Tag Archives: financial

To Hedge Or Not To Hedge International? Revisiting The Question

Summary Currency-hedged ETFs have become a popular vehicle for international diversification with hedged currency risk. But the U.S. dollar trade has become a “crowded” and increasingly volatile trade. Does it make sense to utilize currency-hedged products in the current market environment or is it just “return chasing”? Currency-hedged ETFs have been around since 2010, but with the US dollar so strong relative to other currencies they have been gaining in popularity with investors seeking to reduce the currency risk in their portfolios. Through July there were more than 327 currency hedged products available globally, capturing an estimated $118 billion in assets. An estimated $47 billion have landed in currency-hedged products this year, representing 40% of passive flows into international products. Below is a table with the names and tickers of the largest currency-hedged ETFs: Source: ETF.com Currency-hedged international equity products can boost returns when the local currency is weakening against the dollar, but they can also be a drag on returns if the dollar weakens. Most currency-hedged ETFs use “currency forwards” to hedge currency exposure and if the trade is executed correctly, currency exposure is neutralized. The foreign currency markets can be very volatile. Just this week, the Euro rose four cents in one day against the dollar after the European Central Bank’s stimulus measures came in well short of expectations. As another example, the Swiss franc jumped by 30% in a matter of minutes last January. And then of course there was China’s currency devaluation over the summer. And ever since the global financial crisis, foreign currency volatility has markedly increased in the era of quantitative easing (QE) and monetary policy intervention. This trend has been exacerbated over the last few years thanks to the growing economic divergence between the U.S. economy and the rest of the world’s. The U.S. has emerged since the financial crisis as one of the stronger economies on the globe. Economic and currency divergence has resulted in a substantial difference in returns between hedged and unhedged investments in several regions including Developed Markets (EAFE), Emerging Markets (EM), Europe, Japan, and Germany as depicted in the chart below. (click to enlarge) Source: Bloomberg So given the fact that it is likely the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates this December, further strengthening the position of the dollar, it seems like a “no brainer” to hedge international investments. But is it? The sharp spike in the Euro relative to the dollar recently illustrates that the dollar trade is a very “crowded” trade and as a result also subject to wide swings in volatility. Even Fed Chair Janet Yellen said much of the divergence is already priced into the dollar. So by utilizing currency-hedged ETFs, as an investor are you merely piling into an already crowded trade and chasing returns? Long-term Risk Reduction Most academics would argue that over the long-term, currency investing is a zero-sum game and currency volatility cancels out over time. But currency movement does still add risk and volatility to investor portfolios. Investors unhedged to currency have excess exposure to the U.S. dollar and a rising dollar environment can severely compromise their international returns. By eliminating a form of uncompensated risk, hedging currency exposure over the long-term can serve to reduce risk and volatility. Short-term Tactical Trade As a short-term trade, currency-hedged products can also be utilized tactically to capture opportunities created by monetary policy shifts. Investors tactically playing the EU’s monetary stimulus trade for example, have been handsomely rewarded even considering the recent rally of the Euro relative to the dollar. Investors considering currency-hedged products must also consider the cost to hedge as part of their decision making process. Currency-hedged products typically have higher expense ratios and there is also a “carry cost” associated with the forward contracts. Much of the cost of the hedge is based on the interest rate differential, which provides an advantage to U.S.-based investors. Most funds reset their forwards monthly, so that may also inhibit the effectiveness of the hedge, especially in very volatile markets. But overall, currency-hedged products are a nice tool to have in the investment arsenal to help provide international diversification while mitigating currency risk. A 100% Hedge? So should investors hedge all of their international exposure in the current market environment given that much of the divergence and “flight to quality” trade has already played out? It is very easy for investors to mistime hedging. For example, there is historical evidence that the dollar tends to sell off initially after the first Fed rate hike, experiencing a “sell on the news” phenomenon. Analyzing the change in the dollar index after the last three rate hikes, the dollar has sold off the 3 months after the initial increase. (click to enlarge) A More “Balanced” Approach So perhaps the best strategy is a more balanced approach to help minimize downside risk without over penalizing upside opportunity. One such potential implementation is to allocate half (50%) of one’s international exposure to unhedged products and the other half (50%) to hedged. Along those lines, investors can create this paired exposure quite efficiently themselves with a 50/50 allocation. Another option is to utilize a 50/50 hedge ETF such as IndexIQ’s three 50% hedge products: the IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (NYSEARCA: HFXI ), the IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE Europe ETF (NYSEARCA: HFXE ), and the IQ 50 Percent Hedged Japan (NYSEARCA: HFXJ ). IndexIQ, which is part of New York Life’s MainStay Investments, makes a compelling case for what they call in their white paper this “hedge of least regret.” And WisdomTree (NASDAQ: WETF ) recently filed for four dynamic hedging ETFs that will adjust currency hedging ratios ranging from 0 to 100 using currency-related quantitative inputs. In conclusion, currency-hedged products do indeed make sense over the long-term, but given that much of the strong dollar trade has already been priced into the market, hedging all of one’s international exposure, at least in the short-term, may be too much of a good thing.

An Aggressive Portfolio For Investors Using Modern Portfolio Theory

Summary The aggressive allocation strategy incorporates a mere 15% of the portfolio to bonds. The portfolio also contains 8% to utilities and 25% to equity REITs which are sensitive to movements in interest rates. This kind of portfolio is designed for an investor that can bear substantial risk and is willing to have the portfolio rebalanced at regular intervals. I’ve selected a combination of the Schwab and Vanguard funds that I find attractive. Several are in my portfolio. Facing expectations for an increase in domestic short-term rates, portfolio strategy has been on my mind. Frequent readers will know that I cover mREITs a great deal and invest a material portion of my portfolio in the mREITs that I consider most attractive. In this piece, I want to talk about a strategy that I think would be very reasonable for the rest of the portfolio. Before we get into the allocations, I want to stress that this is designed as an aggressive portfolio and for many investors, this portfolio would simply be too risky. I have a long-time horizon, and aggressive allocations make sense for me. Each investor should carefully consider their circumstances. The Strategy I feel that a portfolio like this would be most useful under MPT (Modern Portfolio Theory). The portfolio would be designed with the expectation of frequently rebalancing positions. That can be a problem for investors that are holding their positions across several accounts or don’t have free trading on the securities. Several of these ETFs will qualify for free trading through either Schwab or Vanguard but not both. I’d love to see each of those brokerages bring out additional funds to make it possible for an investor to select funds from only one brokerage for this strategy. It might be possible through Vanguard, but I’m more familiar with Schwab’s international options. Tax Exempt For the purpose of this article, I’m assuming the accounts are retirement accounts that are tax exempt. Some investors may figure that this would be a problem because the employer sponsored 401k is unlikely to have all of these options, but I’ve personally had success with rolling former employer 401k accounts into IRA accounts. The heavy weight for domestic equity REITs would be fairly strange for an investor facing higher income taxes on the position. Asset Allocation That domestic total allocation of 65% could be treated as a home country bias and there may be some arguments for moving that combined position down to 60% of the total portfolio so that international positions and bonds can be increased. For now, I’m going to go with 65% in the combination of domestic equity and domestic equity REITs. Many investors may think 40% into traditional equity with 25% into equity REITs is incredibly heavy on equity REITs, but I see the lack of corporate taxation as a huge and durable advantage for providing superior growth. Domestic Equity The first 40% gets broken up between three funds: I’ve used the Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHB ) over the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (NYSEARCA: VTI ) on the basis of a .01% lower expense ratio. This is fairly small, but I’m long both ETFs in different accounts. I’m also using the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHD ) and love the defensive allocations. In this case, I opted to use the broad market ETF because I’m combining it with the Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (NYSEARCA: VDC ) and the Vanguard Utilities ETF (NYSEARCA: VPU ) to make the combined domestic equity position significantly more defensive. Equity REITs This is fairly simple. Investors could use the Vanguard REIT Index ETF (NYSEARCA: VNQ ) or the Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHH ). For investors seeking higher dividend payouts, the easy answer is VNQ. Since I have a very long time until the retirement and the portfolios are very similar, I’ve been adding more to my SCHH holdings since it has free trading a lower expense ratio. International As I noted at the start of the article, I’m more familiar with Schwab’s international options than with Vanguard’s. The Schwab International Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHF ) gets only 5% of the portfolio and matches the Schwab Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHE ). The heaviest weight goes to the Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHC ) because I want the international equity allocations to favor smaller companies on the assumption that they will earn more of their revenues from the international market. I don’t have much use for overweighting multinational companies that happen to have their headquarters in a different country. Therefore, I prefer the smaller companies in this space. Bonds I went with a mix of the Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF to get very high credit quality (including treasuries) and fairly moderate duration and the Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index ETF (NASDAQ: VCLT ) for a higher yield. The long duration on high credit quality corporate issues allows the fund to still exhibit a negative correlation with the S&P 500 while offering significantly stronger yields than treasury securities of the same long maturity. One Problem Using a portfolio like this would be ideal for an aggressive investor that is ready to put a rebalancing plan in place. Some of the brokerages will offer options to create an automatic portfolio and will allow users to influence the allocations. When I tested out Schwab’s feature for it, I was disappointed to find that some of my favorite Schwab funds were not included in the options. Of course, Schwab also does not have an equivalent option to VDC or VPU in its group of funds with extremely low expense ratios. If it rolls out an option that would allow automatic rebalancing across the account with my favorite ETFs included, I would be very interested in trying it. I wouldn’t want to incorporate my mREIT positions into that part of the portfolio, but I would feel comfortable designing a weighting system for the rest of my portfolio that would be automatically rebalanced. One of the funds I was disappointed to see excluded from the system was SCHH. Since this kind of rebalancing system would be problematic outside of tax-exempt accounts, I would really want to be able to run a heavy equity REIT allocation. Conclusion I’d love to see brokers continue to develop their portfolio management tools so that it is simple for investors to set up a portfolio like this. They would need to be careful about handling things such as rebalancing and allow investors to set a goal like to rebalance individual positions when the bid-ask spread is only one cent.

Valuation Dashboard: Financials – Update

Summary 4 key factors are reported across industries in the Financial sector. They give a valuation status of industries relative to their history. They give a reference for picking stocks in each industry. This is part of a monthly series of articles giving a valuation dashboard in sectors and industries. The idea is to follow up a certain number of fundamental factors for every sector, to compare them to historical averages. This article covers Financials. The choice of the fundamental ratios used in this study has been justified here and here . You can find in this article numbers that may be useful in a top-down approach. There is no analysis of individual stocks. You can refine your research reading articles by industry experts here . A link to a list of stocks to consider is provided in the conclusion. Methodology Four industry factors calculated by portfolio123 are extracted from the database: Price/Earnings (P/E), Price to sales (P/S), Price to free cash flow (P/FCF), Return on Equity (ROE). They are compared with their own historical averages “Avg”. The difference is measured in percentage for valuation ratios and in absolute for ROE, and named “D-xxx” if xxx is the factor’s name. For example, D-P/E = (AvgP/E – P/E)/AvgP/E. It can be interpreted as a percentage in under-pricing relative to a historical baseline: the higher, the better. It points to over-pricing when negative. ROE is already a percentage. A relative variation makes little sense. That’s why we take the simple difference: D-ROE = ROE – AvgROE. The industry factors are proprietary data from the platform. The calculation aims at eliminating extreme values and limiting the influence of the largest companies. These factors are not representative of capital-weighted indices. They are useful as reference values for picking stocks in an industry, not for ETF investors. Industry valuation table on 12/3/2015 The next table reports the 4 industry factors. For each factor, the next “Avg” column gives its average between January 1999 and October 2015, taken as an arbitrary reference of fair valuation. The next “D-xxx” column is the difference as explained above. So there are 3 columns for each ratio. P/E Avg D- P/E P/S Avg D- P/S P/FCF Avg D- P/FCF ROE Avg D-ROE Commercial Banks 15.85 15.24 -4.00% 3.02 2.06 -46.60% 18.45 13.44 -37.28% 8.79 8.89 -0.1 Thrifts & Mortgage Finance* 19.29 20.66 6.63% 2.92 2.03 -43.84% 21.57 14.75 -46.24% 6.08 5.02 1.06 Diversified Financial Services 23.8 17.85 -33.33% 4.41 2.94 -50.00% 18.4 16.13 -14.07% 4.78 6.38 -1.6 Consumer Finance* 10.62 13.15 19.24% 1.4 1.47 4.76% 7.11 8.22 13.50% 11.13 11.83 -0.7 Capital Markets* 16.22 18.07 10.24% 3.57 3.06 -16.67% 17.55 19.62 10.55% 8.2 7.89 0.31 Insurance 14.46 13.7 -5.55% 1.3 1.07 -21.50% 11.67 8.99 -29.81% 9.05 8.71 0.34 REITs** 34.38 35.42 2.94% 5.19 4.56 -13.82% 45.45 38.74 -17.32% 4.97 4.07 0.9 Real Estate Management** 35.72 31.19 -14.52% 3.44 3.06 -12.42% 22.08 25.55 13.58% 4.01 -1.33 5.34 * Averages since 2003 – ** Averages since 2006 Valuation The following charts give an idea of the current status of industries relative to their historical average. In all cases, the higher the better. Price/Earnings: Price/Sales: Price/Free Cash Flow: Quality (ROE) Relative Momentum The next chart compares the price action of the SPDR Select Sector ETF ( XLF ) with the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) (chart from freestockcharts.com). (click to enlarge) Conclusion The financial ETF has the same return as SPY in the last 3 months. On this period, the 5 best performing S&P 500 financial stocks are Blackrock Inc (NYSE: BLK ), Cincinnati Financial Corp (NASDAQ: CINF ), Equinix (NASDAQ: EQIX ), Plum Creek Timber Co (NYSE: PCL ) and Public Storage (NYSE: PSA ). CINF, PCL and PSA hit an all-time high this week. Some financial industries look overpriced, but all of them are above or close to their baseline in quality, with ROE in a [-1.6,+5.4] interval from the historical average. REITs have improved since last month in valuation and are stable in quality. Consumer Finance is the only industry with 3 valuation factors pointing to underpricing. For Capital Markets, 2 out of 3 are pointing to underpricing. Commercial Banks, Diversified Financial Services and Insurance are overpriced for the 3 valuation ratios. Diversified Financial Services look the less attractive industry, with all metrics in negative territory. However, there may be quality stocks at a reasonable price in any industry. To check them out, you can compare individual fundamental factors to the industry factors provided in the table. As an example, a list of stocks in Financials beating their industry factors is provided on this page . If you want to stay informed of my updates on this topic and other articles, click the “Follow” tab at the top of this article.