Tag Archives: game

Asset Allocation For 2016

Key views: 1-3 months: short Gold long DAX long XLY / short XLP 6-12 months: short XAUUSD short XLE / long SPX long GBPJPY 12+ months: short R2K / long SPX short AUDNZD In spite of the ugly start of the year, I do not think there have been fundamental changes in the global markets since a year ago. A regime shift actually occurred in 2014-2015. By that time, the global economy had managed to stage a mostly uninterrupted, albeit very slow, recovery. In 2014, it became clear that the global market cycle was entering its late stage. At that time, risk asset valuations had reached “fair value” levels across the asset classes, following 5 years of a fairly re-rating on the back of extremely accommodative monetary policy globally. The Fed then made it clear that monetary policy would gradually tighten and the markets priced this in rapidly, mostly by bidding up the US dollar and selling short dated treasuries. Due to the still deeply embedded remains of the “forward guidance”, the market moves were big, prompting volatility to return to more normal levels not seen in years. At the same time, the US economy began showing signs of mid-cycle dynamics, with the unemployment rate sharply falling closer towards most estimates of NAIRU, consumer confidence rising to cyclical highs and M&A activity surging. The environment in which most of today’s prime-aged investment professionals built their careers is characterized by “irrational exuberance”, with stock market valuations typically ballooning during the bull markets and deflating rapidly during recessions. Many got burned in the process and I do not think that the industry will get ahead of itself once again. It is more likely that valuations would remain at fundamentally justified levels (rather than trending up persistently), with the stock market only collapsing in case of catastrophic outcomes. In addition to the US financial and economic cycles, a few other cycles are important for understanding the current regime. The commodity cycle is still in its downtrend. I do not think anyone is good enough at forecasting spot prices of commodities based on supply and demand fundamentals. The safest strategy is to look at where the trend is and stick to it until it reverses. This is how CTAs have been making money for decades trading commodities and I feel no need to reinvent the wheel. The commodity price decline is fundamentally related to a number of other developments: a continued evolution of the global economy from manufacturing to services, the weakening demand from China, the fracking revolution and more recently the rise of the US dollar. All these interrelated trends are putting an immense amount of pressure on emerging economies. While emerging market currencies have fallen substantially, a more decisive shift from the old growth model will be required in order to adjust to the evolving world. There will inevitably be both winners and losers in this game. Equivalently, the developed market economies are experiencing a similar challenge, with manufacturing and extraction showing signs of continued weakness, and tight financial conditions depressing US corporate earnings. Going forward, I anticipate a continuation of the desynchronized market patterns across the world and return of volatility to normal levels. My hunch is that strategists and fund managers in the industry generally seem to be experiencing quite low levels of conviction in their views. There is also a healthy amount of bears in the market, which should lead to a better balance, despite higher volatility. In such an environment, relative value trades will be a much more important source of return generation compared to simple exposure to broad markets. Quantitative indicators for “alpha potential” from bottom-up stock picking have still not normalized (even though it has improved), so I expect that single stock selection will still struggle in 2016. However, big picture long/short macro positions should work well at the time when most investors continue to fret over whether we are in a bull or a bear market. In 2016, cross-asset performance will be driven by a small number of key risks. The most important ones: US Monetary policy, Chinese economic slowdown and the commodity price collapse. I will be writing about these, as well as about my key trades, in the following weeks, so stay tuned.

More Currency-Hedged ETFs From WisdomTree

WisdomTree Investments (NASDAQ: WETF ) is the name of the game in the currency-hedged equities ETFs space. Though other big issuers like State Street and bellwether iShares of BlackRock are now looking to beef up their currency-hedged portfolio, WisdomTree seems in no mood to give up its top rank among the currency-hedged ETFs’ space (read: Can Anyone Match WisdomTree in Currency-Hedged ETFs? ). After all, the investing paradigm will now be in focus as the Fed is on the course of policy tightening and the most developed economies are walking along the easy-money path. Among them, the Euro zone and the Japan are under the spell of QE polices. Thanks to this policy differential, the greenback will likely gain strength in the coming days while other developed currencies will lose it. Probably this is why WisdomTree rolled out four currency-hedged ETFs lately, each with a focus on dividends. Let’s delve a little deeper: WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (BATS: DDWM ) The newly launched fund seeks to provide exposure to dividend-paying companies in the industrialized world ex U.S. and Canada while hedging exposure to fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies (read : 2 Excellent Dividend Growth ETFs in Focus ). With this focus, the index currently holds a well-diversified basket with HSBC Holdings, Nestle SA and GlaxoSmithKline Plc as the top three holdings. In fact, the fund also provides a nice exposure to various sectors. Financials tops the list with 47.9% allocation, followed by Industrials with 24.5%, Consumer Staples with 23.4% and Consumer Discretionary with 22.9% of the basket. Country-wise, United Kingdom and Japan get double-digit exposure. The fund charges 35 bps in fees. Competition: The newly launched product is likely to face competition from quite a number of funds prevalent in the global equities space. Still, a few ETFs can emerge as strong contenders. The db X-trackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity Fund (NYSEARCA: DBAW ) and the MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: HDAW ) are some of the examples. WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (BATS: DDLS ) The fund looks to track the small-cap dividend-paying companies of the industrialized economy outside of the U.S. and Canada while offering currency-hedging exposure. The fund is pretty well spread out across components with no firm making up more than 0.56% of assets. Salmar ASA, Cofinimmo and Ladbrokes Plc are the top three holdings of the index. The ETF is skewed toward Industrials (48.8%), Consumer Discretionary (41.2%) and Financials (35.6%). In terms of country allocation, Japan (27.9%), U.K. (16.3%) and Australia (10.9%) take the leading positions. The fund’s net expense ratio is 0.43% annually. Competition: The foreign mid and small cap equities ETF space is relatively less jam-packed. In the set, while non-hedged small-cap ETFs like the FTSE All-World ex-US Small Cap Index ETF (NYSEARCA: VSS ) and the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: PDN ) pose as threats, products like the Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: HSCZ ) may give direct competition. WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged Europe Equity Fund (BATS: DDEZ ) This one follows the same strategy with a focus on European stocks. In terms of country allocation, Germany, France, Spain and Italy are leading with double-digit exposure. Company-specific concentration risk is moderate with around 4.25% exposure. Anheuser-Busch InBev NV, Banco Santander SA and Total SA are the top three holdings of the fund. The fund has a tilt toward Financials (46.9%) while Industrials, Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples and Utilities account for considerable weight in the fund. The fund’s net expense ratio is 0.43% annually. Competition: The hedged Europe equities ETFs are teeming with products. The WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: HEDJ ) , the Deutsche X-trackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DBEU ) and the ProShares Hedged FTSE Europe ETF (NYSEARCA: HGEU ) are to give neck-and-neck competition. WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged Japan Equity Fund (BATS: DDJP ) Obviously, there will be a separate fund for Japan with the above-mentioned investment objective. WisdomTree already has several successful currency-hedged ETFs on Japan. Toyota Motors, NTT DoCoMo, Nippon Telegraph are the top three holdings of the fund. No stock accounts for more than 4.60% of the basket. Consumer Discretionary (41.9%), Industrials (39.4%) and Financials (33.1%) are the top three sectors of the fund. Competition: The likely peers of this newbie are the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Dividend Growth ETF (NYSEARCA: JHDG ) , the WisdomTree Japan Dividend Growth Fund (NYSEARCA: JDG ) and the Deutsche X-trackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DBJP ) . Link to the original article on Zacks.com

Fair Value, Like A Reliable But Tardy Guest, Is Always Late And Always Arrives

Many investors like to repeat John Maynard Keynes’ overquoted quip about how the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent. There are numerous problems with this saying, especially when taken out of context, since as long as you don’t use margin you should always remain solvent. Those who go overboard with investing, as with anything else in life, will sometimes be rewarded in the short run but will inevitably fail in the long run. Those who bet on extremes becoming more extreme will similarly often prosper for some unknown period of time, but will eventually lose in the end because all assets eventually revisit fair value. After doing so, whatever had been previously wildly trendy and overvalued usually ends up becoming roughly equally despised and underpriced. Thus, if you can consistently buy gradually into whatever has become the greatest percentage below its fair value, and sell whatever has become the most stretched above its fair value, you will have a method, which will be highly successful in the long run. It will also be consistently unpopular for others to follow, because you will be buying near the end of an extended bear market when everyone is gloomy and you will be selling anything when its recent outperformance encourages almost everyone to anticipate indefinite additional future gains. If we look at U.S. equity indices through the decades, there is a pattern in which nearly all bear markets and especially the most severe ones often begin with underperformance by thousands of small-cap shares. IWM tracks the Russell 2000, which represents U.S. companies 1001 through 3000 by market capitalization. IWM moved above 120 in early March 2014, having enjoyed a powerful bull market for just about exactly five years. Since then, it has fluctuated in both directions and briefly set a new peak in June 2015, but is now trading below 120. Most investors are unaware of this development, but ignorance is certainly not bliss as this persistent underperformance by small-cap U.S. equities relative to their large-cap counterparts is classically how bull markets transition to bear markets. Until nearly the end of 2015, investors responded to this divergence by crowding increasingly intensely into fewer and fewer advancing securities – much as they had previously done in years including 1929, 1972, and other periods when buying U.S. stocks was especially popular and ultimately disastrous. Even in 2007, small-cap U.S. indices peaked in the spring and early summer while many of the most popular names continued to climb until almost the end of that year. If investors believe they can remain ahead of the game by shifting from small caps to large caps, it is similar to switching into a first-class cabin on the Titanic instead of heading for a lifeboat. You will enjoy fine luxury for a while, but in the end, you won’t survive. Those who have been buying the “fang” stocks (Facebook (NASDAQ: FB ), Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN ), Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ), Google (NASDAQ: GOOG )) did wonderfully in recent months, but will end up in the poorhouse because wildly overvalued and trendy names in each generation end up just like the “Nifty Fifty” did during 1973-1974, collapsing far worse than the broader market during a sustained downturn. Already in 2016, we are getting a taste of what is in store for the next two years or so for what had been the most popular securities of 2015. This is appropriate, since the high-dividend favorites of 2014 including utilities (NYSEARCA: XLU ), REITs (NYSEARCA: IYR ), and U.S. Treasuries (NYSEARCA: TLT ) slumped throughout most of 2015 after having briefly climbed to even more overvalued peaks in January 2015. If money is coming out of nearly all of these former investor favorites, where is it going to go? Real estate has also become irrationally overvalued and will eventually suffer the same fate as Netflix and Amazon. Even the relatively steady S&P 500 Index has been repeatedly unable to set new all-time highs since it had topped out on May 20, 2015. Investors have been continuing to abandon the least popular sectors of recent years, making all-time record outflows from nearly all assets involved with commodity production and emerging markets. However, even the worst bear markets end eventually, and since they represent a high percentage of the bargains, which are currently available, they will ultimately rebound enough to attract the attention of momentum players and many others who don’t like to buy into the cheapest prices but wait until they observe that a recovery has been “confirmed.” Of course, there is no such thing as true confirmation, since anything can rise or fall at any time. However, whenever any asset has become so cheap that it could double or triple and still be below fair value, then it will often behave in a subsequent bull market by being among the top performers and eventually becoming as irrationally overvalued, as it had been previously undervalued. It works the other way too, so that the most popular assets often become the least popular a few years later. The U.S. dollar is a classic example of a wildly loved currency that climbed to its highest point in 2015 since April 2003, but has been unable to remain above its highs from March 2015. The U.S. dollar index has repeatedly climbed towards or above 100 and has failed to hold above that level. Investors have flooded into bets on a higher greenback while sentiment has rarely been more bullish, but market behavior hasn’t responded by staging an appropriate rally extension. Instead, resistance keeps reappearing and investors keep getting more optimistic. This is how major tops are formed. Instead of rising further to 110 or 120 as most observers currently expect, an equal move the opposite way to 90 and then 80 is a far more likely scenario for the U.S. dollar index in 2016 and perhaps the early months of 2017. Even mentioning to someone that you are anticipating a significantly lower U.S. dollar will get people seriously questioning your sanity, which thereby makes it far more likely to occur. Ultimately, whatever is last shall be first and vice versa. Expect to see the least popular assets of recent years finally enjoying a year or more in the sunshine of strong bull markets, while the most sought-after assets of recent years will severely disappoint holders with losses generally exceeding half. Probably most investors can’t imagine their Nasdaq favorites or San Francisco/Vancouver/Tel Aviv real estate losing more than half their current valuations, but that is what is going to happen. Fair value seems elusive and unachievable, until it is inevitably achieved and usually far surpassed in the opposite direction. Disclosure: Whenever they have appeared to be especially depressed, I have been buying the shares of funds, which invest either in emerging-market assets or in the shares of commodity producers, since I believe these are among the two most undervalued sectors in a world where real estate and U.S. equity indices remain dangerously overvalued. As the extremely popular U.S. dollar stuns investors by suffering a bear market instead of continued gains as almost everyone is expecting, this will lead to a major upward revision in global inflationary expectations. From my largest to my smallest position, I currently own GDXJ, KOL, SIL, XME, HDGE, COPX, GDX, EWZ, RSX, REMX, GLDX, URA, FCG, IDX, GXG, VGPMX, ECH, VNM, BGEIX, NGE, RSXJ, PLTM, EPU, TUR, SILJ, SOIL, EPHE, and THD. I expect the S&P 500 to eventually lose roughly two thirds of its May 20, 2015 peak valuation of 2134.72, with its next bear-market bottom perhaps occurring in late 2017 or early 2018. The Russell 2000 Index and its funds including IWM are trading below their levels from the first week of March 2014; small-cap U.S. equities typically lead the entire U.S. equity market lower as they have done in past decades including 1928-1929, 1972-1973, and 2007. Those who have “forgotten” or never learned the lessons of previous bear markets are doomed to repeat their mistakes.