Tag Archives: feeds

No Sales, No Profits, No Bull: What Happens When Valuations And Central Banks Collide

Total business sales – sales by wholesalers, manufacturers and retailers – have fallen 5% from their July 2014 peak of $1.365 trillion. At $1.296 trillion for January 2016, total business sales have dropped back to where they were in January of 2013 ($1.293 trillion). In fact, the erosion of total sales by American businesses are even uglier when one takes inflation into account. Over the last 20 years, whenever total business sales continued on an upward trajectory, the U.S. economy steered clear of recession. The tech wreck of 2000 and the attacks in September of 2001 resulted in a downward move for business revenue; economic contraction was not far behind. The financial crisis slammed the brakes on business sales in 2008, ushering in The Great Recession; it ended around the same time that businesses began to increase their revenue streams. Might the year-and-a-half long downturn in revenue generation through January of 2016 be an anomaly? Yes and no. Yes, it is certainly possible that we did not hit “peak sales” in July of 2014; rather, the U.S. economy may still find solid footing in the months ahead. On the other hand, take a look what happened to the U.S. dollar via PowerShares DB Dollar Bullish (NYSEARCA: UUP ) beginning in July of 2014. After years of trading near decade lows, the greenback rocketed 25% against major world currencies. The result? U.S. exporters struggled to sell their wares, commodity prices collapsed and foreign stocks never quite recovered. The dollar’s vertical move adversely impacted earnings as well. Consider earnings-per-share (EPS) for the S&P 500. More than half of the profits at S&P 500 corporations emanate from overseas, where significantly devalued currencies hindered the proverbial “bottom line.” Specifically, earnings hit a high water mark in Q3 2014 (July-September). Earnings have been falling ever since. Everything comes back to the dollar’s epic ascent in the third quarter of 2014. Slumping sales. Slumping earnings. Even the top for non-U.S. equities. Take a look at Vanguard FTSE All World ex U.S. (NYSEARCA: VEU ). Between July 1, 2014 and May 21, 2015, the exchange-traded tracker plummeted and recovered. However, it was unable to claim higher ground. Worse yet, VEU has depreciated substantially since the S&P 500 set a record high in May of last year. The effect becomes even more noticeable when we isolate a region like Europe via Vanguard Europe (NYSEARCA: VGK ) or a sovereign like the United Kingdom via iShares United Kingdom (NYSEARCA: EWU ). Whereas U.S. market highs can be traced back to ten-and-a-half months ago (May 21), VGK and EWU have never recovered their July 2014 glory. A cynic might say, “Who cares if most of the world’s equities have been declining for 21 months?” After all, the S&P 500 is within a stone’s throw of recapturing its all-time record (2130) at 2060. Yet one of the reasons for the violent 14% correction of the S&P 500 in January through mid-February was the threat that the dollar would soar to new heights if the Federal Reserve kept its pledge to hike rates four times in 2016. It has since lowered the bar to two, and many believe they’d be lucky to get away with one. Unfortunately, the Fed may be caught in a pickle. Former Dallas Fed president Richard Fisher acknowledges that the institution deliberately created a wealth effect by front-loading a rally in stocks and real estate. The problem with doing so? Wealth effects eventually reverse themselves on the back-end, and the back-end typically begins at valuation extremes. Make no mistake about it. We are sitting on valuation extremes. Based on estimates of as-reported earnings for the S&P 500’s first quarter of 2016 ($89.4), the current price-to-earnings ratio is at 23. Even the non-GAAP, adjusted operating earnings ($100.6) is a lofty 20.5. And low interest rates alone are not a panacea for exorbitant valuation levels. Business sales stagnation. Prolonged profit weakness. And an economy that has been growing at a much slower pace over the last six months (1% or less) – far more lethargic than the 2% growth since the end of the Great Recession? Central banks have the power to prop up asset prices. Nevertheless, asset price reflation can quickly shift to deflation, particularly when revenue and earnings subside. Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.

3 Tips For Investing In Emerging Markets

By Tim Maverick Having been a neglected asset class for some time, emerging market stocks are enjoying a healthy rebound so far in 2016. The story of how we got here is a familiar one. When developing stock markets got overbought, they became overvalued. As a result, nervous investors – mainly from the United States – dumped those assets. But the selloff led to a sharp 180-degree turn – emerging markets then traded at a 28% discount to developed countries. Research Affiliates, founded by noted investor Rob Arnott, explains that emerging market stocks have only been cheaper than current levels six times. Each of those periods sparked an average five-year return of 188%. That should grab any investor’s attention. So what’s the best way to invest in emerging stock markets? Based on my decades of experience as both an advisor and an investor, I’ve compiled three quick tips to help you make sense of this market trend . Tip #1: Do NOT Use Index Funds I’m not a fan of index funds in general… but especially when it comes to emerging markets. It’s a sure-fire way to be unsuccessful. Why, you ask? First, because indices severely restrict your investable universe. And they’re usually restricted to the most overbought and overvalued stocks. Case in point: The Institute of International Finance points out that only $7.5 trillion out of a total of $24.7 trillion in emerging market equities are covered by indices from MSCI and JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM ). The rest are simply ignored as if they don’t exist. Yet, it’s those ignored stocks that usually boast the best bargains and room for growth. Tip #2: Avoid The Closet Index Trackers Even if you do avoid index funds directly, there’s another problem: “Closet trackers.” These are fund managers who like playing it safe. They couldn’t care less about outperforming the benchmark index for their shareholders. These managers have at least 50% of their funds in index stocks, so their funds will mimic the underlying index. Needless to say, that’s not what you want. Worryingly, a study from the World Bank revealed that 20% of equity funds were index trackers or closet trackers. This is a complete waste of money from an investor’s viewpoint. You’re paying for active management, but you’re not getting it. One example of a mutual fund company that usually goes off the beaten track and often invests in smaller companies is the Wasatch Core Growth Fund No Load (MUTF: WGROX ). Though I do not own their emerging market fund, I do own their frontier markets fund – Wasatch Frontier Emerging SmallCountries Fund (MUTF: WAFMX ) – for exposure to the smaller frontier markets. Please note: The fund is closed to new investors if you try buying it through your brokerage, but if you go directly to the fund company, it’s still open. Tip #3: Get Local Exposure If you truly want exposure to developing markets, guess what? You’ll need to own shares in local companies. And while it may seem like a clearer route to a profit, don’t do what many U.S. advisors espouse and have your sole exposure through multinational companies. Yes… there are many great multinationals with huge emerging market businesses – a company like Colgate Palmolive Co. (NYSE: CL ) comes to mind – they’re not the best way to gain exposure to developing markets’ economic growth. I like to use this analogy when explaining this point to clients: Let’s say a Japanese investor wanted exposure to the U.S. economy. His broker recommends Toyota Motors Corp. (NYSE: TM ). After all, Toyota sells a lot of cars in the United States. Silly, right? Toyota shares aren’t a good way to play the overall U.S. economy, as the stock only represents a very select fraction of market success. Neither is investing in emerging markets solely through multinationals. Investing in emerging local companies is the best way to profit from more specific foreign trends. There are all manner of resources available these days for researching foreign companies and stocks. It does take a bit of work, but the rewards can be well worth the time. Alternatively, you can leave the work to proven, active fund managers. Regardless of which route you prefer, now is a good time to build positions in emerging markets. Original Post

Short Gold With These ETFs

The rally in gold ETFs that was spurred by the safe haven demand in the wake of the Chinese market rout, overall global growth worries and nagging oil price declines at the start of 2016, has started to lose steam. Possibilities of another Fed rate hike as early as in April, given stronger U.S. economic numbers and an upward shift in Q4 GDP data have added strength in the greenback lately. Notably, PowerShares DB US Dollar Bullish ETF (NYSEARCA: UUP ) added over 1.3% in the last five trading sessions (as of March 24, 2016). As a result, a surging greenback weighed on the yellow metal as these are mostly priced in the U.S. dollar. Also, rate hike talks pushed up the U.S. Treasury bond yields in recent times, which in turn wrecked havoc on non-interest bearing assets like gold. In any case, the outlook for gold investing was appalling (read: Pain or Gain Ahead for Gold ETFs in 2016? ). The metal saw its third consecutive annual decline in 2015, being crushed heavily by the strength of the greenback in the wake of the Fed policy tightening, demand-supply imbalances and tepid global inflation (especially in the developed markets). As a result, the largest gold bullion ETF SPDR Gold Shares (NYSEARCA: GLD ) lost over 11% in 2015, followed by a 3.8% decline in 2014 and 28.8% in 2013 (see all precious metal ETFs here ). Now the renewed talks of Fed tightening have cast a shadow over this space. The price of gold fell to the lowest level in more than a month of late. Following the Fed meeting in mid-March, which indicated two more hikes this year, the largest gold bullion ETF SPDR Gold Shares saw asset outflow of $844.9 million from March 20 to March 27, 2016. As a result, investors who are bearish on gold right now may want to consider a near-term short on the precious metal. Below, we highlight a few such options (read: Believe in Goldman? Short Gold with These ETFs ). DB Gold Short ETN (NYSEARCA: DGZ ) This ETN has an inverse (opposite) relation to the movement of gold prices and thus creates a short position in the underlying index. It has managed assets of $23.9 million so far in the year and trades in average daily volume of more than 200,000 shares. This suggest a relatively wide bid/ask spread increasing the total cost for the product beyond the annual fees of 75 bps. DGZ added about 2.7% in the last five trading sessions (as of March 24, 2016). DB Gold Double Short ETN (NYSEARCA: DZZ ) This ETN seeks to deliver twice (2X or 200%) the inverse return of the daily performance of the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold, as per etfdb. The note charges 75 bps in fees per year from investors. The product has amassed about $52.8 million in AUM. The ETN generated impressive returns of about 4.4% in the last five trading sessions (as of March 24, 2016). ProShares Ultra Short Gold ETF (NYSEARCA: GLL ) This fund seeks to deliver twice the inverse return of the daily performance of gold bullion in U.S. dollars; the gold price is fixed for delivery in London. The product is expensive when compared to the other geared options in the space, charging 95 bps in fees a year. The $60-million fund trades in average daily volumes roughly 30,000 shares. The ETF gained 5.6% in the last five trading days (as of March 24, 2016). VelocityShares 3x Inverse Gold ETN (NASDAQ: DGLD ) This product provides three times (300%) short exposure to the daily performance of the S&P GSCI Gold Index Excess Return plus a daily accrual equal to the return that could be earned on a notional capital reinvestment at the 3-month US Treasury rate less the daily investor fee. The ETN has been able to amass an asset base of $18 million. The product is a high cost choice in the gold bullion space, charging 135 bps in fees per year from investors. Additionally, it has a wide bid/ask spread given its small average daily volume of 60,000 shares that increases the total cost of the product. Not surprisingly, the note returned an excellent 8.8% in the last five days (as of March 24, 2016) buoyed by negative sentiments for gold across the globe. Original Post