Tag Archives: energy

Time For Dow ETFs?

Dow Jones Industrial Average has been the worst performing index among the popular trio – S&P 500, Dow and Nasdaq – thanks mainly to a freefall in oil prices and rising rate worries in the U.S. Added to this, fears of a hard landing in China and its ripples throughout the world sent this key index into the correction territory in August. So far this year (as of October 9, 2015), SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (NYSEARCA: DIA ) is down about 4%. However, things seemed to have been set right for the Dow Jones lately on the oil price jump and the diminishing prospect of a rate hike this year. Oil prices regained some of the lost ground as the U.S. count of oil and gas drilling rigs slipped to a five-year low. Also, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) expects a remarkable drop in U.S. crude production through the middle of next year before a turnaround in late 2016. Oil output is estimated to fall from 9.2 million barrels per day (bpd) in 2015 to 8.9 million bpd in 2016. Needless to say, the rise in oil prices supported energy stocks greatly in recent sessions. On the other hand, a weak September job data pushed the speculative timeline of the Fed rate lift-off to early next year. After all, the year-to-date monthly pace of job gains now averages 198K and the pace for the last three months is much lower at 167K. This compares with the monthly average of 260K for 2014, hinting at the lost momentum in U.S. economic growth. And the stocks surged in hopes of incessant cheap money flows. Moreover, a soft job report curbed the dollar strength which in turn provided a long-awaited boost to the commodities and material stocks. Though all the major benchmarks are correlated and got the boost they needed in October from the Fed and energy-centric optimism, Dow remained relatively more beaten-down and thus is more prone to a sturdy reversal. If this was not enough, a dovish Fed pushed the interest rates down to a lower territory. This in turn brightened the appeal for more yielding securities. Notably, among the top ETFs, Jones Industrial Average-based DIA yields 2.33% annually (as of October 9, 2015) against the S&P 500-based SPY ‘s 2.02% and Nasdaq-100 based QQQ ‘s 1.08%. Below, we highlight a few Dow Jones-based ETF options which could be intriguing options to play: DIA seeks to match the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index. The index is price weighted and measures the performance of 30 large cap stocks traded in the U.S. markets. Industrials, Financials, IT, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care all hold double-digit exposure in the fund. However, it is subject to company-specific concentration risks as it invests more than half of its portfolio in the top 10 holdings. This $11.6 billion-fund trades in large volumes of over 5 million shares daily and charges 17 bps in fees. It advanced 4.8% in the last 10 trading sessions (as of October 9, 2015). The fund has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 with a Medium risk outlook. iShares Dow Jones U.S. ETF (NYSEARCA: IYY ) This $941.1 million ETF also tracks the Dow Jones U.S. total market index. This fund has a proportionate exposure in almost all sectors with maximum emphasis on IT (19.77%), Financials (17.47%), Health Care (13.91%), Consumer Discretionary (13.55%), and Industrials (10.66%). Unlike DIA, this 1,280-stock fund invests less than 15% share in the top 10 holdings. IYY charges 20 basis points as fees and added 4.2% in the last 10 trading sessions. ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (NYSEARCA: SDOG ) This fund applies the ‘Dogs of the Dow Theory’ on a sector-by-sector basis using the S&P 500. This could be easily done by selecting the five highest yielding securities in each of the 10 GICS sectors and equally weighing them. These higher yielding stocks will appreciate in order to bring their yields in line with the market, leading to outsized gains. This approach results in a portfolio of 51 stocks with each security accounting for less than 2.33% of total assets. The fund focuses on yield in the large cap market while giving investors roughly equal exposure to all sectors. SDOG has accumulated $1.1 billion in AUM and trades in good volume of more than 180,000 shares. It charges 40 bps in annual fees and has an annual dividend yield of 3.63%. The ETF was up over 5.9% in the last 10 days. Original Post

I Sold McDonald’s And Then Made These Moves

Summary I sold McDonald’s as I felt the future returns would be diminished. I bought Johnson & Johnson. I made a quick trade in Wells Fargo. I then added to my WEC Energy Group. Last week I published this article which detailed my reasons for selling McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD ). As I stated in the article, it was not easy selling MCD as I had held the stock for 8-years. However, I felt future growth was limited and the high dividend payout would limit future dividend growth. I decided that if I could find a stock with better long-term prospects, I would sell MCD. The stock had to pay a dividend in the vicinity of 3% or more, have good prospects for long term dividend growth, have a solid balance sheet, and have a business set for long-term growth. I keep a list of stocks that I believe are solid businesses and keep an eye on the price action so I am aware when they might become reasonably priced. One of those stocks is Johnson and Johnson (NYSE: JNJ ) and fortunately for me, it recently became reasonably priced. For most investors, JNJ needs no introduction, it is the largest health care company in the world, operating in three segments, consumer, pharmaceutical and medical devices. In the second quarter , consumer sales were $3.5 billion, pharmaceutical sales were $7.9 billion and medical devices had sales of $6.4 billion. Let’s take a look at all three of these segments. Consumer – The consumer segment primarily sells personal care products like nonprescription drugs, skin and hair care products, baby care products, oral care products and first aid products. JNJ products, like Tylenol and Listerine, are well known, but consumer is the smallest segment of JNJ. A few years back, JNJ was embarrassed by a rash of consumer product recalls due to poor safety protocols in the manufacturing plants. The recalls became so bad, that JNJ pulled many of its products from store shelves. After rebuilding their production facilities, JNJ products have slowly returned to the shelf and consumer sales have risen. In the second quarter worldwide consumer sales of $3.5 billion increased 2.3%, with U.S. sales up 2.7%, while outside the U.S. sales grew 2.1%. Look for JNJ to try and build their consumer business globally. Many of their products are regional and JNJ would like to expand their distribution. Here is a comment from JNJ management at a recent conference. ” Coupled with the fact that this business can be globalized, many of the brands have been developed regionally, we now think they can be taken on a more global scale .” Medical Devices – The medical devices segment sells a wide-range of products, such as wound care, surgical sports medicine. women’s health care, products for circulatory disease, blood glucose monitoring, orthopedic joint reconstruction, spinal products and disposable contact lenses. The medical device division recently completed a divestiture of Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics which reduced sales for the second quarter. Worldwide medical devices segment sales of $6.4 billion decreased 4.7%. U.S. sales declined 5.8% while sales outside the U.S. declined 3.9%. Excluding the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, underlying operational growth was 1.4% worldwide with the U.S. up 1.6% and growth of 1.4% outside the U.S. JNJ wants to be number one or number two in all their medical device businesses. Going forward, they want to focus on the orthopedic business as that is where they see the growth. Between 2015 and 2016 they will have 20 new product filings in the medical device business. Pharmaceuticals – The pharmaceutical segment includes products in therapeutics, anti-infective, anti-psychotic, cardiovascular, contraceptive, dermatology, gastrointestinal, hematology, immunology, neurology, oncology, pain management, urology and virology. As you can see, that is a long list and I could list all the drugs they currently have on market and what is about to come to market, but rather than list a bunch of drugs I cannot pronounce, I feel it is more important to share this fact. JNJ believes it will file 10 new drug filings by 2019, each with the potential to achieve $1 billion in annual sales. Here is a quote from JNJ’s second quarter earnings call . ” Our focused R&D strategy and commitment to driving launch excellence to ensure broad access and reimbursement has really come together to make a difference for patients and have this well-positioned to continue to drive above industry compound annual growth rate over the next several years. Fueled by seven of our recently launched products that we expect will each exceed $1 billion in sales this year and the more than 10 new products we plan to file by 2019 that each have $1 billion plus potential of their own based on their transformational potential to treat significant unmet medical needs worldwide .” In the second quarter worldwide sales of $7.9 billion increased 1% with U.S. sales down 1.5% and sales outside the U.S. up 3.8%. New competitors in hepatitis C and a divestiture impacted sales results. Why I am Confident in JNJ Going Forward – All the information I gave you concerning the various segments of JNJ business is interesting, but that is not why I bought the stock. I bought the stock for the following reasons.. The entire world population is getting old and in need of increased medical care. I like to buy stocks that have an overriding theme that will increase their chance for success. In JNJ’s case, their unique broad spectrum of health care products makes them an excellent candidate to benefit from the aging world population. Here are just a few facts highlighting why JNJ is likely to benefit from demographic trends. The United Nations states population aging is unprecedented, without parallel in human history and the 21st century will see even more rapid aging than did the previous century. The global share of older people (aged 60 and over) increased from 9.2 percent in 1990 to 11.7 percent in 2013 and will continue to grow to 21.1% in 2050. In the U.S. the older population-persons 65 years or older-numbered 44.7 million in 2013 (the latest year for which data is available). They represented 14.1% of the U.S. population, about one in every seven Americans. By 2060, there will be about 98 million older persons, more than twice their number in 2013. People 65+ represented 14.1% of the population in the year 2013 but are expected to grow to be 21.7% of the population by 2040. The increased number of persons over 65 years will potentially lead to increased health-care costs. The health-care cost per capita for persons over 65 years in the United States and other developed countries is three to five times greater than the cost for persons under 65 years, and the rapid growth in the number of older persons, coupled with continued advances in medical technology, is expected to create upward pressure on health- and long-term–care spending. One million Americans a year are getting total joint replacement. That figure is expected to grow to four million over the next 20-years. Global annual spending on cancer drugs has hit $100bn for the first time By 2021, annual prescription drug spending will nearly double, to $483.2 billion Health spending growth in the United States is projected to average 5.8 percent for 2014-24, reflecting the Affordable Care Act’s coverage expansions, faster economic growth, and population aging. Those are just a few facts, I could add more, but to me, it is obvious that as the world ages, health care will be a fast growing sector. I am confident, that JNJ, with its over 250 operating companies across the globe, will share in that growth. Why JNJ over McDonald’s – When comparing the two companies it seemed obvious to me, that JNJ was the financially stronger company and the company more likely to grow its business and dividend in the future. Let’s compare the two companies. All numbers are from Yahoo finance. Category JNJ MCD Price to earnings 16.75 23.95 Price to earnings growth 3.10 3.25 Price to book 3.70 9.05 Total cash $33.95B $4B Cash per share $12.26 $4.25 Debt $19.31B $17.9B Debt to equity 27.14 169.51 Yield 3.17 3.36 Dividend payout ratio 50.2% 77.96% Operating cash flow 17.09B 6.55B I think any fair-minded observer would look at those numbers and say JNJ is the more financially sound company and the company more likely to reward shareholders going forward. At a recent Morgan Stanley conference, JNJ CFO Dominic Caruso said this about the large amount of cash that is on the balance sheet. ” So I think it’s safe to say, we have sufficient capital to put to use, we’re going to put it to use. It’s going to be in a value creating acquisition, or in share buybacks ” So we have two companies. MCD which may be cash challenged, or JNJ which is sitting on a pile of cash. We have JNJ selling at a P/E under 17 and MCD selling for over 23. We have JNJ which has raised it’s dividend 6% and 7% the last two years and we have MCD which has raised it’s dividend 5% the last two years. We have JNJ which saw earnings per share grow from $3.49 in 2011 to $5.70 in 2014 and we have MCD which saw earnings fall from $5.27 in 2011 to $4.82 in 2014. After considering all that information, on September 28th, I sold MCD for $97.57 and bought a full position in JNJ for $90.41. I expect to hold forever, or until the business deteriorates. I expect JNJ to grow slowly, benefiting from the demographic trends and JNJ’s diverse health care related products. I also expect the dividend to grow steadily. Next Move McDonald’s was the second biggest position in my portfolio, so selling it freed up a large sum of cash. Even though I bought a full position in JNJ, I still had cash left over from the sale, in addition to cash that had built up in my account from the recent quarterly dividends. As I sat on the cash contemplating what to do with it, I saw a short term situation develop which I took advantage of. On Friday, October 2nd, the Labor Department announced a very disappointing jobs number. When I saw the jobs number, I knew the number was very disappointing and I knew traders would determine any Federal Reserve rate increase, which many thought was coming soon, would be delayed. Based on that, I had a hunch the banks would take a pounding at the open, as investors would determine the banks interest rate spreads, which everyone thought would be improving with a rate increase, would now be further in the future. As I expected, the market opened down big and the banks were the worse performers. I thought this was very short-sighted and an overreaction. Banks were in no worse shape on October 2nd than they were on October 1st. So I took the cash funds in my account and bought Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC ) for $49.60 shortly after the open. This was a short-term trade, not an investment. I have sworn off banks as an investment as it seems every five years or so, they have some sort of crisis. Fortunately for me, before the day was over, WFC was back above $51.00 and closed at $51.26. I sold WFC on October 7th for $52.56, a quick gain of approximately 6%. The 6% gain added a little more funds to my account, so on October 7th, after selling the Wells Fargo shares, I bought shares in WEC Energy Group (NYSE: WEC ), formerly Wisconsin Energy. I paid $51.88 per share. I began building a position in WEC in July, when I made two purchases, one for $45.10 and another for $46.34. Those two purchases amounted to a little bit more than a half position. With the latest purchase, I now have about an 85% position at a cost basis of $47.63. I imagine I will complete the position before the end of the year. The company, formerly known as Wisconsin Energy, recently purchased Intergys Energy another Midwest utility. The combined company is now known as WECEnergyGroup. WEC is deserving of its own article as there is a lot I would like to say, but briefly let me mention this. WEC provides electricity and natural gas service to 4.4 million customers across four states, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan and Minnesota. They are the eighth largest natural gas distribution company in the country and among the 15 largest investor owned utilities in the country. WEC currently yields 3.5% and investors can expect dividend growth of 6-8% a year, in-line with earnings growth. I think WEC is an excellent, financially sound, utility which has several unique characteristics that differentiates it from other utilities. I will expand on WEC in a future article, but suffice to say, I intend to hold WEC forever, or until the business deteriorates. The End Result When all was said and done, I had sold McDonald’s, a long time holding and purchased Johnson and Johnson, a dividend stalwart, that had become attractively priced. I then made a quick purchase and sell of Wells Fargo that resulted in a small profit. Subsequently, I purchased additional shares in WEC Energy Group. So I now own a stock, JNJ, that, in-my-opinion, is a better value and has better long term prospects than MCD, which I previously owned. I also was able to purchase additional shares in WEC Energy Group a stock I am currently building a position in. In addition, the dividends I get from the shares I bought in JNJ and WEC will be slightly more than the dividends I was getting from MCD. Investing is about maximizing your investable cash. I believe in long-term investing, however, at times, there may be a company that offers better value, better growth, and/or better dividend growth, than the stock you own. In that case, selling a stock that you have owned for a long time makes sense. That is the situation I recently saw and that is the action I took. Only time will tell how it works out.

CenterPoint Energy: Be Sure To Understand What You Own

Summary CenterPoint currently yields nearly 5.35% and has $1.2B in cash reserves. Transmission and distribution income – nearly 50% of operating income – is geographically concentrated. It is largely considered to be a utility – however, a quarter of the income is derived from the MLP equity interest, which has been historically volatile. CenterPoint Energy (NYSE: CNP ) is a diversified pseudo-utility with a wide range of operations. The company operates a regulated natural gas utility business, a transmission and distribution arm, and retains ownership of substantial equity interest in Enable Midstream Partners (NYSE: ENBL ). CNP has been a favorite of investors chasing yield, but the shares have had trouble keeping up with the utility index over the past two years. Unfortunately for shareholders, the shares are down 20%, compared to a 20% gain for the broader utilities index. Contrary to what you might think, the dividend has actually been growing measurably the past two years, and the company now yields over 5.49%, well above historical averages. Is there an opportunity here for shareholders for both solid yield and capital appreciation? Business Operations CenterPoint’s strongest business unit in regards to operating income is its electric transmission and distribution business. This segment provides the infrastructure to connect power plants to substations which connect to the retail customer. This is a low-business risk, high-value business. Because the infrastructure is entirely pole/wire assets, there is significantly less regulatory and environmental risk compared to actual power generation. While this is a monopolistic business with very little risk, CenterPoint’s operations do have geographic risk in that the company only owns assets located in and around the House/Galveston metropolitan area. While this area has retained its strong growth even with the fallout of plummeting energy prices, there is no guarantee that this trend will continue. A reversal in the area’s fortune would result in a slowdown in demand for electricity, driving earnings down in this segment. The most stable and consistent business unit is CenterPoint’s intrastate natural gas distribution business. Compared to the transmission and distribution business that is concentrated in one area, this segment provides natural gas to more than three million customers in six states. Like other gas utilities, the company passes along the cost of the gas to customers, so there is little effect of gas price fluctuations on CenterPoint’s profitability aside from revenue numbers. Further cementing operating results, the company has weather normalization and decoupling mechanisms in place to limit the effects of seasonality and variations in customer demand in five of six states. This portion of CenterPoint is extremely well run, and earnings consistently bump up against the maximum allowed rate of return that the public utility commissions have set for the company (authorized return on equity in the 10% range). As mentioned, CenterPoint owns 55.4% of the limited partner units of Enable Midstream Partners, receiving 40% of the distribution rights. Operational control is split 50/50 between CenterPoint and OGE Energy (NYSE: OGE ). The reason for CenterPoint’s underperformance may largely lie with poor results from Enable. Enable’s first half of the year has been poor when compared to the 2014 results ($93M in operating income for Enable in 1H 2015, compared to $138M in 1H 2014). The downside action in Enable may have been overdone. Compared to many midstream companies like Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI ), the company is much less levered (2.6x net debt/EBITDA), making it better positioned to handle any long downturn in U.S. energy midstream operations. I think the weak recent share price performance is primarily related to the company’s short public history and heavy insider ownership. With very little track record and such a small percentage of the float open for trading, the shares have been volatile, scaring many retail and institutional investors away. Operating Results (click to enlarge) Revenue can vary widely year to year, especially within the natural gas distribution segment. As an example, revenue grew 40% from 2012 to 2014 ($959M), but operating income only grew 26% ($60M). This can cause operating margin decreases through no fault of the company as these operating margins decrease as the fixed cost of the natural gas being provided rises. Meanwhile, further putting pressure on operating margins has been a steady increase in operations and maintenance costs within the electric transmission and distribution segment. Between 2012 and 2014, revenue grew 12%. Regrettably, operations and maintenance costs grew 32%. While its maintenance capital expenditures will be recovered as part of capital plans eventually, these recoveries may not be as timely as investors might expect. (click to enlarge) 2014 was a concerning time for the company from a cash flow perspective. Cash from operations had fallen nearly $500M from 2012 levels, and capital expenditures were up tremendously. CenterPoint had to plug the hole with the $600M in proceeds from long-term debt it had raised late in the year prior. With $6.4B in net debt, the company is only moderately leveraged at 3.2x net debt/EBITDA. However, with CenterPoint keeping $1.2B in cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet, it is prepared to weather any mild operational issues quite well. Conclusion When investing in CenterPoint, investors need to be aware they aren’t buying a company with 100% regulated utility operations. The higher dividend yield here is likely justified, given the volatility present in the Enable ownership. On the plus side, the natural gas operations are very well run, and the electric transmission business, while experiencing headwinds currently, is also solid. In my opinion, the shares likely trade around their fair value. Investors looking for yield can likely comfortably add some exposure to the company in the $17-18/share range.