Tag Archives: energy

ETF Deathwatch For September 2015: 13 Members Recently Died

Seventeen new names joined ETF Deathwatch this month, but the overall membership roll dropped by five as 13 members died and nine left due to improved health. The current count stands at 325 (233 ETFs and 92 ETNs). The number of actively-managed funds on the list declined from 41 to 39. All newly-launched products are granted an exclusion from ETF Deathwatch for the first six months of their life. This gives them an opportunity to attract investor interest either in the form of sufficient assets to achieve profitability or enough trading activity to spur asset growth in future months. For September, the 149 new products launched between March 1 and August 31 are excluded. This leaves 1,619 eligible ETFs and ETNs. From a percentage viewpoint, ETFs have lower representation on Deathwatch than ETNs. Within the ETF classification, passively-managed funds are currently faring better than actively-managed ones. The overall ETF representation comes in at 16.3% of the eligible funds, with 14.8% of the 1,307 eligible passively-managed funds and 32.0% of the 122 eligible actively managed ETFs on the list. Even though the quantity of listed ETNs has shrunk by more than 10% this year, nearly half of their remaining population is on Deathwatch. For September, 48.4% of the 190 eligible ETNs are on the list. Day traders have been migrating from 2X to 3X leveraged ETFs to get the biggest bang for their buck. As a result, 2X funds are falling out of favor, and four more of them were added to ETF Deathwatch this month. Six of the other September additions are from sponsors with little or no name recognition among retail ETF investors. ETFs from Arrow, EGShares, GreenHaven, KraneShares, Lattice, and Sit are new members. BlackRock closed 18 of its iShares ETFs in August. Twelve of these closed ETFs make up the bulk of the ETFs that came off of Deathwatch this month. Perhaps what is more interesting is the fact that six of the iShares ETF closures were not on Deathwatch. For example, iShares FTSE China (NASDAQ: FCHI ) had more than $37 million in assets and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Eastern Europe (NYSEARCA: ESR ) had nearly $31 million, keeping them both off the list. The current criteria for ETF Deathwatch states that funds with more than $25 million in assets are automatically removed from the list. So far this year, eleven products with more than $25 million in assets have closed. It may be time to raise that threshold. The average asset level of products on ETF Deathwatch held steady at $6.8 million, and the quantity of products with less than $2 million also remained constant at 62. The average age increased from 49.7 to 50.1 months, and the number of products more than five years old was unchanged at 110. Here is the Complete List of 325 Products on ETF Deathwatch for September 2015 compiled using the objective ETF Deathwatch Criteria. The 17 ETPs added to ETF Deathwatch for September: Arrow QVM Equity Factor (NYSEARCA: QVM ) Direxion Daily Basic Materials Bull 3x (NYSEARCA: MATL ) EGShares Brazil Infrastructure (NYSEARCA: BRXX ) ETRACS CMCI Silver TR ETN (NYSEARCA: USV ) GreenHaven Coal Fund (NYSEARCA: TONS ) Guggenheim S&P High Income Infrastructure (NYSEARCA: GHII ) iPath US Treasury Flattener ETN (NASDAQ: FLAT ) KraneShares FTSE Emerging Markets Plus (BATS: KEMP ) Lattice Emerging Markets Strategy (NYSEARCA: ROAM ) ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers (NYSEARCA: SMDV ) ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats (NYSEARCA: REGL ) ProShares Ultra Gold Miners (NYSEARCA: GDXX ) ProShares Ultra Junior Miners (NYSEARCA: GDJJ ) ProShares UltraShort Gold Miners (NYSEARCA: GDXS ) ProShares UltraShort Junior Miners (NYSEARCA: GDJS ) RevenueShares Global Growth Fund (NYSEARCA: RGRO ) Sit Rising Rate ETF (NYSEARCA: RISE ) The 9 ETPs removed from ETF Deathwatch due to improved health: Columbia Large Cap Growth (NYSEARCA: RPX ) PowerShares KBW Capital Markets (NYSEARCA: KBWC ) PowerShares KBW Insurance (NYSEARCA: KBWI ) ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (NYSEARCA: YXI ) ProShares Ultra S&P Regional Banking (NYSEARCA: KRU ) ProShares UltraShort Technology (NYSEARCA: REW ) QuantShares U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta (NYSEARCA: BTAL ) SPDR BofA Merrill Lynch Emerging Markets Corp Bond (NYSEARCA: EMCD ) SPDR S&P International Consumer Discretionary (NYSEARCA: IPD ) The 13 ETPs removed from ETF Deathwatch due to delisting: AdvisorShares Accuvest Global Long Short (NYSEARCA: AGLS ) iShares Asia Developed Real Estate (NASDAQ: IFAS ) iShares Financials Bond (NYSEARCA: MONY ) iShares Industrials Bond (NYSEARCA: ENGN ) iShares MSCI All Country Asia Information Technology (NASDAQ: AAIT ) iShares MSCI All Country Asia x-Japan SmallCap (NASDAQ: AXJS ) iShares MSCI Australia Small-Cap (BATS: EWAS ) iShares MSCI Canada Small-Cap (BATS: EWCS ) iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Growth (NASDAQ: EGRW ) iShares MSCI Emerging Markets EMEA (NASDAQ: EEME ) iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Discretionary (NASDAQ: EMDI ) iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Energy Sector (NASDAQ: EMEY ) iShares MSCI Singapore Small-Cap (NYSEARCA: EWSS ) ETF Deathwatch Archives Disclosure covering writer: No positions in any of the securities mentioned. No positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned. No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned.

What Will Happen To Utility Stocks If The Fed Raises Rates?

Summary Relative to the yield on the 10-year Treasury, utilities actually look cheap today. Based on earnings, however, they look expensive. The decline in utility prices so far this year is likely the market preparing for a rate increase. If rates do go up, the worst of the damage has likely already been done; and there won’t be a large amount of additional downside. Utilities are often thought of as a “bond substitute”. They have fairly steady earnings and usually have regulatory support to keep them healthy. Investors often think of utility dividends as a revenue source comparable to a bond’s interest payment. Ever since 2008’s financial crisis, utility valuations have been influenced by the artificially low interest rate environment the Fed created. Since the returns available from bonds have been so terrible, investors have naturally moved to utility stocks as a way to increase their income. As the Fed discusses the possibility of higher rates, investors should think about the implications for their utility holdings. You can really see how interest rates have impacted utility stocks (as measured by the Philadelphia Utility Index (UTY) since 2014 in the following chart. Chart 1 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet In 2014, while interest rates were falling, all stocks were basically rising (as shown by the S&P 500), but the utilities seemed to be receiving an added boost. Utilities peaked early this year, and since then, as Treasury yields have risen, they have taken a fall much greater than the rest of the market. A large amount of the utility drop is likely from investors anticipating a Fed rate increase and trying to get out before a big fall. Expanding this chart to the turn of the century provides additional observations. Chart 2 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet First off, you can see that utility dividend yields were lower than the 10-year treasury essentially until late 2002. At that point Enron, the California Electricity Crisis, and unwise investments by many players in the industry, finally took its toll, and utility values crashed. The yield on the 10-year treasury was actually falling because of the recession, but utilities performed terribly even with their “safe haven” status. Then over the next few years, as 10-year Treasury rates rose, utilities actually performed well. Utility dividend yields again were below 10-year Treasury until the 2008 financial crisis. The next thing to look at is the rise in the 10-year rate in 2013. There was a sizable initial drop when interest rates bounced off their lows, but the UTY stabilized before the upward move in rates was complete. Also, UTY components Exelon (NYSE: EXC ) and FirstEnergy (NYSE: FE ) were going through dividend cuts at this time, which may have had a bigger impact on the group’s underperformance than the rise of the 10-year. The next chart shows the ratio of the UTY’s dividend yield to the 10-year Treasury. Since the turn of the century, utility yields have been about 1.2x the 10-year Treasury. Today’s ratio is about 1.9x, which is more than one standard deviation above the average over the past fifteen years. Chart 3 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet The above chart basically says that utilities are cheap today relative to the 10-year Treasury. You could also argue that the historical average ratio between utility yields and the 10-year is actually artificially high because of industry issues early in the century, making today’s ratio look even further cheaper compared to the “true” average. An alternative way to look at this data is to take the spread between utility dividend yields and the 10-year. This still basically leads to the same conclusion that utilities are cheap against Treasuries on a yield basis. Chart 4 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet So if we just limited the analysis to the impact of interest rates, utility investors wouldn’t have much to worry about. Treasury rates are still so low that there will be plenty of investors looking for a way to get higher income with relative safety. Utility yields have such a cushion that as 10-year rates increase, the spread would likely just shrink from the higher Treasuries. If utility yields were to increase, it would just keep spreads at today’s extreme levels. Of course utilities trade on more than just dividends, and another big driver for valuations is earnings. Chart 5 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet On this basis things don’t look as good for the utility group, but it isn’t a disaster waiting to happen. P/E ratios have come in a lot since they reached their peak at 18x earlier this year, but the current utility P/E of 14.8x is still above its 14.1x average over the last 15 years. If you look at the middle of the last decade, Treasury yields were 200-300bp greater than they are today, and utility P/E ratios were equal to or greater than today’s levels. So there is precedent for earnings valuations to be at today’s levels in an interest rate environment higher than today’s. This chart seems to imply that the drop in utilities this year has just been a preemptive move by the market, and if a Fed rate increase leads to higher interest rates, utilities have already made the majority of their adjustment. The post-Enron period was mentioned earlier in this article, and that is an event that could have artificially skewed the average P/E of the group below its “true” level. Of course, other unique things have happened in the past that could artificially move the average higher. For example, in the time period right before the Financial crisis, competitive power generation had a very positive outlook. It looked like these assets were only going to rise in value. Shale gas did a number on that prediction, but you could argue that the unique situation inflated the historical group average. (And maybe utilities with competitive assets are entering another period with increasing values. See here for more on that possibility.) Since there are reasons to adjust the average utility P/E up or down to get a “true” number, this article just uses the 14.1x based on the historic values. Another thing to note from chart 5 is that during the rising rate period of 2003-2004, when utilities made a substantial upward run, P/E ratios started much lower than today’s levels. This should wipe out any hope that a rise in rates today would come with an increase in utility stocks similar to 2003-2004. That was really a unique situation that doesn’t currently apply. This year’s move from an 18x P/E to a 14.8x P/E means about an 18% drop in utility stocks. If the P/E were to fall to the 14.1x historic average, this would require a further drop of 4.7%. If the group were to really get hit hard, and P/E ratios went to 13x, then the group would have to drop 12% from today’s level. If utility P/E ratios started going much lower, you would expect value investors to start moving into the space and prevent a freefall. Of course, when thinking of P/E ratios we also need to think about how the group compares to the market in general. The following chart shows the P/E of utilities compared to the P/E of the S&P 500 over time. Chart 6 (click to enlarge) Source: FactSet Based on this chart we again have a situation where utilities are trading a little rich compared to historical averages, but not outrageously so. Treasury yields have been more than 200bp higher than today’s level with utility P/E ratios compared to the S&P even higher than today. There could be some downward pressure on utilities based on this metric, especially if P/E ratios in the S&P 500 contract, but there is no reason to think things will go back to the way they were at the turn of the century. One last area that will be mentioned in this note is the impact of higher rates on utility earnings. Regulators set utility rates based on an allowed return on equity. As interest rates have been falling, these allowed ROEs have been falling as well. Chart 7 (click to enlarge) Source: SNL A Fed increase in rates should slow down this drop in utility ROEs, and help support utility earnings in the future. So a rate increase is not all bad news for utility investors. Conclusion While a rise in interest rates is not a good thing for owners of utility stocks, a tightening by the Fed in the near future should not lead to a disaster in these names. Right now it seems that low interest rates have increased demand for utilities by attracting investors looking for yield. As these investors have come into the space they have driven up P/E ratios in the sector, and investors focused on this valuation metric have likely stayed away. As rates rise, the balance between these two forces should gradually shift. But rates are starting at such a low level that utility yields will still be attractive to people looking to juice up the income in their portfolio, so there shouldn’t be a mad rush out from dividend-focused investors. The Philadelphia Utility Index has already fallen almost 18% off of its peak earlier this year. Utility P/E valuations were extremely high at that time, and it is likely the drop was in anticipation of interest rates falling later this year. Utilities would have to fall about 5% to bring their P/E back to this century’s average of about 14.1x, and they would only have to fall 12% to get down to 13x. If valuations start reaching these lower levels, then value investors would likely start moving back into utilities. The other thing to remember is that a rate increase is not all bad news for utilities. Higher rates should be beneficial in utility rate cases, allowing them to earn higher returns. So, even with a Fed increase, interest rates are likely to remain low and income investors will still want to own utilities for the added income. If too many income-driven investors leave and utilities go down by more than 12%, earnings valuations should start to look cheap, and it would put a floor under these names. Also, higher rates should help utilities in their rate cases, benefiting future earnings. So while you should expect a decline from the utility group if rates go up, it shouldn’t be a giant one. Housekeeping Items I am making the assumption that an increase in rates by the Fed will lead to a general increase in all Treasury rates. In theory, there are scenarios where you could say a rate increase at the Fed might lead to lower rates elsewhere in the financial world. (Maybe the Fed’s increase signals increased confidence in America’s economy, and money floods into US Treasuries lowering rates.) I’m not going to get in any type of complicated repercussions from a Fed increase. This analysis makes the simple assumption that if the Fed increases rates, Treasury rates will also increase. Historic utility performance was based on the Philadelphia Utility Index. The current components of the index are: AES Corp. (NYSE: AES ), Ameren (NYSE: AEE ), American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP ), CenterPoint Energy (NYSE: CNP ), Consolidated Edison (NYSE: ED ), Covanta (NYSE: CVA ), Dominion Resources (NYSE: D ), DTE Energy (NYSE: DTE ), Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK ), Edison International (NYSE: EIX ), El Paso Electric (NYSE: EE ), Entergy (NYSE: ETR ), Eversource Energy (NYSE: ES ), Exelon, FirstEnergy, NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE ), PG&E (NYSE: PCG ), Public Service Enterprise Group (NYSE: PEG ), Sourthern Company (NYSE: SO ), Xcel Energy (NYSE: XEL ). Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.