Tag Archives: ideas

Bumps In The Road

There are frost-heaves ahead. Is your portfolio ready? Click to enlarge Photo: Kevin Connors . Source: Morguefile At this time of year in New Hampshire, we have to deal with frost heaves. Rain and melt-water from winter storms seep into the roadbed, then lift the road when the water re-freezes. How we deal with the bumps says a lot about what kind of people we are. Some folks sail blithely through, figuring that their car’s shocks can handle the stress. That’s fine as long as they have a good suspension – and strong stomachs! Some of the bigger bumps can really rattle you. Others slow down, picking their way through, creeping over the biggest heaves. That’s fine as long as you don’t need more momentum later, like when you’re going uphill on a snowy day. Still others start to cruise moderately through, but they seem to find perfect speed to maximize effect of the bumps. Their vehicles shake more and more violently, until it looks like their cars are skipping and hopping. From behind, you can see them bouncing inside the car. My engineer daughter tells me that they’ve found a resonance frequency that does the maximum damage. It’s like this in investing. If you see a rough patch ahead, you can just cruise through, riding down and riding back up, if you have the stomach for it – and no loose fillings! Or you can raise cash, lowering your expected return in the short run in exchange for the peace of mind that comes from having dry powder. That’s the go-slow approach. But you really don’t want to be shaken around and panic, selling as the market tanks and buying back in after things get more expensive. That’s a sure way to bottom out – or get launched right off the road! Click to enlarge S&P 500 over the last 20 years. Source: Bloomberg Frost heaves present us with bumps in the road – like the squiggles and jiggles of the market. It’s good to know how to deal with them. Because after they subside, it will be time for mud season.

Stock Valuation And The Gordon Growth Model

Valuing Stocks with the Gordon Growth Model Preface Hedge funds and financial analysts typically use a variety of approaches to determine the intrinsic value of shares. With that being said, the Gordon Growth Model is a subcategory of a larger group of mathematical models commonly known as the dividend discount models. The idea of the model states that the value of a stock is the expected future sum of all of the dividends. The model, named after Myron J. Gordon, is quite fascinating since it provides a relatively simple yet intuitive method of valuing the intrinsic value of a stock to be compared to the current market price. In this article, we will be discussing the core formula and how it serves as a benchmark for short or long decisions. Afterwards I will give insight on how to setup an Excel spreadsheet to perform the calculations so that the valuation can be obtained within a matter of seconds. Assumptions Before we begin the valuation, there are some assumptions that a stock must fulfill in order for this model to function properly. The assumptions are: Gordon Growth Model allows you to disregard all current market factors and focus strictly on the fundamentals. With that being said, the model does not account for special products or branding that may allow a company to stand out relative to its competitors. The model assumes that the stock of the company in question has and will pay dividends. Certain variations of the model work around this, however, the one presented in this article must include a stock that historically pays dividends. The expected dividend growth rate must be smaller than the expected rate of return. If this is not the case, then the valuation would be negative, which is impossible (Those terms will be explained once we discuss the core formula). The dividend growth rate must be estimated. Although this seems risky, I will provide information explaining what and how a dividend growth rate is estimated and how it can be done easily on Excel. The dividend growth rate is assumed to be constant. The sensitivity of the difference between the required rate of return and the dividend growth rate is quite high. This means one small alternation in the difference can lead to a radically different valuation (So we must be careful). The Formula Now that the boring rules are out of the way, it is time to take a look at the formula behind the Gordon growth model’s intrinsic valuation of a stock. First, let’s denote the current value of the dividend as “D0” and a constant dividend grow rate by “g”. The dividend in “n” number of years will be represented as the following: Assuming now that we require some compounded rate of return represented by the variable “r”, we simply take the ratio from the previously mentioned dividend in “n” year’s equation shown below (See next header for calculations of “r”): If we now add every single dividend from year “n” back to the present day, we reach a total present value resembling the following: Click to enlarge If we then project this geometric series equation to “n=infinity”, we can rewrite the above in the following infinite sum (We can think of this as a simpler version of the above series): Click to enlarge Interestingly, if we extract the geometric series portion of the above equation, we are left with a remarkably simple formula, representing the intrinsic value of a stock as the following: If the expected dividend of (let’s say) year 1 has already been determined (calculated), then the equation can be further simplified to simply the following: Deriving the Dividend Growth Rate Now it’s time to define the way in which we obtain “g” or the dividend growth rate. First, we must acquire historical dividend data (Preferably from Yahoo). Second, we add up the quarterly dividend data per year in order to give us annualized or “yearly” data. Third, we input the relevant information into the equation below. Once “g” has been obtained, we then proceed to calculate the arithmetic average of the annual dividend, which can be done as follows: This process is easily done in Excel since the summations of sets of data can easily be calculated and tweaked if needed (For information on how to calculate the dividend growth rate and even a compounded dividend growth rate, refer to the Excel guidelines in the final header). Obtaining Required Rate of Return Although the model is pretty intuitive, variables such as “r” representing the required rate of return must be calculated separately before being integrated in the formula. To calculate the value of “r”, refer to the equation below: The values of the variables are determined by the user. Generally, they are obtained through the preferences and research done by the user. For example, “rf” or the “risk-free rate” is generally a US Daily Treasury long-Term Rate, however, it is up to the user to make such a decision. This is therefore the same for determining the “market risk premium”. The “the stock beta” on the other hand must be calculated by the user with results being relative to a certain benchmark. Ok, cool, so how does one calculate Beta? Calculating Beta ( β) When we talk about beta being relative to a benchmark, we are specifically highlighting the geometric slope of the closing prices of a stock in a given period relative to those closing prices of popular index within the corresponding exchange. For example, shares of Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM ) can be compared to the S&P 500 as a benchmark. When calculating beta, I personally gather 37 monthly prices (for the chosen ticker and Index) from a specific start date to an end date (You can pick as many monthly prices as you wish). In my preferred calculations, returns will be calculated from months 2 to 37 since in order to calculate the return for month 2, I need month 1 and therefore I would need 37 prices in order to get 36 results. Returns for a specific number of months, denoted as “n”, can be calculated with the equation below: To be specific, let’s note that the monthly prices should be the close price on the first trading day of each month (This may not be the first day of each month). Once we have the returns for our ticker and our index, we can now calculate the Beta by using Excel’s Slope function to make the calculation easier and quicker. Calculating the Gordon Growth Model in Excel Please refer to the links below to download the spreadsheets (They are free). The Excel spreadsheets that I am providing calculate the dividend growth rates, the Beta of selected stocks and the Gordon Growth Model valuation of a stock. There is one separate spreadsheet used for calculating Beta and another one which includes both the dividend growth rate and the Gordon Growth Model valuation integrated together. Essentially, a potential investor begins by opening the “calculate beta” worksheet and inputs the respective parameters. The user must input the desire stock ticker, benchmark index ticker and both start and end dates. The user then clicks the “Download Data button” and receives the respective information in the “results” section of the current sheet. This process is all powered by sophisticated VBA coding, allowing for the spreadsheet to download data from Yahoo Finance and make the appropriate calculation. A user should end up with the following: Click to enlarge Once a potential investor has the relevant Beta calculation, he or she can copy and paste that value into the next worksheet. By opening the “Gordon Growth” worksheet, the user can insert the Beta calculation in the parameters section of the Gordon Growth Model section. Within the Gordon Growth Model spreadsheet, the investor begins by entering the respective stock in the ticker section and proceeding to click the “get bulk dividend button” in order for the VBA coding to provide both a dividend growth rate and a compounded dividend growth rate in the preceding sheets. View the graphic below: Click to enlarge Once the user obtains their required dividend growth rate, they can now input the given result into the Gordon Growth Model parameters. By inserting the remaining information listed to the right of the parameters section, the investor obtains a theoretical valuation in the “results” section. This theoretical value represents the intrinsic value of the stock, and by comparing such a value with the current market price, the investor can determine whether they believe the stock is over or underpriced. That is to say, if the predicted value is higher than the actual trading price, then the share is priced fairly. However, if the predicted value is lower than the current stock price, then the Model predicts the stock to be overpriced. Keeping those results in mind, this model can now serve as a benchmark in determining the sentiment that an investor would have towards a long or short position for a given share price. Link to download the spreadsheet. Side Notes This process generally takes me less than two minutes to input and calculate. I have tested these spreadsheets on my phone and they work just fine. Mobile investors will especially find the spreadsheets of this model useful for when they are on the move. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: I do not claim ownership of the mathematical formulas used. I am simply writing this article to provide the community with a better understanding of the model and the techniques that can be used in excel. I am not the original creator of the excel files, I simply edited them to fit with the functions of this mathematical model

Forget Production Cut: Short Oil And Energy ETFs

The free fall in oil prices for over the past one-and-a-half years had taken a brief pause in recent sessions on hopes of an output freeze by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). The biggest oil-producing countries – Saudi Arabia and Russia – along with Qatar and Venezuela had agreed to freeze oil output at the January level if other countries joined them in the initiative. Had the move materialized, the oil patch – which has long been suffering from higher supplies and lower demand on weak global growth – would see prices shoring up and losses paring down. Many had started to view the move as the beginning of the long-wished production cut. However, all optimism went down the drain after Iran called the OPEC top-brass Saudi Arabia-led initiative a ” joke “. In any case, chances of Iran joining the treaty were slim as the country has been trying to boost production after the sanctions on it were lifted last month. This is because it was producing below its capacity and pre-sanction levels since 20 1 1 while the other countries had raised their output limit to record levels in the mean time. After Iran’s remark, Saudi Arabia also scrapped the option of output cuts by major producers in the near term. However, Saudi oil minister Al-Naimi also noted that he expects more countries to agree on the output freeze scheme by next month. So, while output cut has taken a backseat, investors should also keep in mind that there is no improvement in the demand scenario either. Earlier this month, the International Energy Agency (IEA) slashed its estimates for global oil demand for 20 15 and 20 16, by 100,000 barrels a day. This represents flat demand growth ( 1.2 million barrels a day) this year. Market Impact Following the dimming prospects of an output cut and limited benefits from a likely output freeze at record levels, oil prices started giving up prior gains. The United States Oil ETF (NYSEARCA: USO ) – which looks to track the daily changes of the spot price of the U.S. crude – lost over 4.8% on February 23 while it lost about 1.3% after hours. On the other hand, the United States Brent Oil ETF (NYSEARCA: BNO ) – which looks to track the daily changes in percentage terms of the spot price of Brent crude oil – was off 3.5% on February 23. Short Oil Given the situation, investors may want to consider shorting oil or the entire energy space. So, for investors seeking to make an inverse bet on oil as a commodity or on the energy equities, below are three ETFs pertaining to each case. Any of these will prove gainful amid declining oil prices. However, investors should keep in mind that a short play in the futures market requires a strong appetite for risks. ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF (NYSEARCA: SCO ) SCO is the most popular option in the short oil ETF space. The fund tracks the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index to provide twice the inverse performance on a daily basis of WTI crude oil. The fund was up 8.5% on February 23 while it added 2.7% after hours. DB Crude Oil Double Short ETN (NYSEARCA: DTO ) The note follows a benchmark of crude oil futures contracts to provide -2x exposure. The fund added more than 7.4% on February 23, 20 16. VelocityShares 3x Inverse Crude Oil ETN (NYSEARCA: DWTI ) DWTI is one of the riskier ways to play the short oil market, utilizing -3x exposure with daily rebalancing. The fund tracks the S&P GSCI Crude Oil Index to provide exposure to crude oil. The product surged 14.4% on February 23, obviously for its triple-leverage strategy and advanced 4.8% after hours. Short Energy ProShares Short Oil & Gas ETF (NYSEARCA: DDG ) This fund provides unleveraged inverse (or opposite) exposure to the daily performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index. The ETF makes a profit when the energy stocks decline and is suitable for hedging purposes against the fall of these stocks. DDG was up 3.3% on February 23. ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas ETF (NYSEARCA: DUG ) This fund seeks two times (2x) leveraged inverse exposure to the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index. DUG returned more than 6.5% on February 23. Direxion Daily Energy Bear 3x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: ERY ) This product provides three times (3x) inverse exposure to the Energy Select Sector Index. The fund surged over 10% on February 23 and added 1.9% in after-market trading. Original post