Tag Archives: greece

New Year 2016: Looking Back, Moving Forward

The Facts: There were lots of ups and downs in the markets in 2015. Unfortunately, by the time December came to close, there were a few more downs than ups. Although the S&P 500 actually posted a slight gain, it was the index’s softest performance in seven years. We’ll show you what it all means. The Impact: U.S. large caps finished the year up 1.38% (including dividends), while small caps retreated. International stocks fell, with emerging markets dropping almost 15%. Fixed-income markets were relatively flat, though moves by the U.S. Fed triggered unusual volatility. What It Means for Investors: Where some see weakness, there may be opportunity. With a well-diversified portfolio, a simple rebalancing strategy may help investors capture opportunities almost automatically. Read on for what this might mean for each of the major asset classes. A Closer Look As Shakespeare said, “All the world’s a stage,” and a dramatic year for both domestic and international markets may have once again proven him right. It was central banks that took center stage in 2015: The U.S. Federal Reserve (the Fed) made a small but significant step toward tighter interest rates, while looser monetary policy ruled the day in Europe, Japan, China, and elsewhere. The markets were unusually volatile, too, buffeted by several international flashpoints, including financial instability in Greece, a slowdown in China, and terrorist attacks in Paris that grabbed the world’s attention. The end result? Most markets came under pressure in 2015. U.S. stocks ended the year mixed, international markets sagged (especially those in emerging economies), and U.S. bonds ticked slightly higher. Before we take a closer look, let’s quickly review the economic highlights for December. Fed raises rates-finally: The odds makers finally got some rest. On Wednesday, December 16th, the Federal Open Market Committee voted to raise its benchmark interest rate, the federal funds rate, by 0.25%. This was the first interest rate increase in nearly a decade, and the first time in seven years the rate has exceeded the zero to 0.25% range. Projections by Fed governors also suggested that the Fed may increase rates by another 1% through the end of 2016. U.S. economy keeps chugging along: The U.S. showed slow but steady growth throughout 2015. The unemployment rate dropped from 5.6% in December 2014 to 5.0% in November, the most recent month for which we have data, and the workforce expanded by 2.6 million employees. While gross domestic product grew by just 2% through the third quarter, the housing market and other indicators pointed to an economy that continues to expand. Domestic Equities There’s a lot to cover this month, so let’s go straight to the numbers. The large-cap-oriented S&P 500 shed 1.58% in December, but finished the year up 1.38%, the smallest total return for the index since 2008. Without dividends, the S&P actually posted a modest annual decline. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite performed significantly better for the year, gaining 6.96% (also including dividends). The month and year were much tougher for U.S. small caps. The small-cap-oriented Russell 2000 shed 5.02% in December-and finished 2015 with an annual decline of 4.41%. Among the sectors that make up the U.S. equity markets (based on the S&P 500 sector indexes), consumer staples, utilities, and health care stocks were the biggest gainers in December, while the energy, materials, and consumer discretionary sectors lagged. The top performers for the year were consumer discretionary stocks, perhaps partially due to lower oil prices leaving more money in consumers’ pockets. Health care and consumer staples stocks also outperformed. On the downside, the energy sector was by far the weakest, falling by 21.12%, followed by materials and utilities. It may be helpful to take a quick look at the energy markets, which struggled considerably in 2015. A glut in global oil supplies triggered a decline of 30.05% in the benchmark New York Mercantile Exchange in 2015-for a total loss of 64% over two years. The last time that crude dropped two years in a row was in 1997-1998. During the course of the year, oil plunged from a high of $61 a barrel to a low of $35, and more than 250,000 jobs in the energy sector were lost on a global basis. For the equity styles, both growth and value stocks were lower in December, though growth slightly outperformed. (We track style performance using the Russell 3000 Growth and Value Indexes.) This theme played out through most of 2015, as growth led value by more than nine percentage points for the year. What to Consider for 2016 : In the spirit of New Year’s resolutions, the start of the year can be a great time to consider rebalancing one’s portfolio to its target allocations. Because U.S. small caps performed relatively poorly in 2015, this could mean adding exposure to small caps by redirecting funds from cash or other assets. (Of course, there’s no guarantee you’ll be reallocating assets at an advantageous time-and tax consequences could be triggered if the transactions are made in a taxable account.) As for U.S. sectors, it’s almost impossible to predict how things will play out. It might be tempting, for instance, to call a bottom in energy at these levels, but even more pain could be ahead, as U.S. crude inventories expand, Iran comes online, and Saudi Arabia fulfills its pledge to meet any increases in demand. Among other sectors, consumer stocks could continue to benefit from the spending power generated by oil price weakness, while higher interest rates could lift financials. International Equities Volatility ruled international stocks in 2015-to vastly different results. Developed markets ended the year just fractionally lower, while emerging markets dropped sharply. The MSCI EAFE Index, a widely followed measure of developed market performance, fell 1.35% in December, finishing the year down 0.81%. Among the component regions that make up the index, Japan was the year’s star performer, while stocks in other Pacific countries and the UK fell sharply. Many Pacific economies were weighed down by the ripple effects of slowing growth in China and depressed commodity prices. Emerging markets saw no reprieve in December. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index fell 2.23% for the month, and ended the year with a loss of 14.92%, the worst annual performance of any index we track. (This was also the index’s third consecutive yearly loss.) Latin America was the weakest region in the index, dropping sharply on lower pricing for some of the region’s biggest exports-oil and other natural commodities. What to Consider for 2016 : Given the underperformance of emerging markets over the past three years, many investors might find that their emerging market holdings have grown smaller relative to other asset classes. If this applies in your situation, now might be a good time to consider adding funds to the category to bring it back to desired target allocation. Investors might even want to reconsider the split in your international allocation-specifically, the amount you hold in emerging vs. developed markets. Valuations for emerging markets are now more attractive than they’ve been in quite some time, and emerging economies still offer the world’s highest (albeit declining) growth rates. Fixed Income The U.S. fixed income market had a relatively flat year, as the Fed finally put an end to the question of “when,” and voted to raise its benchmark interest rate. The Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index was down 0.32% in December, to end the year with a gain of just 0.55%. In the U.S. Treasury arena, the yield on the benchmark 10-year note closed the year at 2.27%. This represented a gain of six and 10 basis points for the month and year, respectively. (A basis point is one one-hundredth of a percent.) For the full-year period, while rates increased across most maturities, the shape of the yield curve remained essentially unchanged. Among the various U.S. fixed income sectors, Treasury bills were the strongest performers in December, while high-yield bonds (also known as “junk” bonds) were the weakest. For the full-year period, intermediate-term U.S. Treasuries led the pack, while high-yield bonds, TIPS, and long-term U.S. Treasuries lost the most. For both periods, high-yield bonds were hit by a number of factors, including the category’s overexposure to the energy sector, and new competition for income from bond sectors that are generally considered less risky. What to Consider for 2016 : While more rate increases are expected by the Fed this year, the bond market may have already priced in some of these moves. Short-tem rates may continue to rise, though this could be tempered by surging demand from yield-starved investors. Long-term rates, which are more influenced by inflation and economic growth than by rate policy, could stay at current levels or rise slightly. If this scenario plays out, the expectation would be for longer-term bonds to outperform their shorter-term counterparts. The Bottom Line Like every year before it, 2015 was full of surprises. But what will happen in 2016? Of course, we can’t predict the future, but there’s one thing we know for certain. Because 2016 is an election year (and there’s no incumbent on the ballot), a new American president will be elected. Other themes that may play out in 2016 include: divergent monetary policy across developed economies (some countries loosening, others tightening); the consequences of higher domestic interest rates, whether intended or not; the effect of higher rates on corporations, particularly those that need to seek funding in the volatile high-yield market; and continued conflict in the Middle East. Plus, we’re sure there will be plenty of new surprises, which makes the financial markets so fascinating to watch and participate in. So what can investors do to prepare their portfolio for the changes ahead? As always, our best advice is fairly straightforward: Stay focused on the long term . Stick to a long-term investing plan by maintaining a risk-appropriate, well-diversified portfolio. This may help prepare one’s investments no matter which way the election goes, or whatever the news may bring. Consider rebalancing periodically to maintain target allocations . January can be a great time to review and refine one’s portfolio to stay in line with pre-set target allocations. This may mean selling some holdings that were relatively successful in 2015, and investing in sectors or regions that underperformed, while keeping in mind that there’s no guarantee of future performance. (If making transactions in a taxable account, it also helps to be mindful of any potential tax consequences.) While it may feel uncomfortable selling winners to buy losers, this strategy follows one of the basic tenets of investing for the long term.

Playing The Santa Rally With ETFs And Stocks

After a spectacular six-year bull run, the U.S. stock market got caught up in a nasty web of never-ending worries. It all started with the collapse in oil prices. Then came the instability in Greece, global growth concerns and the uncertainty of the Fed rate hike. Persistent weakness in China and the slump in commodities aggravated the woes. As a result, the S&P 500 and Dow Jones indices are trading in the red in the year-to-date frame, losing 1% and 2.3%, respectively. But the trend might reverse heading into the winter holidays if Santa pays a call. A Santa rally has gained coinage in the investment world, referring to the increase in stock prices in the final week of the calendar year (i.e. between Christmas and New Year’s Day) and extending into the first two days of the New Year. According to the 2016 Stock Trader’s Almanac , the Santa Claus rally has yielded average positive returns of 1.4% in 34 of the past 45 holiday seasons since 1969. Other research also confirmed this trend. If we dig into historical data dating back to 1896, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has a track record of gaining an average of 1.7% during this seven-day trading period. And this has happened 77% of the time. Santa on The Way! The Fed has raised interest rates for the first time in nearly a decade with a dovish view for future hikes. It is a clear signal that the U.S. economy has largely emerged from the impact of a financial crisis supported by solid labor market fundamentals and a gradually increasing inflation rate. This in turn has lifted consumer confidence, providing a boost to the stock market, setting the tune for a Santa rally. This is especially true as the stock market gained momentum at the start of this week with both the S&P 500 and Dow Jones gaining 1.7% each. Further, year-end seasonal factors such as holiday optimism, tax-related affairs, people investing their Christmas bonuses, short sellers going on vacation, and the “January effect” added to the strength. As such, Santa seems to be just round the corner but the rout in commodities and the resultant stress in the junk bond space could block its way. Nevertheless, the oil price has rebounded slightly from their 11-year low, bolstering hopes of a bullish market. As hopes start building for a Santa rally, we have highlighted a trio of ETFs and stocks that could provide investors with happy returns in the coming days and weeks. ETFs to Buy While there are a number of ETFs that are expected to benefit from the Santa Claus rally, we have highlighted three growth funds that have a higher potential to move upward when the markets go up. These products have been leading the broad market by a wide margin and have a top Zacks ETF Rank of 1 or ‘Strong Buy’. Further, these provide a broad play across various sectors rather than specific ones. PowerShares Dynamic Large Cap Growth Portfolio (NYSEARCA: PWB ) This ETF provides a pure exposure to the large cap growth segment of the broad U.S. equity market by tracking the Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index. The fund is widely diversified across 50 securities with each holding less than 3.5% of total assets. From a sector look, consumer discretionary takes the top spot at 32% while information technology, healthcare and consumer staples round off the next three spots. The product has accumulated around $415.3 million in its asset base and charges 58 bps in fees per year. It gained 6.4% so far this year. iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (NYSEARCA: IWY ) This fund offers exposure to 139 large U.S. companies whose earnings are expected to grow at an above-average rate relative to the market. It is concentrated in the technology sector and the top firm – Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) – occupies 8.2% of the basket while the other firms hold no more than 3.4% share. Consumer discretionary, healthcare and consumer staples also receive double-digit allocation each. The fund has amassed $559.3 million in AUM and has an expense ratio of 0.20%. IWY is up 5.6% in 2015. First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (NYSEARCA: FTC ) This fund provides a slightly active choice as it uses the AlphaDEX methodology to select the stock. The methodology seeks to narrow the large cap space to only the best positioned growth companies, eliminating the bottom ranked 25% of the stocks. This approach results in a basket of 177 stocks, which are widely spread across various securities with none holding more than 1.21% share. More than one-fourth of the portfolio is skewed toward consumer discretionary, followed by information technology (19.5%), healthcare (13.5%), consumer staples (13.0%) and industrials (12.8%). The product has $714.8 million in AUM and charges 63 bps in annual fees. It added 3.2% in the year-to-date time frame. Stocks to Buy For stocks, we have chosen three top picks using the Zacks Screener that fits our six criteria: a Zacks Rank #1, a Growth Style Score of ‘A’, Zacks Industry Rank within the top 15%, positive estimate revision for the current year, market cap of over 1 billion and year-to-date price performance in excess of the broad market returns. Here are the three chosen stocks. American Woodmark Corp. (NASDAQ: AMWD ) Based in Winchester, VA, American Woodmark is a major manufacturer and distributor of kitchen cabinets and vanities for the remodeling and home construction markets in the United States. The company has seen solid earnings estimate revisions of 8 cents for the current quarter over the past 30 days and delivered positive earnings surprises in the last four quarters, with an average beat of 35.40%. The stock has a solid Zacks Industry Rank in the top 5% and has doubled its returns in the year-to-date time frame. Integrated Device Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: IDTI ) Based in San Jose, CA, Integrated Device is engaged in designing, developing, manufacturing, and marketing a wide range of high-performance semiconductor products and modules for the communications, computing, and consumer industries worldwide. The company has seen earnings estimates rising by a penny for the current quarter over the past 30 days and delivered average positive earnings surprises of 10.04% in the last four quarters. Further, Integrated Device has an Industry Zacks Rank in the top 15% and gained over 37% this year. Leidos Holdings Inc. (NYSE: LDOS ) Based in Reston, VA, Leidos Holdings delivers solutions and services in the national security, health, and engineering markets in the United States and internationally. It has seen earnings estimate revision of 3 cents for the current quarter over the past 30 days and generated an average earnings surprise of 22.44% in the last four quarters. The stock is up 27.3% this year and has an Industry Zacks Rank in the top 15%. Bottom Line As the positive momentum starts to build in the market this week, Santa might definitely be on the way to give bountiful gifts to investors and set the tone for the New Year. Original Post

GREK Seems Just Fairly Valued, But Many Of Its Individual Stocks Are Undervalued

Summary My rough bottoms-up valuation of the GREK index reveals just fair overall valuation. Greek banks now represent less than 5% of the GREK, and I consider them a long-term call option costing me roughly 5% of the index. While the overall GREK index looks just fairly valued, the low median values reveal that there are many very cheap individual stocks. These stocks are cheap for a reason, such as high debt, falling sales and often energy sector dependence. The general theme of Greece has come out of the headlines recently. However, its banks were very much in the spotlight in the past weeks as their stocks crashed following the expected stock dilution and lukewarm interest from institutional investors to take part in the recapitalization. With the Greek banks’ bad news getting gradually priced in, I wanted to reexamine the Global X FTSE Greece 20 ETF (NYSEARCA: GREK ) index now and attempt to make a very rough bottoms-up valuation to see if there is an attractive investing opportunity. My analysis revealed several surprises and facts, which I would like to share with my readers now. Fact #1: There is very little downside risk in GREK from the Greek banks now With year-to-date returns of Alpha Bank ( OTCPK:ALBKY ), National Bank of Greece ( OTCPK:NBGGY ), Eurobank ( OTCPK:EGFEY ) and Piraeus Bank ( OTCPK:BPIRF ) up to negative 99%, the total weight of the Greek banks in GREK has been diminished to below 5%. This significantly reduces the risk of a large decline in GREK. The GREK options implied that volatility has fallen recently to reflect this lower downside risk. So I now consider the Greek banks as a call option that costs less than 5% of the GREK index and never expires. Not only is the banks’ weight on the index insignificant, but the banks are also usually valued using industry-specific valuation metrics. Valuing them using traditional broad market valuation metrics would just distort the entire picture. Due to these two facts, I decided to simply ignore the banks in the valuation and treat them as the 5% call option that never expires. So what exactly is GREK made of? Here is the list of the current top 25 holdings, representing the overwhelming majority of the total index value, sorted by their weights on the index. The holdings and their weights are updated as of December 17, 2015 and provided my Morningstar. (click to enlarge) Source: Morningstar, author’s recalculations Financial ratio metrics I recalculated the index weight values by summing up holdings of the same company in the form of its primary stock listing (usually listed in the Athens stock exchange) and its ADR form. Here is the updated list, which simplifies things and shows a clearer picture of the holdings, including the financial ratio metrics. (click to enlarge) Source: author’s calculations based on data from Bloomberg, Morningstar, Gurufocus, Yahoo finance and Finviz A quick warning on methodology Please bear in mind that some of the data was hard to get and calculate, and had to be obtained from several sources that may not be using a consistent methodology. While most data incorporates the third quarter 2015 numbers, which include the tough period of bank transaction limits, etc., some minor data was available for the June quarter only. Therefore, an error margin should be much wider than usual, at least plus and minus 20% in the valuation metrics. Otherwise, the valuation is very representative because it takes into account ~92% of the GREK index’s holdings, omitting just the ~5% attributed to the banks for the reasons described above, and also ignoring about 3% of GREK that comes from some below 1% positions. The total GREK metrics calculations are made using a weighted average, with the values being weighted by the stock’s index weight. Negative or N/A values are ignored, and the weights of the remaining valid values are increased proportionally to make up 100%. Surprising fact #2: the GREK index as a whole looks fully valued using most financial metrics The overall dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is just 1.25%, nothing to attract income investors (even if the other risks were ignored). Other metrics are not faring much better. Consider the following. Trailing-twelve-month P/E not very attractive The average trailing-twelve-month P/E of the GREK index is ~16.14x. This is roughly on par with the U.S. and many European or other indexes of economies that are in much better shape, with much more predictable future political and economic environment. So this is a big disappointment, but in times of economic distress, P/E’s may be abnormally high or low as they near bottoms. Some commodity and energy-related GREK stocks are arguably at a deep through of the current cycle. The negative P/Es were ignored, so the calculation takes into account ~86.50% of the total index; the 10% of the index has negative earnings, and the remaining 5% are the banks. The high P/E for the two largest constituents, which are not very cyclical and represent ~40% of GREK, are not very enticing. On the other hand, if we look at the more important cash earnings, the P/FCF figures for these two largest stocks are much lower and arguably quite attractive. Trailing-twelve-month Price/free cash flow is more attractive than the TTM P/E The weighted average TTM P/FCF came in at ~13.31x. This is not bad at all given what Greece and their companies have had to go through in the past twelve months, though the largest constituent, Coca Cola HBC ( OTC:CCHBF ), is predominantly export-oriented. Nevertheless, investors can buy many companies outside of Greece with even lower P/FCF ratios and arguably similar or better prospects or at least less political and economic risk, such as even Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ), or International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM ), or Xerox (NYSE: XRX ). The P/FCF calculation includes ~85% of the index weight. About 10% of the index has negative FCF, and the remaining 5% are the banks, which were excluded. The forward P/E is even a bit worse than the TTM P/E The weighted average forward P/E currently stands at ~16.94x, as represented by just ~54% of the index. The rest of the constituents either don’t provide forward guidance or I was not able to obtain one. So the forward P/E is less representative but not very attractive nonetheless and carries a higher risk of ending significantly off the mark as many factors are either unpredictable or not factored in the guidance. The Price-to-sales and price-to-book is similar to other markets and not very attractive The weighted average P/S came in at ~1.40x and the P/B is ~1.60x. This is nothing out of the normal range typical for other markets and doesn’t really entice much buying when so many markets with similar valuations are available to international investors. However, some companies within the average show very attractively low P/S and P/B values, indicating distress but also potential attractive deep value plays for patient investors. These include the energy sector stocks, such as Motor Oil (Hellas) Corinth Refineries SA ( OTCPK:MOHCY ), Hellenic petroleum SA (ATH:ELPE), and Public Power Corporation of Greece ( OTCPK:PUPOF ), as well as others such as Ellaktor SA ( OTCPK:ELLKY ). However, many of them carry relatively high debt and other risks. The important fact #3: Using EV/EBIT and EV/EBITDA, GREK trades at about half the S&P 500 valuation The average EV/EBIT stands at ~11.6x and is calculated using 85% of the index. The remaining 10% has negative enterprise value or negative EV/EBIT and was ignored, as were the banks. The average EV/EBITDA is ~5.7x and was derived from ~88% of the stocks weight, with ~7% being EV/EBITDA negative or having negative enterprise value, with the banks being excluded again. For a comparison, the aggregate S&P 500 EV/EBITDA currently stands at around 10x while the median value is around 11x and is arguably overvalued as a group. The GREK index trades at about a half of the EV valuation of the S&P 500. In other words, GREK would have to DOUBLE in order to trade at the same valuation as the S&P 500. And EV metrics for some individual GREK stocks are even more attractive. For example, Coca Cola HBG trades at just ~3.5x EV/EBIT and 2.29 EV/EBITDA thanks to its high debt leverage. The most important fact #4: while overall GREK valuation looks full, the mean averages are much lower, signaling plenty of individual stock opportunities in GREK While mean valuations for the U.S. indexes are mostly higher than the weighted average, in GREK, the opposite is true. There are many stocks cheaper than the overall index. In other words, while the U.S. S&P index valuation masks how expensive many of its individual stocks are, the GREK index’s seemingly unattractive overall valuation hides many undervalued stocks beneath the surface. For example, the median P/B is just 0.91, below 1x, signaling clear distress in parts of the index, especially the energy. I believe it is worth it for investors to go through the individual Greek stocks and pick the best spots rather than buy the overall index, which in itself is only fairly priced and future returns will be just average in my opinion (5% to 10% per year with high political and economic risk). Several GREK individual stock ideas for further research 1. Coca Cola HBC While the company trades at a seemingly high P/E and forward P/E, the cash metric, trailing P/FCF is sitting at just ~11x. 3.5x EV/EBIT and 2.29 EV/EBITDA are very low as well. The problem, of course, is the relatively high debt/capital ratio as well as other potential risks that need to be analyzed in more detail before buying. 2. Several other companies There are many companies trading at very attractive valuation metrics, and their individual risk profiles and future outlooks have to be carefully examined before jumping in. These include Athens Water Supply & Sewerage ( OTCPK:AHWSF ), Folli Follie ( OTCPK:FLLIY ), and Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics ( OTCPK:GOFPY ). 3. Many energy-related bargains, mostly carrying higher risk Metka SA trades at just ~6x P/E. However, it is FCF negative. As an engineering contractor, it has been negatively impacted by the energy sector weakness. However, the 2.28x EV/EBIT and 1.45x EV/EBITDA look very cheap if the company manages to survive through the downcycle. There are also several companies trading at depressed valuations due to being closely tied to falling energy prices, such as Public Power Corporation of Greece , Motor Oil (Hellas) Corinth Refineries , and Hellenic petroleum (ATH:ELPE) and Ellaktor , which trade at rock-bottom P/S ratios but carry mostly very high risk due to low commodity prices and high debt. Risks Besides the specific risks in the individual stocks, such as debt and falling sales and margins, the GREK and its constituents are prone to very high political and economic risks that may include higher taxes, price controls, and even an outright nationalization or semi-permanent strikes, revolutions, and boycotts of local sales by the local population. Conclusion While the overall GREK index does not look cheap given all the extra risks involved with Greece, the low median valuations reveal that there are many individual companies in the index that are attractively priced. However, they also carry individual risks such as high debt and more. Some individual stocks worth further investigation include Coca Cola HBG, Metka, Athens Water Supply & Sewerage, Folli Follie, and Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics. There are also several energy-related companies trading at distressed P/S ratios carrying high debt and cyclical risk. Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.