Tag Archives: etf

Closed-End Target Date Muni Bond Funds Have A Good Yield And Low Interest Rate Risk

Blackrock and Nuveen target date funds pay back upon maturity. These funds hold pretty safe municipal bonds. These fund have decent yields. Blackrock (NYSE: BLK ) and Nuveen have a series of closed-end municipal bond funds that have a target date maturity. These funds have a nice yield and pay back principal in just a few years. We will look at the Blackrock Municipal 2018 Term Trust (NYSE: BPK ). As of today, it is trading at $15.50 and is almost at par with its net asset value (NAV). That means that the underlying portfolio of cash and bonds are worth what the market capitalization is. The portfolio holds 124 different issues of municipal bonds. They appear to be revenue bonds with names like: New York State Dormitory, California Waste, and Maryland Transportation. Revenue bonds are backed by the revenues generated from a certain project like a toll road or student housing. The bonds are rated: 6.9% AAA, 21.4% AA, 41% A, 18.9% BBB, 5.2% BB, 3.3% not rated, and 3.3% cash. The portfolio is only 1.5% leveraged, meaning that in a closed-end fund, that is all that has been borrowed. The fund has returned 5.8% since it was taken public in October 2001. Most of the time, it trades at par to NAV except when the markets went crazy in ’08 and then recovered. The trust yield 4.7¢ a month, so the total yield is 56.4¢ a year divided by today’s market price of $15.50 for a yield of 3.64%. The bonds will be liquidated or will have matured by December 31, 2018. That’s a pretty good yield for a bond that matures in about three years. The maturity price is $15. I assume that there could be some cash left over. The internal fee is 0.64%. It does not appear that there are many funky bonds that could go under. These include Detroit, Illinois, and Puerto Rico government obligations. As the bonds in the portfolio are backed by specific projects, they appear to be pretty safe. I must say, it’s seems like a pretty good investment for certain circumstances. As bonds are sold in $1,000 increments and the minimum that most bond brokers require is to buy in a $5,000 a lot, an investor must have quite a bit of money to hold a diversified portfolio. These Blackrock funds are good to hold smaller amounts of cash that are low risk, provided that the trade fees don’t negate the returns. These funds are traded like stocks. Other funds that fit in this category include: the Blackrock Municipal 2020 Term Trust (NYSE: BKK ), the BlackRock New York Municipal 2018 Term Trust (NYSE: BLH ), the Nuveen Intermediate Duration Quality Muni (NYSE: NIQ ), and another Nuveen Intermediate Duration Municipal Term Fund (NYSE: NID ). I have not done the research on these as I have on the Blackrock listed above. I have also not looked at the prospectus and just looked at the fact sheet. The particular closed-end fund seems to have a decent return and should do well in a rising interest rate environment. It would be nice if the fees were a little lower but what can you do? A yield of over 3% with a maturing of three years is pretty good in this environment.

Why Long-Term Investors Need To Be Looking Overseas…

Summary Value opportunity in foreign markets. Developed markets facing multiple headwinds. Investors looking to go international face many obstacles. Over long-term investment horizons, valuations can be a valuable guide for portfolio allocation. Most recently, we here at AlphaClone have been struck by the current valuation divergence across global equity markets. We believe long-term investors should be looking to increase their allocations to international equities in their portfolios. Why? In a word, price. The case for favoring international equities over U.S. domestic equities all comes down to price. This table sums up the current situation. (click to enlarge) (Table Source ) Whether it is developed market central banking policies, or other economic factors that have led to developed markets being richly valued, the bottom line is that equity markets in the U.S. and other western markets are historically expensive. As you can see in the table above, United States equities trade for 24x their cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio or CAPE ratio. The historic average for U.S. equities has been a CAPE of around 16x. If U.S. equities regress all the way back to their historic average of 16x CAPE over the next 10 years, then investors would be looking at a -4% per year headwind. As price multiples contract, earnings have to grow that much faster to maintain the same price growth levels. Even if we only go only half way back to a 20x CAPE ratio, that would represent a -2% per year headwind for U.S. investors. All of these headwinds would predict anywhere from a positive 1% to potentially negative -2% real return for U.S. equities over the next 10 years. That is a lot of headwind for the investor who invests solely in the U.S.! Meanwhile… In the international markets and emerging markets, in particular, their average CAPE is just 13x. What’s more, if you focus in on just value stocks within emerging markets, you can find an average CAPE of 8.5x for those stocks. These markets have been hammered over the last three years but now they may offer compelling value to the patient long-term investor. This opportunity means investors can get almost 2-3x times as much value for their invested dollar through investing in stocks internationally as they can from buying the U.S. broad market indices. If you’ve invested Internationally, you’ve lived this growing valuation divergence. Through November 4, 2015, Morningstar’s Foreign Large Blend equity fund category is -4.8% in the past three months compared with their U.S. Large Blend equity fund category -0.6%. This foreign category is dominated mostly by actively managed funds. Annualized returns for longer periods can be seen below. (click to enlarge) Is the time right for foreign equities to start outperforming U.S. domestic equities? Timing is always difficult, but we believe that this is the area where patient long-term investors should be looking for value to increase their international equity portfolio allocations and take advantage of the discount they represent. How should you do it? Even if you are convinced of the opportunity that exists internationally, how should an investor best do it? International investing brings with it a host of additional challenges for investors including: Which countries to choose Which sectors to pick Which securities to select Foreign currencies issues When to enter/exit trades Tax implications What visibility do you have But probably the most important question is which managers should you trust to help you navigate the above obstacles over the long term. If the table above shows you anything, it shows you how difficult it’s been historically for active managers to beat the broader, cap-weighted market benchmarks. Despite the under performance recently of active management in the international arena, active management is still probably the best choice for long-term investors who would like a solution that can adapt to the changing market environments we are likely to face, and who would like to add a value tilt in their foreign investing.