Tag Archives: etfs

IndexIQ Projects Top 5 ETF Trends For 2016

When one year ends and another begins, people love to look back at the previous 12 months and acknowledge the best and worst of the period. The Oscars, the Grammies, and the Darwin Awards play to this common desire to reflect on the achievements and failures of the past year, as do various financial-industry awards and lists. But the New Year is also a time to look ahead, and that’s the direction IndexIQ chooses to fix its gaze in anticipation of the top five ETF trends for 2016: Currency-hedging Inflation Hedge fund strategies Commodities bottom Dynamic ETF innovation Currency Hedging IndexIQ believes the divergent economic policies of global central banks will fuel currency-hedging in 2016. The U.S. Federal Reserve recently raised interest rates for the first time in almost a decade, while the European Central Bank (“ECB”) and the Bank of Japan (“BOJ”) remain committed to “easy money” policies – the BOJ, in fact, recently pushed Japanese rates into negative territory. Currency-hedging can offset these monetary moves and thereby isolate the performance of underlying assets, irrespective of currency strength. Given the widely diverging policies of the world’s leading monetary authorities, many international investors will choose to hedge their bets. Inflation After years of unprecedented monetary expansion, central banks are complaining of low “inflation.” By this, of course, they mean “price inflation,” as measured by a gauge such as the consumer price index (“CPI”). But there’s an argument that the monetary expansion over the past several years did cause inflation – in asset prices – and that it must eventually trickle down into consumer goods. IndexIQ says that “if history is any guide,” prices are hard to contain once inflationary pressures start to push them higher – and that could happen in 2016. Hedge Fund Strategies These same dynamics are making alternative strategies – such as those pursued by hedge funds – more attractive. Alternative strategies are designed to have low correlation to traditional assets like stocks and bonds, and given the wild currency movements and potential for price inflation, stocks and bonds may have a difficult year. Alternative strategies, however, can take advantage of currency trends as well as investing in inflation-hedged assets like precious metals, real estate, and Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (“TIPS”). Hedge funds and other alternatives can also capitalize on Trend #4: commodities bottoming. Commodities Bottom? Although the firm admits it’s a “tough call,” IndexIQ believes 2016 may finally be the year that commodities hit rock-bottom and begin to mean-revert higher. Monetary easing in Japan and China may finally give life to oil, copper, and other reeling markets. Inflation could also be a factor pushing them higher, especially when denominated in currencies other than the U.S. greenback. Dynamic ETF Innovation These are “ETF trends,” of course, and IndexIQ’s “dynamic” ETFs are designed to take advantage of them. The continued “innovation” of so-called “dynamic” ETFs is another trend all on its own, with products built to help manage domestic and international equity volatility, interest rate risk, and the impact of currencies on investors’ portfolios. “The slowdown in China, an unsettled geopolitical situation, the ongoing impact of currency devaluations on growth and trade, and a pending U.S. election suggest that investors will be grappling with increased market volatility in 2016,” said IndexIQ CEO Adam Patti, in a recent statement. “As central bank policies diverge and a broad range of generally non-correlated asset classes show greater independence, we believe investors will increasingly look to liquid alternative products to help manage potential fixed income, equity, and currency volatility impact on their portfolios.” Jason Seagraves contributed to this article.

5 Top-Ranked Diversified Bond Mutual Funds To Add To Your Portfolio

Fixed-income securities are the preferred choice of investors who are ready to forgo capital growth for regular income flows. The expense involved in creating such a portfolio of bonds from different categories may be quite considerable. This is why most investors select mutual funds since they are a convenient and affordable method of investing in bonds. Also, diversified bond funds further reduce the risk involved by holding securities from different sectors. A downturn in any one sector therefore only has a partial effect on the fund’s fortunes. Below, we share with you 5 best-ranked diversified bond mutual funds. Each has earned a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and we expect the funds to outperform their peers in the future. PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series C (MUTF: FXICX ) seeks to maximize total return with preservation of capital. FXICX invests the majority of its assets in fixed-income securities including corporate debt obligations, inflation-indexed securities of corporate bodies and structured notes. FXICX allocates its assets throughout the globe. The PIMCO Fixed Income SHares C fund has a three-year annualized return of 1.6%. Curtis Mewbourne is the fund manager of FXICX since 2009. PIMCO Income Fund A (MUTF: PONAX ) invests a minimum of 65% of its assets in fixed income securities from a wide range of sectors. These securities may include options, futures contracts and swap agreements. PONAX may invest not more than half of its assets in securities that are rated below investment grade. The PIMCO Income A fund has a three-year annualized return of 3.9%. PONAX has an expense ratio of 0.85% compared to a category average of 1.02%. Toreador Core Fund Adv (MUTF: TORLX ) seeks long-term capital growth. TORLX invests mostly in domestic and foreign large-cap companies. The market capitalizations of these companies are identical to those listed in the S&P 500 Index or the Russell 1000 Index. The Toreador Core Retail fund has a three-year annualized return of 8%. As of October 2015, TORLX held 97 issues, with 5.14% of its total assets invested in Micron Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: MU ). Columbia Strategic Income Fund A (MUTF: COSIX ) invests in U.S. government bonds, investment grade corporate bonds, mortgage backed securities, inflation-protected securities, convertible securities as well as high yield instruments. COSIX seeks total return that includes current income and capital appreciation. The Columbia Strategic Income A fund has a three-year annualized return of 0.7%. Colin Lundgren is the lead manager and has managed COSIX since 2010. John Hancock Income Fund A (MUTF: JHFIX ) seeks a high level of current income. JHFIX mostly invests in three types of securities. These include corporate debt securities from both developed and emerging markets, U.S. government securities and domestic high yield bonds. JHFIX may invest a maximum 10% of its assets in foreign stocks. The JHancock Income A fund has a three-year annualized return of 1.7%. JHFIX has an expense ratio of 0.81% compared to a category average of 1.02%. Original Post

Best And Worst Q1’16: Financials ETFs, Mutual Funds And Key Holdings

The Financials sector ranks seventh out of the ten sectors as detailed in our Q1’16 Sector Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter , the Financials sector ranked sixth. It gets our Dangerous rating, which is based on an aggregation of ratings of 41 ETFs and 244 mutual funds in the Financials sector. See a recap of our Q4’15 Sector Ratings here . Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst-rated ETFs and mutual funds in the sector. Not all Financials sector ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 22 to 572). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings. Investors seeking exposure to the Financials sector should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Four ETFs are excluded from Figure 1 because their total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. See our ETF screener for more details. Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings The iShares US Insurance ETF (NYSEARCA: IAK ) is the top-rated Financials ETF and the Davis Financial Fund (MUTF: DVFYX ) is the top-rated Financials mutual fund. Both earn a Very Attractive rating. The PowerShares KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: KBWY ) is the worst-rated Financials ETF and the Rydex Series Real Estate Fund (MUTF: RYREX ) is the worst-rated Financials mutual fund. Both earn a Very Dangerous rating. 602 stocks of the 3000+ we cover are classified as Financials stocks. The Progressive Corp (NYSE: PGR ) is one of our favorite stocks held by IAK and earns a Very Attractive rating. PGR also lands on January’s Most Attractive Stocks list. Since 2009, Progressive has grown after-tax profit ( NOPAT ) by 5% compounded annually. Over this same time frame, Progressive’s return on invested capital ( ROIC ) never fell below 17% and is currently a top quintile 19%. The strength in Progressive’s business helps explain why the stock was up over 17% in 2015, but even after this price increase shares remain undervalued. At its current price of $31/share, Progressive has a price to economic book value ( PEBV ) ratio of 1.0. This ratio means that the market expects Progressive’s NOPAT to never meaningfully grow from its current levels. If Progressive can grow NOPAT by just 5% compounded annually (similar to past five years) for the next five years , the stock is worth $39/share today – a 26% upside. Prologis (NYSE: PLD ) is one of our least favorite stocks held by RYREX and earns a Dangerous rating. On the surface, Prologis would appear to be a healthy business that has grown GAAP net income by 181% compounded annually since 2010. However, this net income growth fails to account for the expansion of the balance sheet to fund the GAAP growth. In fact, Prologis’ debt has increased from $3.6 billion to $10.4 billion since 2010 and in total, Prologis’ invested capital has grown from $7 billion to $25 billion over the past five years. Increasing invested capital does not come free of charge and after removing the cost for Prologis’ invested capital we find that Prologis has only earned positive economic earnings in one of the past 17 years (2005). Despite its long-term track record of value destruction, PLD is priced for significant profit growth going forward. To justify its current price of $41/share, PLD must grow NOPAT by 10% compounded annually for the next 12 years . This expectation seems highly optimistic given PLD’s history of value destruction. Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Financials ETFs and mutual funds. Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst ETFs Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Mutual Funds Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings D isclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector or theme.