Tag Archives: etf

The Smart Beta Rally That Many Investors Missed In 2015

By Luciano Siracusano, III One of the big trends in the exchange-traded fund (ETF) industry has been this year’s flow of new money into developed world equity ETFs, both unhedged and currency hedged. WisdomTree estimates that nearly $100 billion of this year’s $171 billion in ETF industry inflows cascaded into these funds through the end of October. But the vast majority of assets in international equity ETFs-and the vast majority of net inflows this year-has been concentrated primarily in developed world large-cap strategies. While equity returns for the MSCI Europe and MSCI Japan indexes have, thus far in 2015, exceeded those generated by the S&P 500 Index, the bigger bull market has actually occurred in the smaller-company segment of the developed world. If we look at year-to-date returns through October 30, we can see by how much small-cap indexes have outperformed compared to broad market indexes comprising primarily large-cap companies in Europe, Japan and the developed world. (click to enlarge) For definitions of indexes in the chart, visit our glossary . What’s interesting is that the excess return produced by the small caps compared to their large-cap brethren is not just a 2015 phenomenon. Excess returns have held up over the last year, three years, five years and the better part of the last decade going back to the inception of the WisdomTree Indexes back in May of 2006. When One Compares Returns across Asset Classes, Additional Light Bulbs Light Up The double-digit gains European and Japanese small caps have generated thus far in 2015 have not only surpassed the broad European and Japanese benchmarks (MSCI Europe and MSCI Japan), they have outperformed the major asset classes investors typically tap to construct a globally diversified portfolio: large caps and small caps in the U.S. 1 ; MSCI EAFE Index and MSCI Emerging Markets Index; REITs 2 , U.S. Treasuries, investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds 3 ; commodities 4 and gold 5 . Moreover, year-to-date in 2015, small caps measured by the WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index and the WisdomTree Europe SmallCap Dividend Index outperformed each of the major indexes designed to measure how each smart beta factor is performing: MSCI Momentum, MSCI Quality, MSCI Value, MSCI Low Volatility or MSCI Size. What accounts for the divergence in returns? Part of it can be explained by sector concentrations, country and currency exposure. Another reason: Small-cap stocks are less tied to the global economy and often more sensitive to inflections in local economies. This can be partly explained by the historic tendency of small-company stocks to outperform large caps. This is one of the reasons that back in 2006 WisdomTree became the first ETF manager to launch international small-cap ETFs. At that time, WisdomTree knew that international small caps not only added potential for higher returns compared to large caps but they could also provide diversification benefits to a globally diversified portfolio. Since its inception in 2006, for example, the WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index had a correlation of .49 to the S&P 500. Adding components with lower correlations to one’s U.S. equity exposure has the potential to lower the overall volatility of a globally diversified portfolio. Conclusion Because most passive indexes and active international managers tend to concentrate primarily on large-cap stocks, international investors may miss the potential of small-cap companies unless they make a conscious effort to include them in their portfolios. We believe international small-cap exposure can help investors complete their international allocations. Returns this year in Europe, Japan and the developed world add additional real-time evidence to support our thesis. Unless otherwise stated, data sources are Bloomberg and WisdomTree. Sources S&P 500 and Russell 2000 Index. MSCI US REIT Gross Total Return and S&P Global ex-U.S. REIT USD Index. Barclays US Agg Corporate Yield-To-Worst and Barclays U.S. High Yield 2% Issr Cap Yield To Worst. Commodity Research Bureau BLS/US Spot all Commodities Index. Gold Spot Price Index. Important Risks Related to this Article Performance, especially for very short periods, should not be the sole factor in making your investment decision. Foreign investing involves special risks, such as risk of loss from currency fluctuation or political or economic uncertainty. Investments focusing on certain sectors and/or smaller companies increase their vulnerability to any single economic or regulatory development. Investments in commodities may be affected by overall market movements, changes in interest rates, and other factors, such as weather, disease, embargoes and international economic and political developments. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. Luciano Siracusano, III, Executive Vice President-Head of Sales and Chief Investment Strategist Luciano Siracusano, III has served as our Executive Vice President-Head of Sales and Chief Investment Strategist since March 2011. Prior to serving in those positions, Mr. Siracusano served as our Director of Research from 2001 until October 2008, and as a research analyst and editor of our various media publications from 1999 until 2001. Mr. Siracusano, together with Mr. Steinberg, was responsible for the creation and development of our fundamentally weighted index methodology.

Some Prefer Southern Company Over Wisconsin Energy: I Just Don’t Get It

Summary I recently published a follow- up article about Wisconsin Energy after the acquisition of Integrys. Several friends told me that I should prefer Southern Company over Wisconsin Energy. They claim that the superior yield is due to some short term hardships that will soon be over. I totally disagree, I believe Wisconsin Energy is by far a superior investment. I will now try to explain why. Introduction A week ago I wrote this article about Wisconsin Energy (NYSE: WEC ). In the article, I tried to analyze the company after the acquisition of Integrys (NYSE: TEG ). The article is really in favor of buying the shares of the company. Several friends told me after reading the article that I should prefer Southern Company (NYSE: SO ) over Wisconsin Energy. They claim that the superior dividend yield and the longer streak of dividend raises make it a superior investment for dividend growth investors. They believe that currently, the company suffers from short-term headwinds. I read a lot about Southern Company and I totally disagree. In this article, I will show the fundamentals and valuation of the company, and then show a comparison with Wisconsin Energy, that I believe will allow me to emphasize the superiority of Wisconsin Energy over Southern Company. Southern Company through its subsidiaries, Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company and Mississippi Power Company, supplies electric service in the states of Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and Mississippi. Each of those subsidiaries is an operating public utility company. Additionally, Southern Company owns all of the common stock of Southern Power Company, which is also an operating public utility company, which constructs, acquires, owns, and manages generation assets and sells electricity at market-based rates in the wholesale market. Fundamentals Southern Company has terrible fundamentals, really, it is hard for me to describe it otherwise. The revenues for example grew from $13.554 in 2005 to $18.467 in 2014. This is CAGR of 3%, which might be reasonable if the income is growing at least at the same pace. Yes, it is a utility company which doesn’t show fast growth, but I still have higher expectations. SO Revenue (NYSE: TTM ) data by YCharts EPS growth is even worse, when thinking about the EPS growth together with inflation, well there is practically none. The EPS grew from $2.13 in 2005 to $2.18 in 2014. This is CAGR of 0.23%, which is practically no growth, and when taking inflation into consideration, it is practically declining. Let’s look now towards the future. The analysts’ estimates are for growth of 2.5%- 3% in EPS for the next 3- 5 years. Having said that, I am not happy with the EPS growth in the past and the future estimates. SO EPS Diluted (Annual) data by YCharts The dividend is another weak fundamental in my opinion. The annual payment grew from $1.49 in 2005 to $2.1 in 2014. That is CAGR of just 3.5%. As you read above, as EPS is flat, the dividend rose by expanding the payout ratio. This is not sustainable for the long run, and therefore it makes me worry about the ability of the company to show real growth. In 2014, the payout ratio was over 95%, and even for the estimate for 2015, the payout ratio will be over 75% which is high for utilities. Currently, the company yields just under 5%. I don’t think the yield is high enough to justify such slow growth. SO Dividend data by YCharts Usually I like it when companies reward shareholders by using big parts of the FCF for dividends and share repurchases. However, with such a high payout ratio, I didn’t expect Southern Company to buy its own shares. Yet, I figured out that not only that the number of shares didn’t decrease, it actually rose by over 22% over the past decade. I don’t mind being diluted when smart acquisitions are made like the acquisition of Integrys by Wisconsin, or by the purchases of new properties by Realty Income (NYSE: O ). In these cases the dilution is used to grow EPS and FFO. In this case, the dilution comes with low growth. Not my cup of tea. Valuation When I look at the valuation of Southern Company, I find a company that is valued cheaper than Wisconsin Energy. The difference in the valuation makes perfect sense as Wisconsin Energy is growing its EPS while Southern Company has stagnated. In my opinion, the difference isn’t big enough. I find Wisconsin Energy fairly valued for a company that will grow at around 6% every year. By looking at the forward P/E for this year and the year after, I can see that the gap is becoming smaller and smaller. As a long term investor, it is hard for me to justify purchasing Southern Company at the current valuation. SO PE Ratio ( TTM ) data by YCharts The lower valuation is not low enough for me to consider Southern Company at the moment. It might sound odd, but I find it overvalued when compared to other high yielding companies, with slower than average growth. Risks As I see Southern Company, there are two main risks to this investment. The first one is the lack of growth catalysts. The company is forecasted to grow its earnings by less than 3% annually over the next several years. This is very low even for a utility company, especially one that expanded its payout ratio so much. The company must find new ways to grow its income and revenues. The second risk is the still increasing expenses of the Kemper project in Mississippi. This project consumes more and more money, and it takes a big part of the cash flow as it increases the capex. In 2014 alone, the expenses on this project cost the company $0.83 per share. Southern Company will have to invest more money in order to finish it. Finishing it will indeed free some if its cash flow, but it will still not be able to serve as a real growth catalyst. Opportunities Southern Company still has several opportunities, but I find them pretty vague. Firstly, most major expenses on the Kemper project are behind us already. The necessary investment will now be much lower, and it will allow the company to use the money in a better way. Another opportunity is the fact that even when it suffers from headwinds, Southern Company still manages to show fair margins and fair return on equity. If the company will be able to find growth prospects, it will be able to utilize its efficient structure to create more income and more value to its shareholders. Comparison with Wisconsin Energy I will now sum the comparison between these companies. I believe that Wisconsin Energy has superior fundamentals when looking at the past decade and the next five years. Southern Company is valued cheaper, but not cheap enough to justify the lack of growth in the EPS. Wisconsin Energy, doesn’t suffer from huge expenses due to problematic projects such as Kemper in Mississippi. This kind of projects consume a lot of capital, and it will be hard for them to return the money invested. Wisconsin Energy has a lower debt burden. The debt to equity ratio is lower, and it gives Wisconsin Energy more flexibility. Southern company has more debt and a very high payout ratio. This is a combination that can be damaging to the company. It puts the dividend in an unpleasant place. Not only that, Wisconsin Energy is working on lowering its debt after the acquisition of Integrys. Southern Company on the other hand has higher margins and return on equity. This is a positive sign, which is not enough when the company can’t find growth prospects. Yet, to be fair, holding a more profitable company is always a plus. I am writing from my position as dividend growth investor, so it makes perfect sense that I will give Southern Company credit for the higher dividend yield. The dividend yield is much higher at almost 5% compared to the yield of over 3.5% that Wisconsin Energy has. If you look for income it is an important aspect. Conclusion I am certain that Wisconsin Energy can show superior returns for the near future. It has better fundamentals and growth opportunities, and I think that dividend growth investors should prefer it over Southern Company. In my opinion, it will also beat Southern Company in total returns even though the latter has higher dividend yield. I would only pick Southern Company if I were a retiree who is looking for income right here and right now.