Tag Archives: energy

Relevance Of Portfolio Holdings: 3 Concentrated Funds To Buy And Sell

In our previous article, we discussed how concentrated mutual funds rely on the limited numbers of stock holdings that they own. Focused funds invest in a limited number of companies, rather than having a diversified portfolio. In this context, we showed how Sequoia Fund (MUTF: SEQUX ), which has slumped nearly 70% since Oct. 18, has learnt a lesson for its nearly 30% exposure to Valeant Pharmaceuticals (NYSE: VRX ). We also spoke of funds such as Fairholme Allocation (MUTF: FAAFX ) and Fidelity Select Computers Portfolio (MUTF: FDCPX ) that have gained on the strong performance of its core holdings. However, both FAAFX and FDCPX had a relatively higher number of total issues in stock holdings. The number of holdings in a portfolio may be considered one of the measures of portfolio risk. A lower number of total issues will indicate that the fund is more concentrated and is thus more vulnerable to fluctuations in these holdings. So, if a fund invests in just five stocks, it is highly susceptible to fluctuations in them. Though northward bound stock holdings brighten the prospects of concentrated funds, the advantage of portfolio diversity is denied. In case of a well-diversified portfolio, losses in some stocks may be offset by gains in others. In addition to the number of holdings in a portfolio, the percentage of assets invested in stocks is also crucial. A fund with the bulk of its assets invested in a particular stock is most likely to be guided by the performance of that stock. This time, let’s look at three Sell-ranked concentrated mutual funds that have total issues in the stock holdings below 30 and have underperformed in recent times. For investors ready to gamble, we will also pick three Buy-ranked concentrated mutual funds that have outperformed broader markets despite holding a limited variety of stocks in its portfolio. 3 Sell-Ranked Concentrated Funds These mutual funds either carry a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4 (Sell) or Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5 (Strong Sell) and have total issues in the stock holdings below 30. These funds have underperformed over the year to date and 1-year periods. The minimum initial investment for these funds is below $5000. Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (MUTF: FSUTX ) seeks capital growth over the long run. FSUTX invests the lion’s share of its assets in common stocks of companies primarily involved in the utilities sector, and companies that derive the major portion of its revenues from operations related to this sector. FSUTX invests in both U.S. and non-U.S. firms. FSUTX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5. The number of holdings in FSUTX’s portfolio is 24. FSUTX has lost 11.3% year to date and is down 10.6% over the last 1-year period. FSUTX’s top 3 holdings include NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE ), Exelon (NYSE: EXC ) and Sempra Energy (NYSE: SRE ) and the fund has invested respectively 15.7%, 12.8% and 10.5% in them. NextEra Energy, Exelon and Sempra Energy have lost 4%, 20.8% and 7.3%, respectively, so far this year. Tocqueville Select (MUTF: TSELX ) invests in a focused number of small and mid-sized domestic companies. TSELX normally invests in a focused group of 30 stocks. A maximum of 25% of its assets may be invested in non-US securities. TSELX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4. The number of holdings in TSELX’s portfolio is 27. TSELX has lost 10% year to date and is down 8.2% over the 1-year period. TSELX’s top 3 holdings include Web.com Group, j2 Global (NASDAQ: JCOM ) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE: MTX ) and the fund has invested 6.2%, 5% and 4.8% in them, respectively. While Web.com Group and j2 Global have gained respectively 29.6% and 32.4% year to date, Minerals Technologies has lost 12.1%. AMG SouthernSun Small Cap Investor (MUTF: SSSFX ) invests in common stocks of small cap US firms. Market capitalizations of these companies (at the time of purchase) are within the capitalization range of firms listed in the Russell 2000 Index. SSSFX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5. The number of holdings in SSSFX’s portfolio is 26. SSSFX has lost 12% year to date and is down 15.3% over the 1-year period. SSSFX’s top 3 holdings include AGCO Corp. (NYSE: AGCO ), Darling International (NYSE: DAR ) and Centene Corporation (NYSE: CNC ) and the fund has invested 5.7%, 5.3% and 5.2% in them, respectively. So far this year, while AGCO and Centene have gained a respective 7.5% and 14.5%, Darling International has lost 48.6%. 3 Buy-Ranked Concentrated Funds A counter argument in case of concentrated funds is that well-chosen stock picks that are surging can also translate into significant gains for mutual funds. So, for investors ready to bet, below are 3 mutual funds that either carry a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) or Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2 (Buy) and have total issues in the stock holdings below 30. These funds have garnered decent gains over the year to date and 1-year periods. The minimum initial investment in these funds is below $5000. Davis Financial A (MUTF: RPFGX ) uses Davis Investment Discipline to invest a minimum of 80% of its net assets in securities issued by companies engaged in the financial services sector. These companies own financial services-related assets that are at least 50% of the value of total assets or earn a minimum of 50% of revenues from offering financial services. RPFGX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2. The number of holdings in RPFGX’s portfolio is 28. RPFGX has gained 3.8% year to date and is up 5.6% over the 1-year period. RPFGX’s top 3 holdings include Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC ), Markel Corporation (NYSE: MKL ) and American Express (NYSE: AXP ) and the fund has invested 8.9%, 6.9% and 6.6% in them, respectively. While Wells Fargo and Markel have gained 4.8% and 31.8% respectively year to date, American Express has lost 20.6%. ICON Consumer Staples A (MUTF: ICRAX ) invests most of its assets in equities of companies belonging to the Consumer Staples sector. ICRAX may invest in common stocks and preferred stocks of companies of all sizes. ICRAX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2. The number of holdings in ICRAX’s portfolio is 23. ICRAX has gained 2.6% year to date and is up 5% over the 1-year period. ICRAX’s top 3 holdings include CVS Health (NYSE: CVS ), Reynolds American (NYSE: RAI ) and Tyson Foods (NYSE: TSN ) and the fund has invested 8.3%, 7.3% and 7% in them, respectively. Year to date, Reynolds American and Tyson Foods have gained 46.7% and 11.7%, while CVS Health has lost 2.5%. Smead Value Investor (MUTF: SMVLX ) keeps roughly 25-30 firms in its portfolio and invests in common stocks of large-cap firms. SMVLX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2. The number of holdings in SMVLX’s portfolio is 26. SMVLX has gained 4.9% year to date and is up 7.9% over the 1-year period. SMVLX’s top 3 holdings include NVR Inc. (NYSE: NVR ), Amgen (NASDAQ: AMGN ) and Tegna (NYSE: TGNA ) and the fund has invested 6%, 5.9% and 5.8% in them, respectively. NVR, Amgen and Tegna have gained 29.6%, 2.1% and 10.6% respectively year to date. Original Post

Is Listed Infrastructure The Most Attractive Investment Avenue Now?

Summary In the current global scenario where traditional asset classes no longer assure stable returns, listed infrastructure is attracting investors in a big way. In 2015, investors have largely been cautious about the equity markets due to expectations of stable growth in the US and the likely interest rate hike by the Fed. However, inconsistent economic indicators, the Greek crisis, and a slowdown in China impacted returns. Even amid concerns about the global economy, bond yields were at their lowest in most developed economies, making fixed income investments unattractive. Global fund managers consider real estate an alternative investment avenue for stable returns on their investments, as real estate assets are likely to witness substantial price appreciation. By Ati Ranjan and Subarna Poddar Global fund managers consider real estate an alternative investment avenue for stable returns on their investments, as real estate assets are likely to witness substantial price appreciation. Listed infrastructure, an up-and-coming segment of the real estate sector, is gradually gaining traction among fund managers due to its monopolistic nature, price inelasticity, stable predicted cash flows, and inflation hedging characteristic. Although these assets are also traded in the form of equities, the underlying asset is immune to default risks due to strong government backing. Furthermore, these equities act as defensive plays during the downturn. Listed infrastructure assets are largely government or quasi-government owned. The sovereign backing makes ongoing infrastructure projects less likely to default compared with other privately held real estate asset classes. These assets work in a cost plus model; hence, profitability is already hedged. Also, listed infrastructure assets typically enjoy monopoly due to entry barriers set by the local governments, thus maintaining stable cash flows. Demand for these assets is often inelastic to price changes, such as electricity, water, toll, as people continue using these utilities despite tariff changes. Thus, this asset class provides stable returns even during an economic downturn. Although investment in infrastructure is capital intensive, the equity route makes it cheaper, investor friendly and keeps transactions transparent. High-return, moderate-risk asset class What is listed infrastructure? Listed infrastructure is a comprehensive and diversified asset class of largely state-owned or public-private partnership (NYSE: PPP ) companies that develop, manage, and own assets related to energy, communications, water, transportation, and other systems essential for an economy. This asset class is segmented into small units and listed as equities on stock exchanges. Hence, the quantum of investment is lower than that of a direct investment in real estate. Furthermore, these equities act as defensive plays and protect investors during market corrections as they carry low default risk and are backed by sovereigns. The asset class outperformed during pre and post crisis period If we compare the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index with its peers over the pre and post economic crisis period, we can see that infrastructure clearly outperformed during the pre-crisis (2006-07) and post recovery period, i.e., 2012 onward. During the recovery period (2010-2011), the asset class clearly outperformed equities (S&P 500 Index). The chart below shows that the asset class has remained superior to equity investments over 12 years and, hence, we can conclude that it offers better returns irrespective of the economic conditions. Performances of various asset classes over last 12 years: Source: Bloomberg Most attractive features of listed infrastructure Financial and operational performance · Access: Direct exposure to global basic infrastructure facilities that are monopolistic · Liquidity: Liquid exposure to infrastructure investments, and no issue with deal flows and fixed investment horizon · Transparency: Access to existing and established infrastructure facilities, and no issue with blind pool investing · Low impact of regulatory changes: Regulatory changes are managed by governments; as these assets are primarily government or PPP projects, the regulatory changes are likely to have low impact on them · Diversification: Allows global investors to easily diversify their portfolio holdings as per the specific risk profile (e.g., geographic allocation, currency, level of gearing, and regulatory and political risks) · Cost: Cost is lower than unlisted infrastructure investments or direct buying/selling of properties · Level of gearing: Lower level of gearing than unlisted infrastructure and real estate firms, and primarily backed by government funding Classification of listed infrastructure Source: Aranca Research Cash generation and return · Higher dividend: Dividend accounted for over 33% of the overall returns of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index in the last 10 years; average dividend growth outpaced average inflation. · Predictable cash flow: The assets work in a cost plus model; therefore, future profitability is secured. · Inflation protection: Revenues of listed infrastructure companies are linked to inflation, thereby providing protection against it. (i.e. concessions permitting rent escalations linked to inflation, regulated price mechanisms that consider rate of inflation) Growth in dividend per share of listed infrastructure companies vs. CPI (click to enlarge) Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, IMF, Bloomberg, Aranca Research Operational risks Delays: Since these kinds of projects are majorly government owned, there are possibilities of delays in project execution; this could interrupt income generation from the project. Financing: As many emerging market economies are facing funding shortage, there is possibility of slower disbursement of resources as well, as big funding organizations may not sanction adequate grants. Recovery of other alternative asset classes: Other asset classes could recover at a faster pace and make investment in listed infrastructure assets less attractive. Why listed infrastructure? Since the beginning of 2015, global equity markets have witnessed significant volatility due to a series of global events. Slowdown in China’s economy, declining GDP of Japan and the Greek debt crisis dampened investor sentiment. The Eurozone still has a long road ahead in terms of complete recovery. Amid a strengthening dollar, emerging economies such as China and India are not offering encouraging signs to equity investors. The US is the only market that has performed fairly well in 2015 compared with other geographies, supported by a bullish dollar and an expected rate hike by the US Federal Reserve later this year. The ongoing volatility in oil prices have kept investors directionless. Oil prices witnessed a steep fall until mid-2015, primarily due to strong non-OPEC oil production forecast. The OPEC’s refusal to reduce oil output worsened the situation. Furthermore, the withdrawal of sanctions on Iran after the nuclear deal exerted pressure on oil prices. The weak outlook for oil prices impacted the earnings of companies in the energy sector across the world, which consequently reflected in their stock prices. In addition, the ongoing drop in commodity prices affected investor sentiment across global markets. Separately, possibility of new drug pricing rules triggered negativity about biotech stocks, which was once considered the most defensive sector. Performance of major global equity indices (2015 YTD) Source: Bloomberg Among the investment options available, portfolio managers prefer fixed income or bonds, real estate investment trusts (REITs), bullion, and listed infrastructure to create a balanced portfolio. Bond yields globally are already under pressure and reached their all-time lows in January 2015 (US 30-year Treasury yield at +1.7%, UK 10-year gilt yield +1.4%). Moreover, any increase in the rates, especially a rate hike by the US Fed, would make them an unattractive investment option. With regards to gold, a sharp drop in its prices has severely impacted its safe-haven status. With continued decline in commodity and gold prices, the bullion price is expected to remain under pressure in the near term. Real estate is another alternative that provides higher capital gains; however, it is capital intensive and, hence, represents higher risk. In such a scenario, where most of the sectors are underperforming, a defensive play with stable returns and moderate risks is likely to gain attention of the global fund managers. Listed infrastructure is an asset class with all the above mentioned qualities. It offers high returns as well as steady income and assured capital benefits. The equity route makes it less capital intensive and provides benefits of the bull-run during positive economic scenario. Furthermore, this asset class is inflation protected. The inflation-linked nature of revenue from infrastructure businesses enables an automatic hedging against any rise in interest rates, thereby providing listed infrastructure an edge over other investment options. Market size of listed infrastructure assets to rapidly increase According to McKinsey Global Institute, infrastructure investment of around USD57 trillion would be required to achieve the projected global GDP by 2030, accounting for 3.5% of the expected global GDP in 2030. Furthermore, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development estimates a required global investment of USD40 trillion in new and existing infrastructure projects by 2030. With such large infrastructure spending, opportunities in listed infrastructure are expected to substantially increase. Market capitalization of listed infrastructure assets has increased to USD3.3 trillion in 2015 YTD as compared to USD861 billion in 15 years ago. Market capitalization of global listed infrastructure Source: Aranca Research The advancements in the global listed infrastructure market have enabled easier access to an asset class that has been traditionally illiquid. Historically, the global listed infrastructure market has performed robustly irrespective of the market scenario. This asset class offers higher returns at moderate risk. Currently, in addition to several smaller-sized funds, six major global funds are operating in this segment, with a combined asset size of USD4 billion. Some major players in the listed infrastructure segment that hold investments from top global fund managers are: Source: Fund fact sheets, Aranca Research Larger players attract major portion of investments in listed infrastructure The S&P Global Infrastructure Index comprises 76 companies, with a combined market capitalization of nearly USD1.2 trillion. The top 10 companies account for a large portion of the market capitalization. In terms of sector classification, Industrials accounts for 40.7% of the total index weight, followed by Utilities (39.3%) and Energy (20.0%). The key index players attract higher investments from global fund managers. S&P Global Infrastructure Index Country Number of constituents Index weight (%) US 22 35.1% Canada 7 7.9% Australia 4 7.8% Italy 4 7.1% UK 4 6.9% France 3 6.9% China 8 5.9% Spain 2 5.2% Japan 4 4.1% Germany 2 2.7% Singapore 3 2.6% Mexico 2 2.3% New Zealand 1 1.3% Switzerland 1 1.3% Brazil 3 1.1% Chile 2 0.7% Austria 1 0.4% Hong Kong 2 0.4% Netherlands 1 0.3% Source: Index fact sheet Listed infrastructure – an attractive alternative investment in current scenario Listed infrastructure assets have high potential for steady returns, low volatility, diversification, higher income, longer duration, and abundant capacity. Such investment options were traditionally considered off-market activities; however, listed infrastructure is an upcoming and promising real estate investment alternative, and is likely to be widely accepted globally. We believe the asset class is not overvalued and is trading at a fair projected 12-month P/E of 8.05x (P/E of S&P Global Infrastructure Index) compared with 15.2x P/E of S&P 500, offering significant opportunities for investors. Emerging investment opportunities in the water, communications and transmission, transportation, and distribution sectors are expected to substantially influence the listed infrastructure segment, driving growth in this segment and attracting long-term investors. Upgrading infrastructure is expected to become one of the key focus areas for governments of emerging economies. Demand for electricity, water, and sanitation would significantly increase due to higher population growth and urbanization. Hence, despite the recent drop in commodity prices, resource-rich governments would continue investing significant capital into infrastructure investments. Key drivers of listed infrastructure assets across the world are: Global population growth: According to the IMF projections, the global population is expected to grow over 8 billion by 2020. Increasing population requires additional housing and power supply, public transport, clean water, healthcare, and education facilities, which would further increase demand for public spending in the infrastructure sector. Increasing wealth: With per capital income growing in developing countries, the population would start expecting world-class infrastructure facilities. Economic expansion: Economic expansion in Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRIC nations) and Southeast Asia would boost government spending on social infrastructure. Urbanization: With growing urbanization in the developed as well as developing countries, demand for road transportation, telecom, and energy utilities is expected to significantly rise. Climate change: Improved long-distance infrastructure is essential not only for more efficient provision of energy but also for potentially remote and renewable energy resources such as solar and wind. Climate change represents both a challenge and an opportunity for development in emerging markets. Limited supply: Roads, airports, and pipelines can only operate up to a fixed maximum capacity, beyond which additional assets are required. As emerging markets develop, governments typically focus on ensuring the transport infrastructure is sufficiently robust to support growth. Shift in financing: As governments worldwide increasingly face fiscal constraints, particularly in the developed world, the private sector is expected to be involved greatly in construction responsibilities through the PPP route. The private sector is actively involved through PPP into listed infrastructure projects in Australia, Europe, Canada, and the US, and this trend is expected to continue. Performance of two of the largest listed infrastructure funds Source: Fund fact sheets Major listed infrastructure funds and their asset size (click to enlarge) Source: Fund fact sheets, Aranca Research Breakdown of the listed infrastructure investment universe Source: Aranca Research.

DHS: Strong Dividend, Intelligent Holdings, Solid Sector Allocations

Summary The dividend yield is a strong 3.41%. The holdings include several established dividend champions which gives the portfolio a more durable feel. The sector allocations look respectably defensive which is a positive when I would consider the market to still be moderately expensive. The Federal Reserve pushing short rates higher could help the financial sector generate more interest income. The WisdomTree Equity Income ETF (NYSEARCA: DHS ) hits very well on 3 of 4 categories. The only weakness in this fund is the expense ratio. The dividend yield, holdings, and sector allocations create a very compelling trio of factors in favor of the ETF. Expenses The expense ratio is a .38%, which is fairly standard for several of the WisdomTree (NASDAQ: WETF ) funds I’ve looked into. Dividend Yield The dividend yield is currently running 3.41%. This is simply excellent, no complaints there. Holdings I grabbed the following chart to demonstrate the weight of the top 18 holdings: (click to enlarge) General Electric (NYSE: GE ) has had a disappointing several years as their strong dividend has not been matched with solid share price growth. However the company has been very active in looking for solutions and even took measures as extreme as turning one of their departments into Synchrony Financial (NYSE: SYF ). To be fair, it is unclear to me why the finance division that turned into Synchrony Financial was supposed to fit with the rest of the company at GE. Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM ) and Chevron Corp (NYSE: CVX ) both get heavy allocations and have huge dividends. Oil is extremely “out of favor” right now, but I expect an eventual comeback. If it never comes, at least the oil for my truck will be fairly cheap. Two of the highest holdings go to the telecommunications sector with AT&T (NYSE: T ) and Verizon (NYSE: VZ ). I’ve found those allocations to be fairly risky given the aggressive competition in the telecommunications industry, but there are some positive aspects to doing a heavy allocation here as it aligns part of the risk with the investor’s expenses. If T and VZ are having a hard time covering their dividend, it would indicate that the profits within the telecommunications industry had dried up and would suggest that the investor is probably saving a chunk of money on their cell phone bill each month. McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD ) is another holding that I think should be represented in most dividend growth portfolios in one way or another. While their burgers have left a great deal to be desired over the last few years, they have still been able to remain relevant because they collected a large amount of high quality real estate. Over the last earnings report things began to look materially better for this real estate giant disguised as a seller of cheap burgers. Phillip Morris (NYSE: PM ), Altria Group (NYSE: MO ), and Coke (NYSE: KO ) all sell products that kill people, but they continue to deliver sales and earnings and the earnings are used to pay some fairly attractive dividends. I know some investors might think I’m crazy for tossing Coke in there with the tobacco companies, but high fructose corn syrup has quite a few very damaging health effects and heart failure is a major source of death in the United States. You won’t see me protesting the stable dividend though. Sectors Financials get a heavy weight which might be a good thing with the Federal Reserve working so hard to raise rates and justify paying interest on excess reserves when the rest of the world is shifting towards further rounds of quantitative easing or NIRP (negative interest rate policy). We have learned over the last few years that negative nominal returns and negative real returns are very possible because simply holding onto cash creates other problems. It turns out that protecting cash is not free and that banks can be pushed to accept negative interest rate policies. That’s interesting and it suggests there will be quite a few books on macroeconomics that need to have chapters replaced. The heavy allocations to consumer staples and energy look good in my opinion since I like the defensive nature of the consumer staples sector and appreciate the energy exposure as demonstrated in my comments on XOM and CVX. The three defensive sectors are consumer staples, utilities, and health care. Those three are all present in the top 6 allocations, so this looks like a respectably defensive fund. Since P/E ratios are fairly across most of the market, I prefer a defensive portfolio to an aggressive portfolio. Conclusion Great dividend, mediocre expense ratio, great holdings, and great sector weightings make a fairly attractive portfolio. If the expense ratio were lower it would get some very serious consideration from me. This fund simply performs great on several metrics.