Tag Archives: ideas

Rate Hike Leads To Bond Funds’ Biggest Withdrawals: 3 Funds To Sell

Time and again we at the Zacks Mutual Fund Commentary section warned investors about the possibility of bond fund exodus once the U.S. Federal Reserve pulls the trigger on rate hike. This turned out to be true last week when bond mutual funds and exchange-traded funds saw a record wave of withdrawals. Bond market funds saw the largest redemptions since 1992, when Lipper started tracking the flows. Remember, a low interest rate environment is favorable for investments in bond funds. This stems from the fact that the market value of a bond is inversely proportional to interest rates. Thus, the rush to pull out money from bond funds was pretty obvious. The U.S. corporate bond market is particularly at risk, as the central bank’s rate hike will lead to significantly higher borrowing costs for the lowest-rated companies. Corporate bond prices have also seen significant volatility, as investors find trading in and out of big positions next to impossible without affecting their prices. The Exodus from Bond Markets Apprehensions over the stability of the bond market compelled investors to pull out $15.4 billion from taxable bond funds for the week ending Dec 16. High-yield junk bond funds saw an outflow of $3.8 billion during the week. This was the largest outflow since Aug 2014. Another record wave of redemptions left investment-grade bond funds lose out $5.1 billion. This was the biggest outflow since Lipper started recording data in 1992. Alongside, yields on investment grade and junk bonds shot up to their highest level since 2012, according to data from Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Tom Roseen, head of research services for Lipper, said: “They were getting out of the way of the Fed.” He also acknowledged the recent closure of bond mutual funds and picked on the Third Avenue fund. He commented: “People are focused on the Third Avenue fund taking it on the chin.” New York-based Third Avenue Management had announced that it was closing the high-yield bond mutual fund Third Avenue Focused Credit Fund (MUTF: TFCVX ), but its investors will not get their money for “up to a year or more.” The move to block redemptions from a Stone Lion credit fund was also playing on investors’ minds. According to Morningstar data, high-yield bond funds were the biggest losers over the last one week among other Taxable Bond Funds. The high-yield bond funds lost 3.5% in the one-week period and its year-to-date loss is now at 4.8%. Corporate bond funds lost 0.5% over the one-week period and the year-to-date loss stands at 1.2%. Corporate Bond Funds in Trouble According to UBS, an astounding $1 trillion of U.S. corporate bonds and loans that are rated below investment grade may be in danger. A UBS strategist commented: “It is our humble belief that the consensus at the Fed does not fully understand the magnitude of the problems in corporate credit markets and the unintended consequences of their policy actions.” According to Bank of America Merrill Lynch indices, price of U.S. company debts rated “CCC” had dropped to the lowest level since 2013. Subsequently, the average yield soared to a six-year high. Meanwhile, Moody’s noted that the list of companies rated B3 or lower with a negative outlook increased 5% in November to 239. This was a 37% year-on-year increase. What Increases the Risk for Bond Funds? A rise in rates may lead to bond exodus; consequently, the lack of liquidity may compel investors to sell the asset class at a significant discount. There is a growing concern that a massive exit from bonds may freeze the markets, as the number of sellers may not match the number of buyers. Redemption of bonds would increase the sell-off and fund managers would then have to sell the less liquid assets to match investors’ cash demands. However, if a mutual fund or an ETF holds illiquid bonds, the price swings will be rapid and would create a vicious cycle as price drops will again intensify selling pressure. The liquidity risk is of high concern. For bonds, sovereign government bonds are said to be the most liquid. On the other hand, corporate bonds are to suffer the most. New regulations and capital requirements have compelled Wall Street banks to cut their inventories. This has made the buy-and-sell activity of corporate bonds in the secondary market more difficult. The drop in inventories following fresh regulations has created a gap in the number of buyers and sellers. Thus, bond fund managers are now less prone to holding a large chunk of bonds in fear of any possible rout. The Securities and Exchange Commission had proposed a rule earlier this year that mutual fund companies must disclose how vulnerable their bond portfolios are to rate hikes. This was among SEC’s first moves to address concerns that the first rate hike in about seven years may spark a rapid sell-off in bond funds, resulting in steep losses. 3 High-Yield Bond Funds to Avoid Increasing concerns over bond funds will only intensify as the central bank opts for a gradual hike in rates. Thus, investors looking for safer avenues should exit from certain high-risk high-yield bond mutual funds. Below we highlight 3 mutual funds from the High Yield bond fund category that carry a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4 (Sell) or Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5 (Strong Sell), as we expect the funds to underperform their peers in the future. Remember, the goal of the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is to guide investors to identify potential winners and losers. Unlike most of the fund-rating systems, the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is not just focused on past performance, but the likely future success of the fund. These funds have negative returns year-to-date and over the last 1-year period. The 3-year annualized return is also in the red. The minimum initial investment is within $5000. Northeast Investors Trust (MUTF: NTHEX ) focuses on investing in marketable securities of prominent firms. NTHEX primarily purchases debt securities rated below investment grade by any of the two major ratings firms. Northeast Investors Trust currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5. Over year-to-date and 1-year periods, NTHEX has lost 17.8% and 17.7%, respectively, and has a negative 3-year annualized return of 4.2%. Annual expense ratio of 1.09% is higher than the category average of 1.06%. NTHEX’s 85.59% of assets is allocated to bonds. Franklin High Income A (MUTF: FHAIX ) invests mostly in lower-rated debt securities that provide high yield. These lower-rated securities include bonds, debentures, convertible securities and other debt securities. The fund seeks a high level of current income. Franklin High Income A currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5. Over year-to-date and 1-year periods, FHAIX has lost 11.8% and 10.9%, respectively, and has a negative 3-year annualized return of 1.9%. Annual expense ratio of 0.76% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. Consulting Group High Yield Investments (MUTF: THYUX ) seeks a high level of current income by investing in below investment grade debt securities. THYUX focuses on investing most of its assets in domestic junk bonds. THYUX may utilize 20% of its assets to purchase high yield bonds of issuers located in emerging or developed economies. Average portfolio duration of THYUX is from two to six years. Consulting Group High Yield Investments currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4. Over year-to-date and 1-year periods, THYUX has lost 8.4% and 7.6%, respectively, and has a negative 3-year annualized return of 0.4%. Annual expense ratio of 0.74% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. Original post

3 Top-Rated Allianz Mutual Funds To Invest In

Allianz Global Investors – a segment of Allianz SE ( OTCQX:ALIZF ) ( OTCQX:AZSEY ) – seeks to provide financial services throughout the globe, including the U.S., Europe and Asia-Pacific, by following their philosophy: Understand. Act. According to Morningstar, the company currently has $29.7 billion of assets under management (excluding money market assets) invested in a wide range of mutual fund categories, including equity and fixed-income funds. The company offers financial services to both institutional and retail clients. Meanwhile, founded in 1890, the parent company of Allianz Global Investors, Allianz SE, currently has a nearly $73 billion market capitalization. Below we share with you 3 top-rated Allianz mutual funds. Each has earned a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and is expected to outperform its peers in the future. To view the Zacks Rank and past performance of all Allianz mutual funds, investors can click here to see the complete list of Allianz mutual funds . AllianzGI International Small-Cap Fund A (MUTF: AOPAX ) seeks capital growth over the long run. AOPAX primarily invests in securities of companies having market capitalizations similar to those included in the MSCI World Small-Cap Index. AOPAX is expected to have a weighted-average market capitalization of 50-200% of the same index. The AllianzGI International Small-Cap A fund returned 12.7% in the past one-year period. AOPAX has an expense ratio of 1.45% compared to the category average of 1.53%. AllianzGI Structured Return Fund A (MUTF: AZIAX ) uses an in-the-money short call overlay strategy to gain long equity exposure. AZIAX primarily invests in ETFs that have significant exposure to securities included in the S&P 500 Index. AZIAX may also invest in ETFs with exposure to real estate investment trusts (REITs). The AllianzGI Structured Return Fund A returned 5.6% in the past one-year period. Greg P. Tournant is one of the fund managers of AZIAX since 2012. AllianzGI International Managed Volatility Fund A (MUTF: PNIAX ) seeks to maximize growth of capital over the long term. PNIAX invests a lion’s share of its assets in securities of companies located in foreign lands. PNIAX invests not more than half of its assets issued in any particular country. PNIAX invests in securities of companies from a wide range of countries, including those from the MSCI EAFE Index. PNIAX seeks to manage overall portfolio volatility by investing in these securities. Though PNIAX focuses on acquiring securities issued in developed nations, the fund may also invest in emerging market securities. The AllianzGI International Managed Volatility Fund A returned 3.2% in the past one-year period. As of October 2015, PNIAX held 153 issues, with 3.06% of its assets invested in Lawson Inc. ( OTC:LWSOF ). Original Post

Should We Be Getting Ready To Cover Our Shorts In Energy?

Summary Crude oil priced in gold is near a 30-year low. Crude oil priced in inflation-adjusted dollars tells another story. What are the crude/gas ratios and technicals telling us about our short positions? Getting paid to be patient while we wait for the bottom in energy markets and stocks. Now that oil and gasoline cost less than bottled water, maybe it’s time to start looking at covering our short positions. Don’t get me wrong; I’m not ready to use the L word just yet (long), but I can clearly see long positions on the horizon at lower levels. The downward spiral is still intact, but history has proved short-selling parties can’t last forever. Just how inexpensive is crude oil? Let’s look at the 30-year chart for a barrel of crude priced in gold. All-time high 0.15050 of an ounce, June 2008. All-time low 0.03322 of an ounce, July 1986. Current 0.03370 of an ounce, December 2015. 1986-2015 average, 0.69889. Distance from the all-time low priced in gold 0.00048 of an ounce or about 50 cents. Source & supporting data Federal Reserve data 1986-2105-cost-of-oil-priced-in-gold 1986-2015 oil gold ratio (oil normally trades above gold on this ratio) Source Federal Reserve Is $34.52 per barrel misleading if you look at the historical price action from 1993-2015 calculated in inflation-adjusted dollars? All-time high $147.27 per barrel, July 2008 ($162.34 in 2015 USD). All-time low $10.35 per barrel, December 1998 ($15.80 in 2015 USD). The 30-year average price for oil is $42.87 ($59.09 in 2015 USD). 2015 dollars generated using the bls.gov inflation calculator . Current cash oil price $34.52 per barrel Data source Chicago Mercantile Exchange The fundamentals are still weak The technicals are still weak Daily = downtrend Weekly = downtrend Monthly = downtrend The spread between a gallon WTI crude and wholesale gasoline is more than twice the historical average. 1990-2015 historical average, $0.2147 ($0.28 in 2015 dollars). Current 12-month rolling average = $0.4426. Spread between WTI crude and retail gasoline, better than average. 1990-2015 historical average is $0.8642 ($1.14 in 2015 USD). Current 12-month rolling average = $1.2612. Spread between wholesale and retail gasoline, consistent with the historical average. 1990-2015 historical average is $0.6496 ($0.86 in 2015 USD). Current 12-month rolling average = $0.8186. Where the futures market is pricing crude oil through December 2024. Ratios tell me to maintain shorts, technicals say stay short, futures markets indicate higher prices. One current crude oil position to track Short March 2016 deliver at $46.80, contract value $46,800. Deposit posted per contract = $15,000. Exchange margin per contract = $3,800. March 2016 is currently trading at $36.74, contract value $36,740. I’d like to cover these $46.80 shorts, reverse to long at $33.00. 1) To cover my $46.80 shorts, I’m going to write a put at the $33.00 strike , collecting $1.24 per barrel or $1,240 per contract (expires in 58 days). The only way my current $46.80 short can be “pulled” away is if the market falls from the current price of $36.74 down to $33.00. Should this occur, my short position would appreciate by another $3,740 per contract between now and 17 February 2016 expiration. If March delivery never goes down to $33.00, I keep the $1,240 put premium collected against my $46.80 short. 2) I’m also going to write another put at $33.00, collecting another $1,240. Again, if March 2016 WTI crude does not trade down to $33.00, I keep the $1,240 in time premium. If it does go below $33.00, I was paid $1,240 to enter a new long position at $33.00 or $3,740 per contract better than where the market is currently trading ($36.74), (yes, I’ll have to offset and roll the position in March). 3) If the market stays the same, I’ve collected $2,480 over the next 58 days on a position if delivered is worth $33,000. 4) If oil starts to rally, I can cover my $46.80 shorts and watch the $33.00 puts expire worthless (+$2,480). There are several other ways to offset my $46.80 shorts, example, writing an in-the-money put at $40.00 currently trading at $4.59, collecting $4,590 in premium ($920 in time value). On the upside, the current position is trading at $36.74 contract value $36,740 (1,000 barrel contract x $36.74 per barrel) or I’m getting paid 6.750% in total time value over the next 58 days to liquidate my $46.80 if the market goes down to $33.00. If $33.00 in put is hit, my gain on the trade = $13,800 per contract plus the collected time value of $2,480 for a total of $16,200. The margin I’m allocating on this position is $15,000 per contract ( exchange margin = $3,800 per contract). What this strategy has done is paid me 16.53% in option time value on my $15,000 deposit per contract to be patient over the next 58 days. Many traders don’t realize how collecting fat time premium can work for you. Let’s assume the market is right and crude oil bottoms at the current price of $36.74 (March 2016 delivery). Let’s assume you go long crude oil at $36.74, wrote an out-of-the-money call at $39.50, and the $39.50 call is trading at $1.59, then you’re collecting $1.59 per barrel, $1,590 per contract, $27.41 per day or $10,006 per year on a position that has a total value of $36,740. The time value writing out-of-the-money options = 27.23% in annual time premium collected or 66.70% on the $15,000 allocated to cover the $3,800 in exchange margin. We’re posting $11,200 more than is required by the exchange to minimize the probability of a call. Our margin for error without being in jeopardy of having a call is $11.20 a barrel plus whatever option premium collected; in this case, $1.59 for a total of $12.79. In order for us to be on call (in this example) March 2016, crude oil would need to fall below $23.95 a barrel between now and 17 February 2016 (58 days). Again, I’m not advocating getting in at $36.74, I’m using this as an example to show you how hefty the time premium is writing out-of-the-money calls to generate income against a long crude oil position. In this example, the only way your $36.80 position can be called away from us is at $39.50 for a $2.70 profit per barrel or $2,700 per contract. If it does not get called away, we’d keep the time premium against our long of $1,590 (+10.60% on the $15,000 deposit for 58 days). In my case, I’m writing the $33.00 put to get into a $33.00 long position collecting $1,240 in time value; if delivered at $33.00, I’ll write the $36.00 or $37.00 call against the delivered $33.00 long collecting another $1,000 to $2,500 against the $33.00 long (I will have to roll this position to forward delivery month). Energy Stocks Energy stocks might not be as sick as all the academic chatter generated by the tradeless master debaters. Sure, crude may go down to $20, maybe $10, who cares? There are defined risk strategies to capture the move in both crude and energy stocks if you’re up to speed and can handle the risk. Fact, over the next five years, the world will need energy and the additional products crude produces. Demand may go down, but population will increase, and there are scores of situations that could generate a nice rally in crude from the low $30s as well as energy stocks. Many of these energy stocks you can trade using the same strategy of writing puts to get in and calls to get out as I’ve explained in the crude oil example above. Word of caution, you have to watch your bid/ask spreads, make sure you get firm quotes on the bid/ask, match them up to your other desks and always use price orders. On the horizon, I see short covering and potential net new long positions entering in energy stocks. Yes, the charts still look ugly. If you want to be less aggressive, wait for the turn (change in trend) using something as simple as a Bollinger 20,2 and exponential moving average 9 on weekly data in the examples below. Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE: XOM ) BP p.l.c. (NYSE: BP ) Royal Dutch Shell plc (NYSE: RDS.A ) Chevron Corporation (NYSE: CVX ) Valero Energy Corporation (NYSE: VLO ) (no short on this) Petrobras – Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (NYSE: PBR ) Marathon Petroleum Corp. (NYSE: MPC ) (no short on this) ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP ) Suncor Energy, Inc. (NYSE: SU ) Total S.A. (NYSE: TOT ) Statoil ASA (NYSE: STO ) Yes, oil is inexpensive and appears to be moving lower, but the world still needs it. We will eventually find a bottom, might as well get paid on our short positions while we wait.