Tag Archives: etf

Fight Global Warming With These ETFs

Establishing a terror-free world may be the foremost agenda at the international level now, but the global warming issue is equally heated. While so long it was presumed that global warming leads to climate change, causing rising sea levels, drought in one region and flood in other, the latest theory is that this monster can ” cause job losses, recessions and even a tumbling stock market”, according to economists. So, one can easily understand the urgency of controlling pollution and cooling down the globe. In that vein, global leaders assembled in Paris at the COP 21 meet – which is the 21st annual conference of parties – to chalk out an elaborate and comprehensive plan for lowering carbon emissions and moderating the warming of the planet. Efforts to arrest global warming have been constant across individual countries. Now, not only developed economies, but the emerging ones too are pushing themselves to attain this goal. China intends to build a pollution-free environment. As part of this mission, the president of China and U.S. president Barack Obama have recently struck a deal to lessen carbon emissions. The agreement calls for carbon emission reductions by 26% to 28% in the U.S. by 2025. It also includes the first-ever commitment by China to stop emissions from growing by 2030. Notably, China and America are two largest emitters of greenhouse gases . President Obama has always been active in the cause of cleaning up carbon pollution. A proposed Environmental Protection Agency rule seeks to reduce 30% carbon emission from power plants by 2030 from the levels emitted in 2005. At the conference, the Russian president noted that his country has not only averted the rise of greenhouse emissions, but has actually slowed it. Russia targets to curb 70% of greenhouse emissions by 2030 from the levels seen in 1990. At the Paris meet that is under way, global superpowers will also decide on supporting underprivileged countries like Bangladesh and Indonesia to finance the needed reforms they can’t pay for. Investors can also make outsized profits from this awareness on global warming. Several clean energy and low-carbon ETFs have been rolled out to capitalize on the growing need for environment protection and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Below, we highlight a few ETF options that investors can go “green” with. SPDR MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (NYSEARCA: LOWC ) This has become an $87.6 million ETF within just a year of its launch. The 1,277-stock ETF looks to track the stocks from developed and emerging markets that discharge lower carbons. The fund charges only 20 bps in fees. Here too, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) (1.9%) takes the top spot, followed by Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ) (1.17%) and General Electric (NYSE: GE ) (0.85%). The fund is heavy on the U.S., which has half of its total exposure, while Japan (7.9%) and the U.K. (7.1%) take the next two spots. LOWC is down about 0.9% so far this year (as of November 30, 2015). iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (NYSEARCA: CRBN ) The 931-stock fund also charges 20 bps in fees a year from investors. The fund has amassed over $217 million in assets since its debut in December 2014. Its exposure is quite similar to LOWC, as Apple (1.92%), Microsoft (1.17%) and General Electric (0.82%) are the top three holdings. The fund’s geographic exposure is also pretty much like that of LOWC. Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (NYSEARCA: ETHO ) This new ETF has a 400-stock portfolio having a carbon emissions profile that is 50-70% lower per dollar invested than a conventional broad-based benchmark. The index studies total greenhouse gas emissions from over 5,000 equities to choose “climate leaders” in each industry. No stock accounts for more than 0.56% of the basket. Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ), M&T Bank Corp. (NYSE: MTB ) and Energy Recovery Inc. (NASDAQ: ERII ) are the top three holdings of the fund, which charges 75 bps in fees. Original Post

4 Sector ETFs On Sale

A string of woes have held back the U.S. market this year, with the S&P 500 adding just about 2.5% so far. Global growth issues, Fed lift-off worries and a surging greenback are coming in the way of the markets’ outperformance. While many may hope for a sharp revival in the market in 2016 following such a slow year, Goldman Sachs’ latest prediction points to the same story next year. Considering dividends, Goldman estimates stocks to return merely 3% next year. The renowned investment banker also raised overvaluation concerns over the U.S. market. This statement very well motivates investors to search for a value sector, if there is any left at all. A value play is especially required given the broad-based revenue weakness noticed in Q3, not only among multinationals but also within small-cap companies. After all, the low valuation might lead investors to some quality sector buys at best prices. No doubt, with all the major indices trading at around all-time highs, it is hard to find value plays at home. But for those investors ardently seeking undervalued sectors, there are still a few hidden treasures out there. While several indicators are used to find out any stock or sector’s valuation status, price-to-earnings ratio or P/E has been the most widespread. We have identified four sector picks having the lowest forward P/E ratio for next year’s earnings in the pack of 16 S&P sectors classified by Zacks and detail the related ETFs to play those sectors’ undervalued status. Auto – First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto ETF (NASDAQ: CARZ ) The U.S. automotive industry is on high gear. A strong labor market, persistently lower energy prices, increasing aging vehicles on road and a still-low interest rate environment made the first half of 2015 the best six months in a decade for auto sales. Though the Fed is poised to raise key interest rates in December, it will opt for a slower rate hike trajectory. So, auto loans are presently feared to get pricy. Despite strong fundamentals, the sector has a P/E ratio of 9.9 times for 2015 and 8.8 times for 2016, the lowest in the S&P universe, as per the Zacks Earnings Trend issued on November 18. Investors should note that the P/E of the auto industry trades at a 43.8% discount to the current year P/E of S&P and 45.7% discount to the next year P/E. The space is down 12.1% so far this year, implying that the auto stocks are yet to capitalize on the sector’s momentum. Investors should note that there is only one pure play CARZ in the space that provides global exposure to nearly 40 auto stocks by tracking the Nasdaq OMX Global Auto Index. CARZ has a Zacks ETF Rank #2 (Buy) and is up 1.4% so far this year (as of December 1, 2015). Transportation – iShares Dow Jones Transportation Average Fund (NYSEARCA: IYT ) This is yet another sector which failed to make the most of improving economic activities. The sector’s pricing is down 13.2% year to date. While a strong dollar will definitely play foul with the profits of big transporters, tailwinds including a stepped-up economy and cheap fuel are still in fine fettle. This raises optimism on the future of the transportation sector. This is especially true as total earnings of the sector were up 22.5% in Q3 while revenues declined 1.3%. This is much better than Q2 earnings growth of 9.4% and revenue decline of 1.9% for the same period. Revenues are forecast to grow from the first quarter of 2016. The current and the next year P/Es for the sector are 12.2 times each, reflecting a 30.7% and 24.7% discount to the S&P 500, respectively. One way to play this trend is with IYT, which tracks the Dow Jones Transportation Average Index that holds 20 stocks in its basket. The fund has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 (Hold) with a High risk outlook. The fund is off 10% so far this year (as of December 1, 2015). Finance – SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (NYSEARCA: KRE ) With the looming prospect of a lift-off, all eyes will be on financial stocks and ETFs. While the operating backdrop of financial stocks has improved a lot from the recession-cursed phase, a potential rising rate environment is another positive for the financial ETFs. The space has a current-year P/E of 13.6 times, reflecting a 22.7% discount to the S&P while its next year P/E stands at 12.8 times, a 21% discount to the S&P 500’s 2016 P/E. The space has lost 1.7% so far this year (as of November 27, 2015). While there are plenty of financial ETFs, investors can take a look at Zacks #2 ETF KRE. The bank fund is up 12.4% so far this year. Utilities – PowerShares S&P SmallCap Utilities ETF (NASDAQ: PSCU ) Utilities will be hurt by the Fed lift-off as this sector underperforms in a rising rate environment. But the space is expected to score positive earnings growth from the second quarter of 2016. The space has a current-year P/E of 15.7 times, reflecting a 10.8% discount to the S&P while its next year P/E stands at 15.3 times, a 5.6% discount to the S&P 500’s 2016 P/E. The space has lost 13.4% so far this year (as of November 27, 2015). However, investors should note that utility is a risky bet at this point of time. We thus highlight the small-cap utility ETF as small-cap stocks deal more with the reasonably expanding U.S. economy and also offer less exposure to the greenback. PSCU is up 4.1% so far this year (as of December 1, 2015). Original Post

Historical Rates Impact Common Stocks

Summary We think there is a recency bias surrounding interest rates. Historical rates are in the band between 3% and 6%. We believe rates will rise when there is a demand for credit, which can be a good thing for common stock owners. Time and coincidence often cloud our own perception. Consider interest rates. Baby Boomers and Generation Xers became adults (25 or older) between 1965 and 2005. During that period, these adults witnessed an aberration in the history of interest rates. They saw moments of monumental highs (20%) and levels consistently above historical norms. The chart below shows that long- and short-term interest rates in the United States have spent most of the last 400 years in a range between 3% and 6%. We contend that this deviation clouds the judgment and expectations of many of today’s investors. There are numerous implications for long-duration common stock owners arising from the examination of historical interest rates. Intrinsic Value Computations The father of value investing, Ben Graham, concluded through his years of research that 10-year corporate bonds averaged 4.4%. Therefore, in his revised intrinsic value equation, he used 4.4% as the numerator for adjusting intrinsic value based on interest rate fluctuations. This long-term interest rate chart supports the validity of his choice, and is right in the middle of the 3-6% historical range. One could argue that long-duration equity investors have been using discount rates in their intrinsic value calculations much higher than historical interest rates justify. This is likely due to the unusually high rates of the period between 1965 and 2005, a recency bias. Commitment of Capital to Bond Investments In 1980, the prime interest rate at the major banks was 20%. Long-term Treasuries peaked at 15% in early 1981. Inflation topped out in 1981 at 11%. Thirty-year fixed mortgages were issued as high as 17%. What people didn’t realize at the time was that they were living through a five-standard deviation event, according to history. Even if inflation had stayed at 11%, those interest rates offered investors very high inflation-adjusted returns. As the famous bond investor Bill Gross has argued, this laid the groundwork for more than 30 years of declining interest rates and a normalization back into the band between 3% and 6%. This has rewarded bond investors and got them addicted to an asset-allocation commitment based on lookback returns which are statistically unlikely. Interest rates are currently below the historical 3-6% range, and will likely rebound over the next 10 years into the historically normal band. We believe common stock buyers should include that likelihood in their stock selection methodology, whether in their intrinsic value calculations or in the effect that higher rates in the U.S. have on the U.S. dollar and overall economic growth in the country. We contend that the surprise in the U.S. will be how much stronger economic growth will be than what is expected. How else can rates go up, unless someone demands the capital via borrowing? Need for Solid Returns for Investors Owners of wealth in the form of liquid assets have an economic need in both low and high interest rate time periods. They need to earn a return above inflation to defend the purchasing power of their liquid asset pool. Ownership of long-duration common stocks has proven to be superior to that of other liquid assets over long time periods, except for the 10-year stretch from 1999 to 2008. As 10-year Treasuries fell to 1.6% in 2008 and stocks were liquidated in the financial crisis, two five-standard deviation events conspired to elevate bond investments in popularity and thrust bond portfolio managers into god-like status. We think a good rule of thumb is to avoid portfolio success stories created by five-standard deviation events. These only happen 2.5% of the time. Rather than being preoccupied with the consensus of investors, we believe building our portfolio around high-probability events is much more valuable to the long-term investor. Industries Benefited By Higher Rates in the 3-6% Range We have argued ad nauseam that common stock investors have two possibilities in front of them as it pertains to interest rates. If interest rates were to rise back into the 3-6% historically normal band, there must be forces which demand the money and industries which benefit from the forces that cause the rise in rates. If rates stay below the historical band, intrinsic value calculations using discount rates above the historical average will undervalue common stocks. Certain industries would welcome higher interest rates. Insurers must earn interest on collected premiums, banks would like to charge more for loans, and homebuilders would like to have so many customers for new homes that the resulting demand for money drives up interest rates. Consumer discretionary companies would love to see a level of prosperity which would drive retail sales and liberal advertising budgets. Drug and biotech companies would like everyone to be able to afford the fantastic new medicines they will introduce in the next 10 years. In summary, above-average returns don’t come along without taking risk. Investors have become very comfortable with today’s historically low interest rates, and fear continued poor economic growth rates. Equity portfolio managers use discount rates higher than today’s actual rates because of the abnormally high rates of the last 40 years. Lastly, the contrary long-duration common stock investor should be attracted to industries which benefit from the gravitation back into the historically normal returns from the bond market. The information contained in this missive represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Bill Smead, CIO and CEO, wrote this article. It should not be assumed that investing in any securities mentioned above will or will not be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management within the past 12-month period is available upon request.