Tag Archives: financial

The ‘Critically Counterintuitive’ Rules Of Investing

A few years ago, I came across the concept of the “critical counterintuitive.” It’s one of the most compelling mental models I have ever come across. And it’s also one that you can readily apply to the world of investing. The “critical counterintuitive” is “critical” because little else really matters. It is “counterintuitive” because the world works in ways almost exactly opposite to the way you think it does. The “nice guys” who take the flowers and candy route rarely get the girl. The smartest kid in the class rarely becomes rich and famous. The class clowns who make it big are oftentimes the most unhinged, the trappings of material wealth notwithstanding. And understanding how you can apply this mental model can spell the difference between your investment success – and utter disaster. Don’t Confuse Luck with Smarts The role of luck in investment success is deceptively subtle. You may think that investing $10,000 into one stock that makes you $1 million would be the best thing that could ever happen to you. But you’d be wrong. Having enjoyed such phenomenal success, you’d suddenly think that you’d cracked the code of the markets. The next time around, you bet your house, your car and your life savings on another “can’t lose” investment. Maybe you’d win this time as well. You calculate that if you do it only one more time, you’d have $100 million in the bank. Eventually, however, your luck runs out. Your last investment flops. And since you bet the farm, you not only lost your shirt but also you’re deeply in debt. You are worse off than when you started. Moreover, you also spend the rest of your life trying to replicate your initial trade, telling yourself that you’ve learned your lesson, and if you do it only one more time, you’ll take all your chips off of the table. That’s the problem with sudden wealth, whether it comes from a big bet on a stock tip or buying a winning lottery ticket. Any Psychology 101 student can cite the study according to which almost all lottery winners end up poorer five years after they’ve won than beforehand. As a wise man once said, “If you win a million dollars, you’d best become a millionaire. Because then you get to keep the money.” The lesson? Understand that if you have ever won a big investment bet, you were at least as lucky as you were smart. But over the long term, there are no shortcuts. Making money on a consistent basis is a grind that is one part “insight” and ten parts “discipline.” Your Analysis Is Irrelevant to Your Investment Success The philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche once observed that “any explanation is better than none.” I disagree. Sometimes, in the investment world, no explanation is really necessary – or relevant. Today, we suffer from the paradox of information overload. If you have a smartphone in your pocket, you can access more information about the financial markets than the world’s top hedge funds did 20 years ago. Yet, I bet your investment returns have not improved one iota as a result. Not only do we seem incapable of divining the future, we can’t even seem to agree on what happened. Was the credit crunch a result of Greenspan’s monetary policy, Bernanke’s incompetence or President Clinton’s “affirmative action” for low-income borrowers? Or was it just a classic mania? We crave explanations because they give us an illusion of control. But it gets even worse. Even those Cassandras who got their analysis “right” in predicting the credit crunch weren’t able to turn their accurate insights into money for their clients. And truth be told, time hasn’t been kind to their predictions either. Gold didn’t hit $5,000 an ounce. The U.S. dollar didn’t implode. Treasuries didn’t collapse. Analysts who promised to “crash-proof” their clients’ portfolios ended up losing more money for their clients than if they had stuck with simple index funds. The lesson? Successful investors are effective in the long term because they admit their mistakes. As the world’s greatest speculator, George Soros, said, “My system doesn’t work by making valid predictions. It works by allowing me to recognize when I am wrong.” Your ‘Intelligence’ is Your Biggest Handicap Warren Buffett famously observed that it takes no more than average intelligence to become a successful investor. I’d add something to that. I’d say high intelligence is actually a handicap to successful investing. Here’s why… When you are smart, you are used to being 100% correct. You just can’t take the possibility of being wrong. So you stick to your guns, even when the market is telling you otherwise. That’s why overeducated Wall Street analysts make such lousy money managers. And it is why hedge-fund managers who flaunt their intelligence inevitably flounder. Think about it this way… If high intelligence were the key to successful investing, top business school professors and economists would be the wealthiest guys on the planet. Instead, the Forbes 400 is populated by dropouts from places like Harvard (Bill Gates) and Stanford (the Google (NASDAQ: GOOG ) (NASDAQ: GOOGL ) guys). None could have gotten a job on Wall Street, let alone taught at a top business school. That’s also why poker players make the best traders and investors. They play each hand as it is dealt to them. If they get a bad hand, they fold. They play the investment game the same way. Perhaps that’s also why a former dean of Harvard College, Henry Rosovsky, observed about Harvard students: “Our A students become professors. Our B students go to law school. Our C students rule the world.” After all, it was those C students who stayed up all night playing poker with Bill Gates. So how can you use these “critically counterintuitive” rules to improve your investment returns? First, never bet too big on one idea. You may get lucky once. Maybe even twice. But your luck eventually will run out. And if you bet the farm, you are out of the investment game for good. Second, don’t delude yourself into thinking that you have special insight into the market. Bring that attitude to your investments, and you will have your head handed to you. And it’s not a question of “if” but “when.” Third, learn to think of your investments like a hand in a poker game. Up the ante when you are lucky enough to get a good hand. But also be prepared to fold – and to fold often. But above all, take the advice of a very wise trader who once said: “Some people are born smart. Some people are born lucky. Some people are smart enough to be born lucky.” Here’s hoping that you were born lucky! Until then, I wish you a very Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays.

Everyone Wants To Hit The Long Ball

If you ever go to a golf driving range count the number of people hitting their driver relative to the number of people hitting their pitching wedge. You’ll notice that the vast majority of amateur golfers focus excessively on how far they can hit a golf ball. This makes no sense though. If you’re like most amateurs, you probably have trouble breaking 100. And that means you’re going to pull your driver out of your bag fewer than 15 times including the par 3 holes (unless you’re like me and you regularly keep that driver out to account for Mulligans). The point is, about 15% of your shots will occur with the driver. 85% of your shots will likely occur with an iron or putter. The short game is far more important than the long game. Golfers focus on hitting the long ball because it is a greater form of instant gratification. It’s the what have you done for me lately effect. A golf round can last for 3, 4, 5 or 6 hours. A few moments of instant gratification can make a seemingly arduous day appear worthwhile. Of course, this is precisely the wrong way to win these games. You win by doing lots of little things right and avoiding big mistakes. Ironically, going for the long ball increases the odds of making big mistakes, which increases your chances of performing poorly. The investing corollary is the constant reach for the next Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ), the next Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ), the “market beating” fund manager or what Peter Lynch called the “10 bagger.” This chase is as alluring as the long ball in golf. And it’s just as destructive. But like most amateur golfers, the average amateur investor doesn’t fully realize that what they’re often doing here is increasing the odds of making big mistakes in their portfolios rather than increasing the odds of winning (achieving their financial goals). For most of us, achieving our financial goals has nothing to do with finding the next Apple, “beating the market” or landing the next 10 bagger. For most people, allocating their savings boils down to two simple goals: Maintaining your purchasing power. Avoiding an excessive amount of permanent loss risk. But the allure of the long ball and instant gratification is often too enticing to ignore. And so we keep pulling out that driver. Again and again and again.

Is Consolidated Edison A Good Income Investment With Its Underperforming Total Return?

Summary Consolidated Edison’s dividend is high at 4.1% and has been increased each year over the last 41 years making Consolidated Edison a dividend aristocrat. Consolidated Edison’s total return underperforms over the last 35.8 month test period but its cash flow is good to make the dividend safe that will most likely be increased in. Consolidated Edison’s revenue growth is not great at 2% going forward but is very stable and the company business is defensive. This article is about Consolidated Edison Inc. (NYSE: ED ) and why it’s an income company that’s being looked at in The Good Business Portfolio. Consolidated Edison is a holding company with its business being an electric and gas utility in the North East United States. The Good Business Portfolio Guidelines, total return, earnings and company business will be looked at. Good Business Portfolio Guidelines. Consolidated Edison passes 7 of 10 Good Business Portfolio Guidelines. These guidelines are only used to filter companies to be considered in the portfolio. There are many good business companies that don’t break many of these guidelines but will still not be considered for the portfolio at this time. For a complete set of the guidelines, please see my article ” The Good Business Portfolio: All 24 Positions .” These guidelines provide me with a balanced portfolio of income, defensive and growing companies that keeps me ahead of the Dow average. Consolidated Edison is a large-cap company with a capitalization of $17.829 billion. The Company operates through its subsidiaries, which include Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (O&R) and the Competitive Energy Businesses. Consolidated Edison has a dividend yield of 4.1% that has been increased each year for 41 years. The dividend grows slowly but is extremely safe. Consolidated Edison therefore is a income story. The average payout ratio is 67% over the past five years which leaves plenty of cash remaining for investment after paying its high dividend Consolidated Edison’s cash flow is good at $1.2 Billion which leaves it with plenty of cash allowing it to pay its high dividend and have cash left over for company equipment modernization. I also require the CAGR going forward to be able to cover my yearly expenses. My dividends provide 3.1% of the portfolio as income and I need 1.9% capital gain in addition for a yearly distribution of 5%. Consolidated Edison has a three-year CAGR of 2% not meeting my overall requirement. Looking back five years $10,000 invested five years ago would now be worth over $15,379 today (from S&P IQ). This makes Consolidated Edison a good investment for the income investor with its steady slow growing 4.1% dividend that has been raised for over the last 41 years each year but does not meet the 5% CAGR growth I require. Consolidated Edison’s S&P Capital IQ has a two-star rating or sell with a price target of $59.0. This makes Consolidated Edison slightly over priced at present but a good choice for the income investor that does not need much capital gains growth and wants a safe income stream. Total Return and Yearly Dividend The Good Business Portfolio Guidelines are just a screen to start with and not absolute rules. When I look at a company, the total return is a key parameter to see if it fits the objective of the Good Business Portfolio. Consolidated Edison did worst than the Dow baseline in my 35.8 month test compared to the Dow average but does have a positive total return of 24.54% over the test period of 35.8 months.. I chose the 35.8 month test period (starting January 1, 2013) because it includes the great year of 2013, the moderate year of 2014 and the losing year of 2015 YTD. I have had comments about why I do not compare the total return to the S&P 500 average. I use the Dow average because the Good Business Portfolio has six Dow companies in it and is weighted more to the Dow average than the S&P 500. Modeling the Dow average is not an objective of the portfolio but just happened by using the 10 guidelines as a filter for company selection. This total return makes Consolidated Edison appropriate for the income investor with the steady slow growing dividend of 4.1%, but the aggressive investor should look for companies with more growth potential. It is expected that the dividend will be increased from its present $0.65/Qtr. to $0.67/Qtr. in January of 2016. DOW’s 35.8-month total return baseline is 30.71% Company Name 35.8 Month total return Difference from DOW baseline Yearly Dividend percentage Consolidated Edison Inc. 24.54% -6.17% 4.3% Last Quarter’s Earnings For the last quarter Consolidated Edison reported earnings on November 5, 2015 that missed expected at $1.44 compared to last year at $1.48 and expected at $1.48. They reaffirmed yearly earnings of $3.90 – $4.05. This was a fair to weak report. Earnings for the next quarter are expected to be at $0.52 compared to the last year at $0.58. The steady slow growth in Consolidated Edison over long periods of time should provide a company that will continue to have slightly below average total return but provide steady income for the income investor. Business Overview Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison) is a holding company. The Company operates through its subsidiaries, which include Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (O&R) and the Competitive Energy Businesses. CECONY delivers electricity, natural gas and steam to customers in New York City and Westchester County. Orange and Rockland Utilities Inc. (O&R) delivers electricity and natural gas to customers located in south-eastern New York, northern New Jersey and north-eastern Pennsylvania. O&R’s utility subsidiaries include Rockland Electric Company and Pike County Light & Power Company. Competitive energy businesses provide retail and wholesale electricity supply and energy services. The Competitive Energy Businesses include three subsidiaries: Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc. (Con Edison Solutions); Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc. (Con Edison Energy), and Consolidated Edison Development, Inc. (Con Edison Development). The good cash flow of Consolidated Edison, Inc. allows the company to expand its business slowly and modernize its equipment as the population of its service area increases over time. Takeaways and Recent Portfolio Changes Consolidated Edison Inc. is an income company choice considering its steady slow growth and its total return underperforming the Dow average. Consolidated Edison is a buy for the income investor that is willing to have underperformance of total return but have a steady increasing income and have safety of a defensive company business. Consolidated Edison is not being added to The Good Business Portfolio right now since there are no open slots in the portfolio and the total return underperforms the DOW average for the 35.8 month test period. Bought Eaton Vance Enhanced Income Equity Fund II (NYSE: EOS ) to bring it up to 6.5% of the portfolio. Great income fund that beats the DOW average. Trimmed Cabela’s (NYSE: CAB ) to 4.6% of the portfolio, want to take a little off the table while its up due to the buyout possibilities. The Good Business Portfolio generally trims a position when it gets above 8% of the portfolio. Home Depot (NYSE: HD ) is 8.3% of portfolio, Walt Disney (NYSE: DIS ) is 7.5% of the portfolio and Boeing (NYSE: BA ) is 8.9% of the Portfolio therefore BA and HD and now in trim position with DIS getting close. I have written individual articles on EOS, CAB and HD, if you have an interest please look for them in my list of previous articles. Of course this is not a recommendation to buy or sell and you should always do your own research and talk to your financial advisor before any purchase or sale. This is how I manage my IRA retirement account and the opinions on the companies are my own.