Tag Archives: ideas

Factor-Based ETFs Provide Increased Stability, Returns

During a volatile market climate where ETFs are especially getting hit hard, an increased utilization of factor-based investing has the opportunity to provide more stable and higher returns. Factor-based investing allows investors to increase exposure to certain factors, including size, value, quality and momentum. Last year, MSCI introduced a variety of multi-factor indexes that offer investors a better strategy that could be just right for this market environment. These indices cover US, World, Emerging Markets, and more. Click to enlarge The 1 year return of the MSCI US Momentum Index (NYSEARCA: MTUM ) distinctly outperformed iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF: Click to enlarge (Source: Bloomberg) A Focus on Momentum Momentum-based investing has proven to be a successful strategy in a volatile market climate, as seen with AQR’s posted returns in their liquid alternative funds. Such a strategy can provide returns in a downed market as well because the strategy works both ways. A hedge fund can short a portfolio of negative momentum securities and vice versa. For MSCI with their new diversified multi-factor indices, it’s all about choosing the right exposure to multiple factors, not just momentum. They’re targeting four main factors (listed above), including momentum. The MSCI USA Momentum Index didn’t perform well in the past year (-8.04%), but the MSCI diversified multi-factor indices have seen much better returns. MSCI is able to increase or decrease their exposure to certain factors that they see as favorable or unfavorable. Such optimization is extremely strategic as risk level of the underlying index is maintained. These multi-factor indices aren’t brand new strategies, either. The MSCI World Diversified Index returned an annualized 9.8% over a 16-year period during backtests, which is double the return of the regular MSCI World Index. The main methodology is to increase factor exposures to achieve higher historical returns. Which Factor is the Best? With the recent sell-off and market environment that is arguably a mess, what is the right factor to increase exposure to? With the MSCI World DMF index, which has one tilt towards value, there was a positive exposure to earnings yield even in this market. There is no one best factor, which is the point of these indices. A combination of multiple positive exposures with tilts towards different factors (momentum, size, value, quality, leverage, etc.) is what has made these MSCI products produce better returns than the run-of-the-mill ETFs. For example, the MSCI World DMF Index had positive exposure to stocks of lightly levered companies, lower residual volatility and smaller size: (SOURCE: MSCI ) The above described strategies for ETFs is something investors should make note of as clearly alternative strategies are needed in this market situation. Consistent optimization of diversified multi-factor products, like those of MSCI’s, are not completely immune to risk, but have now proven to have broken away from the poor performance of regular ETFs in the past year. Factor-based investing is very optimal for this market is a very forward-thinking investing strategy. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Want To Become A Millionaire During The Market Crash? Buy This ETF

With gold regaining its status as a safe alternative to equities, it’s about time we look at the precious metal. Gold is becoming increasingly important in this market, and the potential for large gains relates to (1) the range gold can move and (2) the possibility of a reversal with extremely high momentum: Gold’s huge sell-off since 2011 makes a comeback one of potentially great heights – a 50% upside if your price target is the previous high. We are seeing the best quarterly performance in gold in the past 30 years, signaling a possible turnaround. In this article, we will focus on the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GLD ) instead of the physical metal or futures. While futures perhaps constitute the most profitable of the bunch for speculative trades, it is also of higher risk and outside the risk tolerance of most investors. Physical gold is the best of these three options for holding gold but is illiquid and has delivery as well as storage costs. For most investors, GLD is the best option to play gold, even though it does not entitle you to physical gold. Thus, if you’re buying gold to prepare for an economic collapse or the like, look into physical gold. For the rest of us, we will discuss GLD as an investment. Speculative? Gold is less speculative than most other commodities and is typically safer, as the biggest governments’ central banks still hold gold as a reserve asset. Those who suspect a true economic collapse typically hold gold, banking on the idea that gold will become an actual currency if fiat currencies fail. Although I am bearish on the economy and hate the current financial system, I highly doubt that non-fiat currency will ever “become a thing.” Thus, we should look at gold as an investment somewhere between the speculative investments of stocks and the inflation-defensive investments of bonds. If we place GLD on this spectrum, it is closer to a bond ETF than a stock. Indeed, like bonds and unlike stocks, most hedge funds are not apt to take strong short positions on GLD: Click to enlarge (Source: Bloomberg) The demand for GLD from hedge funds is more attributable to true hedges (most hedge funds aren’t actually for the sake of hedging) than speculative positions meant to profit from a demand for gold. That is, GLD is seen as a protection against a market crash. If this were not true, we would not see so many GLD positions in hedge funds during the 2014 gold bear market. With GLD being at a near-year high for net-long positions in hedge funds, we can only ask if the hedge funds know something we don’t. The recent economic news has been mixed. The Philly Fed report, for instance, shows a huge spike in new orders; other reports, such as imports and exports show clear declines. Gold and the Market What we have noticed in the past few months is that GLD has seemingly lost its negative correlation to the stock market. That is, when stocks surge, GLD does not drop as expected. In fact, in the past few weeks we have seen both GLD and the general market rally. I sincerely doubt this is due to a real need for gold – i.e., gold used for jewelry. No, the recent gold rally is more likely due to banks and hedge funds increasing their holdings in gold, primarily as hedges but also as speculative investments. Remember that Goldman Sachs correctly predicted the gold crash in 2013; now they are predicting a rally for 2016. The Fed also has some blame. Without clear policies for interest rates, Fed pushes banks and hedge funds toward gold. The lack of the rate raise last Wednesday has caused concern for the dollar and for future rate raises, as explained in this video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDBJrdksAFs It’s Not All about the US Check out this line for the new iPhone in China: Actually, I lied. That’s a line to buy gold from back in June 2013, which coincided with a 12% correction in the Chinese stock market. (Source: Caixin) Demand in Asia is also driving up the price of gold, which drives up GLD as a proxy. According to Reuters, the majority of gold demand comes from Asia. India and China alone make up 50% of the gold demand. With North America only accounting for 8% of gold demand, it’s no wonder that the US stock market and gold prices are out of alignment. In fact, to predict gold demand, you might be better off watching the Chinese stock market. On that note, we see physical gold demand at pre-2008 levels. Miners Miners affect gold price by increasing the supply. Mine production has slowed in growth and is at a nearly sideways trend. Much of the recent gold production has been from China, which has been constantly increasing its gold mining efforts despite the low price of gold. China uses gold to hedge its currency. With the Yuan taking hits in the recent years, China’s growing gold reserves have served their purposes. The Chinese demand for gold should grow as the Yuan falls. If world gold mine production continues to fall to where gold production levels out, we have a status quo situation, in which demand exceeds supply. In this situation, gold prices will rise in tandem with the current stock market bubble and debt bubble. Currency War The currency war, which is currently underway, makes future currency prices unpredictable. Japan wants a weak Yen and therefore a strong greenback. China wants a strong Yuan and therefore a weak greenback. The US, with its recent interest rate hold, has given China what it wants. But the currency wars have just begun. Most of the major currencies will see devaluation against one another. Eventually, some currencies will come out on top. But throughout this chaos, we should see gold appreciate against all other currencies, simply because gold doesn’t have a country or a central bank trying to devalue it. Thus, the simultaneous devaluation of the greenback and Yen, for example, will provide a rising gold/dollar and gold/yen phenomenon. Stock Market Crash The stock market crash or correction that we will inevitably see ( I’m predicting 2016 ) should further bolster the strength of gold. A market crash will likely lead to the printing of money for the purpose of quantitative easing, which would further devalue currencies, amplifying the currency wars. Interest rate decreases would also help stimulate the economy but hurt the bond market. Hence the final node of the vicious cycle: investors and hedge funds selling bonds and avoiding cash in favor of appreciating gold. An ounce of gold could easily break the $3,000 per ounce price range in such a situation. Holding GLD during this time could easily be your best-performing asset. If this prediction comes true, you would only need have invested $419,000 in GLD to turn that sum into a nice million. Learn More about Earnings My Exploiting Earnings premium subscription is now live, here on Seeking Alpha. In this newsletter, we will be employing both fundamental and pattern analyses to predict price movements of specific companies after specific earnings. I will also be offering specific strategies for playing those earnings reports. Our last newsletter looked at the upcoming earnings for Lululemon (NASDAQ: LULU ). Request an Article Because my articles occasionally get 500+ comments, if you have a request for an analysis on a specific stock, ETF, or commodity, please use @damon in the comments section below to leave your request. Disclosure: I am/we are long GLD. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Too Far, Too Fast? Market Professionals Reflect Evolving Smart-Money Opinion

How good have their forecasts been? Figure 1 is the record of five years of daily forecasts for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 ETF (NYSEARCA: UDOW ), an ETF that holds derivative securities which are intended to magnify the daily percentage price changes in the DJIA index by a factor of 3 times, either up or down. Figure 1 tells what the Market-makers daily hedging-implied forecasts for UDOW over the past 5 years have produced as net profits for a wide range of imbalances between upside and downside prospects. Those imbalances are measured by the Range Index [RI] which tells what percentage of the whole forecast range lies below the market quote at the time of the forecast. Figure 1 also indicates how often the forecasts were able to produce a profitable outcome, operating in a realistic, time-constrained portfolio management discipline. Click to enlarge So what did MMs see earlier, see now? Here is the current picture of probable coming UDOW prices, along with similar once-a-week forecasts over the past 2 years. Figure 2 (used with permission) The vertical lines of Figure 2 are the price range forecasts for UDOW implied by the MM community’s hedging actions to protect firm capital exposed during buyer~seller balancing to “fill” volume trades. The forecast of 5 weeks ago was from a then-price of $46.54 and a Range Index of -11. Now it has a quote of $64.72 and a Range Index of 57. A week ago the price of $59.49 carried a RI of 51. Figure 1 suggests that buys of UDOW at today’s RI level of 57 in the past might produce only a +2% payoff from here, instead of the upwards of +12% that had been experienced by -11 Range Index forecasts earlier. The +2% prospect is reinforced by the row of data in Figure 2 as the actual payoff experience achieved in 108 of the 1261 days for which UDOW forecasts were available. Forecasts that had RIs of around 57. The current forecast is more optimistic than past experience; it projects a potential gain of +5.6% Odds for reaching the current payoff prospect remain high, with priors producing a profit in 84 of every 100 among the 108 experiences. The fact that gains better than three times the earlier forecast’s average payoff already have been experienced makes one wonder if the “other shoe might drop” any time now and markets might start to back off. To ease such concerns, it is appropriate to know as UDOW prices were rising during this past week, its MM expectations rose faster. The outlook gains pulled back RIs which on a couple of days were at 68. Continued rising expectations, at a gain rate faster than prices, will put strength under a continued market price rise, albeit at a slower pace. Failure to do so may signal weakening market enthusiasm. We’ll have to see what happens. It can be monitored on blockdesk.com., along with expectations for the VIX index and VIX-based ETFs. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.