Tag Archives: feeds

Is It Worth Investing In China? 3 Mutual Fund Picks

Slowdown in the manufacturing sector and the export business taking a hit are compelling China to turn into a consumer driven economy. This phase of transition is expected to be painful. But for patient investors, the returns are expected to be encouraging if they choose to remain invested in the service sector over the long run. While the service sector was on an expansionary mode in February, retail sales registered double-digit growth during the first two months of this year. China’s regulatory measures, on the other hand, raised hopes of a much stable economy. Hence, it will be prudent to invest in China focused mutual funds that have significant exposure to the service sector. GDP Slows Down, Foreign Trade Hit Badly China’s GDP came in at 6.9% last year, the lowest in almost a decade. The International Monetary Fund has trimmed China’s economic growth to 6.3% this year. China’s economy continued to be weighed down by sluggish demand at home and abroad. China’s trade surplus narrowed to $32.6 billion in February from January’s all-time high of $63.3 billion. Exports in February tanked 25.4% from last year’s figure, while imports including oil, iron ore and copper nosedived 11.2%. Even though this fall is partly due to the Lunar New Year holidays that fell in February, the overall trend is downward. In January, both exports and imports had declined by 11.2% and 18.8%, respectively. Moreover, in 2015, China’s foreign trade shrank by 8% from 2014. Manufacturing Slows Down China has mostly been a manufacturing hub. But of late, its manufacturing sector is slowing down. The official manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) came in at 49.0 in February, lower than January’s reading of 49.4. In fact, China’s factory activities contracted for the seventh straight month in February. The Caixin manufacturing PMI also came in at 48 in February, a five-month low. Manufacturing was hit mostly by the beleaguered construction sector, which generally boosts demand for industrial products. Major funds such as Oberweis China Opportunities (MUTF: OBCHX ), AllianzGI China Equity A (MUTF: ALQAX ) and Matthews China Investor (MUTF: MCHFX ) fell 11.8%, 8.4% and 13.1%, respectively, on a year-to-date basis, mostly due to significant exposure to the industrial sector. Service Sector Expands, Retail Sales Rise Due to weakness in the manufacturing sector, China is looking to shift its focus to the service and consumption based sector. The official services PMI came in at 52.7 in February, down from January’s figure of 53.5. Also, the Caixin services purchasing managers’ index (PMI) for February was at 51.2 compared to 52.4 in January. Even though these figures went down in February, it remained above the key figure of 50, indicating expansion in service activities. He Fan, chief economist at Caixin Insight Group said that “overall, the services sector has outperformed manufacturing industries, reflecting continued improvement in the economic structure.” Meanwhile, retail sales of consumer goods gained 10.2% on a year-over-year basis during the first two months of 2016, according to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). Retail sales were mostly driven by online sales. Online sales in the first two months of this year surged by 27.2% year on year to 636.1 billion yuan. 3 China-Focused Mutual Funds to Buy Given this scenario, China’s service sector remains the only bright spot, which might help its economy to navigate through troubled waters. Moreover, China’s financial market regulators’ promising moves to boost the economy such as imposing a ban on initial public offerings, restrictions on margin trading, allowing government-managed pension funds to invest in equity markets and restricting large shareholders from shorting stocks will help investors in the long run. Here we have selected three China focused mutual funds that mostly invest in the service sector, which includes retail, financials, information technology, telecommunications and healthcare. Funds have been selected over stocks, since funds reduce transaction costs for investors and also diversify their portfolio without the numerous commission charges that stocks need to bear. Further, these funds boast a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) or #2 (Buy), have positive 4-week and 3-year annualized returns and carry a low expense ratio. Fidelity China Region (MUTF: FHKCX ) invests a large portion of its assets in securities of Chinese issuers. As of the last filing, Tencent Holdings Ltd. ( OTCPK:TCEHY ), China Construction Bank Corp. ( OTCPK:CICHY ) and AIA Group Ltd. ( OTCPK:AAGIY ) were the top three holdings for FHKCX. FHKCX’s 4-week and 3-year annualized returns are 10.3% and 1.4%, respectively. Annual expense ratio of 0.96% is lower than the category average of 1.76%. FHKCX has a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2 and has a minimum initial investment of $2,500. Matthews China Dividend Investor (MUTF: MCDFX ) invests the majority of its assets in dividend-paying equity securities of companies located in China. As of the last filing, New Oriental Education SP (NYSE: EDU ), SERCOMM and China Construction Bank Corp. were the top three holdings for MCDFX. MCDFX’s 4-week and 3-year annualized returns are 9.6% and 4.2%, respectively. Annual expense ratio of 1.19% is lower than the category average of 1.76%. MCDFX has a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 and has a minimum initial investment of $2,500. ProFunds UltraChina Investor (MUTF: UGPIX ) seeks returns that correspond to two times the daily performance of the BNY Mellon China Select ADR Index. As of the last filing, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA ), China Mobile Ltd. (NYSE: CHL ) and Baidu Inc. (NASDAQ: BIDU ) were the top three holdings for UGPIX. UGPIX’s 4-week and 3-year annualized returns are 38% and 7.8%, respectively. Annual expense ratio of 0.75% is lower than the category average of 1.99%. UGPIX has a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 and has a minimum initial investment of $15,000. A higher minimum investment helps the fund manager to control cash flows, which eventually helps management of assets on a regular basis. Original Post

Best And Worst Q1’16: Small Cap Value ETFs, Mutual Funds And Key Holdings

The Small Cap Value style ranks eleventh out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our Q1’16 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter , the Small Cap Value style ranked tenth. It gets our Dangerous rating, which is based on aggregation of ratings of 19 ETFs and 268 mutual funds in the Small Cap Value style. See a recap of our Q4’15 Style Ratings here. Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst-rated ETFs and mutual funds in the style. Not all Small Cap Value style ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 13 to 1482). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings. Investors seeking exposure to the Small Cap Value style should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated mutual funds from Figure 2. Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings The First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (NYSEARCA: FNK ) and the Guggenheim S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF (NYSEARCA: RFV ) are excluded from Figure 1 because their total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings The iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF (NYSEARCA: JKL ) is the top-rated Small Cap Value ETF and the Royce Special Equity Fund (MUTF: RSEIX ) is the top-rated Small Cap Value mutual fund. JKL earns a Neutral rating and RSEIX earns a Very Attractive rating. The Guggenheim S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF (NYSEARCA: RZV ) is the worst-rated Small Cap Value ETF and The Putnam Small Cap Value Fund (MUTF: PSLAX ) is the worst-rated Small Cap Value mutual fund. RZV earns a Dangerous rating and PSLAX earns a Very Dangerous rating. Standard Motor Products (NYSE: SMP ) is one of our favorite stocks held by RSEIX and earns a Very Attractive rating. Since 2004, Standard Motor Products has grown after-tax profit ( NOPAT ) by 19% compounded annually. Over this same time, the company has greatly improved its return on invested capital ( ROIC ) from 2% in 2004 to 13% over the last twelve months. Despite this long-term success, SMP is undervalued at current prices. At its current price of $33/share, SMP has a price-to-economic book value ( PEBV ) ratio of 0.9. This ratio means that the market expects SMP’s NOPAT to permanently decline by 10%. If Standard Motor Products can grow NOPAT by just 5% compounded annually for the next decade , the stock is worth $47/share today – a 42% upside. Raven Industries (NASDAQ: RAVN ) is one of our least favorite stocks held by ARIVX and earns a Dangerous rating. From 2005 to the last twelve months, Raven Industries has failed to grow NOPAT. Over the same time, the company’s profitability has tanked, with ROIC falling from 29% to 7%. With such poor fundamentals, it should be no surprise that RAVN is down 20% over the past decade. What may surprise you though is that RAVN remains overvalued. To justify its current price, Raven Industries must grow NOPAT by 6% compounded annually for the next 21 years . This expectation seems rather optimistic given Raven’s poor track record of profit growth. Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Small Cap Value ETFs and mutual funds. Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst Funds Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Funds Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings D isclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Chickens And Eggs

Are you a chicken farmer, or an egg farmer? Chicken farmers raise chickens for their meat. Egg farmers raise chickens for what they lay. Investors who plan to sell their stocks to pay for college or to buy a second home are chicken farmers. Investors who hope to use the income from their investments are egg farmers. The financial press doesn’t understand egg farmers. Every day they report market prices and how they’ve changed. But they almost never report on dividends. This bias sometimes causes income-oriented egg-farmer investors to forget who they are and believe that they are chicken farmers. If they get confused, they may have a hard time reaching their goals. Prices are volatile. If you’re a chicken farmer, when you buy, and especially, when you sell, is extremely important. A chicken farmer needs to watch the market like a hawk. But if you’re an egg farmer, the most striking aspect of dividend payments is how boring they are. They just don’t jump around very much. Both kinds of portfolios need oversight, but managing a dividend stream is different. Risk doesn’t come from market swings, but from factors that endanger a company’s ability to earn profits and pay investors. Egg farmers like bear markets, especially bear markets that don’t threaten corporate revenues. When the market falls, investors can adjust their portfolios without taking gains and paying taxes. By contrast, chicken farmers hate it when prices fall. But chicken farmers love mergers and acquisitions. The buyer almost always has to pay a premium. But for egg farmers, takeovers just complicate things. Acquirers – especially serial acquirers – usually aren’t as generous with their dividends. Both approaches are valid, but they meet fundamentally different needs. So you never have to ask which comes first.