Tag Archives: ideas

Top 10 Drivers Of Valuation

Business Valuation Framework Over the years I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about and working on business valuations across a broad range of transactions. Given that I’m a visual learner, I thought it would be helpful to illustrate my thoughts in a diagram. Click to enlarge Source: CFI Top Down vs. Bottom Up As I look at the diagram it logically flows from top to bottom, however, when building a financial model to value a business I usually think about it bottom up, and in an iterative way. I start in the bottom left corner of the diagram with historical financials, working my way up to the top, then back down again to build the forecast financials (and repeat the process again). 1. Historical Financials The first place to start when valuing a business is usually with historical financial statements. The past matters a lot when performing a valuation as it informs a view of the future and what’s realistically possible. The future, of course, is heavily influenced by what the company’s assets, management team, competition and markets will do going forward. 2. Assets Examining the asset base in conjunction with the historical income statement will paint a picture of the business’ ability to generate a return on those assets (“ROA” net income divided by total assets), and most importantly, generate free cash flow (operating cash flow less capital expenditures). When evaluating a business’ assets it’s important to look at both tangible (property, plant, equipment, etc.) and intangible assets (brands, customer lists, intellectual property, etc.). 3. Management Track-record Assessing management can be quite challenging, especially if you don’t have the opportunity to meet them in person (which is the case for most retail investors). An easy way to evaluate their performance is to look back at historical guidance (if a public company) and measure it against results achieved. Do you see a consistent trend of missing, meeting, or beating guidance? Measuring the track-record combined with in-person meetings to assess integrity, honesty, work ethic, etc. will be the best way to decide whether you assign a “management premium” or “management discount” to the business. 4. Competition What is the current state of competition in this industry? Are barriers to entry high or low, and how much pricing power does the company have? Answers to these types questions (and others listed in the diagram above) will help shape your view of risk and the company’s ability to protect profits (which will be reflected in the forecast financials). 5. “Moat” Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger are notorious for buying business that have wide moats around them, or more literally, have durable competitive advantages. Examples of companies with big moats around them include Google (NASDAQ: GOOG ) (NASDAQ: GOOGL ) (Alphabet), railroad companies (infrastructure), Coca Cola (NYSE: KO ) (its brand), and business with network effects like Facebook (NASDAQ: FB ) and Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN ). The wider the moat, the longer the company will be able to earn above average profits, and the lower the risk of the investment. The inverse it true for companies with little to no moat. 6. Culture & Strategy I group these two together because they are two of the main objectives of the CEO. Culture is critical as it drives the “Why” of an organization (see Simon Sinek) and motivates people to create a business that can change the world (even if in some small way). Culture is also critical for driving company behavior such as honesty and integrity, which lowers the risk of the business. Next in importance is strategy (i.e. “strategy eats culture for breakfast” ?) as this will be critical in maintaining any durable competitive advantage that a company has, or is attempting to gain/increase. 7. Future Assets Based on the strategy of the business, what will the assets look like in the future? Will the company have to significantly invest to grow the asset base, and if so, what types of ROA will they earn? It’s important to think carefully about how much capital is required to sustain and grow the assets (based on the strategy) and how those assets will create value in the form of free cash flow generation. The details/inputs behind these assets will generate the “principles” or drivers of the financial model. 8. Forecast Financials With a deep understanding of the industry, management (culture & strategy), and the business’ assets it’s now possible to forecast future financial statements. A good model will dis-aggregate the various drivers of revenues, expenses, etc. and present them as inputs that can easily be changed. Depending on the industry or maturity of the business you may forecast out anywhere from 5 years to the end of an asset’s life. 9. Discount Rate Once the financial forecast is in place, setting up the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model is just simple mechanics in Excel. The most challenging and subjective part of the DCF model is determining what discount rate to use. There are specific formulas you can use based on interest rates and relative volatility, but the essence of the discount rate is captured in most of the qualitative issues discussed above: stability of assets, durability of a moat, competence of management, risk of changes in competitive dynamics, and risk of changes in markets (i.e. government regulation). Taking all of these into account will determine what discount rate you think is appropriate to account for the riskiness of the investment. To the extent you have risk-adjusted the cash flows directly in the model (for the risks discussed above), you don’t need to include those risks in the discount rate (i.e. a perfectly risk adjusted cash flow forecast would be discounted at only the appropriate risk free government treasury rate). 10. Price The net present value (“NPV”) of future cash flows gives you the value of the business, but how much are you willing to pay for it? Value investors will typically want to build in a margin of safety (say 20-30%) by paying less than the intrinsic value. Other investors pay full value if they are willing to accept the discount rate as their internal rate of return (“IRR”). Investors typically look at comparable companies or past transaction (acquisitions) to see what other people are willing to pay for similar business (this adds an element of game theory or “greater fool theory” and moves away from intrinsic value). Conclusion This is how I think about valuation when building a financial model and I hope you found it insightful. I’m a visual learner and find it useful to organize mental models, like valuation, on paper. The key takeaway for me is that valuation is an iterative process — you really have to cycle through things like markets, competition, management, and assets multiple times before you can build a reliable financial forecast and discount it back to today. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Q1 2016 Style Ratings For ETFs And Mutual Funds

At the beginning of the first quarter of 2016, only the Large Cap Blend style earns an Attractive-or-better rating. Our style ratings are based on the aggregation of our fund ratings for every ETF and mutual fund in each style. Investors looking for style funds that hold quality stocks should look no further than the Large Cap Blend and Large Cap Value styles. These styles house the most Attractive-or-better rated funds. Figures 4 through 7 provide more details. The primary driver behind an Attractive fund rating is good portfolio management , or good stock picking, with low total annual costs . Attractive-or-better ratings do not always correlate with Attractive-or-better total annual costs. This fact underscores that (1) cheap funds can dupe investors and (2) investors should invest only in funds with good stocks and low fees. See Figures 4 through 13 for a detailed breakdown of ratings distributions by style. Figure 1: Ratings For All Investment Styles Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings To earn an Attractive-or-better Predictive Rating, an ETF or mutual fund must have high-quality holdings and low costs. Only the top 30% of all ETFs and mutual funds earn our Attractive or better rating. The Vulcan Value Partners Fund (MUTF: VVPLX ) is the top rated Large Cap Blend fund. It gets our Very Attractive rating by allocating over 61% of its value to Attractive-or-better-rated stocks. Oracle Corporation (NYSE: ORCL ) has long been one of our favorite stocks held by VVPLX and earns a Very Attractive rating. Over the past decade, Oracle has grown after-tax profit ( NOPAT ) by 15% compounded annually. The company’s earns a top quintile 23% return on invested capital ( ROIC ). Oracle has grown into a cash machine, generating over $40.7 billion in free cash flow over the past five years. Unwarranted concerns about the company’s ability to adapt to new cloud technologies have created a great buying opportunity. At its current price of $37/share, ORCL earns a price-to-economic book value ( PEBV ) ratio of 0.9. This ratio means that the market expects Oracle’s NOPAT to permanently decline by 10% from current levels. If Oracle can instead grow NOPAT by just 5% compounded annually for the next decade , the stock is worth $57/share today – a 54% upside. Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth (MUTF: NSNAX ) is the worst rated Small Cap Growth fund. It gets our Very Dangerous rating by allocating over 48% of its value to Dangerous-or-worse-rated stocks. Making matters worse, it charges investors total annual costs of 5.37%. Brunswick Corporation (NYSE: BC ) is one of our least favorite stocks held by NSNAX and earns a Dangerous rating. Over the past decade, Brunswick’s NOPAT has fallen by 1% compounded annually. Over the same time, the company’s ROIC has declined from 9% in 2004 to 8% over the trailing-twelve months. Despite the continued deterioration of the business, the stock remains overvalued. To justify its current price of $44/share, Brunswick must grow NOPAT by 10% compounded annually for the next 16 years . This expectation seems rather optimistic given Brunswick’s inability to grow profits over the prior decade. Figure 2 shows the distribution of our Predictive Ratings for all investment style ETFs and mutual funds. Figure 2: Distribution of ETFs & Mutual Funds (Assets and Count) by Predictive Rating Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 3 offers additional details on the quality of the investment style funds. Note that the average total annual cost of Very Dangerous funds is almost five times that of Very Attractive funds. Figure 3: Predictive Rating Distribution Stats Click to enlarge * Avg TAC = Weighted Average Total Annual Costs Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings This table shows that only the best of the best funds get our Very Attractive Rating: they must hold good stocks AND have low costs. Investors deserve to have the best of both and we are here to give it to them. Ratings by Investment Style Figure 4 presents a mapping of Very Attractive funds by investment style. The chart shows the number of Very Attractive funds in each investment style and the percentage of assets in each style allocated to funds that are rated Very Attractive. Figure 4: Very Attractive ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 5 presents the data charted in Figure 4 Figure 5: Very Attractive ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 6 presents a mapping of Attractive funds by investment style. The chart shows the number of Attractive funds in each style and the percentage of assets allocated to Attractive-rated funds in each style. Figure 6: Attractive ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 7 presents the data charted in Figure 6. Figure 7: Attractive ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 8 presents a mapping of Neutral funds by investment style. The chart shows the number of Neutral funds in each investment style and the percentage of assets allocated to Neutral-rated funds in each style. Figure 8: Neutral ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 9 presents the data charted in Figure 8. Figure 9: Neutral ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 10 presents a mapping of Dangerous funds by fund style. The chart shows the number of Dangerous funds in each investment style and the percentage of assets allocated to Dangerous-rated funds in each style. The landscape of style ETFs and mutual funds is littered with Dangerous funds. Investors in Small Cap Value have put over 38% of their assets in Dangerous-rated funds. Figure 10: Dangerous ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 11 presents the data charted in Figure 10. Figure 11: Dangerous ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 12 presents a mapping of Very Dangerous funds by fund style. The chart shows the number of Very Dangerous funds in each investment style and the percentage of assets in each style allocated to funds that are rated Very Dangerous. Figure 12: Very Dangerous ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 13 presents the data charted in Figure 12. Figure 13: Very Dangerous ETFs & Mutual Funds by Investment Style Click to enlarge Source: New Constructs, LLC and company filings D isclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector or theme. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Indonesia Slashes Rates Again: ETFs In Focus

Indonesia’s central bank cut its benchmark interest rate for the second time this year in its efforts to improve sluggish economic growth. Bank Indonesia (BI) slashed its benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points to 7%. BI had undertaken a similar sized cut in January after keeping rates unchanged for the last 10 months of 2015. The recent rate cut was largely expected as the majority of economists surveyed by Reuters had predicted that BI would cut the key rate by 25 basis points. In its efforts to ease the economy, BI not only lowered interest rates but also reduced the reserve requirement on rupiah deposits by 1 percentage point to 6.5%, effective from March 16. This move is expected to boost liquidity by more than $2.5 billion (34 trillion rupiah). These measures from the Indonesian central bank come closely on the heels of the U.S. Federal Reserve taking a dovish stance with hopes of further rate hikes fading. The Indonesian bank stated that its measures to ease monetary policy are aimed at achieving solid macroeconomic stability with reduced inflationary pressure against a backdrop of uncertain global markets. It further pointed out that it will continue to work with the government to control inflation, stimulate domestic economic growth and bring about structural reforms. The Indonesian president, Joko Widodo, popularly known as “Jokowi” has been quite vocal about his wish to see interest rates fall further to spur growth. As per a Bloomberg report, Indonesia’s economy expanded just 4.79% last year, the lowest since 2009. This year, with inflation under control, the overall sentiment is that the rates could be slashed further. In 2016, BI expects inflation to be around the mid-point of its target range of 3% to 5%. Apart from Indonesia, several other countries are also following the strategy of monetary easing, which generally comes in the form of an interest rate cut, to boost growth. Earlier this year, Bank of Japan’s (BOJ) move to impose a negative interest rate for the first time surprised the markets. The BOJ Governor Haruhiko even stated that there will be no limit to efforts for easing monetary policy. The central bank may further expand asset purchases if required. Other Asian countries including Taiwan and Bangladesh have cut rates. Meanwhile, the European Central Bank (ECB) has also hinted on further policy easing in its March 2016 meeting. Investor sentiment towards Indonesia has improved following its liberalization developments by easing restrictions on foreign investment in several industries including films, restaurants and healthcare earlier this month. Jokowi’s move to deregulate the traditionally protectionist economy should help in accelerating growth and making the Indonesian business environment more conducive for new investment. A Closer Look at 3 Indonesian ETFs In the light of these developments, we highlight three ETFs – the iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (NYSEARCA: EIDO ) , the Market Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (NYSEARCA: IDX ) and the Market Vectors Indonesia Small-Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: IDXJ ) – that have gained 6.2%, 7.2% and 6.2%, respectively, in the last 10 days. All three have a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 or a ‘Hold’ rating with a High risk outlook. EIDO This is the most popular ETF tracking the Indonesian market with AUM of $344.3 million and average daily volume of almost 756,000 shares. The fund tracks the MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index, holding 86 securities in its basket while charging 62 bps in annual fees from investors. The product is somewhat concentrated in both sectors and securities. The top five firms account for almost half of total assets, while from a sector point of view, financials dominates the fund’s assets with 38% share. The fund has a heavy tilt towards large-cap stocks at 84%. IDX This ETF follows the Market Vectors Indonesia Index, holding a basket of about 45 companies that are based or do most of their business in Indonesia. The product puts about 54.6% of total assets in the top 10 holdings, suggesting moderate concentration. Large caps are pretty prevalent, as these make up 83% of assets. With respect to sector holdings, financials again takes the largest share at 34.9%, followed by consumer staples (18%) and consumer discretionary (14.4%). The product has amassed $98.1 million in its asset base while it trades in volumes of around 89,000 shares. It charges 58 bps in fees per year from investors. IDXJ Unlike the other two, this is a small-cap centric fund. It is unpopular and less liquid having AUM of $5.3 million and average daily volume of about 2,000 shares. The fund tracks the Market Vectors Indonesia Small Cap Index and charges 61 bps in annual fees. Holding 29 stocks, the product does a decent job of spreading out as the top 10 securities hold about 62% weight. However, it is a bit concentrated from a sector outlook, as financials takes the top spot at 42.1% while industrials and energy round off the next two positions at 23% and 14.7%, respectively. Original Post