Tag Archives: etf

Yahoo Lacks ‘Growth Pulse,’ Stock Down On Latest Turnaround Plan

Yahoo ( YHOO ) outlined a new turnaround strategy late Tuesday along with a Q4 revenue beat, but the beleaguered Web portal’s new plan “sounds a lot like the old plans,” according to Pacific Crest Securities analyst Evan Wilson, who lowered his 2016 revenue and earnings estimates for the company. “Yahoo beat Q4 estimates but is still struggling for organic growth,” wrote Wilson in an industry note. He said that Yahoo’s new  plan “looks more dire than the previous plan.” Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer said that the plan includes a new round of job cuts and a possible reverse spinoff of the core business. And, she said, “The board will also engage with other qualified strategic proposals.” Analysts say that Yahoo’s latest plan essentially puts the company on the sales block. “After 10 reported layoffs, countless plans and CEO after CEO, it is hard to blame management or the strategy,” wrote Wilson. “The core search and display assets are limited by scale and data, and we do not see a way out of it save for linking with a platform that is not so limited.” Yahoo stock closed down 4.8% at 27.68 on the stock market today . Earlier in the day, Yahoo slid to 26.57, its lowest point since September 2013. Yahoo stock is down 38% over the past 12 months. Yahoo stock got at least six price-target cuts from investment banks Wednesday. Rosenblatt Securities analyst Martin Pyykkonen downgraded it to sell from neutral, saying that he couldn’t find “a growth pulse” on Yahoo stock, as advertising dollars increasingly slip away to rivals. “ Facebook ( FB ), Alphabet ( GOOGL ), Netflix ( NFLX ), etc. are obvious, but there are also a vast number of smaller properties taking usage and traffic away from Yahoo and its properties,” Pyykkonen said. Nomura analyst Anthony DiClemente said that while Yahoo’s core business was “modestly higher” in Q4, the company’s guidance for Q1 and 2016 missed his expectations. “We were discouraged by Q1 guidance, which suggests 13% margins; guidance for Q1 implies net revenue and EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) declines of 19% and 53% year over year, respectively,” said DiClemente. Nomura lowered its target price on Yahoo stock to 34 from 40, adjusting for recent changes in the valuation of Yahoo’s holdings in China e-commerce giant Alibaba Group ( BABA ). Yahoo owns a 15% stake in Alibaba, about 385 million shares. After an initial plan to spin off its Alibaba shares, Yahoo reversed course following tax concerns. On Tuesday, Yahoo indicated that a reverse spinoff of its stake in Alibaba still remains a possibility. But Yahoo will close its offices in Dubai, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Madrid and Milan. Alibaba stock was down 3%, near 63, in midday trading Wednesday, and its shares are down more than 30% in the past 12 months. Along with its Q4 earnings, Yahoo announced that it will cut 15% of its workforce — roughly 1,600 jobs — and look to sell non-core divisions and assets, such as patents and real estate, as part of a strategic plan to return the company to what it forecasts as modest though accelerating growth in 2017 and 2018. The company’s turnaround plan includes continued investment in what the company calls “Mavens,” Mayer said. Mavens refers to Yahoo’s mobile, video, native and social businesses, where its ad revenue is growing. Mayer said that Yahoo’s consumer products division will consist of three global platforms — Search, Mail and Tumblr — and that it will focus on four vertical markets: news, sports, finance and lifestyle. Yahoo said that Q4 earnings excluding items plunged 57% from the year-earlier quarter to 13 cents a share, meeting the views of FactSet and analysts polled by Thomson Reuters. Yahoo said that revenue minus traffic acquisition costs — what the company pays other sites to carry its ads — fell 15% to $1.002 billion. Still, it that beat FactSet’s $948.2 million forecast. Yahoo added that its total revenue in Q4 rose 1.6% to $1.27 billion, where Thomson Reuters had expected $1.19 billion. For Q1, Yahoo is guiding GAAP revenue at $1.005 billion to $1.09 billion, down 17.9% to down 11%.

This FANG Stock Just Tripped A Very Bearish Signal

Loading the player… FANG stocks Facebook ( FB ), Amazon ( AMZN ), Netflix ( NFLX ) and Google parent Alphabet ( GOOGL ) are all falling in heaving volume in the stock market today . Amazon is now tripping a bearish signal, shortly after the e-commerce giant’s quarterly report missed analyst expectations. Wall Street’s disappointment comes even as Amazon has continued to make outsized market share gains, posting a new record for annual sales and its largest profit in at least four years. But shares closed down 3.8% in heavy volume on Wednesday, dropping below the critical 200-day line in intraday trade for the first time in about a year. The stock has pared some of its losses, but unless Amazon can close the session above the line, that’s a bearish signal. It’s now more than 20% below its high reached in December. Fellow FANG stock Netflix has been trading below its 200-day line for several weeks now. On Wednesday, the stock finished 0.8% lower. After reversing lower from a new high in Tuesday’s session, Facebook is falling for a second day in big volume, threatening to round-trip from its recent breakout. Shares ended Wednesday down 1.7%. Google parent Alphabet fell 4% in heavy turnover and undercut the 50-day line after retaking that level last Friday. It’s now 7.5% below its intraday high reached in Tuesday’s session after the Alphabet’s strong Monday night earnings report.

5 No-Load Vanguard Mutual Funds To Buy In February

The continuous slump in oil prices and weak Chinese economic data has resulted in a bloodbath in the U.S. stock market so far this year. The Dow and the S&P 500 suffered their biggest monthly losses in January since Aug 2015. Both the indexes had also snapped multi-year winning streaks to end in the red last year. In the face of this downtrend, a long-term view will help investors to stay calm. Also, one should look for investments that are less expensive. In this regard, Vanguard mutual funds could be a good choice due to their low expense ratios. The cost can be further reduced if one selects Vanguard funds that have no-load. Why Vanguard Funds? Vanguard funds witnessed a large inflow last year. This indicates that investors had flocked to passively managed funds, being dissatisfied with the widespread failure of actively managed funds. Investors poured in $236 billion of money in the Vanguard Group in 2015, the largest in the industry, according to Morningstar Inc. In fact, Vanguard witnessed total net inflows of about $1 trillion in the last five years, which is almost double the entire sum attracted by the hedge fund industry during the same period. Currently, it is one of the world’s largest investment management companies. It has crossed the milestone of $3 trillion in assets under management. The secret of Vanguard’s success last year lay in its very low expense ratios. The low cost to operate a mutual fund helped Vanguard to navigate the volatile broader markets, which were beleaguered with global growth worries and a rout in oil prices. Now, in 2016, these very same factors are continuing to haunt the stock market. The major U.S. indexes are already in correction mode. Hence, in order to navigate the choppy waters, Vanguard funds are the best choice. Vanguard’s Expense Ratio Declines In January, Vanguard reported expense ratio reductions for 35 individual mutual fund shares. This also includes 12 Vanguard target-date funds. Separately, the Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund trimmed its expense ratio by 3 basis points. This U.S. mutual fund provider picked up the trend from last year. In 2015, Vanguard announced expense ratio reductions for 102 individual mutual fund shares. Vanguard has a history of lower expenses. In 1975, Vanguard managed $1.8 billion assets with an average expense ratio of 0.89%, while it currently manages about $3.2 trillion of assets and charges an average expense ratio of around 0.18%. If considered on an asset-weighted basis, the average expense ratio is even lower at 0.14%. Vanguard CEO Bill McNabb had said that “We strongly believe in setting our investors up for success, and one of the best ways to do that is to keep the cost of investing low, enabling them to keep more of what they earn.” Additionally, Todd Rosenbluth, director of ETF and mutual fund research at S&P Capital IQ said that “due to strong inflows in Vanguard mutual funds, they are able to bring expense ratios down for many mutual funds on a regular basis.” The Advantage of No-Load Funds Investing in no-load mutual funds reduces investors’ expenditure. Numerable research showed that no-load funds fared better than load funds on many occasions. Last year, out of the 15,129 no-load funds, the top 100 funds showed an average yearly return of 16.74%, beating the top 100 load funds’ average return of 11.05%. The average return of these top 100 no-load funds also came in ahead of the top performing mutual fund categories in 2015 such as Japan stock, healthcare and foreign small/mid growth to name a few. 5 No-Load Vanguard Mutual Funds to Consider As the stock market is subject to a persistently downward trend, mostly due to a continuous drop in oil prices and the crisis in China, it will be prudent to invest in no-load Vanguard Mutual Funds. In addition to the advantages discussed above, Vanguard mutual funds don’t charge front-end and back-end loads. A front-end load is charged while purchasing the shares. This type of fees can be as high as 8.5%. This might curtail a $50,000 investment to $45,750. On the other hand, a back-end load is charged when shares are sold. This type of fees can be as high as 5% to 7%. Meanwhile, Vanguard mutual funds charge expense ratios that are on an average 82% less than the industry average. Let us now take a hypothetical low-cost scenario. We assume that the value of a portfolio is $100,000 and it is expected to grow at an average of 6% yearly. Now, if we consider an expense ratio in a low-cost environment to be 0.25%, while the higher-cost scenario has an expense ratio of 0.9%, then in almost 30 years, the low-cost investor will emerge as a winner by gaining about $100,000 more than the high-cost investor. Additionally, such funds when combined with a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) are expected to boost your returns. The following funds also have impressive 3-year and 5-year annualized returns and the minimum initial investment is within $5000. Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund Investor (MUTF: VSEQX ) seeks maximum long-term capital growth by investing in stocks of small and midsize companies. VSEQX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 10.8% and 11.1%, respectively. VSEQX carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 and has neither a front load nor a deferred load. The annual expense ratio of 0.21% is lower than the category average of 1.15%. Vanguard New Jersey Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor (MUTF: VNJTX ) seeks a high level of income exempt from both federal and New Jersey personal income taxes. VNJTX invests in high-quality municipal bonds issued by New Jersey State. VNJTX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 3.5% and 5.8%, respectively. VNJTX carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 and has neither a front load nor a deferred load. The annual expense ratio of 0.20% is lower than the category average of 0.91%. Vanguard Ohio Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Inv (MUTF: VOHIX ) seeks a high level of income exempt from both federal and Ohio personal income taxes. VOHIX invests in high-quality Ohio municipal securities. VOHIX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 4.2% and 6.4%, respectively. VOHIX carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 and has neither a front load nor a deferred load. The annual expense ratio of 0.16% is lower than the category average of 0.97%. Vanguard Value Index Fund Investor (MUTF: VIVAX ) seeks long-term growth of capital and income from dividends. VIVAX holds all the stocks in the Standard and Poor’s Value Index and attempts to match the performance of the index. VIVAX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 9.6% and 9.4%, respectively. VIVAX carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 and has neither a front load nor a deferred load. Annual expense ratio of 0.23% is lower than the category average of 1.11%. Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Investor (MUTF: VBINX ) seeks income and long-term growth of capital and income. VBINX’s assets are divided between indexed portfolios of stocks and bonds, with 60% of its assets in stocks and 40% in fixed-income securities. VBINX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 6.8% and 7.4%, respectively. VBINX carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 and has neither a front load nor a deferred load. The annual expense ratio of 0.23% is lower than the category average of 0.89%. Original Post