sales, and discounted cash flow. For details on the methodology, click here . The Graham Number for SO with a book value per share of $22.22 and TTM EPS of $2.35 is $34.28. Based on the last closing price, the stock is currently 30% overvalued. SO’s 5-year average P/E is 18.92, and the 10-year average P/E is 17.80. Based on the analyst earnings estimate of $2.94, we get a fair value of $55.62 (based on the 5-year average) and $52.33 (based on the 10-year average). SO’s average yield over the past five years was 4.60% and over the past 10 years was 4.61%. Based on the current annual payout of $2.17, that gives us a fair value of $47.17 and $47.07 over the 5- and 10-year periods, respectively. The average 5-year P/S is 2.16 and average 10-year P/S is 2.0. Revenue estimates for next year stand at $21.18 per share, giving a fair value of $45.74 and $42.35 based on 5- and 10-year averages, respectively. The consensus from analysts is that earnings will rise at 3.58% per year over the next five years. If we take a more conservative number at 3%, running the three-stage DCF analysis with an 8% discount rate (expected rate of return), we get a fair price of $36.73. The following charts from F.A.S.T. Graphs provide a perspective on the valuation of SO. (click to enlarge) (Source: F.A.S.T. Graphs ) The chart above shows that SO is slightly undervalued. The Estimates section of F.A.S.T. Graphs predicts that at a P/E valuation of 15, the 1-year return would be 2.75%. (click to enlarge) (Source: F.A.S.T. Graphs ) Conclusion Electric utilities in general have seen slower sales industry-wide amid a combination of energy conservation, energy efficiency and shift towards independent power generation/natural gas usage. Coupled with the new regulations from the US government to reduce carbon emissions, electric utilities have started focusing a shift away from dirty fuels such as coal. Southern Company still relies heavily on coal, but has started focusing on cleaner energy alternatives to meet the target. In a move to diversify and fortify its assets, the company is moving to acquire AGL Resources Inc. in a deal financed by new share and debt issuance. While this is good for the overall company’s business, in the short term (over the course of next few quarters/years) some balance sheet damage can be expected as the company takes on more debt and investors see share dilution. An added risk for investors is the potential rise of interest rates by the US Fed. Bond substitutes such as utility stocks suffer the most in rising rate environments. Based on the metrics discussed above, if we give equal weight to all metrics, we get a fair value of $45.31. Full Disclosure: None. My full list of holdings is available here .

Momentum Model Of ‘Swensen Six’ Portfolio Recommends 100% In Cash

Momentum Model called for move to cash back on August 10th. A three metric model is used to drive the momentum model. The “Swensen Six” portfolio covers six asset classes, depending on how asset class is defined. Example ETFs are provided to populate the recommended asset classes. David Swensen, in his book, Unconventional Success: A Fundamental Approach to Personal Investment , lays out what he calls “The Science of Portfolio Structure.” The following bullet points lay out the basic points of Swensen’s logic for constructing what I call the “Swensen Six” portfolio. Basic financial principles require the portfolio exhibit diversification and equity orientation. The “Swensen Six” is well diversified in that it covers the globe by using U.S. Equities (NYSEARCA: VTI ), Developed International Equities (NYSEARCA: VEA ), and Emerging Market Equities (NYSEARCA: VWO ). By equity orientation Swensen skews a portfolio toward stocks instead of bonds. The equity Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) in the “Swensen Six” are: VTI, VEA, VWO, and VNQ . High expected return types of securities dominate the portfolio as 70% is allocated to equity investments. The specific percentages are listed below. Use six asset classes to provide portfolio diversification. Domestic equities comprise 30% of the portfolio or invest 30% in VTI. Swensen is not specific about the individual securities so I am recommending particular ETFs for each asset class. The percentages are Swensen recommendations. Determining what percentage to invest in what asset class is one of the most difficult decisions individual investors face when it comes to portfolio construction so Swensen’s percentage recommendations are most helpful. Developed international equities carry a recommendation of 10% so invest 10% in VEA. Originally, Swensen recommended 15% be allocated to developed international equities, but in a more recent paper lowered the percentage to 10%. One could stay with the original 15% recommendation. Emerging markets make up 10% of the portfolio so invest 10% in VWO. Originally, Swensen recommended 5% be assigned to emerging markets, but he later shifted 5% from developed international equities to emerging markets. One could stay with the original 5% recommendation. Domestic Real Estate makes up 20% of the total portfolio so invest 20% in VNQ. Another option is to invest 15% in VNQ and 5% in RWX , an international REIT ETF. This is my preference as it adds more diversification by adding a seventh asset class, International Real Estate. Investors wishing to keep life simple will stick to the “Swensen Six” rather than expand to include RWX. U.S. Treasury Bonds make up another 15% of the portfolio so invest 15% of the total in TLT . U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities is the last asset class and we invest 15% in TIP . In my Dashboards worksheet, I classify both TLT and TIP in the Bonds and Income asset class, but for purposes of following Swensen, I’ll break the two into separate asset classes. With only six ETFs, Swensen covers the globe so diversification is accomplished. The equity orientation is in place as 70% of the portfolio is tilted in that direction. Swensen provides interesting logic behind his recommendations. Two paragraphs from page 83 of his book state it very well so I quote below: “Investors achieve equity orientation by investing a preponderance of assets in the high-expected-return asset classes of domestic equity, foreign developed equity, emerging market equity, and real estate. The return-generating power of equity positions drives the results of long-term investment portfolios. Investors give up expected return to defend portfolios against unanticipated inflationary or deflationary economic conditions. U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities protect against inflation with certainty, while real estate holding guard against inflation with reasonable assurance. In the long run domestic equities add to the inflation-hedging characteristics of a portfolio, but in the short run domestic equities prove notoriously unreliable as inflation hedges.” This six ETF portfolio has an equity emphasis, provides some protection against inflation and is broadly diversified. By keeping these six assets in balance, the passive investor is well served. If you are a momentum style investor, what does the “Swensen Six” look like in the current market environment? Below is the ranking for these six ETFs and as readers can see, all monies are investing in SHY or cash. None of the critical ETFs are ranked above SHY. ETF Rankings of “Swensen Six”: The following ranking is built upon three metrics. Fifty percent (50%) of the weight is allocated to the performance of each ETF over the past 91 calendar days. Thirty percent (30%) of the weight is assigned to the performance over the most recent 182 calendar days and the final 20% is a volatility measurement where low volatility is highly valued. SHY is the cutoff or “circuit breaker” ETF. When the ETFs rank below SHY, as is currently the case, 100% of the portfolio is invested in SHY or cash. The portfolio is reviewed every 33 days as the ETFs are ranked again to see if any show up for potential investment. This portfolio has been in cash for nearly two months. (click to enlarge)